Manipulation in communication - good or bad? Managing emotions is the most effective way to resist manipulation.

The word “manipulation” is usually associated with something bad and negative.

  • On television they manipulate my consciousness and push a certain opinion...
  • The supermarket manipulates my emotions and sells me unnecessary products...
  • Gypsies manipulate and swindle money...
    - these are the typical ideas of an ordinary person about manipulation.

However, by definition,
Manipulation- this is (just) a hidden influence of one person on another. Hidden from conscious control.

Yes, of course, it’s not very nice that something can happen without my control. But no one is terrified that it might snow or hail unexpectedly tomorrow? This is a completely acceptable event and is beyond human control. How do you like the fact that millions of people right now are doing as they want - regardless of your personal opinion and your control?

The knife itself is neither bad nor good. It all depends on whose hands it is in. In the hands of a surgeon it is used to preserve life, in the hands of a criminal it is the opposite. Therefore, manipulation must be considered in the context used, and the purposes for which it is used are also important. The results of manipulation can be both beneficial and harmful.

Classifications of manipulations

There is a wide variety of manipulative techniques, which are classified in their own way by different authors.

1) COMPULSION

Manipulator coerces the object of manipulation to his point of view, the commission of an action, the emergence of a feeling - by force. These are threats, pressure from authority, emotional attack, physical violence, etc. The role of the manipulator in this case can be described as Security officer.

The picture shows stills from the film "Friends with Benefits", 2011, directed by Will Gluck:

2) SMOOTHING

The manipulator forces the object of manipulation to perform actions through an insincere demonstration of his immeasurable kindness, sincerity, gratitude. The role of the manipulator in this case can be described as Darling, which explicitly or implicitly appeals to the noble, good and kind:
“Why quarrel, because we love each other so much!”
“Do a good deed for a good person!” ,
“I am so old, sick, exhausted, you are the light in my window.”

The picture shows an example: The husband uses a manipulative technique "Flattery" in response to his wife's criticism.

3)EVASION

The manipulator in various ways distracts and scatters the attention of the object of manipulation from the main topic, avoids answering and confuses or changes the direction of the conversation in a completely different direction.

The role of the manipulator can be described as Tactician. The tactician deceives, laughs it off, creates fog, involves, builds logical traps.

Example: Using a manipulative technique "Alternative wording of questions" in a conversation between husband and wife.

Everett Shostrom provides a detailed classification of the various types of manipulators:


In the figure, the sectors of the circle opposite each other contain roles that represent exactly the opposite behavior.

So, Dictator suppresses, orders, refers to authorities, etc., and Rag acts as a victim of the Dictator and represents his direct opposite - he deliberately demonstrates his sensitivity and vulnerability, forgets, does not hear, he is passive and silent.

Calculator strives to calculate and control everything and everyone at all costs. He deceives, confuses, cheats, tries to outwit and double-check others.

The opposite of it is Stuck- is emphatically dependent, wants to be led, seeks care and is ready to be fooled. He "allows" others to do his work for him.

The impact of manipulation on relationships

Such manipulations lead to the following consequences in close relationships:
- Growing mistrust: I was forced
- Alienation appears: I was forced
- Unpleasant aftertaste: I was deceived

Under the influence of manipulation, the object performs actions that it did not plan. Time passes, awareness comes. An unpleasant feeling remains: “I was used.”

At the next contact, the partner begins to suspect that he will again be manipulated, forced, deceived, and left in the cold. Relationships become tense; the manipulated partner seeks to close himself off and defend himself.

A person stops sharing and begins to hide his feelings, thoughts, desires.

The victim of manipulation exposes protection, through which it becomes more and more difficult to break through each time. If the manipulator does not give up manipulation, then the conflict between the parties worsens more and more, the problems are not resolved, and the parties move further and further away from each other.

Such relationships do not enrich partners, but turn into a battlefield “Who will win?” Manipulation destroys relationships.

Manipulation for good

However, there are situations in which it is impossible to do without hidden influences - manipulations. Manipulation can be used for positive purposes.

1. Educational goals
Such goals are manipulative, because hidden from the child, absolutely not included in his plans, but with a wise teacher they act for the benefit of the pupil.

