Personality traits in legal psychology. Subject of legal psychology

Legal psychology is a science that synthesizes various areas of psychology and jurisprudence. Any area of ​​applied psychology implements the system and provisions of general psychology in their application to various types of human activity. But any human activity in the sphere of public relations is regulated by rules. Rules that are binding for a certain group of people are called norms of behavior. Standards of behavior are established by members of groups and serve primarily the interests of these groups, which may or may not coincide with the interests of society as a whole. All norms are usually divided into technical and social. Technical standards regulate the relations of people in the use of natural resources (consumption standards for electricity, fuel, water, etc.). Social norms relate to the sphere of social, interpersonal relations, and include customs, moral and legal norms.

Morality is a set of social norms that have developed within a large social group or the entire society. They are supported by the power of public opinion and require the performance of certain actions or abstinence from condemned actions.

Law is the will of the ruling class elevated to law. The law ensures behavior that is pleasing to the current government and guarantees coercive measures, with the help of the law enforcement apparatus, that citizens comply with the rules of law.

Object of legal psychology are individual types of people and their communities as subjects of legal activity within the framework of existing processes of legal regulation.

Subject of legal psychology- mental patterns of human activity and personality in the field of legal relations.

As many researchers emphasize, the methodological feature of legal psychology is that here the center of gravity in cognition is transferred to the individual as a subject of activity. And if the law, first of all, identifies the offender in a person, then legal psychology examines the person as an offender, a witness, a victim, etc. The focus of this science is on the psychological problems of reconciling man and law as elements of one system. The subject of legal psychology is not frozen and unchanging. Changes in life, its social conditions, and the general development of science will also influence this branch of psychology. The uniqueness of this science lies in the fact that most of the mental patterns that it studies are outside the framework of generally accepted social norms of behavior expressed in law.

Three general areas of research in legal psychology can be distinguished:
1) psychology of the criminal and criminal behavior;
2) psychology of persons administering justice and fighting crime;
3) psychology of resocialization (re-education) of the criminal.

The above definitions of the object and subject of legal psychology reflect the essence of this branch of psychology, which does not mean a simple application of psychological research data to a certain area of ​​practice, but is a system for obtaining psychological knowledge about people’s activity in the legal field.

Yu. V. Chufarovsky identifies the following tasks of legal psychology.
Study of the structural elements of the subject of this science: the personality of a lawyer, his activities, lawful and unlawful behavior, the personality of a law-abiding person and an offender, the psychology of the socio-legal resocialization of an offender (including in an ITU), the psychological characteristics of the legal procedure and crime prevention.

The study of its methodological and theoretical foundations, the development of methodology and methods for theoretical and applied research, the adaptation for the purposes of legal psychology of techniques and methods developed in other sciences, including industrial psychology.

Development of practical recommendations for legal practitioners on their implementation of law enforcement, law enforcement and law-making functions, improvement and improvement of their own work, stimulation of joint activities, development of methods for career guidance, professional selection, professional consultation of lawyers, professional charts and psychograms of legal professions, etc.

Theoretical and methodological support for the academic discipline “Legal Psychology” and related special courses.

Providing practice with special psychological knowledge, developing the theory and methodology of forensic psychological examination, psychological consultation, etc.

Before naming the basic methodological principles of legal psychology, let us define the main concept. Principle (from Latin principium - basis) is a central concept, a logical expression of knowledge, a fundamental idea that permeates a system of knowledge and establishes the subordination of this knowledge. The general principles for constructing any theory, including legal psychology, are the principles of connection and development, historicism, systematicity and causality.

The principle of historicism allows us to characterize social phenomena as natural, directed and irreversible development, a progressive tendency, and the struggle of internal contradictions at each given stage of history. In legal psychology, the principle of historicism is the basis for studying the history of this science, the development of its subject and system, in particular, the development of the deformation of the psychology of the offender, etc.

The principle of development in psychology means the movement of forms of mental reflection from biologically determined elementary forms (sensations, emotions) to socially determined ones (self-awareness), the transformation of individual psychological characteristics into personality properties. In legal psychology, this principle is concretized in the study of the emergence of unlawful behavior of an individual and social groups, psychological means of resocialization of the offender’s personality.

The principle of causality is manifested in one of the most important types of connection, in particular the genetic connection of phenomena, in which one thing (cause) under certain conditions gives rise to another (effect). Causality as a principle of knowledge allows us to see the universality of phenomena, the inevitability of the generation of some by others, and so on ad infinitum. In legal psychology, the principle of causality means that mental phenomena, processes and human states, the psychology of social groups in the field of law are secondary formations, causally determined by objective reality, and a reflection of this reality.

For legal psychology, the principle of humanism, widespread in legal sciences, must also be applied as the moral and ethical side of knowledge, recognizing the value of a person as an individual, his right to freedom, happiness, development and manifestation of his abilities.

A method is a way of knowledge, a way that allows you to explore the subject of science. Therefore, the methodology of science includes, along with principles, also a system of research methods. Each science has its own subject and corresponding methods of scientific research, which have the following requirements.

The phenomenon under study must be investigated in its development and in connection with the environment, in connection with other systems.

Scientific research must be objective. This means that the researcher should not bring anything from himself during the research, both in the process of observation and in the formation of final conclusions.

Legal psychology uses a system of scientific methods both of psychology as a whole, being its branch, and a specific set of methods that provide the process of cognition of its subject. Let us add that legal psychology is constantly and systematically enriched with new methods, developing its own and borrowing them from other sciences (for example, jurisprudence).

These methods can be classified both by purpose and by research methods. According to the objectives of the study, methods of legal psychology are divided into three groups.

Methods of scientific research. With the help of them, the mental patterns of human relations regulated by the law are studied, and scientifically based recommendations are developed for practitioners involved in the fight or prevention of crime.

Methods of psychological influence on personality. They are carried out by officials fighting crime. These methods pursue the goals of preventing criminal activity, solving a crime and identifying its causes, re-educating criminals, and adapting them to the conditions of normal existence in a normal social environment. These methods, in addition to their criminal procedural regulation, are based on scientific methods of psychology and are closely related to criminology, criminology, correctional labor pedagogy, etc. The main method of influence that can be used in legal psychology is persuasion. Persuasion is an influence on consciousness through communication, explanation and proof of the importance of a particular position or its inadmissibility in order to force the listener to change his views, attitudes, positions, attitudes and assessments, or to share the thoughts or ideas of the speaker (for example, to convince a person under investigation, a suspect, accused, witness, victim to give truthful testimony). Persuasion is the main, most universal method of leadership and education. The mechanism of persuasion is argumentation, which means the presentation of logical arguments in order to prove the truth of a judgment. Persuasion is a complex method, since it requires the person using it to have developed intelligence and knowledge of logic.

Other methods in this group include suggestion and manipulative tactics.

Suggestion is nothing more than an invasion into a person’s consciousness (or instilling in him an idea), occurring without the participation and attention of the person receiving it and often without clear consciousness on his part (for example, hypnosis, religion, programming, etc.) . With suggestion, a targeted verbal or figurative influence is carried out, causing uncritical perception and assimilation of any information. The method of suggestion and its variety - self-hypnosis - has proven effective in psychotherapy, sports and educational psychology, and in solving educational problems.

Manipulative influence is a form of interpersonal communication in which influence on a communication partner in order to achieve one’s intentions is carried out covertly. Manipulation involves an objective perception of a communication partner, the desire to achieve control over the behavior and thoughts of another person. The manipulator is characterized by deceit and primitiveness of feelings, apathy towards life, a state of boredom, excessive self-control, cynicism and distrust of oneself and others. The sphere of “permitted manipulation” is business, propaganda, business relations in general. Manipulators are also found in everyday life.

It should be noted that the range of application of these methods in legal psychology is limited by legislation (in civil and criminal cases) and ethical standards.

Methods of forensic psychological examination. The purpose of these methods is the most complete and objective research conducted by an expert psychologist as ordered by investigative or judicial authorities. The range of methods used in this study is limited by the requirements of legislation regulating the examination. The content of the set of methods used in the EIT is determined by the nature of the offense, the specific tasks assigned to the expert, and the age of the subject(s). Some SPE methods are necessarily included in the research complex: conversation, observation and its variety - behavioral portrait, analysis of criminal case materials, retrospective analysis of the behavior of the subject person(s) in the crime situation under study. The forensic psychological examination itself is often called a method of studying an individual (group).

In relation to research methods, forensic psychology has the following methods.

Observation method. Its value lies in the fact that the research process does not disrupt the normal course of human activity. To obtain objective results, a number of conditions must be met:
1) determine in advance which observation patterns interest us;
2) draw up an observation program;
3) correctly record the results of the study;
4) determine the place of the observer himself and his role among the people being studied.

