Soviet-Finnish war summary. Soviet-Finnish War

The Soviet-Finnish War of 1939-1940 (Soviet-Finnish War, Finnish talvisota - Winter War, Swedish vinterkriget) - an armed conflict between the USSR and Finland from November 30, 1939 to March 12, 1940.

On November 26, 1939, the USSR government sent a note of protest to the Finnish government regarding the artillery shelling, which, according to the Soviet side, was carried out from Finnish territory. Responsibility for the outbreak of hostilities was placed entirely on Finland. The war ended with the signing of the Moscow Peace Treaty. The USSR included 11% of the territory of Finland (with the second largest city of Vyborg). 430 thousand Finnish residents were forcibly resettled by Finland from the front-line areas inland and lost their property.

According to a number of historians, this offensive operation of the USSR against Finland dates back to the Second World War. In Soviet historiography, this war was viewed as a separate bilateral local conflict, not part of the Second World War, just like the battles at Khalkhin Gol. The outbreak of hostilities led to the fact that in December 1939 the USSR, as an aggressor, was expelled from the League of Nations.

Background

Events of 1917-1937

On December 6, 1917, the Finnish Senate declared Finland an independent state. On December 18 (31), 1917, the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR addressed the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (VTsIK) with a proposal to recognize the independence of the Republic of Finland. On December 22, 1917 (January 4, 1918), the All-Russian Central Executive Committee decided to recognize the independence of Finland. In January 1918, a civil war began in Finland, in which the “reds” (Finnish socialists), with the support of the RSFSR, were opposed by the “whites”, supported by Germany and Sweden. The war ended with the victory of the “whites”. After the victory in Finland, the Finnish “White” troops provided support to the separatist movement in Eastern Karelia. The first Soviet-Finnish war that began during the already civil war in Russia lasted until 1920, when the Tartu (Yuryev) Peace Treaty was concluded. Some Finnish politicians, such as Juho Paasikivi, regarded the treaty as "too good a peace", believing that great powers would only compromise when absolutely necessary. K. Mannerheim, former activists and leaders of separatists in Karelia, on the contrary, considered this world a disgrace and a betrayal of compatriots, and Rebol representative Hans Haakon (Bobi) Siven (Finnish: H. H. (Bobi) Siven) shot himself in protest. Mannerheim, in his “oath of the sword,” publicly spoke out for the conquest of Eastern Karelia, which was not previously part of the Principality of Finland.

Nevertheless, relations between Finland and the USSR after the Soviet-Finnish wars of 1918-1922, as a result of which the Pechenga region (Petsamo), as well as the western part of the Rybachy Peninsula and most of the Sredny Peninsula, were transferred to Finland in the Arctic, were not friendly, however openly hostile too.

In the late 1920s and early 1930s, the idea of ​​general disarmament and security, embodied in the creation of the League of Nations, dominated government circles in Western Europe, especially in Scandinavia. Denmark disarmed completely, and Sweden and Norway significantly reduced their weapons. In Finland, the government and the majority of parliament members have consistently cut spending on defense and weapons. Since 1927, to save money, military exercises have not been held at all. The allocated money was barely enough to maintain the army. The parliament did not consider the cost of providing weapons. There were no tanks or military aircraft.

However, a Defense Council was created, which was headed by Carl Gustav Emil Mannerheim on July 10, 1931. He was firmly convinced that as long as the Bolshevik government was in power in the USSR, the situation there was fraught with the most serious consequences for the whole world, primarily for Finland: “The plague coming from the east could be contagious.” In a conversation that same year with Risto Ryti, then the governor of the Bank of Finland and a well-known figure in the Progressive Party of Finland, Mannerheim outlined his thoughts on the need to quickly create a military program and finance it. However, Ryti, after listening to the argument, asked the question: “But what is the benefit of providing the military department with such large sums if no war is expected?”

In August 1931, after inspecting the defensive structures of the Enckel Line, created in the 1920s, Mannerheim became convinced of its unsuitability for modern warfare, both due to its unfortunate location and destruction by time.

In 1932, the Tartu Peace Treaty was supplemented by a non-aggression pact and extended until 1945.

In the Finnish budget of 1934, adopted after the signing of a non-aggression pact with the USSR in August 1932, the article on the construction of defensive structures on the Karelian Isthmus was crossed out.

V. Tanner noted that the Social Democratic faction of the parliament “...still believes that a prerequisite for maintaining the country’s independence is such progress in the well-being of the people and the general conditions of their life, in which every citizen understands that this is worth all the costs of defense.”