Many people know the “by contradiction” technique in dealing with “difficult” children. He is undoubtedly manipulative: for a child who does not agree with everything and takes instructions with hostility, it is enough to say: “Today I forbid you to sleep during the day, eat soup and brush your teeth. Today you will watch cartoons and eat only chocolate.”

The child will do the opposite and act in accordance with the regime.

2. Psychotherapy, Training
In order to move to a new stage of development in an intellectual or spiritual sense, a professional (teacher, psychotherapist) needs to use various manipulative techniques.

Without using these techniques, it is impossible to break outdated patterns of behavior, the narrowness of old thinking and acquire new habits.

The task of learning is inherently manipulative. It is necessary to influence the student in order to persuade him to take certain actions (gain knowledge, complete tasks, acquire a new skill).

These actions and goals, the new state cannot be planned in advance by the student, because initially he is in a different state, at a different stage of development, in which the new state is still unknown to him.

The training system based on the “zone of proximal development” principle is entirely built on manipulations!

At the same time, of course, a professional is a professional because he pursues not your own goals, but goals set by the object and the framework of the process, i.e. works on the object itself.

For example, in psychotherapy the technique of “paraphrasing” is often used - this is the psychotherapist reformulating the client’s message in other words. Receiving such feedback, the client sees what is presented in a different light and his attitude towards the situation and himself changes.

3. Increasing the efficiency of subordinates
Manipulative techniques are also used in business and personnel management. In the hands of skillful managers, such techniques work not only for the benefit of the organization, but also for the benefit of the employee himself.

“What happens if manipulation is eliminated from management?” writes E. Dotsenko in, “... the halo of the leader disappears. Management is a process in an organization that inevitably gives rise to its own internal mythology. The organization is built on the distribution of functions and their mythological support. Remove this division of functions - the organization will disappear; remove the myths - the threads holding it together will disappear. There is power where there are myths. The latter always accompany good managers, as well as good teachers, as well as good specialists in general: there are stories, legends, fables about them, they can make fun of them, they can get angry at them - but they will always listen. This halo is a symbol of power, a sign of strength and an obligatory burden for its owner. In addition, the personality halo is not only a way of holding the organization together, but also a way of structuring the needs of subordinates. If I am a subordinate, then how does it feel for me to realize that I am being led by someone just like me or even weaker? It is much more natural to give in to the archetypal impulse and surrender to the mercy of the strong, to trust his qualifications (hence “chief”, “himself!”, “father”, etc.)”

An example of a manipulative management technique would be an annual bonus, the size of which depends on performance results. Impact? Certainly. But is it really bad for a good employee to receive additional payment for productivity, even though this was not part of his plans?

4. The opportunity to play, have fun, add variety
Let's say a miracle happened. People on Earth have given up manipulation in relationships once and for all. What kind of relationship will this turn out to be?

When everyone is honest and extremely frank, the element of variety and zest disappears. Crystal purity is boring, like an ordinary white sheet. Without the existence of manipulation, no one will understand the meaning of the word "flirting"- it will disappear as a concept. A sex will become a standard household chore.

In healthy relationships, people can choose whether to use direct and open communication or manipulate with positive intentions. Eric Berne used a softer word instead of the negative word “manipulation” "psychological games".

Resume

So, answering the question posed in the topic of the article, we can conclude: manipulation in the hands of a professional can be quite useful and even necessary.

Well, if you are not a leader, not a teacher, not an educator or a psychologist, then by using manipulation you can gradually destroy your relationship.

It is undoubtedly easier to manipulate than to love people, the world and yourself and only sometimes play. Without flirting.

Alla Chugueva,
family psychologist, presenter of the course “Agree with the manipulator”:

References

1. Metkin M.V., “Conflictology”. Textbook, St. Petersburg, 2001.
2. Kozlov N.I., Internet project “Psychologos”.
3. Shostrom. E “Manipulator. Internal journey from manipulation to actualization,” -K., 2003
4. Dotsenko E.L., Psychology of manipulation. - M., 1997.