To record the results of observation, technical means can be used, primarily recording the speech of the observed person on tape. In some cases, it is useful to use photography and filming. In the conditions of a preliminary investigation, technical means can only be used within the framework of procedural law.

Observation can be carried out not only by a psychological researcher, but by any official who needs to obtain relevant information to use the data from its analysis in the fight against crime. Observing the facial expressions and gestures of this person may be of greater importance in obtaining information about the possible involvement of the person being interrogated in the crime event. And in order to avoid a biased subjective assessment of the results of such observation, it must be carried out strictly objectively, with the registration of all facts obtained during the observation and with a sufficient scientific interpretation of the observation results.

Questionnaire method. This method is characterized by the homogeneity of questions that are asked to a relatively large group of people to obtain quantitative material about the facts of interest to the researcher. This material is subjected to statistical processing and analysis. In the field of legal psychology, the questionnaire method has become widespread in the study of the mechanism of formation of criminal intent. Currently, the questionnaire method has begun to be used by practitioners to study some aspects of the causes of crime.

In parallel with the survey, a “public opinion machine” is used.

The main advantage of this method is its complete anonymity. Thanks to this, subjects give the machine different answers to a number of “critical” questions than in the questionnaires.

Interview (conversation) method. As an auxiliary method, it is actively used at the very beginning of the study for the purpose of general orientation and creation of a working hypothesis. Its use is typical when studying a person during a preliminary investigation. A free, relaxed conversation, during which the investigator studies the main characteristics of the interlocutor’s personality, develops an individual approach and comes into contact with the interrogated; such a conversation often precedes the main part of the interrogation and the achievement of its main goal - obtaining objective and complete information about the crime event. When preparing for a conversation, great attention should be paid to the formulation of questions, which should be brief, specific and understandable.

Experimental method. When using this method, the experimenter studies the dependence of the characteristics of mental processes on the characteristics of external stimuli acting on the subject. The experiment is designed in such a way that external stimulation changes according to a strictly defined program. The difference between an experiment and an observation is that during observation the researcher must expect the occurrence of one or another mental phenomenon, and during an experiment he can, by changing the external situation, deliberately cause the desired mental process. Laboratory and natural experiments have become widespread in the practice of forensic psychological research.

Laboratory experiments are mainly common in scientific research, as well as in forensic psychological examinations. The disadvantages of a laboratory experiment include the difficulty of using technology in the practical activities of law enforcement agencies, as well as the difference between the course of mental processes in laboratory conditions and their course under normal conditions. These shortcomings are overcome when using the natural experiment method.

In general, a systematic approach in combination with various methods of psychology and jurisprudence makes it possible to analyze the interaction quite deeply and identify the basic psychological patterns of the activity process, personality structure and system of legal norms, and give an accurate description of this interaction taking into account all the participating elements.

Legal psychology has its own system, consisting of the following sections:
1) legal psychology, which studies law as a factor in the social regulation of behavior, as well as the psychology of legal consciousness;
2) criminal psychology, the subject of study of which is the psychology of committing a criminal act, guilt and responsibility;
3) psychology of criminal proceedings, which studies the psychology of investigative actions in the general system of investigation and forensic psychological examination in criminal proceedings;
4) psychology of judicial activity, consisting of the psychological characteristics of the judicial investigation, its participants and the psychology of judicial debate;
5) correctional psychology, the objectives of which are to study the psychological problems of punishment itself, the psychology of those sentenced to imprisonment for the social adaptation of those released.

Legal psychology is an applied science located at the intersection of psychology and jurisprudence. Studies the manifestation and use of mental patterns and psychological knowledge in the field of legal regulation and legal activity.

Legal psychology studies the problems of increasing the efficiency of lawmaking, law enforcement, law enforcement and penitentiary activities based on taking into account psychological factors.

The subject of legal psychology is the study of mental phenomena, mechanisms and patterns manifested in the sphere of law.

Tasks of legal psychology:

1) carry out a scientific synthesis of psychological and legal knowledge;

2) reveal the psychological and legal essence of basic legal categories;

3) ensure that lawyers have a deep understanding of the object of their activity – human behavior;

4) reveal the features of the mental activity of various subjects of legal relations, their mental states in various situations of law enforcement and law enforcement;

The interaction between psychology and jurisprudence is considered mainly at 3 levels:

1) the application of psychological laws in jurisprudence in a “pure” form (a psychologist acts as an expert, specialist in civil or criminal proceedings, etc.);

2) the use of psychology in jurisprudence through the introduction of psychological knowledge into law enforcement, law enforcement practice, in the selection of personnel in the law enforcement system and their psychological support, etc.;

3) the emergence of legal psychology as a science based on psychology and jurisprudence.

Legal psychology is based on general and social psychology, from which its methodology stems. A personal approach is carried out (for example, personality is studied in the dynamics of an offense), the process of activity is studied in connection with the structure of the personality and the system of legal norms, the system of mental processes, temperament, personality and social group, socialization and social justice, legal awareness, etc. are studied.

5. System of legal psychology

Legal psychology is usually divided into two parts: general and special.

The general part includes the subject, system, history of the development of legal psychology, methods, its relationship with other scientific disciplines, psychology of legal work.

The special part includes forensic psychological examination, psychology of the victim, psychology of a minor, criminal psychology, investigative psychology, psychology of judicial consideration of criminal and civil cases, correctional labor psychology, adaptation of the released person’s personality to the conditions of normal life.

There is a slightly different form of presenting the system of legal psychology, consisting of 5 sections with corresponding substructures.

Legal psychology – psychological aspects of effective lawmaking, legal socialization of the individual, psychology of legal understanding and legal consciousness.

Criminal psychology - the role of biological and social factors in the criminalization of the individual, the concept of the personality of the criminal, the committed criminal act;

Psychology of criminal proceedings or forensic psychology (for criminal cases)

Psychology of preliminary investigation

psychology of the personality of the investigator, his activities in the investigation, the formation of information, as well as forensic psychological examination in criminal proceedings.

Psychology of judicial activity

psychology of preparation and planning of trial, features of its conduct, decision-making by the judge

Penitentiary (correctional) psychology – psychology of the convict and criminal, ways of correction, prevention.

Psychology of civil legal regulation

psychology of civil legal relations, positions of the parties to civil proceedings and their communication activity, aspects of preparing civil cases;

psychology of the activities of a lawyer, notary, arbitration, prosecutor's office in civil proceedings.

Legal psychology Vasiliev Vladislav Leonidovich

Chapter 1 SUBJECT AND SYSTEM OF LEGAL PSYCHOLOGY

Chapter 1 SUBJECT AND SYSTEM OF LEGAL PSYCHOLOGY

Legal psychology includes various areas of scientific knowledge, is an applied discipline and belongs equally to both psychology and jurisprudence. In the field of social relations regulated by legal norms, the mental activity of people acquires unique features that are determined by the specifics of human activity in the field of legal regulation.

Law is always associated with the normative behavior of people. Below we will briefly consider this concept, after which we will move on to consider the systems “man - law” and “man - law - society”, and then to the analysis of law enforcement and other types of legal activities.

Being an active member of society, a person performs actions that are subject to certain rules. Rules that are binding for a particular community of people are called norms of behavior and are established by the people themselves in the interests of either the whole society or individual groups and classes.

All norms of behavior are usually divided into technical and social. The former regulate human activity in the use of resources (consumption rates of fuel, electricity, water, etc.) and tools. Social norms regulate relationships between people.

Social norms include customs, morals and law. All social norms, based on the assessments accepted in society, require either abstaining from certain actions or performing some active actions.

The methodological feature of legal psychology is that the center of gravity in cognition is transferred to the individual as a subject of activity. Thus, if the law primarily identifies the offender in a person, then legal psychology examines the person in the offender, witness, victim, etc.

Mental states, as well as stable characteristics of the character and personality of the victim, offender, witness, develop and proceed in accordance with general psychological and psychophysiological laws. The specificity of the subject of legal psychology lies in the originality of the vision of these states, in the study of their legal significance for establishing the truth, in the search for scientifically based methods of reducing the possibility of violating legal norms through psychological correction of these states, as well as the personality traits of offenders.

The investigator, conducting a preliminary investigation, and the court, examining the case in court, find out the complex intertwining of human relationships, sometimes difficult to take into account psychological qualities of people and the motives that pushed a person to commit a crime. Thus, in cases of murder, incitement to suicide, intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, hooliganism, and theft, essentially psychological issues are considered - self-interest and revenge, deceit and cruelty, love and jealousy, etc. At the same time, the judge, The prosecutor, investigator, and employee of the investigative bodies deal not only with criminals, but also with a variety of people who act as witnesses, victims, experts, and witnesses. The personality of each of them was formed in certain conditions of social life, their thinking styles are individual, their characters are not the same, their relationships to themselves and to the world around them are unique.