Mannerheim described his efforts as “a futile attempt to pull a rope through a narrow pipe filled with resin.” It seemed to him that all his initiatives to unite the Finnish people in order to take care of their home and ensure their future were met with a blank wall of misunderstanding and indifference. And he filed a petition for removal from his position.

Negotiations 1938-1939

Yartsev's negotiations in 1938-1939

The negotiations were started at the initiative of the USSR, initially they were conducted in secret, which suited both sides: the Soviet Union preferred to officially maintain “free hands” in the face of an unclear prospect in relations with Western countries, and for Finnish officials the announcement of the fact of negotiations was inconvenient from the point of view from the point of view of domestic politics, since the population of Finland had a generally negative attitude towards the USSR.

On April 14, 1938, Second Secretary Boris Yartsev arrived in Helsinki, at the USSR Embassy in Finland. He immediately met with Foreign Minister Rudolf Holsti and outlined the position of the USSR: the USSR government is confident that Germany is planning an attack on the USSR and these plans include a side attack through Finland. That is why Finland’s attitude towards the landing of German troops is so important for the USSR. The Red Army will not wait on the border if Finland allows the landing. On the other hand, if Finland resists the Germans, the USSR will provide it with military and economic assistance, since Finland itself is not able to repel the German landing. Over the next five months, he held numerous conversations, including with Prime Minister Kajander and Minister of Finance Väinö Tanner. The Finnish side's guarantees that Finland would not allow its territorial integrity to be violated and Soviet Russia to be invaded through its territory were not enough for the USSR. The USSR demanded a secret agreement, obligatory in the event of a German attack, its participation in the defense of the Finnish coast, the construction of fortifications on the Åland Islands and the placement of Soviet military bases for the fleet and aviation on the island of Hogland (Finnish: Suursaari). No territorial demands were made. Finland rejected Yartsev's proposals at the end of August 1938.

In March 1939, the USSR officially announced that it wanted to lease the islands of Gogland, Laavansaari (now Moshchny), Tyutyarsaari and Seskar for 30 years. Later, as compensation, they offered Finland territories in Eastern Karelia. Mannerheim was ready to give up the islands, since they were still practically impossible to defend or use to protect the Karelian Isthmus. However, negotiations were fruitless and ended on April 6, 1939.

On August 23, 1939, the USSR and Germany entered into a Non-Aggression Treaty. According to the secret additional protocol to the Treaty, Finland was included in the sphere of interests of the USSR. Thus, the contracting parties - Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union - provided each other with guarantees of non-interference in the event of war. Germany began World War II by attacking Poland a week later, on September 1, 1939. USSR troops entered Polish territory on September 17.

From September 28 to October 10, the USSR concluded mutual assistance agreements with Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, according to which these countries provided the USSR with their territory for the deployment of Soviet military bases.

On October 5, the USSR invited Finland to consider the possibility of concluding a similar mutual assistance pact with the USSR. The Finnish government stated that the conclusion of such a pact would be contrary to its position of absolute neutrality. In addition, the non-aggression pact between the USSR and Germany had already eliminated the main reason for the Soviet Union's demands on Finland - the danger of a German attack through Finnish territory.

Moscow negotiations on the territory of Finland

On October 5, 1939, Finnish representatives were invited to Moscow for negotiations “on specific political issues.” The negotiations took place in three stages: October 12-14, November 3-4 and November 9.

For the first time, Finland was represented by the envoy, State Councilor J. K. Paasikivi, the Finnish Ambassador to Moscow Aarno Koskinen, Foreign Ministry official Johan Nykopp and Colonel Aladar Paasonen. On the second and third trips, Finance Minister Tanner was authorized to negotiate along with Paasikivi. On the third trip, State Councilor R. Hakkarainen was added.

At these negotiations, the proximity of the border to Leningrad was discussed for the first time. Joseph Stalin remarked: “We can’t do anything about geography, just like you... Since Leningrad cannot be moved, we will have to move the border further away from it.”

The version of the agreement presented by the Soviet side looked like this:

Finland moves the border 90 km from Leningrad.

Finland agrees to lease the Hanko Peninsula to the USSR for a period of 30 years for the construction of a naval base and the deployment of a four-thousand-strong military contingent there for its defense.

The Soviet navy is provided with ports on the Hanko Peninsula in Hanko itself and in Lappohja (Finnish) Russian.