Catherine

2015-10-26 09:03:34

You will laugh, but I have exactly the same situation, we have been living together for 5 years, we have a child, and he demands that I marry him. And now I have no use for it at all, because... There are loans hanging on it and I absolutely don’t want to take risks and get on my nerves because of the courts. And there’s nothing cool about it, because they don’t ask or invite me to marry, but demand it in the form of an ultimatum, and I listen to him saying that it’s better for me to leave, but we don’t have a family, and I’m constantly being manipulated by him. Well, sometimes I also resort to them myself; I can’t have a normal open dialogue. Now I’m just working on not to react painfully to manipulations, I’m catching my cockroaches

Elena Churzina

2015-10-26 10:14:51

Well, what can you say, Ekaterina!? Of course, if he had no loans, and everything was fine with him and he was just a gift of fate, and not another burden, then he would have been married off. But here you really need to think, why did such a person come into your destiny with such a bunch of problems and stick to him like a leaf? Of course, we must always start with ourselves, because it is our environment that shows us that something is wrong somewhere inside us. And you are doing the right thing by working with your “cockroaches” first of all! You are very smart and on the right track! You change and he will change, the main thing is to find the entry point of the problem in yourself and the world around you will change for the better.

2015-10-26 10:56:48

It's probably a matter of boundaries. If a man manipulates me, then he violates my boundaries. And this only shows that I don’t know how to line them up. You should probably immediately say what you don’t like and what behavior you’re not happy with. Any manipulation: on the part of a woman or on the part of a man, only leads to complications in the relationship. Through manipulation, a person tries to achieve his goal, not knowing how to do it differently.

2015-10-26 12:56:17

You could say it's painful. I don't like manipulation. I feel and see when a person is manipulating me and it is unpleasant for me. Maybe this is due to the negative emotions that I have, because I do not see sincerity from the manipulator. There have been a lot of such people in my life and it is difficult for me to remember this . I understand that manipulation is necessary for life. With their help we get what we want. How to use them correctly and for good? I love sincerity and truth. It’s difficult for me to pretend, so I don’t like to manipulate and impose my will on another person. Many people live like this and achieve a lot and their conscience does not torment them. Maybe I'm not entirely right? Maybe there are manipulations for good? How to use them? How to apply them in life so as not to hurt or offend another person?

2015-10-26 15:06:34

And I have a situation where I am being manipulated... Not only am I dating a married man, but he helps me a lot financially, and I want to send him, and you understand that you depend on him...((and these days, even though I work two jobs, I have a child, but there is a catastrophic lack of money. And other men are not standing in line... So think about whether to be proud and lonely, or allow yourself to be manipulated, receive something in return, but still have it. mental discomfort...

2015-10-26 17:51:45

Elena, this topic is very relevant for me personally at the moment. I’m sharing my experience, I’m a very impatient person for pain, it’s precisely the man’s manipulations that caused me a lot of mental pain and anxiety, it’s as if I find myself in limbo, it’s easier for me to leave such a relationship, although I understand that this is not an option. I want to sort this issue out

2015-10-27 08:45:02

For me this is harmful, probably because I don’t know how to manipulate myself. My husband is trying to impose his model of family life on me, which is not easy for me to come to terms with and as a result we have a complete misunderstanding. He perceives my every response to his complaints against me as criticism addressed to him, and when criticizing me, he declares that it is I who criticize him and thereby poison his life. But in fact, this is not true, I try to harmonize the relationship, I turn a blind eye to many things, but still, nothing works out and gradually he still wins, but I give in and it makes me feel worse. We don’t have a dialogue and it’s easier for me, so as not to swear, to agree with him. I can fight back against strangers trying to manipulate me, but it doesn’t work out with my husband.

Elena Churzina

2015-10-27 09:22:38

Yes, Nadezhda, you are right, you need to be able to build boundaries. And then what to do about who to put at the post at these very borders. Or protect them yourself all the time, living in tension that someone will violate them. How to bring relationships to harmonious respect for these very boundaries? And a voluntary refusal on the part of a man from the desire to manipulate you at any opportunity? How can we build these relations bilaterally differently and without manipulation? And how can we learn to do this differently without slipping into the usual manipulative way of communication? This is where the secret of the right relationship in a couple lies!

