Many users of the application ask the question: on Instagram you can see who watched the stories? The ability to create stories or stories on Instagram appeared on August 2, 2016. This new feature allows you to share every moment of your day with your friends and followers. In this case, the profile is not filled out. But the history is visible only for 24 hours.
With recent updates to the application, it has become possible to add stickers to Instagram stories, captions and drawings. Some users may add a link to Instagram stories. This is a very useful feature especially for bloggers.
Is it visible on Instagram who viewed the story?
It is impossible to find out who viewed regular profile posts. However, one of the distinctive features of Instagram stories is the ability to see all users who have viewed the story. Only the author of the story can see them. This information is not available to other users.
At the same time, many people usually publish several photos or videos in their stories per day. In this case, the story author can find out the users who viewed each individual story. This way you can keep track of your regular readers.
How to see who watched a story on Instagram.
It is also possible to hide an Instagram story from a specific person. Remember that after the history disappears from the application, it will be impossible to recognize the users who viewed it. Thus, the author of an Instagram story can see who watched the stories, but other users cannot.
Aloha, friends! 🙋🏻
Instagram never ceases to amaze us with its Stories updates:
- (adding guests to broadcasts)
To create them you need to click on the first circle " New" Then you select any stories from your archive (we'll talk about archives below), a cover, and set a folder name.
Once you've done all this, your circle cover will appear on your profile and will appear as a separate Story when someone clicks on it. It will “hang” there until you remove it. You can create an unlimited number of Special Stories. Also, you can edit them at any time. To do this, simply click on the folder and hold your finger on it until a menu appears.
Why use highlighted stories on your profile?
Everything here, of course, depends on your imagination and creativity, but here are a couple of examples for inspiration:
- Re-engage your followers with your best stories;
- If you have, then by highlighting stories you can extend the life of your promotions, discounts and campaigns by more than 24 hours;
- Create stories about your company, brand, or put interesting behind-the-scenes photos and videos into a separate folder;
- Highlight reviews from your clients and customers in your stories.
How to add a story to an Instagram archive?
Instagram started talking about creating an archive six months ago, but this function was in the stage of extensive testing and was only available to users in some countries. Now, stories will be automatically saved to Instagram Archive after 24 hours.
So, to enter the Archive with Stories, you need to click on the “Archive” circle in your profile. From there, you can easily switch between the message archive and the new Stories archive. The very first Story of each day will display a date stamp (see image 2) to help you navigate through your archive as you scroll.
Please note that only you can view your archived Stories. Instagram also gives you the opportunity to disable automatic archiving of stories in settings profile. To do this, go to your profile settings ⇒ Click on story settings ⇒ Under the “Save” heading, deactivate the second slider “Save to Archive.” If you suddenly want to enable archiving again, simply follow all the steps again.
Have you already received these updates? Let us know in the comments below!
While everyone is vigorously discussing the love story of Nicholas II and the ballerina Matilda Kshesinskaya, told in the film by Alexei Uchitel, Woman's Day wondered: were the emperor's feelings for the commoner really strong, since he could not defend them? After all, history knows the facts, when rulers married for love against all odds.
Alexei Uchitel’s film “Matilda” is not discussed today, perhaps only by lazy people. The film tells us about the forbidden love of the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II, who entered into a relationship with the ballerina Matilda Kshesinskaya. And although in this film there is a place for artistic exaggeration and fiction, you cannot argue against historical facts - the romance between Nikolai and Matilda took place. If you believe the diaries of the ballerina, she loved the emperor passionately and selflessly, and when the engagement of Nicholas and Alice of Hesse-Darmstadt happened, she was crushed by grief. Perhaps, deep down in her soul, the girl believed that feelings could overcome duty... But, probably, the latter turned out to be above all else for the sovereign. Or maybe the passion for Matilda was not so strong? Dynastic marriages have at all times shackled rulers, but if love turned out to be real, it broke all barriers - members of royal families went against the court, fell out of favor, or even abdicated the throne.
