Blessed is the gentle poet to read. Nikolai Nekrasov - Blessed is the gentle poet: Verse

Blessed is the gentle poet Nekrasov analysis of the poem according to plan

1. History of creation. N. A. Nekrasov wrote the work “Blessed is the gentle poet” (1852) in connection with the death of N. V. Gogol.

In "Dead Souls" there is an author's digression, which represents Gogol's thoughts in defense of the so-called. "civil" direction in literature. Nekrasov fully shared these views, directed against representatives of “pure art”.

In Nekrasov’s work, the image of the poet-accuser symbolizes Gogol, and in a broader sense, the poet of the civil movement. By “kindly poet,” most likely, V. A. Zhukovsky is meant.

2. Genre of the poem- civil lyrics.

3. Main theme works are the essence of literary activity. Nekrasov clearly supports the poet-accuser. But at the same time, he does not reproach the “kindly poet” for anything. In a sense, the author even envies the one “who has little bile and a lot of feeling.” “Peace-loving lyre” gives a feeling of serenity and peace, in contrast to the “torture of the creative spirit” among supporters of civil lyricism.

Singing only the love and beauty of nature, the “kindly poet” will live a long, happy life, enjoying universal honor and respect. However, there is a subtle irony hidden behind Nekrasov’s reasoning. It is manifested in the remark about the power of the poet over the crowd.

In Russian poetry, “crowd” traditionally carries a negative meaning. Every poet with even the slightest respect for himself, since the time of Pushkin, has disdained such power over a dark and stupid gathering of people.

The preparation of a lifetime monument for the “kindly poet” is an open mockery of Nekrasov about the excessive self-importance of dubious idols of the crowd. The author dwells in more detail on the fate of the poet-accuser. He does not skimp on describing all the difficulties of his creative path. Nekrasov's sympathy for this hero becomes immediately noticeable.

The “noble genius” of such a creator does not bring him any benefits. His path is accompanied by “wild screams of anger.” The accusatory poet is incomprehensible to the crowd because he “preaches love... with the word of denial.” During his lifetime he was not destined to achieve recognition. The creativity of a genius will only be appreciated after his death.

4. Composition. The work is divided into descriptions of a representative of “pure art” (4 stanzas) and a poet-citizen (6 stanzas).

5. Poem size- iambic tetrameter with cross rhyme.

6. Expressive means. The entire work is built on antithesis. In the foreground, the images of the main characters are contrasted ("calm art", "peace-loving lyre" - "accuser of the crowd", "punishing lyre"), in the second - the selfless feat of the poet-accuser and the reaction of society ("noble genius", "high calling" - “blasphemy”, “severe enemies”).

A large role is played by various metaphors (“torture of the creative spirit”, “arming the mouth with satire”), personification (“sympathy... caresses”, “pursued by blasphemies”), comparison (“like the murmur of waves”).

7. Main idea works. Nekrasov proves that creativity for the sake of “pure art” has only temporary ostentatious value. Only a strong civic position makes creativity truly important and valuable, although recognition of the poet-accuser’s merits always comes to him too late.

Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov thought very often about the role of the writer in the life of society, as his works speak about. For example, the poems “The Poet and the Citizen” or “Blessed is the Gentle Poet.”

Of these two works, the poem “Blessed is the gentle poet” appeared first in 1852. It was written immediately after Gogol's death. And although Gogol’s name is not remembered, lyrical digressions from “Dead Souls” are clearly visible in the text.

Nekrasov was completely convinced that Russia had lost one of the great writers. It was as if he was trying to convey to the reader how underrated the work of Gogol was, whom many contemporaries considered a simplified satirist writer.

Nikolai Alekseevich was sure that descendants would be able to appreciate Gogol’s talent. And he was right.

Not all poets, writers, and artists were able to gain fame during their lifetime. However, they did not write to please the authorities and the crowd, but spoke about pressing problems of society. This was able to raise them above their helpful contemporaries, and make them idols in the eyes of their descendants.

Blessed is the gentle poet

Blessed is the gentle poet,
In whom there is little bile, a lot of feeling:
Hello to him so sincerely
Friends of Quiet Art;

There's sympathy for him in the crowd,
Like the murmur of waves, caresses the ear;
He is alien to self-doubt -
This torture of the creative spirit;

Loving carelessness and peace,
Disdaining daring satire,
He firmly dominates the crowd
With your peace-loving lyre.