Elena Churzina

2015-10-27 09:34:42

Julia, you are a very sensitive person and you very correctly sense the nature of manipulation. You are right, manipulation is never fair. And the line between malicious and white and fluffy manipulation is very small. Our ego will always help us cross this line. And those who walk over their heads and at the same time feel good, they live in their own world of illusions, which they themselves invented, violating the laws of God. Remember the main law of freedom of choice. And even God does not interfere in our affairs, but only helps when we ask for help. It's the same with manipulation. But somewhere there is a golden mean. And God has awarded us women with intuition, which should protect both us and the man who is next to us? Men don't have it, but they have naked logic! Now the question is - how to convey to your beloved man that you feel that it will be better for both of you in this particular situation? And it remains open!

Elena Churzina

2015-10-27 09:40:48

Olga, of course, running away is not an option. The situation will always catch up with you only in an even more aggravated form. Therefore, you need to resolve it here and now since this was sent to you! Think about where you manipulate people and in what ways. The world is a mirror. It shows us where we behave the same way! You need to figure out at what level of relationships you allow manipulation with people around you and correct this situation, then they will stop manipulating you.

Elena Churzina

2015-10-27 09:46:03

Lena, by suppressing your needs and disagreement with your husband, you accumulate internal conflict and dissatisfaction with your husband and the relationship with him will grow stronger and stronger. You just need to learn to negotiate with your husband and not conflict. The principle of reflection works here, in which the husband, with his indignation, shows you that you have a high level of resentment towards criticism from other people. Work in this direction and your husband will stop reacting so painfully to your conversations.

Elena Churzina

2015-10-27 09:54:03

Natalya, without giving up the old, the new will not come into your life. Don't pour anything into a full glass! Break free from these half-relationships and improve your self-esteem. And learn to build relationships with real men, awakening your feminine side. The lesson on “Femininity” in the right corner of this site will help you. Start with this.

To begin with, it is worth considering the key concept “ manipulation" Psychologists say that this is a hidden coercion of a person to act in the interests of another person. Should manipulation really become the main tool in building communication? Of course not! Several types of manipulation can be distinguished:
1. Economic. I am for you, and you are for me. Trade cannot always be conducted openly, although both parties understand perfectly well what they will get as a result of the agreements.
2. Power. You must do as I want! Coercion almost always works, but it always leads to the destruction of relationships.

3. Diplomatic. A special manipulation when other people have an impressive incentive to carry out the actions you say. This is real, direct manipulation.

Most psychologists choose diplomatic manipulation to work with patients. You can, of course, make exceptions to this rule. Don't have time to persuade a potential client? Then you can simply push it down or spread it apart. , you should be very careful, because no one likes it when it is used in secret. The consequences can be the most unpredictable if a person finds out about the manipulation you performed. There are several classic manipulations that every person uses from time to time.

Game of good and evil cop. Negotiations in two stages can go well, without any additional conditions or ultimatums. At the last moment, one party may refuse. It takes a little effort and the person who refused you the deal will persuade you to make a decision that is beneficial for you. Why is this happening? The whole point is that he feels obligated. You were able to complete your manipulation in time.

Imposing a service. We all from time to time ask for help from friends, who in turn may ask for help from us. Won't you feel obligated? It will be very difficult to refuse.

We manipulate emotions. Have you been unfairly insulted? Or were they just rude to you in a fit of rage? Perhaps you just fell under the hot hand and the person simply threw out all his feelings on you. As a result, he blames himself and strives to correct the situation in every possible way.

This list can be continued, because there are a huge number of techniques! Just remember the banal bluff, which is also manipulation. It is necessary to take some action to interest and motivate the other person.

Should manipulation always be perceived only from the negative side?

Sometimes, it allows you to achieve significant results for the benefit of the common cause! So, it’s up to you to decide for what purposes to use this technique.

Is it good or bad to manipulate? Is it possible to do without manipulation? Let's proceed from the fact that hidden mind control was, is and will be. And also from the fact that “forewarned is forearmed.” Treat the style as “bad advice”: a story about atrocities is not a call to commit them.