Finland transfers the islands of Gogland, Laavansaari (now Moshchny), Tytjarsaari and Seiskari to the USSR.

The existing Soviet-Finnish non-aggression pact is supplemented by an article on mutual obligations not to join groups and coalitions of states hostile to one side or the other.

Both states disarm their fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus.

The USSR transfers to Finland territory in Karelia with a total area twice as large as the Finnish one received (5,529 km²).

The USSR undertakes not to object to the armament of the Åland Islands by Finland's own forces.

The USSR proposed a territorial exchange in which Finland would receive larger territories in Eastern Karelia in Reboli and Porajärvi.

The USSR made its demands public before the third meeting in Moscow. Germany, which had concluded a non-aggression pact with the USSR, advised the Finns to agree to them. Hermann Goering made it clear to Finnish Foreign Minister Erkko that demands for military bases should be accepted and that there was no point in hoping for German help.

The State Council did not comply with all the demands of the USSR, since public opinion and parliament were against it. Instead, a compromise option was proposed - the Soviet Union was offered the islands of Suursaari (Gogland), Lavensari (Moshchny), Bolshoi Tyuters and Maly Tyuters, Penisaari (Small), Seskar and Koivisto (Berezovy) - a chain of islands that stretches along the main shipping fairway in the Gulf of Finland, and the territories closest to Leningrad in Terijoki and Kuokkala (now Zelenogorsk and Repino), deep into Soviet territory. The Moscow negotiations ended on November 9, 1939.

Previously, a similar proposal was made to the Baltic countries, and they agreed to provide the USSR with military bases on their territory. Finland chose something else: to defend the inviolability of its territory. On October 10, soldiers from the reserve were called up for unscheduled exercises, which meant full mobilization.

Sweden has made its position of neutrality clear, and there have been no serious assurances of assistance from other states.

Since mid-1939, military preparations began in the USSR. In June-July, the Main Military Council of the USSR discussed the operational plan for the attack on Finland, and from mid-September the concentration of units of the Leningrad Military District along the border began.

In Finland, the Mannerheim Line was being completed. On August 7-12, major military exercises were held on the Karelian Isthmus, where they practiced repelling aggression from the USSR. All military attaches were invited, except the Soviet one.

The Finnish government refused to accept Soviet conditions - since, in their opinion, these conditions went far beyond the issue of ensuring the security of Leningrad - while at the same time trying to achieve a Soviet-Finnish trade agreement and Soviet consent to armament of the Åland Islands, the demilitarized status of which was regulated Åland Convention of 1921. In addition, the Finns did not want to give the USSR their only defense against possible Soviet aggression - a strip of fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus, known as the “Mannerheim Line”.

The Finns insisted on their position, although on October 23-24, Stalin somewhat softened his position regarding the territory of the Karelian Isthmus and the size of the proposed garrison of the Hanko Peninsula. But these proposals were also rejected. “Do you want to provoke a conflict?” /IN. Molotov/. Mannerheim, with the support of Paasikivi, continued to insist to his parliament on the need to find a compromise, declaring that the army would hold out on the defensive for no more than two weeks, but to no avail.

On October 31, speaking at a session of the Supreme Council, Molotov outlined the essence of the Soviet proposals, while hinting that the hard line taken by the Finnish side was allegedly caused by the intervention of third-party states. The Finnish public, having first learned about the demands of the Soviet side, categorically opposed any concessions.

Negotiations resumed in Moscow on November 3 immediately reached a dead end. The Soviet side followed with a statement: “We civilians have made no progress. Now the floor will be given to the soldiers.”

However, Stalin made concessions the next day, offering to buy it instead of renting the Hanko Peninsula or even rent some coastal islands from Finland instead. Tanner, then Minister of Finance and part of the Finnish delegation, also believed that these proposals opened the way to reaching an agreement. But the Finnish government stood its ground.

On November 3, 1939, the Soviet newspaper Pravda wrote: “We will throw to hell every game of political gamblers and go our own way, no matter what, we will ensure the security of the USSR, no matter what, breaking down all and every obstacle on the way to the goal.” " On the same day, the troops of the Leningrad Military District and the Baltic Fleet received directives to prepare military operations against Finland. At the last meeting, Stalin, at least outwardly, showed a sincere desire to achieve a compromise on the issue of military bases. But the Finns refused to discuss it, and on November 13 they left for Helsinki.

There was a temporary lull, which the Finnish government considered to confirm the correctness of its position.