Having an accurate understanding of why we act the way we do gives us the opportunity to better understand our lives and manage them more consciously. The judge and the investigator, the prosecutor and the defense attorney, the administrator and teacher of the correctional colony must be armed with psychological knowledge that allows them to correctly navigate the complex and confusing relationships and conflicts that they have to navigate. Undoubtedly, knowledge of psychological science is necessary for everyone who deals with people, who is called upon to influence them, to carry out educational work. The science of mental life and human activity, which studies such processes as sensation and perception, memory and thinking, feelings and will, personality traits with individual characteristics (temperament, character, age, inclinations), cannot but have a very direct relationship to the disclosure and investigation of crimes, consideration of cases in court.

To a large extent, the tasks of legal psychology are determined by the need to improve the practical activities of justice authorities.

Investigators and court workers, daily faced with various manifestations of the psyche of a defendant, victim, witness, of course, try to understand the complexities of their mental world in order to correctly understand and properly evaluate it. The professions of investigator, prosecutor and judge gradually form certain ideas about the human psyche, forcing them to operate with the principles of practical psychology and to be somewhat knowledgeable in this area. However, the volume and quality of such knowledge, mainly intuitive, cannot go beyond the individual experience and personal data of a particular employee. In addition, such empirical knowledge about the human mental world, acquired from case to case, is unsystematic and therefore cannot satisfy the ever-increasing demands of life. For the most objective and qualified solution to the many issues that constantly arise before forensic investigators, along with legal and general erudition, professional experience, extensive psychological knowledge is also required.

The peculiarities of the work of these workers make moral and psychological hardening necessary, since they are associated with a significant strain of mental and moral forces.

A significant increase in crime, as well as the development of its most dangerous forms (organized crime, sexual murders, contract killings, etc.) place demands on increasing the efficiency of the law enforcement system. On the other hand, the protection of the rights and interests of individual citizens in the process of bringing them to criminal responsibility is increasing and the tendency towards humanization of the process of investigation and judicial consideration of criminal cases, which determines the need for a high level of professional competence of law enforcement officers as the main integral factor that ensures both the protection of the interests of individual individuals and organizations from criminal attacks, as well as compliance with all legal rights and interests of citizens and groups, as well as compliance with ethical standards. Professional competence itself is largely determined by the personal potential of a lawyer, i.e., by a system of psychological factors that can be united under the general concept of “psychological culture.”

The psychological culture of a lawyer is a complex of psychological knowledge, including the psychology of personality and activity, the psychology of legal work and the psychological characteristics of individual legal professions, skills and techniques for using this knowledge in professional situations in the process of communication.

Lawyers need to be able to rationally distribute their strengths and abilities in order to maintain work productivity throughout the entire working day, to possess professional psychological qualities in order to obtain optimal evidentiary data with the least expenditure of nervous energy. In the consistent development of such professional qualities as flexibility of mind and character, keen observation and tenacious memory, self-control and endurance, integrity and fairness, organization and independence, the recommendations of psychological science are of great importance, which indicates the ways and means of their formation. Along with this, further growth in the efficiency of the work of forensic investigators requires a comprehensive, in-depth development of the psychological foundations of forensic tactics, as well as the study or knowledge of the psychology of other participants in criminal proceedings (accused, victim, witness, etc.). The psychological competence of forensic investigators helps “to prevent errors, sometimes fraught with serious consequences, that can arise when judging human actions due to underestimation of psychological aspects.”

Legal psychology is a scientific and practical discipline that studies the psychological patterns of the “man - right” system, develops recommendations aimed at increasing the effectiveness of this system.

The methodological basis of legal psychology is a systemic-structural analysis of the activity process, which is considered in conjunction with the structure of the individual and the system of legal norms.

Thus, the focus of this science is on the psychological problems of reconciling man and law as elements of one system.

Exploring the problem of the subject and system of legal psychology, we proceed from the fundamental position that psychological patterns in the field of law enforcement activities are divided into two large categories: law-abiding activities and activities associated with certain offenses.

These methodological prerequisites, as well as the principle of hierarchy, determine the construction of a system of legal psychology, in which psychological patterns in the field of law-abiding behavior and in the field of social pathology are consistently analyzed (see diagram on p. 16).

The general part of legal psychology outlines the subject, system, history, methods, connections with other scientific disciplines, as well as the foundations of general and social psychology. A special section talks about the patterns of law-abiding behavior, legal consciousness and intuition of an individual, their role in the formation of an individual’s immunity to a crime situation.

Two large sections of the general part of legal psychology also examine the psychology of legal relations in the field of entrepreneurial activity and the psychology of legal work.

A special part of legal psychology, which is often called forensic psychology, consists of the following sections: criminal psychology, victim psychology, psychology of juvenile delinquency, investigative psychology, trial psychology, forensic psychological examination and correctional labor psychology.

Legal psychology studies a person in its entirety, on the other hand, in this scientific discipline legal aspects are clearly expressed, which determine the complex of objective laws studied by it. She develops psychological foundations:

Law-abiding behavior (legal awareness, morality, public opinion, social stereotypes);

Criminal behavior (personality structure of the criminal, criminal stereotype, structure of the criminal group, criminogenic situation, personality structure of the victim and the role of these structures in the genesis of criminal behavior);

Law enforcement (crime prevention, investigative psychology, psychology of the judicial process, forensic psychological examination);

Resocialization of offenders (correctional labor psychology, psychology of adaptation after release from correctional institutions);

Behavior of minors (psychological characteristics of the problems outlined above);

Using a psychologist as a consultant, specialist and expert in preliminary and judicial investigations.

Legal psychology solves the following problems:

Studying the psychological patterns of the impact of law and law enforcement on individuals, groups and teams;

System of legal psychology

Along with the development of criminal psychology, victim psychology, investigative psychology and other disciplines included in the structure of a special part of legal psychology, in recent years in our country intensive research has been carried out on the psychology of legal work (in particular, its individual aspects), as a result of which professiograms of legal professions, methods of professional selection and professional guidance in the field of jurisprudence have been developed.

To optimize law enforcement activities, it is necessary, firstly, a detailed description of all aspects of this complex professional activity, personal qualities and skills that are implemented in it, and, secondly, scientifically based recommendations on the compliance of a specific human personality with the objective requirements for the legal profession , and about the methodology for selecting and placing legal personnel.

Psychology of legal work is an independent psychological discipline; the complex of main problems she studies is related to legal professionography, professional consultation and orientation, professional selection and professional education, specialization and prevention of professional deformation of the psyche of law enforcement officers. However, there are a number of borderline areas due to which this discipline is included in the system of legal psychology, for example: the individual characteristics of the employee’s personality and their implementation in law enforcement activities (individual style of interrogation); the role of personal qualities in achieving success (or failure) in various professional situations, etc.

Legal psychology in its modern understanding is a science that studies various psychological aspects of personality and activity in the conditions of legal regulation. It can successfully develop and solve the complex of problems facing it only thanks to a systematic approach.

Modern science is characterized by the combination of two opposing trends - increasing differentiation and integration of various branches of science. The emergence of special disciplines is explained, of course, by the growing differentiation and progress of analytical methods. However, in the field of human science, this trend is intertwined with synthetic approaches to holistic or complex types of human activity. Therefore, specialization in this area is most often combined with the unification of individual particular theories into a general theory of a particular formation, property or type of human activity.

Different scientific disciplines have different approaches to the study of the genesis of offenses, since the structure of a particular offense can be analyzed from different points of view. The legal approach characterizes it as an act consisting of four elements: object, subject, objective and subjective sides. For criminology, sociology and psychology, a dynamic genetic approach is more productive, allowing the study of human behavior in development.

From the book Psychology and Pedagogy: Cheat Sheet author Author unknown

From the book Management Psychology: a textbook author Antonova Natalya

Chapter 1 SUBJECT OF MANAGEMENT PSYCHOLOGY

From the book Legal Psychology. Cheat sheets author Solovyova Maria Alexandrovna

2. The subject of legal psychology, its goals and objectives Legal psychology is integrative in nature, as it is at the intersection of jurisprudence and psychology. Legal psychology includes legal psychology, which studies legal

From the book Fundamentals of General Psychology author Rubinshtein Sergey Leonidovich

3. Methods of legal psychology Legal psychology studies mass phenomena characteristic of social psychology (social, collective, group goals, interests, requests, motives, opinions, norms of behavior, customs and traditions, moods, etc.);

From the book Psychology. Textbook for high school. author Teplov B. M.