Depreciation.
You have been provided a service, you need to pay for it (not necessarily in money). I would like to lower the price or not pay at all.
To implement the “devaluation” manipulation, you need to make the person who helped you think that his service:

    - not useful
    - not very useful
    - not provided on time
    - not what you asked for
    - got it too easy for him
    - worth absolutely nothing on the market
    - could have been provided by anyone
    - caused harm.

The last option is aerobatics. If you convince that help “ruined everything,” then on this basis you can ask for either other help or a penalty, that is, not only get a free service, but also earn money, or, without accepting any payment, oblige you forever, with the possibility of kicking for life.

Overstatement.
You have provided a service. You need to get more for it than it's worth.
To implement the “overstatement” manipulation, you need to make a person think that:

    - you saved him
    - only you could do this or do this
    - it cost you too much, both physically and mentally, and you lost other contracts and opportunities.

These goals are well served by written reports that outline the maximum number of assistance operations.

Plagiarism and dummy.
Everything turned out as it did, but I want to earn points on this. You must prove that you did all this: “Only thanks to my intervention, a serious disaster was avoided,” “You don’t know the real reason why you weren’t fired.”
You can provide dummy services. Take money for clearing clouds, do nothing, but if clouds appear in the sky, “return part”, because you worked, but it didn’t work out, or don’t return it and oblige you to wait for a new service. Dummy services include medical scams - scams by fear and treatment of non-existent troubles.

Discrediting the source.
How to defeat your opponent (source) in a dispute? You need to denigrate (discredit) him, then no one will listen to him. Many people do not evaluate an idea, but look at WHO voices it.
The simplest thing is to defame with lies. The best disinformation is unverifiable facts.
It's easy to question mental health or just health.
One may question the moral right to have an opinion. It turns out that a person who does not have children will never be able to talk about education, while the tyrant mother will teach the world how to properly treat children.
You can discredit someone by belonging to a compromised group: “He’s been in power for so many years and doesn’t he steal? Ridiculous!” "Have you seen honest lawyers?"
You can throw a shadow without argument: “Do you even know what he does in his spare time? It’s better for you not to know! To be honest, I don’t even want to get into this dirt...”
You can combine the lack of arguments with aggression: “It was you, scum, who plundered the country!!!”
"The devil is in the details." Keep silent on essential details: “He killed a man,” and don’t add: “When he protected a schoolgirl from a maniac.”
By tarnishing a person, you will turn all his arguments into zero without a stick, and his active position into an attempt to justify himself: now you understand why he was so wound up? justified!
There is one more advantage of this manipulation: even if it immediately turns out that the slander is a lie, those around you will be left with a bad feeling: not everything is pure here, but what if the accused got away with it? There will also be unpleasant associations with the person, and the reputation will be tarnished. Time will pass, the story will be forgotten, but the label will remain. There is a strong group of indelible labels: thief, pedophile, AIDS.

I was offended.
This is only possible with the wrong approach of “carrying water to the offended.”
Resentment is the strongest manipulation. By constantly introducing others into a guilt complex, you force them to “correct”, and for this you need to do something in your garden.
There are hundreds of ways to be “offended.”

Deaf.
Just make sure that there is no connection with your interlocutor. When he speaks, turn off your hearing completely. “Listen” without interrupting, then program it in your own way, and when he tries to catch you, ask him not to interrupt you either.
If he loses his temper, then he is unreasonable, short-tempered and does not want a constructive dialogue, you tried to help him.

Exhaustion and withdrawal.
Steer off the topic of conversation, change the words and questions of your interlocutor, interrupt and confuse him. You are friendly and ready to talk forever, discuss important points, by them mean little things.
A good “psychoanalyst” technique: instead of the matter, discuss your feelings: “I don’t understand this at all, but I was disgusted to watch!” People should make you happy, everything depends on that.
A brilliant deflection technique is an emotional outburst: against the background of a routine conversation, you have to “catch yourself”: “Damn! What time is it now?!!” “Listen, this is what I wanted to ask so I don’t forget!” You might drop something. After an emotional outburst, the topic is changed. People rarely remember the interrupted topic. But even if they do remember, the manipulation is powerful because it can be repeated endlessly.