Peter I and Marta Skavronskaya
During the reign of the first emperor of Russia, there was no official ban on royal misalliances. At that time there was no concept of “morganatic marriage”, that is, a union of people of unequal status in which a spouse of lower origin could not improve his status. The ban on such misalliances among the royals was enshrined in the Law on Succession to the Throne, which was adopted only under Paul I. But, although in the time of Peter, having married a commoner, the emperor did not automatically have to renounce the throne, the likelihood that the ruler would want to marry , which does not promise him any political benefits, was extremely small. Still, alliances by rulers were always concluded with the aim of obtaining certain benefits - allies, lands, etc. That is why the story of the ascension to the throne of the second wife of Peter I, who was able to receive the title of empress and even rule autocratically after the death of the king, is still seems incredible to historians.
Emperor Peter I married a concubine who had several lovers before him
Marta Skavronskaya, who received the name Ekaterina in baptism, was born in Latvia into a poor peasant family. Her parents died early, and the girl was sent to be raised by a pastor. There she lived as a servant until the Northern War began. When Russian troops captured the city where Marta lived, the pastor went out to negotiate with them, and at that time the girl accompanying him was noticed by Field Marshal Sheremetyev. He took Marta away by force, making him his mistress. While in Moscow, the girl soon changed her patron; he became Peter’s closest associate, Count Menshikov. In 1703, while visiting him, the emperor himself noticed the girl, and Menshikov had to give up the beauty. After an unsuccessful marriage with Evdokia Lopukhina, Peter I did not plan to marry again, but Martha, according to historians, became literally indispensable for the tsar - she went with him on grueling hikes, and knew how to calm him down in the most difficult situations. Their wedding took place in 1712, and in 1724 Peter I crowned his wife.
Konstantin Pavlovich and Zhanetta Grudzinskaya
The Romanov dynasty also knows cases of abdication of the throne for the sake of a beloved. Konstantin Pavlovich, the son of Paul I, made such a sacrifice. Before meeting the love of his life, the crown prince, at the insistence of the court, entered into a dynastic marriage. At the age of 15, Konstantin married the German princess Julianna of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (baptized Anna Feodorovna). The young heir did not love his betrothed, and gradually the life of the spouses turned into hell - not only did the husband cheat on his wife, but he also tormented the virtuous girl with unreasonable jealousy. As a result, in 1801 Anna Fedorovna left Russia. She returned to her native Coburg under the pretext of caring for her sick mother.
The House of Romanov did not agree to divorce for a long time. However, it soon became inevitable - Konstantin Pavlovich fell in love and decided to get married. While at a ball in Warsaw in 1815, he met one of the first Polish beauties - Countess Zhanetta Grudzinskaya. The heir to the throne was struck by her beauty and inaccessibility. If you believe her contemporaries, the countess was miraculously beautiful, and among her admirers were the most prominent gentlemen, including Konstanin’s brother, the future Emperor Alexander I. It took the heir in love five years to court Jeannette. In 1820, the girl agreed to become his wife. After the couple got married according to Orthodox and Catholic customs, Konstantin Pavlovich was forced to abdicate the throne, as he married a person of non-royal blood. Alexander I became emperor instead.
Mikhail Alexandrovich and Natalya Brasova
Even if not to renounce, but to make serious sacrifices for the sake of a woman, the closest relative of Nicholas II - his brother Mikhail. According to the established procedures, it was he who was entrusted with the powers of the regent - in the event of the death of the emperor, if at that time his heir did not reach adulthood, the younger brother had to take over the management of the state. If the heir died, Michael automatically became emperor. The Grand Duke lost these privileges when he decided to marry Natalya Wulfert (née Sheremetyevskaya), the 28-year-old wife of his subordinate lieutenant Wulfert. This lady was married for the second time. Her first husband was accompanist Sergei Mamontov, with whom a daughter was born. Natalya Sergeevna gave birth to her second child from Mikhail. At the same time, the son George was born when the woman was still married to Lieutenant Wulfert.
Alexander III with his family (the youngest son Mikhail in a sailor's uniform)
The Grand Duke did not receive permission for this marriage from his brother Nicholas II, but decided to ignore the ban. In 1912, the couple secretly got married in Vienna. Upon learning of this, the emperor was shocked. In letters to his mother Maria Fedorovna, he admitted that he considered his brother’s act a betrayal, since in difficult times for the House of Romanov he was undermining the foundations of the dynasty. The Grand Duke was deprived of all positions and forced to leave the country. The couple returned to Russia when the First World War began. Nicholas allowed his brother to serve in the army. In 1915, the emperor recognized his nephew George, although he still could not have rights to the throne and title. The boy received the title Count Brasov. Mikhail’s wife also adopted the same surname.