On November 26, Pravda published an article “A buffoon at the post of Prime Minister,” which became the signal for the start of an anti-Finnish propaganda campaign. On the same day, there was an artillery shelling of the USSR territory near the village of Maynila. The USSR leadership blamed Finland for this incident. In Soviet information agencies, a new one was added to the terms “White Guard”, “White Pole”, “White emigrant” widely used to name hostile elements - “White Finn”.

On November 28, the denunciation of the Non-Aggression Treaty with Finland was announced, and on November 30, Soviet troops were given the order to go on the offensive.

Causes of the war

According to statements from the Soviet side, the goal of the USSR was to achieve by military means what could not be done peacefully: to ensure the security of Leningrad, which was dangerously close to the border even in the event of war breaking out (in which Finland was ready to provide its territory to the enemies of the USSR as a springboard) would inevitably be captured in the first days (or even hours). In 1931, Leningrad was separated from the region and became a city of republican subordination. Part of the borders of some territories subordinate to the Leningrad City Council was also the border between the USSR and Finland.

“Did the Government and Party do the right thing by declaring war on Finland? This question specifically concerns the Red Army.

Could it be possible to do without war? It seems to me that it was impossible. It was impossible to do without war. The war was necessary, since peace negotiations with Finland did not produce results, and the security of Leningrad had to be ensured unconditionally, because its security is the security of our Fatherland. Not only because Leningrad represents 30-35 percent of the defense industry of our country and, therefore, the fate of our country depends on the integrity and safety of Leningrad, but also because Leningrad is the second capital of our country.

Speech by I.V. Stalin at a meeting of the commanding staff 04/17/1940"

True, the very first demands of the USSR in 1938 did not mention Leningrad and did not require moving the border. Demands for the lease of Hanko, located hundreds of kilometers to the west, increased the security of Leningrad. The only constant in the demands was the following: to obtain military bases on the territory of Finland and near its coast and to oblige it not to ask for help from third countries.

Already during the war, two concepts emerged that are still being debated: one, that the USSR pursued its stated goals (ensuring the security of Leningrad), the second, that the true goal of the USSR was the Sovietization of Finland.

However, today there is a different division of concepts, namely: according to the principle of classifying a military conflict as a separate war or part of the Second World War, which, in turn, represents the USSR as a peace-loving country or as an aggressor and ally of Germany. Moreover, according to these concepts, the Sovietization of Finland was only a cover for the USSR’s preparation for a lightning invasion and the liberation of Europe from German occupation, followed by the Sovietization of all of Europe and the part of African countries occupied by Germany.

M.I. Semiryaga notes that on the eve of the war, both countries had claims against each other. The Finns were afraid of the Stalinist regime and were well aware of the repressions against Soviet Finns and Karelians in the late 1930s, the closure of Finnish schools, and so on. The USSR, in turn, knew about the activities of ultranationalist Finnish organizations that aimed to “return” Soviet Karelia. Moscow was also worried about Finland’s unilateral rapprochement with Western countries and, above all, with Germany, which Finland agreed to, in turn, because it saw the USSR as the main threat to itself. Finnish President P. E. Svinhuvud said in Berlin in 1937 that “the enemy of Russia must always be the friend of Finland.” In a conversation with the German envoy, he said: “The Russian threat to us will always exist. Therefore, it is good for Finland that Germany will be strong.” In the USSR, preparations for a military conflict with Finland began in 1936. On September 17, 1939, the USSR expressed support for Finnish neutrality, but literally on the same days (September 11-14) it began partial mobilization in the Leningrad Military District, which clearly indicated that a forceful solution was being prepared.