It's hard with fools.
Fill it with terms, you don’t know how to talk in any other way, this is a serious matter, you can’t simplify it. Arrogance and contempt help. The interlocutor is stupid, this can be confirmed directly. And there is no conversation with a stupid person.

Petty tyrant.
You don't want to discuss the issue? Destroy someone! A telephone receiver will do, in which there will supposedly be an interlocutor. Anger must be inadequate, to the point of rage. It's good to add action. If there is nothing to break or throw, angrily hit the table with your hand. Swear (and with a real interlocutor - emphatically polite).
You need to destroy a fake interlocutor for the very least, what will happen if you find out about something more unpleasant! When the whole school class is noisy, you need to choose the most peaceful of the noisy ones and publicly smear him, “not noticing” what other schoolchildren are doing. Once they see how much they can get for little, they will calm down, afraid that you will “notice” more.
If the interlocutor is not one of the fearful ones, then you can influence the dummy interlocutor without specifics: “You have no idea how our conversation will end” - the fantasy of the real interlocutor will give birth to what is scary for him.
Even if they don’t intend to upset you, they should still know that you can make you angry, and that in anger you are a tyrant. That is, it is better not to discuss anything with you. You can get started with a small one: “I don’t understand you,” and when they clarify, in a higher tone: “Why are you telling me the same thing over and over again!” You get excited, and you already know how dangerous it is.
It can be done differently: talk emphatically politely all the time, and in the process “run into” other people, real or not, and again return to unctuous communication. This manipulation will still work.

President of the Universe.
Show the LEVEL of problems you solve. If you are on duty loading trains and transferring hundreds of thousands offshore, then, you understand, discussing with you the issue of a delay of just a hundred dollars is at least not decent. Not only because the amount is ridiculous, but also because you are distracted from REAL matters. Let them thank you for condescending to them at all!
You can create a queue of “visitors”, which will make the waste of your valuable time even more impressive. If a person doesn’t get it, nothing prevents him from stating outright that he is interfering with ruling the world with his empty questions.
If the role of the president is difficult to play, you can refer to the deal of the century: “I beg you, not today!”

Guilt complex.
Always blame, never approve. A person wants to be liked, and even if he understands that you are wrong, he goes not to experts or to those who appreciate him, but to you, maybe now you will praise him? Blame! If it doesn't work, be offended.

Getting personal.
One of the most common techniques for getting away from the essence. When you run out of arguments, you need to say: “Yes, your teeth are crooked!”
People rarely realize that this has nothing to do with it; they are distracted by the fact that you are telling the truth.

Fake authority or there are more of us.
Works when there are not enough arguments. Instead of justifying your position, say who approved it. You can invent: the famous Western psychologist Pupkin. Let them check first!
You can enlist the support of real authorities, people forget that great people make mistakes, or that they are great in sports, but not in mathematics.
You can gather a crowd, it is the best argument. Crush them with masses - collect signatures!

The best defense is attack.
What to do if you are accused? Show that the person who has the complaints is even worse! Change the topic from your bad deed to the supposedly bad deed of the person reproaching you (or to the real mistake of another, which allows you to make mistakes or do evil):

    - “Generalize”: derive quality from the relationship to one object. To the phrase: “I don’t like it when you play music loudly,” you should say: “You hate people.”
    - count the reproaches: “You constantly…” It turns out that this happened yesterday, and today, and in general! This is such pettiness towards you.
    - “move the arrows” if you are accused: “Look at yourself!!!” (“transition to personality”)
    - “I’m like everyone else and even better.” Admit guilt: “So what? Do you know how many of these we have in our company?” or “You should also say thank you that I don’t hit you like the neighbor downstairs!”
    - “I suffered more.” How can you discuss another's scratch if your leg is broken?
    - "be human." How can you scold for being late if your children are sick or you feel bad? “Children” and “health” always work to get time off from work, too.
    - “remember everything.” Remember all the sins from the very birth of man. It doesn't matter that he reformed or that it was 20 years ago. By listing your sins you will remove any claims against you.
    Parent to child: “You are a traitor!” "Why?" “When mom asked who cooks better, you said - she!” “So I was 5 years old!” "That's right - since childhood!"