Pavel Alexandrovich and Olga Paley
Nicholas II’s uncle, Grand Duke Pavel Alexandrovich (the youngest son of Alexander II), was also capable of desperate acts. By the way, researchers of the history of the Romanov dynasty call him the most handsome of all the men of this dynasty. On June 17, 1889, Paul married his cousin, Princess Alexandra of Greece. The family approved the marriage. During their marriage, Pavel and Alexandra had two children. However, at the age of only 20, the wife of the Grand Duke died. This happened in 1891. Pavel was not a widower for long - already in 1902 he began a whirlwind romance. His chosen one was Olga Pistolkors, a twice-divorced lady, whose union inevitably cast a shadow on the prestige of the House of Romanov.
If you believe the memoirs of contemporaries, Mrs. Pistolkors had no doubt that the emperor, passionately attached to his uncle Paul, would oppose his happiness and give permission for the marriage. However, Nicholas II was furious at this request and not only did not approve of the union, but also threatened to deprive his relative of everything - both positions and income - if he disobeyed. Pavel risked everything and in 1902 married his beloved. The couple left the country. The Grand Duke also had to give up his children, who went to be raised by his brother’s family. And, although his beloved woman bore him three more offspring over the years, Pavel had a hard time being separated from the children from his first marriage. He also missed Russia. Many years later, the emperor finally allowed his uncle to return to his homeland. In 1915, his wife and children received the Russian title of Princes Paley.
Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson
One of the most famous stories of all-consuming love, for which there are no barriers, is connected with the British royal family. On December 10, 1936, Edward VIII, having been king for ten months, abdicated the throne. This happened because the monarch was refused a request to marry. In a radio speech the day after his abdication, the former king admitted: “I have found it impossible... to perform the duties of a king without the help and support of the woman I love.” Edward loved a simple American woman, Wallis Simpson, who was married at the time the affair with the heir began, and she was already in her second marriage. The woman received a divorce, but hardly expected to be able to intermarry with the royal family, because UK laws regarding morganatic marriages are harsh. However, her lover's feelings turned out to be stronger.
Edward and Wallis, 1940
Wallis Simpson, 1936
Wedding of Edward and Wallis, 1937
On June 3, 1937, Wallis and Edward were married in France. They were given the titles Duke and Duchess of Windsor. Edward's brother Prince Albert (George VI) became King of Great Britain. He forbade the relative to return to the UK without a special invitation. The couple lived their entire lives in exile. They mainly lived in France. For the property (lands and castles) that Edward did not lose during his abdication, he received compensation from his family all his life. The couple lived together for 35 years before Edward died in 1972. The Duchess of Windsor died in 1986 and was buried next to her husband in the royal burial vault at Windsor.
Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles
But another representative of the English royal family, Prince Charles, was not as decisive in the fight for his love as his ancestor Edward VIII. At the time of his wedding to Diana Spencer in 1981, the young man was in love with another woman. The relationship between Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall, Camilla, had lasted for more than nine years by that time. Elizabeth II, in response to her son’s request to marry, rejected her daughter-in-law’s candidacy. Diana seemed more suitable for the role of a princess. However, Charles could not overcome himself - throughout his marriage he cheated on Lady Di. This marriage made both of them unhappy. Camilla's fate was also strange - the woman married the famous womanizer Andrew Parker-Bowles, who, with his constant affairs, opened the way for her to retaliate with the Prince of Wales.
Charles and Camilla, 1979
Diana Spencer and Camilla, 1980
And what’s surprising is that this romance, which lasted 35 years, still ended in a wedding. In 2000, Charles officially introduced his beloved to Elizabeth II, and in 2005 they got married. It must be said that the Queen has still not decided to award her son’s wife the title of Princess of Wales, which Diana bore. Rumors have also leaked to the press that, planning to retire in the foreseeable future, Elizabeth II does not plan to give the throne to Charles, believing that it will be safer in the hands of her grandson Prince William. Still, Charles made a sacrifice for the sake of love, albeit with some delay - the reunion with his beloved cost him his mother’s trust.