Chapter I SUBJECT OF PSYCHOLOGY

From the book Legal Psychology [With the basics of general and social psychology] author Enikeev Marat Iskhakovich

Chapter I. SUBJECT OF PSYCHOLOGY §1. General concept of the psyche Psychology is a science that studies the human psyche. The psyche refers to our feelings, ideas, thoughts, aspirations, desires, which are well known to every person from his own experience. The psyche also includes

From the book Legal Psychology author Vasiliev Vladislav Leonidovich

Chapter 1 Methodological foundations of legal psychology § 1. Subject and tasks of legal psychology Legal psychology studies the psychological aspects of law, legal regulation and legal activity, explores the problems of increasing efficiency

From the author's book

§ 1. Subject and tasks of legal psychology Legal psychology studies the psychological aspects of law, legal regulation and legal activity, explores the problems of increasing the efficiency of lawmaking, law enforcement, law enforcement and

From the author's book

§ 2. System (structure) of legal psychology Legal psychology has its own methodology and system of categories (thesaurus). It consists of a number of sections, each of which has a corresponding substructure.1. Methodological foundations of legal psychology:

From the author's book

From the author's book

Chapter 2 HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL PSYCHOLOGY Legal psychology is one of the relatively young branches of psychological science. The first attempts to systematically solve some problems of jurisprudence using psychological methods date back to the 18th century. In the history of legal

From the author's book

2.1. Early history of legal psychology Like most new sciences that arose at the intersection of various branches of knowledge, legal psychology in the first stages of its development was not independent and did not have special personnel. Related to this discipline

From the author's book

2.2. Formation of legal psychology as a science. The end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. associated with the intensive development of psychology, psychiatry and a number of legal disciplines (primarily criminal law). A number of scientists representing these sciences at that time occupied progressive

From the author's book

2.3. History of legal psychology in the 20th century. End of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century. characterized by the sociologization of criminological knowledge. The causes of crime as a social phenomenon began to be studied by sociologists J. Quetelet, E. Durkheim, P. Dupoty, M. Weber, L. Lévy-Bruhl and others, who,

From the author's book

Chapter 3 METHODS OF LEGAL PSYCHOLOGY 3.1. Methodological foundations Each science has its own subject and corresponding research methods. However, regardless of what area the research is being conducted, certain requirements are imposed on scientific methods:?

From the author's book

11.1. Problems of minors in legal psychology Juvenile crime is caused by the mutual influence of negative environmental factors and the personality of the minor himself. Most often, crimes are committed by the so-called “difficult”

Before copying the form, you should naturally carefully check the parts of the legislation set out in it. Over time they may lose their strength. Free resources are always welcome. A high-quality template will help you solve inconveniences when preparing an official document. This will help you save on a specialist contract.

The work of a practical lawyer involves daily contacts with people, during which conclusions are drawn about people’s character traits, their behavior and habits, and guesses about the motives of their actions.

Legal psychology is a branch of social psychology, which takes as its subject of study the psychological characteristics of activities directly related to criminal and constitutional human rights.

Legal psychology helps to analyze human behavior, his hidden motives, attitudes, and personal characteristics that are important for the competent and correct work of a lawyer. Knowing mental patterns, a lawyer not only understands the mental activity of the defendant, but also controls it. Self-improvement of one’s personality, re-education of a criminal, overcoming resistance to investigation from perjury - all this is included in the field of legal psychology.

In legal psychology, the object is the human psyche in terms of interaction with the law. The subject is allocated in accordance with the conditions and reasons for the study. It can be either the psychological state of the subject or his individual characteristics. Legal psychology is constantly developing, establishing connections with other sciences, and identifying new areas of legal psychology.

Have your family suffered at the hands of a criminal? You don't know how to protect your family? Are you accused of a criminal case? The Phoenix company offers the services of a criminal lawyer and support at any stage of the process. Criminal lawyer of the Phoenix company is a guarantee of victory in court!

We carry out any work on Legal Psychology in the shortest possible time at reasonable prices! Fill out the form below and receive a response within 15 minutes.

* Item:

*Delivery date:

* Number of pages

Most psychologists do not deny that solving a creative problem intuitively occurs unconsciously or subconsciously. (It is more correct to assume that intuition appears in the sphere of the subconscious, and not the unconscious. The sphere of the unconscious is simpler (elementary feelings, attitudes). In the sphere of the subconscious, processes take place that have a decisive influence on the course of an individual’s conscious life.

An intuitive decision appears under certain conditions.

1. If there is a situation of intense search (search activity) of the investigator.

This situation is expressed in parallel in two spheres: emotional and mental. The investigator is somewhat excited during the search (emotional sphere). He seeks to relieve this excitement caused by the search dominant, with the help of a thought process aimed at solving a problem situation (mental sphere). It is the search activity of the investigator that determines the peculiarity of subsequent orientation in a situation when an unconscious product is encountered (i.e., when a prompt situation occurs) and the correct version of the case is put forward.

The most favorable conditions for the correct solution of the case arise at the moment when the investigator has gone through all possible options in the case, but has not yet reached the stage at which the search dominant goes out. The main condition here is dedication and perseverance, passion for the work.

2. “It turned out that the more you saturate the content of the direct product of action in a prompt situation, the more you interest the subject in this, the less possible it is to solve the problem.”

In terms of the investigator’s creativity, this means the following: the less meaningful the direct goal of the action, in which the investigator encounters an unconscious product that objectively contains the key to solving the problem, is the more likely the intuitive solution.

3. The success of solving a problem depends “on the degree of automation of the method of action by which the hint was carried out. The less automated this method was, the better the problem was solved.”

You are more likely to come across an intuitive solution when doing something unusual.

Another condition for the emergence of intellectual intuition is preliminary simplification of the problem.

Outwardly, the intuitive process proceeds so quickly that its individual stages merge into a single, continuously flowing cognitive act, in which, unless it is specially analyzed, it is impossible to distinguish the transition from one stage to another.

Intuition is a rapid transition from one statement to another, sometimes with such rapid skipping of individual links of reasoning that premises and intermediate processes are not isolated, although with a careful restoration of the train of thought they could be detected.

The psychological process of the transition of intuition from the subconscious to consciousness occurs in a unique way. When intuition passes into the sphere of consciousness, the subject feels an emotional background (pleasant, depressing, etc.), the content of which is hidden from him. As a result of a purposeful search for the meaning of the emotional background, intuition appears in the sphere of consciousness.

But sometimes the subject, through an effort of will, removes this emotional background. As a result, the transition process may fade, i.e. turn back into the subconscious (for example, with powerful self-hypnosis).

That is why the skill of self-observation and self-knowledge, which is at the same time indirect objective knowledge, is of great importance for the investigator.

Intuition, as part of creative thinking, does not include, but presupposes conscious, discursive thinking, the ability to develop a guess in a system of evidence, find its factual basis, explain the process of its formation, and ultimately discover its correctness or error.

The main purpose of intuition in the investigative process is that it creates hypotheses. It plays an important auxiliary role in the process of proof, but is completely indifferent from the point of view of the final results of this process for making procedural decisions.

From the point of view of formal logic, an investigator, solving (investigating) a complex crime, solves a problem with a huge number of unknowns, which in complexity can be equated to the problem beloved by cybernetics - the cipher of a safe lock with ten disks (each from 0 to 99). It is estimated that to solve this problem in a “formal” way, billions of billions of samples will be required. However, if a bell is attached to the disk, the ringing of which is heard when the disk is in the desired position, solving the problem will require only about 50 trials.

The investigator knows how to “hear” ringing where the average person cannot hear it. At this stage of putting forward versions and selecting evidence, he is characterized by an intuitive, heuristic mindset.

It would be unreasonable to brush aside the investigator’s intuitive guesses if they lead to a more in-depth study of the circumstances of the case.

On the other hand, intuition is a heuristic process and its conclusions are probabilistic in nature.

Topic: Subject and system of legal psychology

The history of psychological research into law enforcement problems goes back about a hundred years. It began with the problems of legal proceedings and with the name “Forensic Psychology”. This situation remained until the 70s, when the science of “Legal Psychology” was officially registered.

The name change was caused by radical changes in the understanding that the psychological problems of strengthening law and order are not limited to the investigation of crimes. A new approach was also forced by the real state of psychological research that took place in law enforcement agencies and went far beyond the scope of traditional problems. Research began on psychological problems of legal education of the population, strengthening the rule of law, working with law enforcement personnel, professional deformation and psychological training of employees, psychological causes of crimes and their prevention, management in law enforcement agencies and operational investigative work, correction of convicts and social rehabilitation of those released from prison freedom, etc. The trend of expanding legal and psychological research continued to strengthen and develop in the 80s in connection with the increasingly acute need of society to strengthen legality and order and an integrated approach to this work.