Discrimination.
 How to get something for that? Say that you are older and you need to give in. Or younger or weaker - then you also need to give in. Announce to everyone that you are a girl! Say you've been here longer, although it's not very subtle - it's simple hazing. The high level is to announce to others that you are being followed. For the truth, for the origin, for the age, etc.

There is no need to manipulate, especially in your personal circle. Stay clean.
I will be glad to see your additions!

“A smart wife is a cunning wife”, “a husband is the head, and a wife is the neck”, “a wise woman will make the man of her dreams out of anyone” - the list of such expressions of “folk wisdom” can be continued indefinitely. However, in reality, such advice not only does not help, but even interferes with building strong relationships. Why?

In our country, a game that is played on an ongoing basis is very, very common: women try to “unnoticed” control men, as if remaining obliging and submissive, that is, “ideal wives,” and men pretend not to notice this. In fact, this game is well known to both sides - it’s not for nothing that there are a huge number of jokes about women trying to manipulate men, according to which many mistakenly judge all female representatives.

In the heads of many of our compatriots, in general, there are very contradictory ideas about men as such: on the one hand, they are “leaders by nature” and “heads of the family,” but on the other, “just like children.” In this situation, women act as kind of indulgent mothers: they say, yes, yes, you are my smartest, I won’t argue with you, but I’ll decide everything myself nonetheless and do it the way I want. However, this approach presupposes complete disrespect for your partners and their thinking abilities, and it is mutual respect that is the key to a strong, happy relationship. Moreover, almost all the advice given to potential “wise wives” can be boiled down to the idea that men need to constantly show how much they are loved and respected. And all this advice assumes two things: a) these feelings need to be portrayed, but not necessarily experienced, and b) men will not notice such a replacement. And herein lies the main mistake: most people (both men and women) feel when they are taken for fools, and day after day they act out such performances in front of them.

This can provoke internal tension, even if it turns out to be unspoken, and from this, in turn, grow coldness in relationships, endless arguments over trifles, and even a break. In addition, women themselves find themselves in tension, forced to constantly play, try to make their partners feel or do something, but in such a way that they themselves understand everything. But they, such stupid people, for some reason do not always understand - and even step on the same rake a hundred times.

So what then? What to do if manipulation is a path to nowhere? The answer is simple: you need to learn to speak directly about your feelings and desires, explain why this is important and look for convincing arguments when you just want to put emotional pressure on a person. And although this process is not at all simple, the results are worth it. Firstly, such openness in a relationship is precisely the best proof of trust and sincere respect for a partner, and this in most cases only strengthens such feelings in the opposite direction, becoming the key to building a long-term successful union. And secondly, it significantly simplifies the process of achieving the desired result. You shouldn’t be afraid to say directly what doesn’t suit you - although delicacy, of course, has not been canceled, and it is important to remember that the goal is not to criticize a person as a whole, but some of his specific actions or words. If you keep it to yourself, the truth will still appear, but in a much worse form. But if you clearly explain to your partner why certain of his actions hurt you or why you think it is important to make this or that decision, he may agree and continue to try to take your opinion into account. This way, you won’t have to waste time (or will have to spend much less) trying to achieve a similar result later.

Why, if it's so simple, is manipulation still such a common way to get your way? Firstly, society is to blame for this, which ascribes to men and women certain roles and behavior patterns that supposedly must be adhered to, regardless of whether they are actually effective and justified. Many women learn the idea of ​​the need for manipulation from their mothers and grandmothers, who, in turn, also did not know that it was possible to live differently. In addition, low self-esteem can push a woman to manipulation as a method of getting her way. Thus, in our society there is still a stereotypical view of women as second-class citizens, the so-called weaker sex. This results in many women not believing that their opinions, expressed openly, can be valued and their wishes respected. However, manipulation will definitely not help to cope with this situation and can only aggravate it.



Did you like the article? Share with your friends!