Crown Prince Haakon of Norway and Mette-Marit
The whole world admired this couple
Haakon and Mette, 2013
Haakon and Mette with their daughter Ingrid, 2010
For the royal house of Norway, misalliances are not new, but the choice of Crown Prince Haakon still led his parents into confusion. The fact is that the chosen one of the heir, Mette-Marit Tiessem Heiby, had a very dubious past. It became known that in her youth the girl dabbled in illegal drugs and was in a relationship with a drug addict, from whom she also gave birth. The prospect of having such a princess, of course, did not please the court. The Crown Prince's request to marry was decisively refused. Haakon insisted on his own, convincing everyone that this woman was his destiny. The family took pity on him and gave permission for the union, but before that the future princess was obliged to officially confess to the sins of her youth. On August 25, 2001, Haakon and Mette got married.
The fact that the Mendelssohn march is familiar to your boyfriend firsthand has not only obvious disadvantages, but also important advantages. Since he was already married, together with his wealth of experience he will be able to offer you...
Not only cute, but also a realistic look
He knows that family means holidays and happiness in the form of guaranteed sex at any time and a baked piece of mammoth on Sunday. But also everyday life, and with it work on relationships, responsibility and various variations (“days like this”, pregnancy, mortgage), which require calm, patience and informed decisions.
Getting ready for a serious relationship
He was there. He survived the aftermath of a shipwreck, and since he's with you, the diagnosis is clear: he's not the type to be afraid of commitment or relationships. Your man has built a new ship and is assembling a crew for it. He knows that the journey may not be easy, but he believes that the new ship is stronger than the previous one. And it’s somehow more fun together!
Popular
Demo version of your common future
Looking at him and his previous life (file everything in the “case” - his stories about his previous family, photographs and videos, the way he communicates with his children and ex-wife), you will be able to make a completely realistic forecast of the development of your own story. This demo is not 100% correct, but it is still very informative: you, for example, are aware of the risks.
What are they? Let's study it!
Psychologist Maria Surygina breaks down what types of divorced men you might encounter and what the prognosis is. And girls who have found “used grooms” share their experiences.
- He keeps getting married
- Married for a short time, no children
- He was married for a long time and... “happily”
Psychologist:“For your boyfriend, “People get together, break up, and then get married again” is a common thing? Then your chances of keeping such a husband in the family for more than a few years (and sometimes months) are slim. And is it necessary to hold it? But be careful, don’t be lazy to scout out the territory: sometimes you can diagnose the “habit of getting married” to someone who has been married twice (or even three times!) due to their own stupidity, imprudence or an incredible coincidence of circumstances.
Veronica:“If I had just heard that Lenya was married three times at the age of thirty, I would never have given him the green light. Thanks to our mutual friend, who knew Lenya since childhood, she said that out of the three marriage stamps in his passport, only one should be taken seriously. The first seal meant “to escape from the parental nest at any cost” (the marriage, concluded at the age of 18 with a classmate, lasted several months and ended during the summer session), another was “gift” - he wanted to help a good girl get an American visa... and he did ! Perhaps, in someone’s eyes, being the fourth official wife is not very honorable, but the main thing is that we have a good time together, and I completely trust him!
Psychologist:“Everyone makes mistakes. If the marriage was short, most likely this was a mistake noticed in time. This fact does not mean anything. Is it about the fact that the less baggage from your past life your man takes with him into the new one, the better off you both will be!”
Masha:“At the moment of meeting Misha, it was clear that his family union had ended, and this was not just the end, but a real happy end: no betrayals, no scandals - the usual, quiet prose of life, love just passed in a couple of years. Yes, there were many pitfalls, but my husband and his ex-wife managed to forgive each other and, having cleared each of their own fairways, parted like ships at sea.”
Psychologist:“Beware of comparisons with your ex-wife! But you still shouldn’t get hung up on this: if a man compares you, it’s not because he’s still thinking about her, but out of habit. Do frequent comparisons continue even after several months of marriage? Then it seems there is reason to think.”
Asya:“My husband was married happily ever after. Fifteen years old. Then it was all over. What can you do, this also happens. I know there is an opinion that discussing ex-partners is harmful, but I don’t agree with that. Before we got married, I asked him everything that was generally acceptable to ask about life in a previous marriage. My man spoke out, illuminated all the dark places. At times it hurt me, but I understood that we had to get through it and that it was for our benefit. We have been together for three years, and the advice that I gave myself at the beginning of our family life is still relevant now: do not try to outplay his ex. She marinated mushrooms deliciously, and he still remembers them with longing? Great! But mushrooms are not my thing, and I don’t need to rush into this forest. After all, he is with me, despite the mushroom talents of his former wife. But the main thing is that I never allowed myself to make any statements about her, especially derogatory ones. Only respectful neutrality."