According to A. Shubin, before the signing of the Soviet-German Pact, the USSR undoubtedly sought only to ensure the security of Leningrad. Helsinki’s assurances of its neutrality did not satisfy Stalin, since, firstly, he considered the Finnish government to be hostile and ready to join any external aggression against the USSR, and secondly (and this was confirmed by subsequent events), the neutrality of small countries itself did not guarantee that they could not be used as a springboard for attack (as a result of occupation). After the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the demands of the USSR became stricter, and here the question arises of what Stalin was really striving for at this stage. Theoretically, presenting his demands in the fall of 1939, Stalin could plan to carry out in the coming year in Finland: a) Sovietization and inclusion in the USSR (as happened with other Baltic countries in 1940), or b) a radical social reorganization while maintaining formal signs of independence and political pluralism (as was done after the war in the Eastern European so-called “people's democracies”, or in) Stalin could only plan for now to strengthen his positions on the northern flank of a potential theater of military operations, without risking yet interfering in the internal affairs of Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. M. Semiryaga believes that to determine the nature of the war against Finland, “it is not necessary to analyze the negotiations in the fall of 1939. To do this, you just need to know the general concept of the world communist movement of the Comintern and the Stalinist concept - great power claims to those regions that were previously part of the Russian Empire... And the goals were to annex all of Finland as a whole. And there is no point in talking about 35 kilometers to Leningrad, 25 kilometers to Leningrad...” Finnish historian O. Manninen believes that Stalin sought to deal with Finland according to the same scenario, which was ultimately implemented with the Baltic countries. “Stalin’s desire to “resolve issues peacefully” was the desire to peacefully create a socialist regime in Finland. And at the end of November, starting the war, he wanted to achieve the same thing through occupation. “The workers themselves had to decide whether to join the USSR or found their own socialist state.” However, O. Manninen notes, since these plans of Stalin were not formally recorded, this view will always remain in the status of an assumption and not a provable fact. There is also a version that, putting forward claims to border lands and a military base, Stalin, like Hitler in Czechoslovakia, sought to first disarm his neighbor, taking away his fortified territory, and then capture him.

An important argument in favor of the theory of Sovietization of Finland as the goal of the war is the fact that on the second day of the war, a puppet Terijoki government was created on the territory of the USSR, headed by the Finnish communist Otto Kuusinen. On December 2, the Soviet government signed a mutual assistance agreement with the Kuusinen government and, according to Ryti, refused any contact with the legitimate government of Finland led by Risto Ryti.

We can assume with a great deal of confidence: if things at the front had gone according to the operational plan, then this “government” would have arrived in Helsinki with a specific political goal - to unleash a civil war in the country. After all, the appeal of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Finland directly called […] to overthrow the “government of executioners.” Kuusinen’s address to the soldiers of the Finnish People’s Army directly stated that they were entrusted with the honor of hoisting the banner of the Democratic Republic of Finland on the building of the Presidential Palace in Helsinki.

However, in reality, this “government” was used only as a means, although not very effective, for political pressure on the legitimate government of Finland. It fulfilled this modest role, which, in particular, is confirmed by Molotov’s statement to the Swedish envoy in Moscow Assarsson on March 4, 1940 that if the Finnish government continues to object to the transfer of Vyborg and Sortavala to the Soviet Union, then the subsequent Soviet peace terms will be even tougher and the USSR will then agree to a final agreement with the “government” of Kuusinen

M. I. Semiryaga. "Secrets of Stalin's diplomacy. 1941-1945"

A number of other measures were also taken, in particular, among the Soviet documents on the eve of the war there are detailed instructions on the organization of the “Popular Front” in the occupied territories. M. Meltyukhov, on this basis, sees in Soviet actions a desire to Sovietize Finland through an intermediate stage of a left-wing “people's government”. S. Belyaev believes that the decision to Sovietize Finland is not evidence of the original plan to seize Finland, but was made only on the eve of the war due to the failure of attempts to agree on changing the border.

According to A. Shubin, Stalin’s position in the fall of 1939 was situational, and he maneuvered between a minimum program - ensuring the security of Leningrad, and a maximum program - establishing control over Finland. Stalin did not strive directly for the Sovietization of Finland, as well as the Baltic countries, at that moment, since he did not know how the war would end in the West (indeed, in the Baltics decisive steps towards Sovietization were taken only in June 1940, that is, immediately after how the defeat of France took place). Finland's resistance to Soviet demands forced him to resort to a tough military option at an unfavorable moment for him (in winter). Ultimately, he ensured that he at least completed the minimum program.

According to Yu. A. Zhdanov, back in the mid-1930s, Stalin in a private conversation announced a plan (“distant future”) to move the capital to Leningrad, noting its proximity to the border.

Strategic plans of the parties

USSR plan

The plan for the war with Finland provided for the deployment of military operations in three directions. The first of them was on the Karelian Isthmus, where it was planned to conduct a direct breakthrough of the Finnish defense line (which during the war was called the “Mannerheim Line”) in the direction of Vyborg, and north of Lake Ladoga.

The second direction was central Karelia, adjacent to that part of Finland where its latitudinal extent was the smallest. It was planned here, in the Suomussalmi-Raate area, to cut the country's territory in two and enter the coast of the Gulf of Bothnia into the city of Oulu. The selected and well-equipped 44th Division was intended for the parade in the city.