Marveling at the great mind,
He is not persecuted, he is not slandered,
And his contemporaries
During his lifetime, a monument is being prepared...

But fate has no mercy
To him whose noble genius
Became an accuser of the crowd,
Her passions and delusions.

Feeding my chest with hatred,
Armed with satire,
He goes through a thorny path
With your punishing lyre.

He is being pursued by blasphemers:
He catches the sounds of approval
Not in the sweet murmur of praise,
And in the wild screams of anger.

And believing and not believing again
The dream of a high calling,
He preaches love
With a hostile word of denial, -

And every sound of his speeches
Produces severe enemies for him,
And smart and empty people,
Equally branding him ready.

They curse him from all sides
And just seeing his corpse,
They will understand how much he has done,
And how he loved - while hating!

Most likely, when speaking about a gentle poet, Nekrasov had in mind the poet Vasily Zhukovsky, who, being undoubtedly a talented person, became famous for his romanticism in Russian poetry. He wrote elegies, romances, ballads. He was loved at court and was the mentor of Alexander II.

But there was another type of poet.

Poets who are strong in spirit, who write not to please the existing government, who know how to expose the vices of society and reflect the problems of the people will always delight their descendants. Such poets very subtly highlight lies, farce, and hypocrisy. They are not afraid of criticism and are ready for it.

It is this truth that Nekrasov talks about in his work. A negative reaction from the powers that be can sometimes be considered better than any praise. Often this is the recognition of all kinds of vices.

Ungrateful truth

Rebellion, disagreement, rebellion have always been viewed with disapproval. Truth is not a priority for information content. It is much easier for a writer and poet to adapt to the current regime, to write to order, whatever the customer wants. Don’t disturb people’s minds, don’t throw out slogans full of sarcasm, avoid sharp corners. Many people do this. Nekrasov calls such gentle scribblers blessed.

But the other side of the coin is also affected. Nekrasov writes in his work that the fate of gentle poets is easy, he is met everywhere, everyone likes him, however, he should ask himself a question, because after death all his works will disappear, and another like him will come after him and will throw dust in people’s eyes :

“Is he satisfied with his fate, is he pleased with such human praise, which he deserved only by his humility and helpfulness?”

Death as a reward

In the history of art there are countless biographies where, during his lifetime, an underrated genius was persecuted. They either didn’t understand him or didn’t want to understand him. And this did not stop the talented man. Geniuses did not set the goal of life as fame. Such individuals simply could not live differently. They created all their lives: they wrote poetry, plays, music, paintings, and made scientific discoveries.

Some of them were lucky enough to become famous after death. They were lucky, not because their name became known, but because they were able to achieve their goal - to convey their thoughts and feelings to the public.

Perhaps, in decades or even centuries, grateful descendants will be able to discern instructive lines in the poet’s work that are relevant for any time. This is the calling of a true writer.

Analysis of the poem

The work describes in detail the fate of the poets of that time from two sides. The first ones were always against satire and basically told what the censors liked to hear. Although these poems were about nothing, they had many listeners and the authorities treated them with recognition and supported them in every possible way:

"And his contemporaries
During his lifetime, a monument is being prepared...”

Perhaps he is talking about some of his worries and sorrows, however, this is not at all what the real problem of society is. Although there are real tragedies on a large scale, the average person sympathizes only with the author’s momentary experiences. All this is transmitted en masse and makes it easy to control many people without even working hard. However, Nekrasov emphasizes that this fame quickly passes, the poems become empty, they are put on the shelf and no one remembers about it anymore. The true details remain behind the scenes:

"...whose noble genius
Became an accuser of the crowd"

Such a poet did not set himself the goal of being liked by society. He simply created and wrote what he thought. And the flurry of accusations and indignation from the inspection authorities could only serve as confirmation that the path was correctly chosen. For example, on the issue of the fight against serfdom.

Such works could not earn unequivocal public approval. This resulted in constant persecution of writers. Each line of satirical text was like a catalyst for increasing the number of enemies of the author of a certain verse. No one praises such a poet, says thank you or admires him. What such a daredevil could definitely get were threats, intimidation, and even arrest.

It is fearlessness that makes such writers and poets real heroes who do not seek praise, but seek understanding.

Afterword

The question that Nikrasov raised in the poem “Blessed is the gentle poet” runs like a red stripe through the entire work.

Which is better?