- Divorce after betrayal and resentment
- Children from a previous marriage
- Divorced man over 35 years old
Psychologist:“A man, even once traumatized in a previous relationship, will react sharply to anything that even remotely reminds him of the pain he experienced. This does not mean that after his wife’s betrayal, a man will forever turn into Othello. Everything is much more subtle. Betrayal does not happen out of nowhere; it is always preceded by something in the family - some have a storm, some have a calm. It’s these storms (or, conversely, calms) that your loved one will be wary of in a new relationship - and protect himself where you, it would seem, gave no reason.”
Nika:“My husband was married twice before me and both times he divorced hastily, due to grievances and unexplained suspicions. I understood that where there were two times, there was a third time. To prevent this, in the first years of our marriage, I did a lot of work on the topic “Ways to constructively resolve conflicts.” At the first, still imperceptible alarm signal, long before my husband wants to pack his things and slam the door, we sit down and talk. After that, there are no more people willing to slam the door. A husband, remembering his past, often wonders why it didn’t occur to him and his ex-wives to just sit down and calmly discuss the problems.”
Psychologist:“Find out what kind of relationship your man has with his child. Find out how and how much they communicate, what his financial obligations are. This is a given, and you will have to accept these numbers in hours and in rubles. Don't try to seriously influence them! By persuading your lover to spend less time with the child or to cut alimony from a fair amount to a pitiful percentage of a “white” salary, you will make a petty scoundrel out of a decent person. Think carefully about whether you need someone like that nearby.
If you can’t accept the situation - respect your husband for the fact that he is a man, and establish normal relationships with his children (note, no one is forcing you to passionately adore them!) - it’s better to move away. Look for a childless person.”
Oksana:“When I found out that my husband had a daughter from his first marriage, I decided to make friends with her. Simply because I understood: since there is a child, he will grow up, learn about my existence and make some conclusions about me. Let him draw conclusions from personal communication. When we started talking, she was six years old. Now she is thirteen, and it so happens that she lives with us. We have a warm, trusting relationship. I’m glad that from the very beginning I didn’t isolate myself from the fact of her existence, although I didn’t imagine that we would have to live together.”
Psychologist:“If your divorced boyfriend is not very young, then you are more likely to win. Statistics show: in this case, it is better to marry a divorced person than someone who has never been married. After all, if before the age of 35 a man had no relationship in which he believed, then before you start dreaming of a lace garter, it’s worth asking: “What’s wrong with him?” Alas, the answer to you will most likely be the sound of a rockfall - and go figure out which of the stones means self-centeredness, which is immaturity, and which is an unhealthy relationship with parents ... "
Nowadays, if a man is not married after 30, then most likely he has already been married and divorced. How will the experience of his divorce affect your relationship with him? And is it worth starting them with a divorced man?
Text: Margarita Tsarik
Answer your questions
Of course, we are not talking about the moral aspect of divorce - these days, unfortunately, you won’t surprise anyone with divorces; our attitude to marriage is not as serious as our ancestors, who could get a divorce only in the most exceptional cases. And blaming only men for divorces is unfair; there are situations such that it is the man who can become the injured party. And this is precisely what we are talking about - how does divorce affect a man’s psyche, his attitude towards women, towards the institution of marriage? Will he become a good family man the second time around? Will he be faithful to his wife and will he trust her? Will he be able to treat his ex-family with respect, but aloof? Before starting a serious relationship with a divorced man, you need to get answers to all these questions for yourself. And, at a minimum, it is necessary to understand the reason for the divorce. Under no circumstances should you ask directly, don’t drag out painful details, don’t delve into the nuances of family drama, but tactfully and carefully find out from mutual friends whose initiative it was to separate, how many years they lived in marriage and how civilized they were when they divorced.
Delayed depression
If the marriage lasted more than 5 years, then after a divorce most men are practically doomed to experience the so-called “delayed depression” - its peculiarity is that it “covers” not during the divorce and not immediately after it, but after a year or two. Even a man whose divorce occurred on his own initiative can fall into such depression, and if he is abandoned, a depressed state of mind is guaranteed. Therefore, it is very important to know at what point you met the “divorcee”. If two years have not yet passed after the divorce, be prepared for attacks of his blues, and also take into account that during this period he may not behave quite as usual, uncharacteristically for himself - for example, more cynical or, conversely, more vulnerable than ever.