The urgency of solving the entire complex of psychological problems in the activities of law enforcement agencies acquired particular urgency in the 90s, when the task of creating a rule of law state was declared a task of updating our society, and the crime rate increased sharply, becoming a truly national problem. In response to the needs of practice, research into the problems of legal psychology expanded, and their results were accumulated, which are of undoubted practical interest. However, all this was not sufficiently reflected in publications on legal psychology, accessible to a wide student audience and the corps of law enforcement officers.

Our time is characterized by significant development of psychological science, its penetration into all spheres of human activity, the use of psychological data in solving problems of economic and cultural construction, as well as issues of improving the work of law enforcement agencies and officials, for example, the creation of a professiogram of legal professions. An in-depth study of these issues requires a psychological analysis of personality and legal activity, based on the study of basic psychological phenomena, processes, states, and their characteristics in the legal field (needs, motives, goals, temperament, attitude, social orientation and other characteristics of the individual).

The psychological culture of a lawyer presupposes that all employees of legal bodies have a developed system of psychological knowledge, as well as skills and techniques that ensure a high culture of communication. Psychological culture increases the efficiency of legal activity and contributes to its humanization.

The study of legal psychology is greatly hampered by the lack of scientific and methodological literature on this discipline.

To develop this work, the following goals are set:

consider legal psychology as a branch of psychological science;

reveal the subject, methods, tasks and system of legal psychology;

perform control testing in this discipline.

1. Legal psychology is a branch of psychological science

Psychology is a science that studies the patterns and mechanisms of human mental activity. The name of the science “psychology” comes from the Greek words: “psyche” (soul), “logos” (teaching), that is, the science of the soul, or more precisely, of the inner, subjective world of man. The term "psychology" was proposed by the German scholastic Goclenius at the end of the 16th century.

For a long time, psychology developed as an integral part of philosophy, and only in the middle of the 19th century did it emerge as an independent science. This became possible because psychology gradually transformed from a descriptive science into an experimental science. Currently, psychology is a rather complex and branched system of disciplines. In addition to general psychology, which studies the general laws of mental activity, there are private, applied branches of psychology that exist and are rapidly developing. Thus, the group of applied branches that study the patterns and mechanisms of the psyche of people engaged in specific types of activities consists of: labor psychology and its relatively independent sections - engineering, aviation and space psychology; psychology of cognition; educational, military, legal psychology, etc.

Operational, investigative, prosecutorial and judicial workers constantly face many questions, the solution of which requires not only a broad outlook, legal culture, special knowledge and life experience, but also a good knowledge of legal psychology. In order to correctly understand the complex relationships of people, their experiences and actions, in confusing situations that are reflected in criminal cases, you need to know the laws of mental life.

Legal psychology includes various areas of scientific knowledge, is an applied science and belongs equally to both psychology and jurisprudence. In the field of social relations regulated by legal norms, the mental activity of people acquires unique features that are determined by the specifics of human activity in the field of legal regulation. Psychology is the only science that can provide not only knowledge of mental activity, but also its control. With the development of society, its importance will increase more and more.

The need to turn to psychology, its methods, and achievements arises when a specific science, adjacent to psychology or closely related to it, is included in the solution of practical problems. This occurs in pedagogy, medicine and law. Practical activity, as a rule, is realized in the specific actions of specific people, and how this happens depends largely on their psychological characteristics. Only the need to solve practical problems led to the emergence and development of social, ethnic, historical and other branches of psychology on the border with social science. It would, however, be a downplaying of the role of the natural in the life and development of the individual to turn exclusively to the social aspects of its manifestation. Of course, the study of human biology (anatomy, physiology, anthropology) is inextricably linked with research in the field of psychophysiology, neuropsychology, psychophysics and other sciences bordering on psychology and natural science. - The entire system of scientific knowledge feels the need to use psychological knowledge; it becomes a connecting link between various fields of science. Psychology connects social and natural sciences, biology and history, medicine and pedagogy, management and jurisprudence, etc. This determines its place in the system of scientific knowledge.

The theoretical basis for legal psychology is general psychology, since it uses its conceptual and categorical apparatus, knowledge about the general patterns and laws of human mental activity.

Most legal scholars and psychologists working in this area agree that if psychology, as a fundamental science about the human psyche, studies the most general patterns of mental activity of people in general, then legal psychology studies the same patterns of the human psyche, various mental phenomena, but not in general, but in the sphere of various (criminal, civil, etc.) legal relations or, as they sometimes say, in the “man - law” system.

2. Subject of legal psychology

The modern development of science is characterized, on the one hand, by the differentiation of scientific knowledge, and on the other hand, by integration, the interpenetration of some industries into others. This process leads to the creation of new branches of scientific knowledge that connect previously isolated sciences.

From this point of view, the identification of such a science as legal psychology, which turns out to be a connecting link between the psychological and legal sciences, is a natural phenomenon.

Legal psychology is an applied science that includes both psychology and jurisprudence. The mental sphere of persons associated with legal proceedings and legal activities has a number of psychological characteristics, the nature of which is determined by their performance of many different social and legal functions. The specifics of the mental activity of persons involved in the orbit of legal relations is what legal psychology is designed to study.

Thus, the subject of legal psychology is the study of mental phenomena, mechanisms, and patterns that manifest themselves in the sphere of law.

3. Tasks of legal psychology

Legal psychology as a science sets itself certain tasks that can be divided into general and specific.

The general task of legal psychology is the scientific synthesis of legal and psychological knowledge, the disclosure of the psychological essence of the fundamental categories of law.

Particular tasks of legal psychology relate to the development of recommendations for the most effective implementation of law enforcement activities. These include:

1) study of psychological prerequisites (conditions) for the effectiveness of legal norms;

2) psychological study of the personality of the criminal, disclosure of the motivation for criminal behavior, the specifics of the motivation for certain types of criminal behavior;

3) development of socio-psychological foundations for crime prevention;

4) research into the psychological patterns of various types of law enforcement activities (investigator, prosecutor, lawyer, judge);

5) research into the psychological patterns of the activities of correctional institutions in order to develop a system of measures for the correction and re-education of convicts;

4. Methods of legal psychology

In legal psychology, there is a system of methods for the psychological study of personality, as well as various psychological phenomena that arise in the process of law enforcement activities.

These include the following:

Observation method. The method of observation in psychology is understood as a specially organized, deliberate, purposeful perception by the researcher of various external manifestations of the psyche directly in life, during an investigation, trial and in other areas of law enforcement.

The observation method excludes the use of any techniques that could introduce changes or disturbances in the natural course of the phenomena being studied. Thanks to this, the observation method allows us to understand the phenomenon being studied in its entirety and reliability of its qualitative features.

The subject of observation in psychology is not direct subjective mental experiences, but their manifestations in a person’s actions and behavior, in his speech and activity.

Observation can be: direct and indirect, non-involved and included.

In direct observation, the study is carried out by the person himself, who draws conclusions based on the results of this observation. Such observation is carried out by the investigator and the judge during investigative and judicial actions, the teacher of the correctional institution, etc.

Indirect observation occurs in cases where information is received about observations made by other persons. This type of observation has a peculiarity: its results are always recorded in the case documents - in the protocols of interrogations of other persons, in expert opinions (forensic psychological, forensic psychiatric examinations), etc.

Non-participant observation is observation from the outside, in which the researcher is an outsider to the person or group being studied.

Participant observation is characterized by the fact that the researcher enters a social situation as its participant, without revealing the true motives of his behavior (research). For example, when studying the institution of people's assessors, the method of participant observation was used. It was conducted by a graduate of the Faculty of Law of St. Petersburg University, who had practiced in court. The researcher received a detailed researcher-developed questionnaire relating to the progress of the trial and the deliberation of the judges, which he completed after the end of each case. The questionnaire was anonymous. Official permission to conduct the observation was obtained, but the judges were not informed about the study.

The advantage of participant observation is direct contact with the object of study, registration of events that, with non-participant observation, could be hidden from the eyes of the researcher.

All of the above refers to the method of objective observation. In addition to this, psychological research also uses the method of subjective observation - introspection (self-observation). It consists both in monitoring one’s outwardly expressed activities, psychologically significant facts from life, and in monitoring one’s inner life, one’s mental state.

Conversation method. The goal of psychological research is the deepest possible knowledge of the individual, his inner world, beliefs, aspirations, interests, and attitudes towards various phenomena of social life. In such cases, the method of simple observation turns out to be of little use.