A quiet life as a writer, on topics set by the existing government, with recognition, decent fees, and grateful reviews. Working in this mode, you won’t have to work on mistakes, because the poems do not carry any irritating factor. Descriptions of simple everyday situations, a little everyday humor - everything is simple in such creativity.

Or the lot of a rebel poet, with all the ensuing consequences, where there is a place for oppression, negativity, and open criticism. Where censors, subordinate to the authorities, constantly see a threat to the existing system and are ready to fall into disgrace at any moment.

Discussing the topic of the “correctness” of the poet, Nekrasov, undoubtedly, also thinks about his place in literary art. Being a fairly well-known writer, a magazine editor who managed to find his niche at that difficult time, he was sometimes overcome by doubts about the correctness of his chosen path. Thoughts about the ideal poet, about his place among writers, were frequent guests in Nikolai Alekseevich’s head.

In his reasoning, the writer came to the conclusion that literary and public opinion largely helps the masses. Because of this, his poems acquired a special coloring, where, with the help of veiled techniques, he tried to convey to the reader the most pressing problems. And he succeeded.

“Blessed is the gentle poet...” Nikolai Nekrasov

Blessed is the gentle poet,
In whom there is little bile, a lot of feeling:
Hello to him so sincerely
Friends of Quiet Art;

There's sympathy for him in the crowd,
Like the murmur of waves, caresses the ear;
He is a stranger to self-doubt -
This torture of the creative spirit;

Loving carelessness and peace,
Disdaining daring satire,
He firmly dominates the crowd
With your peace-loving lyre.

Marveling at the great mind,
He is not persecuted, he is not slandered,
And his contemporaries
During his lifetime, a monument is being prepared...

But fate has no mercy
To him whose noble genius
Became an accuser of the crowd,
Her passions and delusions.

Feeding my chest with hatred,
Armed with satire,
He goes through a thorny path
With your punishing lyre.

He is being pursued by blasphemers:
He catches the sounds of approval
Not in the sweet murmur of praise,
And in the wild screams of anger.

And believing and not believing again
The dream of a high calling,
He preaches love
With a hostile word of denial, -

And every sound of his speeches
Produces severe enemies for him,
And smart and empty people,
Equally branding him ready.

They curse him from all sides
And just seeing his corpse,
They will understand how much he has done,
And how he loved - while hating!

Analysis of Nekrasov’s poem “Blessed is the gentle poet...”

Nikolai Nekrasov, like many of his predecessors, often wondered what role was assigned to the writer in society. Reflecting on this topic, in 1852 he created the poem “Blessed is the gentle poet...”, dedicated to the anniversary of the death of Nikolai Gogol. The addressee's name is never mentioned in this work, since by that time Gogol was in disgrace. However, Nekrasov was convinced that Russia had lost one of the greatest Russian writers, whose contribution to literature had yet to be appreciated by posterity.

In his poem, the author draws a clear line between poets whose work is liked by ordinary people, and those whose poems cause a storm of indignation among readers. He calls the first kind and blessed, since they always live in peace with themselves and with others. Their poems are devoid of criticism and sarcasm, but at the same time they do not force people to think about the problems that everyone has. Such a poet “firmly rules the crowd with his peace-loving lyre” and at the same time can count on the fact that a monument from grateful admirers will be erected to him during his lifetime. But years will pass, and his work, which does not contain a grain of rationalism, is empty and devoid of true emotions, will sink into oblivion.

The second category of poets are born rebels who not only see all the vices and shortcomings of society, but also reveal them in their works. Therefore, it is quite natural that no one likes their poems. Even sensible people, who realize that every line of such an accusatory poem is intended to change the world for the better, prefer to join the indignant crowd, in which the author is cursed “from all sides.” Moreover, he is not taken seriously at all, since the offense from fair, but sometimes very harsh criticism, prevents one from realizing that there is some truth in the poems.

However, such a poet perceives blasphemy and curses addressed to him as “sounds of approval,” realizing that he managed to touch the soul of people with his poems, to evoke in them, albeit negative, but still vivid emotions. In his words, sometimes offensive and rude, there is much more love and justice than in the unctuous speeches of one who prefers laudatory odes to criticism. But, unfortunately, the fate of the rebel poet is always tragic: Having acted against society, he can never count on recognition. And only after his death those who considered such a poet a troublemaker and an ignoramus, “will understand how much he did, and how he loved - while hating!”

This poem is part of Nekrasov’s satirical and civil lyrics. Here, of course, questions are raised about the purpose of the poet.