Robot-monogamous
A divorced monogamist most often behaves like a robot - he continues to do his usual job, lives as usual, even, probably, meets girls and tries to build some new relationships - but he does it all automatically, by inertia, and his soul remains in his ex family. However, a monogamous person is, by definition, an extra line in your biography. Unless, of course, he loves you. In this case, whether you met him before the divorce or after is unimportant: he is with you solely because the one and only one rejects him, and you are just a way of consolation, but, which is doubly offensive, ineffective. A monogamous man is even capable of hastily marrying again immediately after a divorce, but all this is only to “annoy” his ex-wife or try not to think about her.
Danger! - womanizer!
A man prone to polygamy, or, as we more often say, a womanizer, will fight delayed depression in the ways available to him - he will try to forget himself in numerous one-time sexual affairs; he most likely will not want long-term serious ones with any of the sexual partners during this period relationships. Therefore, be afraid of a womanizer in the post-divorce period - he has no prospects, he is feverishly trying to heal mental wounds with the help of a grueling sex marathon. He will be ready for a new relationship later and may even become a faithful husband. We advise you to wait.
Twice “Exemplary Family Man”
A man of the “exemplary family man” type, of course, will experience separation from his family as painfully as possible, because he cannot imagine himself outside of family relationships. Such men experience separation from their children especially hard - and this, by the way, is an important criterion for you. If your boyfriend is divorced and misses his children, tries to see them more often, takes care of them - this perfectly characterizes him as the father of your future common children. Do not try to reduce his contact with children under any circumstances - this is cruel and can ruin his opinion of you. A divorced man can treat his ex-wife with the same care - there is no need to be jealous or reproach him for this, for him she is, first of all, the mother of his children. Well, in general, intelligent people, having divorced, often remain in excellent relationships. However, you should think about this - being so immersed in the problems and joys of his former family, will this man be able to fully engage in a new family if you are planning one? Is it enough for two houses?
Temporary or permanent?
Some of the divorced men (especially those who divorced on the initiative of their wife, or on their own initiative - but due to the betrayal of their spouse, that is, they feel abandoned, betrayed, offended) for a period of delayed depression may become a misogynist - not in the sense of shying away communication with women, and in terms of a cynical attitude towards them, openly using them exclusively for sexual gratification. Under the motto “all of you women are the same!” such a man, from his own bitter experience, will draw negative general conclusions about the devotion of women and the sanctity of family ties. And it will take a lot of female patience and tenderness for him to thaw and believe in love and fidelity again. If for some reason you like just such a divorced man, the most important thing you need to understand about him is whether he is a temporary or permanent misogynist? Can he improve in the future? It is possible that his disrespect for the female sex was the cause of the divorce, and not the consequence.
Several rules for using “divorce”
A divorced man, of course, should not be ignored or discounted just because he is divorced. Divorce is not a stigma or diagnosis, and does not necessarily characterize a person as hopeless for a future marriage. An intelligent person, even from bitter experience, will draw the right conclusions and be able to analyze his own mistakes, and will not blame only his ex-wife for them. But if you have cast your lot in with a divorced man, especially at a time when divorce is still a fresh wound for him, you need to remember several important rules for communicating with him:
Do not start making far-reaching plans if two years have not yet passed since his divorce;
Don’t be a “vest” for him, into which he will cry out grievances against his ex-wife - this is the road to nowhere;
Be sure to find out the reason for the divorce, but do not ask for details and do not allow your man to be frank with you in detail about his relationship with his ex-wife - he will stop viewing you as a sexual object after he reveals his soul to you;
You must understand - are you the only one with this man? Or does he communicate with several sexual partners at the same time in order to more easily survive the consequences of divorce?
Having met a newly divorced man, do not rush to immediately become his mistress - otherwise you will remain in this capacity forever;
Be patient and gentle, do not criticize harshly, do not manage a man harshly - if he has just gotten divorced, he perceives any remark sharply and painfully;
Do not interfere with his communication with his former family. If he ignores his children after a divorce, this is a serious reason to think about whether you need such a man.
If you are faced with a similar situation and cannot find a way out or solution, you can always seek advice from a professional psychologist in