In such cases, the conversation method is successfully used. The essence of this method is a relaxed conversation with people on issues of interest to the researcher (the conversation should not turn into a questionnaire).

The conversation method is largely similar to interrogation, so it has some similar requirements. In particular, a prerequisite for its success is the creation of an atmosphere of ease, which makes it possible to naturally combine a free narrative with answers to specific questions that clarify, complement and control the presentation.

Questionnaire method. This is a survey of a large circle of people using a strictly established form - a questionnaire. The method is based on the anonymity of filling out the questionnaire, which allows you to obtain the most objective data about the processes, facts, and phenomena being studied. The obtained material is subjected to statistical processing and analysis. In the field of legal psychology, the questionnaire method is used quite widely - from the judicial, investigative and correctional spheres of activity to the field of legal implementation.

In parallel with the survey, a “public opinion machine” (telephone survey) is used. Its main advantage is complete anonymity. Thanks to this, subjects give the machine different answers to a number of “critical” questions than in the questionnaires.

A variation of the survey is the interview method. During the interview, a person expresses his opinions regarding certain phenomena, circumstances, and actions. The interview should be conducted according to a clearly defined program. With its help, you can obtain a wide variety of information about the specifics of the activities of law enforcement agencies. Interviewing investigators and operational officers allows you to learn about their professionalism, the difficulties they encounter, their opinion about the causes of crime and ways to reduce it, etc.

To characterize the psychological characteristics of a person, the biographical method is of certain importance. The essence of this method lies in the collection and analysis of biographical materials that shed light on human characteristics and their development. This includes: establishing specific biographical data, analyzing diaries, collecting and comparing the memories of other people, etc.

In its essence, the method of generalizing independent characteristics is close to the biographical method, the purpose of which is to collect data about a person from various sources independent of each other. This method provides rich material that allows one to get the most complete picture of a person through the analysis of opinions expressed by persons with whom the subject was in one relationship or another.

The experimental method is the leading method in psychological science. It is aimed at studying mental phenomena in conditions specially created for this purpose and, in its essence and types, is divided into laboratory and natural experiments.

There is also another type of experimental method that can be used in legal psychology - this is a formative (educational) experiment. It is aimed at studying mental phenomena in the process of education and professional training by introducing the most active teaching methods, including problem-based ones, with the help of which the professionally important qualities of a future legal specialist are formed.

Finally, we can note another type of experimental method - the associative experiment, first proposed by the English psychologist F. Galton and developed by the Austrian scientist C. Jung. Its essence is that the subject is asked to answer each word with the first word that comes to his mind. In all cases, reaction time is taken into account, i.e. the interval between the word and the answer (determining the involvement of the suspect in the commission of a crime).

A variation of the experimental method, used in a narrower range, is the test method. A psychological test, called a test, has long been used to resolve various issues: checking the level of intellectual development, determining the degree of giftedness of children, professional suitability, and identifying personal parameters.

Method for analyzing products of human activity. The products of human activity are valuable objective material that allows us to reveal many features of the human psyche.

Analysis of the products of activity allows us to characterize the characteristics of skills, techniques and methods of work, personality traits expressed in attitude to work, etc. .

Method of psychological analysis of documents. A document in the broad sense of the word (i.e., something that is written down, drawn or depicted in some other way), even if it is not related to law, may contain information of interest to legal psychology. Document analysis is a method that allows you to obtain such information. There are documents of legal significance and documents that are not related to law.

5. System of legal psychology

Legal psychology has its own system of categories, a certain structural organization. The following sections can be distinguished:

1) Methodological section, which includes the subject, objectives, system, methods and history of the development of legal psychology.

2) Legal psychology is a section of legal psychology that studies the psychological aspects of legal implementation, psychological patterns of legal socialization of an individual, as well as psychological flaws leading to defects in legal socialization.

3) Criminal psychology is a section that studies the psychological characteristics of the criminal’s personality, the motivation of both criminal behavior in general and certain types of criminal behavior (violent crime, acquisitive crime, juvenile delinquency), as well as the psychology of criminal groups.

4) Investigative-operational psychology - a section of legal psychology that studies the psychological aspects of solving and investigating crimes.

5) Forensic psychology - a section that studies the psychological aspects of judicial proceedings, the problems of forensic psychological examination.

6) Psychology of correctional activity - a section of legal psychology that studies the psychological aspects of the effectiveness of criminal punishment, psychological problems of the execution of criminal punishment, the psychology of convicts and the psychological foundations of their resocialization and readaptation after serving their sentence.

Conclusion

The current state of psychological science can be assessed as a period of significant growth in its development. Over the past decades, the frontier of psychological research has expanded, and new scientific directions and disciplines have emerged. The range of problems being developed in psychology is growing, and its conceptual apparatus is changing. Research methodology and methods are being improved.

Psychology is continuously enriched with new data, interesting hypotheses and concepts relating to all the main areas of its problems. Psychological science is increasingly involved in solving various problems arising in different areas of social practice.

A complex and multifaceted course in legal psychology is designed to provide lawyers with an understanding of the socio-psychological essence of legal regulation, the psychological characteristics of human behavior in the sphere of relations regulated by law. Legal regulation is objectively determined by social and socio-psychological patterns. Only by synthesizing legal knowledge with knowledge of the psychology of human behavior can a lawyer become a competent specialist.

By studying legal psychology, a lawyer learns the patterns of human interaction with the environment, the features and conditions for the formation of socially adapted and deviant behavior of an individual, and the psychological factors of criminalization of an individual. Legal psychology equips a lawyer with a systematic analysis of the behavior of a criminal, a structural approach to the organization of investigative and judicial activities.

Having emerged as an independent branch of knowledge at the end of the 19th century. Legal psychology is currently becoming an integral part of legal education, integrating all branches of law on their unified basis - on the basis of the “human factor”.

Control testing

1. Subject of legal psychology:

A - patterns of occurrence, features of the course of mental processes in humans;

B - patterns and mechanisms of the psyche of people included in the sphere of relations regulated by law;

B - borderline mental personality disorder;

2. The tasks of legal psychology include:

A - synthesis of psychological and legal knowledge; ensuring moral and psychological training of lawyers; disclosure of mental characteristics of various subjects of legal relations;

B - disclosure of the peculiarities of the course of neurophysiological processes in the brain; establishing psychological contacts with sick people;

B - synthesis of psychological and legal knowledge; scientific organization of teachers' work; moral and political tempering of personality.

3. A section of legal psychology that studies the problems of mental reflection of legally significant phenomena, the psychological aspects of lawmaking, legal consciousness - this is:

A - criminal psychology;

B - developmental psychology;

B - legal psychology.

4. The section of legal psychology that studies the psychological aspects of property, economic and personal relations regulated by civil law is:

A - forensic psychology;

B - psychology of civil law regulation;

B - criminal psychology.

5. Section studying the psychology of desocialization of the individual, psychological mechanisms of delinquent and criminal behavior. psychology of the personality of the criminal and criminal groups is:

And forensic psychology;

B - criminal psychology;

B - psychology of correctional activities;

6. Correctional psychology solves problems:

A - establishing sanity - insanity; establishing the form of guilt; studying the social environment;

B - resocialization and readaptation of convicts after serving their sentences; problems of execution of criminal punishment;

B - problems of execution of criminal punishment; problems of aesthetic education.

7. The methodological basis for research in legal psychology is:

A - systematic approach, determinism, scientific validity;

B - questioning, testing, systematic approach;

B - determinism, experiment, participant observation.

8. The most ancient in origin is the section of legal psychology that studies:

A - psychology of criminal intent;

B - legal worldview;

B - psychology of judicial activity.

In - Piaget.

B - Lombroso;

11. Russian judicial speakers, who for the first time integrated knowledge of law, psychology and sociology in their activities:

B) - Petrazhitsky.

13. The biological basis for the formation of personality is:

A - character, temperament, type of nervous activity;

B - temperament, extraversion, neuroticism;

B - knowledge, skills, abilities.

14. A psychological state associated with the accumulation of negative emotions as a result of the inability to satisfy desires “conflict of desires” is:

A - Frustration;

B - affect.

15. A person as a bearer of a set of mental properties and qualities that determine socially significant forms of his activity and behavior is:

A - individual;

16. Individual psychological characteristics of a person, which reflect the strength, mobility and balance of nervous processes.

Subject and tasks of legal psychology

Legal psychology is an applied science located at the intersection of psychology and jurisprudence. Studies the manifestation and use of mental patterns and psychological knowledge in the field of legal regulation and legal activity.

Legal psychology studies the problems of increasing the efficiency of lawmaking, law enforcement, law enforcement and penitentiary activities based on taking into account psychological factors.