Finally, in order to prevent counterattacks and possible landings by Finland’s Western allies from the Barents Sea, it was planned to conduct military operations in Lapland.

The main direction was considered to be the direction to Vyborg - between Vuoksa and the coast of the Gulf of Finland. Here, after successfully breaking through the defense line (or bypassing the line from the north), the Red Army received the opportunity to wage war on a territory convenient for tanks to operate, without serious long-term fortifications. In such conditions, a significant advantage in manpower and an overwhelming advantage in technology could manifest itself in the most complete way. After breaking through the fortifications, it was planned to launch an attack on Helsinki and achieve a complete cessation of resistance. At the same time, the actions of the Baltic Fleet and access to the Norwegian border in the Arctic were planned. This would ensure a quick capture of Norway in the future and stop the supply of iron ore to Germany.

The plan was based on a misconception about the weakness of the Finnish army and its inability to resist for a long time. The estimate of the number of Finnish troops also turned out to be incorrect: “it was believed that the Finnish army in wartime would have up to 10 infantry divisions and a dozen and a half separate battalions.” In addition, the Soviet command did not have information about the line of fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus, and by the beginning of the war they had only “sketchy intelligence information” about them. Thus, even at the height of the fighting on the Karelian Isthmus, Meretskov doubted that the Finns had long-term structures, although he was reported about the existence of the Poppius (Sj4) and Millionaire (Sj5) pillboxes.

Finland plan

In the direction of the main attack correctly determined by Mannerheim, it was supposed to detain the enemy for as long as possible.

The Finnish defense plan north of Lake Ladoga was to stop the enemy on the line Kitelya (Pitkäranta area) - Lemetti (near Lake Syskujarvi). If necessary, the Russians were to be stopped further north at Lake Suoyarvi in ​​echelon positions. Before the war, a railway line from the Leningrad-Murmansk railway was built here and large reserves of ammunition and fuel were created. Therefore, the Finns were surprised when seven divisions were brought into battle on the northern shore of Ladoga, the number of which was increased to 10.

The Finnish command hoped that all the measures taken would guarantee rapid stabilization of the front on the Karelian Isthmus and active containment on the northern section of the border. It was believed that the Finnish army would be able to independently restrain the enemy for up to six months. According to the strategic plan, it was supposed to wait for help from the West, and then carry out a counter-offensive in Karelia.

Armed forces of opponents

The Finnish army entered the war poorly armed - the list below indicates how many days of the war the supplies available in warehouses lasted:

• cartridges for rifles, machine guns and machine guns - for 2.5 months;
• shells for mortars, field guns and howitzers - for 1 month;
• fuels and lubricants - for 2 months;
• aviation gasoline - for 1 month.

The Finnish military industry was represented by one state-owned cartridge factory, one gunpowder factory and one artillery factory. The overwhelming superiority of the USSR in aviation made it possible to quickly disable or significantly complicate the work of all three.

The Finnish division included: headquarters, three infantry regiments, one light brigade, one field artillery regiment, two engineering companies, one communications company, one engineer company, one quartermaster company.
The Soviet division included: three infantry regiments, one field artillery regiment, one howitzer artillery regiment, one battery of anti-tank guns, one reconnaissance battalion, one communications battalion, one engineering battalion.

The Finnish division was inferior to the Soviet one both in numbers (14,200 versus 17,500) and in firepower, as can be seen from the following comparative table:

The Soviet division was twice as powerful as the Finnish division in terms of the total firepower of machine guns and mortars, and three times as powerful in artillery firepower. The Red Army did not have submachine guns in service, but this was partially compensated by the presence of automatic and semi-automatic rifles. Artillery support for Soviet divisions was carried out at the request of the high command; They had at their disposal numerous tank brigades, as well as an unlimited amount of ammunition.

On the Karelian Isthmus, Finland’s line of defense was the “Mannerheim Line,” consisting of several fortified defensive lines with concrete and wood-earth firing points, communication trenches, and anti-tank barriers. In a state of combat readiness there were 74 old (since 1924) single-embrasure machine-gun bunkers for frontal fire, 48 new and modernized bunkers that had from one to four machine-gun embrasures for flanking fire, 7 artillery bunkers and one machine-gun-artillery caponier. In total, 130 long-term fire structures were located along a line about 140 km long from the shore of the Gulf of Finland to Lake Ladoga. In 1939, the most modern fortifications were created. However, their number did not exceed 10, since their construction was at the limit of the state’s financial capabilities, and the people called them “millionaires” due to their high cost.