Almost the entire poem, the author “praises” the good poet, but this exaggeration in the description of his “good” qualities and actions creates a comic effect. And then the contrast with that “evil” poet, who Nikolai Alekseevich himself was, shows on whose side the truth is.

The main advantage of a kind poet is that he is convenient for everyone. Nothing (especially the injustice that Nekrasov himself denounced) worries or irritates him. He is not very smart, because doubts are born from the mind, but he does not have them. He lives a wonderful life, he is kind to everyone - everyone loves him. He even dominates the crowd, everyone is happy to praise him and help him. The monument to him is ready, as they say, during his lifetime.

It is clear that he does not create anything fundamentally new, he does not change life. Creative torment is also unknown to him. And all this is his conscious choice, since this poet loves peace and is afraid of satire. No conflicts, scandals or exiles - such a poet lives calmly and richly.

In the middle of the poem, with “but”, a description of the real poet begins, which before this the reader could only grasp through negation. It is said that fate does not spare this accuser. He shows people their mistakes and sins. Of course, this causes irritation and hatred. (But sometimes a doctor must hurt in order for the patient to feel better.) The poet himself hates, he himself arms himself against the crowd. He has a difficult path, everyone scolds him, he lives in poverty. He is all in doubt - sometimes he believes, sometimes he doesn’t, in his chosenness, and he suffers. And yet, with his anger and destruction, he brings love to the world. Nekrasov repeats himself, exaggerates, saying that every word of such a poet creates enemies for him. And they can be not only fools who simply do not understand a creative person, but also smart people who see him as a threat to their world.

The tension continues to build in the poem. The main character is already being cursed from all sides... But in the last lines there is again a turning point and contrast. Seeing the corpse of a real poet, people understand how much he did for them. They will understand his love through all that hatred of their shortcomings.

The poem is somewhat outdated in vocabulary (“bile”, “alien”, “this”), but in meaning it is still very relevant. He has a lot of strength, indignation, anger, but at the same time understanding of life, smiles and wisdom.

Option 2

There is a well-known phrase that calls a poet in Russia something more than just a poet. However, this statement is almost always true, because a real poet is always something more. Such a person not only owns lines and puts together rhymes, he rhymes in various ways the very essence of existence, the millstones of his mind separate the wheat from the chaff, and his fiery gaze incinerates ignorance and disharmony.

Of course, for every real poet, a characteristic type of reasoning is reflection, an assessment of one’s inner world and one’s position in society. In general, poets tend to distance themselves from reality and observe the essence of existence. Therefore, it is not difficult to look at yourself from the outside.

Nekrasov describes quite typical difficulties of a poet, the features of his inner world. The poem begins with the word blissful and this definition is further revealed throughout the poem.

It may seem as if the author is describing different types of poets, first the one who likes “carelessness and peace,” then the one who “feeds hatred in his chest” and “arms his mouth with satire.” However, we are talking about the same poet, who appears in different guises, because the poet’s path is difficult and requires different reactions. His hands can be occupied with both the “peace-loving” and “punishing” lyre, while Nekrasov, at the conclusion of the poem, sums up this contradiction, which he resolves in the synthesis “he loved - while hating.”

This detail is incredibly significant, as it describes the poet as a man of great renunciation, capable of going beyond the boundaries of conventional understanding, but without rejecting high ideals. If the crowd demands denunciation, accusatory speeches, the poet loves while hating, his hatred becomes an instrument of love, which always remains in his soul. Various blasphemy and the like do not attract the attention of the poet, as well as praise; he is always blissful and gentle.

In this sense, we can easily compare the description that Nekrasov offers with the description of how a patient can protest against the actions of a doctor. For example, when it is necessary to remove pus from the body or stitch up a wound, pain appears and the patient may be against it, suffer, and blaspheme the doctor. However, the doctor, understanding how he hurts his patient, still fulfills his own mission in order to achieve a cure.

Nekrasov also writes about this, who talks about the “hostile word of denial,” which serves to preach love, just as a surgical device can serve to remove pus. If something becomes a boil for human existence, the poet acts as an accuser, although he may have absolutely no supporters, and society may find greater comfort in the opposite position. Of course, in the “dream of a high calling” there is no indulgence in personal interests and, especially, the interests of the crowd.

The poet is a kind of doctor for society. He uses different instruments, he is praised and blasphemed. Blessed is the gentle poet.

Analysis of the poem Blessed is the gentle poet according to plan