The subject of legal psychology is the study of mental phenomena, mechanisms and patterns manifested in the sphere of law.

Tasks of legal psychology:

1) carry out a scientific synthesis of psychological and legal knowledge;

2) reveal the psychological and legal essence of basic legal categories;

3) ensure that lawyers have a deep understanding of the object of their activity – human behavior;

4) reveal the features of the mental activity of various subjects of legal relations, their mental states in various situations of law enforcement and law enforcement;

The interaction between psychology and jurisprudence is considered mainly at 3 levels:

1) the application of psychological laws in jurisprudence in a “pure” form (a psychologist acts as an expert, specialist in civil or criminal proceedings, etc.);

2) the use of psychology in jurisprudence through the introduction of psychological knowledge into law enforcement, law enforcement practice, in the selection of personnel in the law enforcement system and their psychological support, etc.;

3) the emergence of legal psychology as a science based on psychology and jurisprudence.

Legal psychology is based on general and social psychology, from which its methodology stems. A personal approach is carried out (for example, personality is studied in the dynamics of an offense), the process of activity is studied in connection with the structure of the personality and the system of legal norms, the system of mental processes, temperament, personality and social group, socialization and social justice, legal awareness, etc. are studied.

Methods of legal psychology

These methods can be classified according to the goals and methods of research (Vasiliev V. A., 2002, pp. 40-51).

Depending on the objectives of the study, the following methods are distinguished:

    scientific research (the psychological patterns of an individual’s relationships, regulated by legal norms, are studied, and scientifically based recommendations for practice are developed);

    psychological impact on the individual (aimed at preventing criminal activity, solving crimes and identifying their causes, studying the effectiveness of punishment and the possibility of re-education, etc.; these methods are used only within the framework of the Criminal Procedure Code and ethical standards);

    forensic psychological examination (the most complete and objective study conducted by expert psychologists according to the order of judicial, investigative or inquiry bodies).

According to the methods of legal psychology, methods are divided into:

    method of psychological analysis of criminal case materials;

    anamnestic (biographical) method;

    methods of observation and natural experiment;

    instrumental methods for studying individual psychological characteristics of a person (various variants of the experimental method, various test methods, questionnaires, questionnaires).

There is another classification of methods of legal psychology (Enikeev M.I., 2000), which includes:

Personal communication qualities

Psychology of communication in the professional activity of a lawyer. Basic techniques for establishing psychological contact with citizens.

Communication is a subtle, multifaceted process of establishing and developing interpersonal contacts. For lawyers, communication is a special type of professional activity that takes place in a special procedural regime in compliance with strictly defined forms of communication (reception of documents, complaints, petitions, questioning during a preliminary hearing). These rules are established by the Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Administrative Offenses and other legislative acts. If these rules are violated, the evidence obtained, for example, is considered inadmissible, and legal sanctions are applied to lawyers who violate these rules.

However, not all cases of communication are described by law, so a lawyer must have communication skills, knowledge of etiquette, and knowledge of the rules of speech behavior of social groups.

In sociology, there are three indispensable components of a lawyer’s non-procedural communication:

1) communication side. Allows a lawyer to participate in interpersonal relationships with maximum benefit and conduct a fruitful dialogue. When entering into psychological contact, it is necessary to take into account the social role of the law enforcement lawyer and the object with whom they enter into dialogue, since it forms a system of role expectations, manifested in the style of performance. All role features influence the development of communication processes. If a lawyer violates the rules of role communication, then this gives rise to misunderstanding, since this behavior is unexpected and incomprehensible to the interlocutor.

Verbal communication involves the use of speech with its rich phonetics, vocabulary, and syntax.

Also, when communicating, they use written language - when drawing up protocols. The requirements for the protocol are: use of unambiguous terms, use of precise, concise formulations, brevity.

Thus, the lawyer has to resort to different types of communication, but the information received will receive legal force if it is received in a certain procedural manner.

2) The perceptual side of communication. In the process of communication between its participants, an active mutual perception of the parties occurs, in which an idea of ​​the interlocutor and of oneself is formed. By comparing yourself with your interlocutor, you can imagine the logic of his actions. Or you understand the emotionality of his actions - empathy. There is also the concept of reflection - the process of an individual’s awareness of how he is perceived by his communication partner. If a subject misinforms a lawyer, then a misconception will be formed about him due to the attribution of certain character traits. A lawyer must notice the impact of the above phenomena, as well as others (social status evaluative stereotypes, the effect of novelty...) and in order to protect himself from communication barriers.

    The interactive side of communication is the exchange of actions at the verbal and non-verbal level. Based on the communication position taken by the interlocutor, the lawyer must be able to anticipate his reaction and prevent a possible conflict or get out of it.

System of legal psychology

Legal psychology is usually divided into two parts: general and special.

The general part includes the subject, system, history of the development of legal psychology, methods, its relationship with other scientific disciplines, psychology of legal work.

The special part includes forensic psychological examination, psychology of the victim, psychology of a minor, criminal psychology, investigative psychology, psychology of judicial consideration of criminal and civil cases, correctional labor psychology, adaptation of the released person’s personality to the conditions of normal life.

There is a slightly different form of presenting the system of legal psychology, consisting of 5 sections with corresponding substructures.

    Legal psychology – psychological aspects of effective lawmaking, legal socialization of the individual, psychology of legal understanding and legal consciousness.

    Criminal psychology – the role of biological and social factors in the criminalization of the individual, the concept of the personality of the criminal, the criminal act committed;

    Psychology of criminal proceedings or forensic psychology (for criminal cases)

    Psychology of preliminary investigation

psychology of the personality of the investigator, his activities in the investigation, the formation of information, as well as forensic psychological examination in criminal proceedings.

    Psychology of judicial activity

psychology of preparation and planning of trial, features of its conduct, decision-making by the judge

    Penitentiary (correctional) psychology– psychology of the convicted person and the criminal, ways of correction, prevention.

    Psychology of civil legal regulation

psychology of civil legal relations, positions of the parties to civil proceedings and their communication activity, aspects of preparing civil cases;

psychology of the activities of a lawyer, notary, arbitration, prosecutor's office in civil proceedings.

Legal consciousness

Law-abiding behavior is the result of socialization, during which the subject assimilates moral and legal prohibitions, social stereotypes of behavior, which, in turn, is determined by group and individual legal consciousness, a sense of social responsibility, social justice, legal intuition, etc.

The psychology of law-abiding behavior examines the internal structure and individual components of the individual and group, which, in combination with environmental factors, provide various response options that do not go beyond the current legislation.

When forming a personality under normal conditions of socialization, legal prohibitions are taken into account and become habitual frameworks of behavior; a social stereotype of individual behavior gradually develops. This stereotype is based on individual legal consciousness based on public consciousness. A person develops a mechanism of social self-regulation, that is, a habitual readiness to act in a given environment in a certain way.

Legal consciousness in the broad sense of the word refers to the entire legal experience of behavior of an individual, group, society. First of all, it includes the psychological mechanism of law-abiding behavior and the relationship between various defects of individual legal consciousness and illegal behavior.

Legal awareness is one of the forms of social consciousness; its content and development are determined by the material conditions of society. It reflects social relations that are regulated or should be regulated by the rules of law.

The economic and other needs of society, having passed through consciousness, take the form of legal motives and are ultimately expressed in the rules of law. Thus, the relationship between interests and needs, on the one hand, and law, on the other, is mediated by legal consciousness (legal psychology and legal ideology).

Legal awareness as one of the forms of social consciousness has the following characteristics:

– not only reflects social reality, but also actively influences it, is the highest level of reflection of the socio-economic relations of people, expressed in the laws of their society;

– always manifests itself through the second signaling system; the verbal and mental activity of people acts as a mechanism of legal consciousness, reflecting the system of legal knowledge and concepts that regulate social relations;

– cannot exist without its specific carrier - a specific human personality, groups; teams. Based on the commonality of awareness of legal norms in society, people unite into groups, and the category of group legal consciousness arises, characteristic of social communities and historical eras.

Legal conflicts of the individual with society - offenses and crimes - should be considered in criminal and penitentiary psychology, taking into account what stages of development of legal consciousness are violated in a particular case and what measures of social readaptation of offenders can return them to the norms of legal consciousness implemented in normal legal behavior.