The northern coast of the Gulf of Finland was fortified with numerous artillery batteries on the shore and on the coastal islands. A secret agreement was concluded between Finland and Estonia on military cooperation. One of the elements was to coordinate the fire of Finnish and Estonian batteries with the aim of completely blocking the Soviet fleet. This plan did not work: by the beginning of the war, Estonia had provided its territories for military bases of the USSR, which were used by Soviet aviation for air strikes on Finland.

On Lake Ladoga, the Finns also had coastal artillery and warships. The section of the border north of Lake Ladoga was not fortified. Here, preparations were made in advance for partisan actions, for which there were all the conditions: wooded and swampy terrain, where the normal use of military equipment is impossible, narrow dirt roads and ice-covered lakes, where enemy troops are very vulnerable. At the end of the 30s, many airfields were built in Finland to accommodate aircraft from the Western Allies.

Finland began building its navy with coastal defense ironclads (sometimes incorrectly called "battleships"), equipped for maneuvering and fighting in skerries. Their main dimensions: displacement - 4000 tons, speed - 15.5 knots, armament - 4x254 mm, 8x105 mm. The battleships Ilmarinen and Väinämöinen were laid down in August 1929 and commissioned into the Finnish Navy in December 1932.

Cause of war and breakdown of relations

The official reason for the war was the Maynila Incident: on November 26, 1939, the Soviet government addressed the Finnish government with an official note stating that “On November 26, at 15:45, our troops located on the Karelian Isthmus near the border of Finland, near the village of Mainila, were unexpectedly fired upon from Finnish territory by artillery fire. A total of seven gun shots were fired, as a result of which three privates and one junior commander were killed, seven privates and two command personnel were wounded. Soviet troops, having strict orders not to succumb to provocation, refrained from returning fire.". The note was drawn up in moderate terms and demanded the withdrawal of Finnish troops 20-25 km from the border in order to avoid a repetition of incidents. Meanwhile, Finnish border guards hastily conducted an investigation into the incident, especially since the border posts witnessed the shelling. In a response note, the Finns stated that the shelling was recorded by Finnish posts, the shots were fired from the Soviet side, according to the observations and estimates of the Finns, from a distance of about 1.5-2 km to the southeast of the place where the shells fell, that on the border the Finns only have border guards troops and no guns, especially long-range ones, but that Helsinki is ready to begin negotiations on the mutual withdrawal of troops and begin a joint investigation of the incident. The USSR's response note read: “The denial on the part of the Finnish government of the fact of the outrageous artillery shelling of Soviet troops by Finnish troops, which resulted in casualties, cannot be explained otherwise than by a desire to mislead public opinion and mock the victims of the shelling.<…>The refusal of the Finnish government to withdraw troops who carried out a villainous attack on Soviet troops, and the demand for the simultaneous withdrawal of Finnish and Soviet troops, formally based on the principle of equality of arms, exposes the hostile desire of the Finnish government to keep Leningrad under threat.”. The USSR announced its withdrawal from the Non-Aggression Pact with Finland, citing the fact that the concentration of Finnish troops near Leningrad created a threat to the city and was a violation of the pact.

On the evening of November 29, the Finnish envoy in Moscow Aarno Yrjö-Koskinen (Finnish) Aarno Yrjo-Koskinen) was summoned to the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs, where Deputy People's Commissar V.P. Potemkin handed him a new note. It stated that, in view of the current situation, the responsibility for which rests with the Finnish government, the USSR government recognized the need to immediately recall its political and economic representatives from Finland. This meant a break in diplomatic relations. On the same day, the Finns noted an attack on their border guards at Petsamo.

On the morning of November 30, the last step was taken. As stated in the official announcement, “by order of the High Command of the Red Army, in view of new armed provocations on the part of the Finnish military, troops of the Leningrad Military District at 8 o’clock in the morning on November 30 crossed the border of Finland on the Karelian Isthmus and in a number of other areas”. That same day, Soviet aircraft bombed and machine-gunned Helsinki; At the same time, as a result of the pilots' error, mainly residential working areas were damaged. In response to protests from European diplomats, Molotov stated that Soviet planes were dropping bread on Helsinki for the starving population (after which Soviet bombs began to be called “Molotov bread baskets” in Finland). However, there was no official declaration of war.