Labor psychology of a lawyer

Methods for studying the work of lawyers

Professionogram of the legal profession

Among the legal professions, there are those whose mastery requires not only inclinations, vocation and education, but also extensive life experience, a whole range of professional skills and abilities. These are, first of all, the professions of a judge, a prosecutor, as well as an Investigator, an arbitrator and some others. The complex and responsible work of these people places increased demands on the employee’s personality. Most of these professions are currently considered prestigious, as evidenced by competitions for entry into law schools and other special educational institutions that train personnel for law enforcement agencies. However, many young people choose these professions for themselves without a clear idea of ​​the complexity of the upcoming activity, and, most importantly, they have no idea what requirements will be placed on them.

The word "legal" is synonymous with the word "legal". Almost all legal terminology is based on these words.

In general, legal activity is a work that requires great effort, patience, conscientiousness, knowledge and high responsibility, based on the strictest adherence to the law.

The work of lawyers, very diverse and complex, has a number of features that distinguish it from the work of most people in other professions.

Firstly, the legal professions are characterized by an extraordinary variety of problems to be solved. The program for solving these problems can be expressed in the most general form, which, as a rule, is formulated in a legal norm. Each new case for an investigator, prosecutor, judge, lawyer represents a new task. The fewer templates used in approaching a matter, the higher the likelihood of finding the truth.

Secondly, legal activity, with all its complexity and diversity, is completely subject to legal regulation, and this leaves an imprint on the personality of each lawyer. Already when planning their activities, any employee mentally compares future actions with the legal norms that regulate these actions.

For almost all legal professions, one of the main aspects of their activity is communicative activity, which consists of communication in the conditions of legal regulation. This legal (procedural) regulation leaves a specific imprint on all participants in communication, endowing them with special rights and responsibilities and giving a special flavor to communication, distinguishing the legal professions as a special group.

Most legal professions are characterized by high emotional intensity of work. Moreover, more often this is associated with negative emotions, with the need to suppress them, and postpone emotional release for a relatively long period of time.

The work of many lawyers (prosecutor, investigator, judge, operative officer, etc.) is associated with the exercise of special powers, with the right and obligation to exercise power in the name of the law. Therefore, most people occupying these positions develop a professional sense of increased responsibility for the consequences of their actions.

For most legal professions, a characteristic feature is the organizational side of the activity, which, as a rule, has two aspects:

Organization of own work during the working day, week, organization of work on the case in conditions of irregular working hours;

Organization of joint work with other officials, law enforcement agencies, and other parties in criminal proceedings.

Many legal professions are characterized by overcoming resistance to their activities from individuals, and in some cases, microgroups. A prosecutor, investigator, operative, or judge, in search of the truth in a case, often encounters passive or active resistance from persons interested in a certain outcome of the case.

Essentially, all legal professions are characterized by a creative aspect of work, which follows from the listed characteristics.

The creation of professiograms of legal professions is part of the deontological characteristics of a lawyer’s work.

Modern legal deontology is closely connected with the progress of legal science as a whole, the popularization of its achievements through the press, radio, television, and the growth of the cultural and educational level of the country's population. All this inevitably introduces new concepts into general legal deontology, which, along with general provisions concerning the professional ethics of a lawyer, faces challenges related to the specifics of a particular legal case. That is why each legal profession, in addition to general requirements, imposes specific requirements on the practicing lawyer - investigator, prosecutor, judge, notary, arbitrator and others. Improving the quality of a lawyer’s work is impossible without taking into account the individual characteristics of his personality and the correspondence of personal qualities to the objective requirements of this profession.

The development of professiograms (derived from the word professiography, which means a description of a profession) represents a detailed description of the most common and leading legal professions, indicating their characteristic functions. An integral part of professiograms is a psychogram. The purpose of developing professiograms is to focus on the study of relatively stable, stable properties that characterize a specialist lawyer in his practical activities.

A great contribution to the development of professiograms of legal professions was made by Russian scientists V.L. Vasiliev, M.I. Enikeev, Yu.V. Chufarovsky. In the activities of a specialist lawyer, they distinguish the following aspects: search (cognitive), communicative, certification, organizational, reconstructive (constructive) and social.

Let us give a general description of each of these aspects (types) of activity:

social – emphasizes the social significance of the legal profession as an organizer of the fight against crime, a defender of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens;

search – consists of collecting information necessary to resolve a legal matter;

reconstructive - represents the final analysis of the collected information on a legal case, putting forward working hypotheses, developing an action plan for its further consideration and completion;

communicative – means the ability to communicate with colleagues, clients, participants in the case and all those related to it;

organizational – consists of volitional actions to check working versions and their implementation;

certifying – consists of the ability to put the received information on a legal matter into the legally prescribed forms of written acts and documents (decisions, protocols, sentences, etc.).

In each of the specialties, these aspects of a lawyer’s professional activity are manifested in a different set, with unequal intensity. For each lawyer, depending on his personal qualities, they acquire a specific character.

Consideration of professiograms in the proposed sequence does not mean that the first legal profession is of greater importance, and each subsequent one is of lesser importance. All legal professions are called upon to guard the social values ​​of the individual, society and the state, and therefore each of them has a specific and important significance for the affirmation of these values.

Investigator's professional profile

The investigator's professional profile is a complex hierarchical structure in which all aspects of professional activity, as well as personal qualities, skills and abilities are presented in mutual connection or dependence.

Each side of the professiogram reflects, firstly, a certain cycle of professional activity, and secondly, it implements personal qualities, skills, abilities, as well as knowledge that ensure professional success at this level of activity.

The basis of the professiogram is the search side of the activity, which realizes the desire to solve a crime and consists of collecting initial information to solve professional problems.

The search side of the investigator’s activity is of particular importance at the first stage of the investigation. Its essence lies in isolating forensically significant information from the environment (traces of the criminal, the victim, weapons or instruments of crime, etc.), which makes it possible to reliably reconstruct the crime event with the degree of accuracy required by the law.

Inspecting the scene of the incident, the investigator is looking for answers to the questions: what happened here, what traces did this event leave? In the correct solution of these problems, the role of personal factors is great: firstly, these are the inclinations and abilities of a tracker, then forensic knowledge (the doctrine of traces, methods of committing crimes), professional experience (skills of isolating reference points and constructing the outline of an event), life experience are important . The effectiveness of the evidence collection process largely depends on the investigator’s knowledge of the information properties of various material objects and on his individual information stock.

The next level is the communicative side of the activity, during which the investigator must obtain the information necessary to solve the crime from people by communicating with them.

The investigator must be able to organize his mental state. A good investigator has the skills to manage his volitional and emotional spheres and, within the framework of the law, the emotions of the person being interrogated.

All information obtained as a result of the search and communication activities of the investigator or interrogator is transformed in the process of certification activities into special forms provided for by law: protocols, resolutions, etc. To do this, the investigator must be fluent in written language and have the skills to quickly translate oral speech into written language .

At the next level, the investigator acts as the organizer of the investigation. Making responsible decisions, he achieves their implementation and at the same time acts as an organizer of the activities of many people.

At the next level is the reconstructive side of the investigator’s activity. In the language of cybernetics, this is a block of information processing and decision making. The general and special intelligence of the investigator is important at this level. A modern investigator must know a lot: criminal law, criminal procedure, criminology and pedagogy, accounting and forensic ballistics. This is not a complete list of scientific disciplines on which the special intelligence of the investigator relies when processing initial information, putting forward hypotheses, versions and developing investigation plans.

The structure of the professiogram is completed by the social side, in which the investigator appears as the organizer of the fight against crime in his area or area. The center of gravity in the fight against crime shifts to finding out its causes and conditions and taking measures to eliminate them.

The investigator’s perception is always purposeful, systematic, and meaningful. This is due to professional experience and peculiarities of thinking.

Observation as a certain type of human activity is associated with the deliberate perception of objects and phenomena of the external world.

A special place in the observation process is occupied by an orientation towards a certain activity, which depends on a specific need and the objective possibility of satisfaction.

The concept of installation is closely related to the problem of unity and integrity of activity.

The system created by the investigator is determined by his “isolation” of the crime event. This is a more or less figurative dynamic picture of events, which represents a form of existence of versions.

Forensic observation when examining a crime scene is a systematic, purposeful, thoughtful perception of the situation. This perception in psychology is called observation. For it to be as effective as possible, certain rules must be followed. Before the inspection begins, it is important to get a general idea of ​​what happened. Although the initial information is often very contradictory and may not be confirmed later, this nevertheless allows the investigator to outline an inspection plan and begin to build a mental model of what happened.

Analysis of successful inspections indicates that at the initial stage, the investigators who carried out these inspections had a predominant simultaneous (whole) perception of objects and phenomena. Successive tendencies (consistent description of “all” objects that come into view, clockwise or counterclockwise, without attempting to isolate traces of a crime event) deprived the investigator of a creative approach and did not create the prerequisites for identifying the most important carriers of forensically significant information.



Did you like the article? Share with your friends!