In Soviet propaganda and then historiography, responsibility for the outbreak of the war was placed on Finland and Western countries: “ The imperialists were able to achieve some temporary success in Finland. At the end of 1939 they managed to provoke Finnish reactionaries to war against the USSR».

Mannerheim, who as commander-in-chief had the most reliable information about the incident near Maynila, reports:

...And now the provocation that I had been expecting since mid-October happened. When I personally visited the Karelian Isthmus on October 26, General Nennonen assured me that the artillery was completely withdrawn behind the line of fortifications, from where not a single battery was able to fire a shot beyond the border... ...We did not have to wait long for the implementation of Molotov’s words spoken at Moscow negotiations: “Now it will be the soldiers’ turn to talk.” On November 26, the Soviet Union organized a provocation now known as “Shots at Maynila”... During the 1941-1944 war, Russian prisoners described in detail how the clumsy provocation was organized...

N. S. Khrushchev says that in late autumn (meaning November 26) he dined in Stalin’s apartment with Molotov and Kuusinen. There was a conversation between the latter about the implementation of the decision already made - presenting Finland with an ultimatum; At the same time, Stalin announced that Kuusinen would lead the new Karelo-Finnish SSR with the annexation of the “liberated” Finnish regions. Stalin believed “that after Finland is presented with ultimatum demands of a territorial nature and if it rejects them, military action will have to begin”, noting: “this thing starts today”. Khrushchev himself believed (in agreement with Stalin's sentiments, as he claims) that "It's enough to tell them loudly<финнам>, if they don’t hear, then fire the cannon once, and the Finns will raise their hands up and agree with the demands.”. Deputy People's Commissar of Defense Marshal G.I. Kulik (artilleryman) was sent to Leningrad in advance to organize a provocation. Khrushchev, Molotov and Kuusinen sat with Stalin for a long time, waiting for the Finns to answer; everyone was sure that Finland would be scared and agree to Soviet conditions.

It should be noted that internal Soviet propaganda did not advertise the Maynila incident, which served as a frankly formal reason: it emphasized that the Soviet Union was making a liberation campaign in Finland to help Finnish workers and peasants overthrow the oppression of the capitalists. A striking example is the song “Accept us, Suomi-beauty”:

We come to help you deal with it,
Pay with interest for the shame.
Welcome us, Suomi - beauty,
In a necklace of clear lakes!

At the same time, the mention in the text of “a low sun autumn"gives rise to the assumption that the text was written ahead of time in anticipation of an earlier start of the war.

War

After the severance of diplomatic relations, the Finnish government began evacuating the population from the border areas, mainly from the Karelian Isthmus and Northern Ladoga region. The bulk of the population gathered between November 29 and December 4.

The beginning of the battles

The first stage of the war is usually considered to be the period from November 30, 1939 to February 10, 1940. At this stage, the Red Army units were advancing in the territory from the Gulf of Finland to the shores of the Barents Sea.

The group of Soviet troops consisted of the 7th, 8th, 9th and 14th armies. The 7th Army advanced on the Karelian Isthmus, the 8th Army north of Lake Ladoga, the 9th Army in northern and central Karelia, and the 14th Army in Petsamo.

The advance of the 7th Army on the Karelian Isthmus was opposed by the Army of the Isthmus (Kannaksen armeija) under the command of Hugo Esterman. For the Soviet troops, these battles became the most difficult and bloody. The Soviet command had only “sketchy intelligence information about the concrete strips of fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus.” As a result, the allocated forces to break through the “Mannerheim Line” turned out to be completely insufficient. The troops turned out to be completely unprepared to overcome the line of bunkers and bunkers. In particular, there was little large-caliber artillery needed to destroy pillboxes. By December 12, units of the 7th Army were able to overcome only the line support zone and reach the front edge of the main defense line, but the planned breakthrough of the line on the move failed due to clearly insufficient forces and poor organization of the offensive. On December 12, the Finnish army carried out one of its most successful operations at Lake Tolvajärvi. Until the end of December, attempts at a breakthrough continued, but were unsuccessful.

The 8th Army advanced 80 km. It was opposed by the IV Army Corps (IV armeijakunta), commanded by Juho Heiskanen. Some of the Soviet troops were surrounded. After heavy fighting they had to retreat.

The advance of the 9th and 14th Armies was opposed by the Northern Finland Task Force (Pohjois-Suomen Ryhmä) under the command of Major General Viljo Einar Tuompo. Its area of ​​responsibility was a 400-mile stretch of territory from Petsamo to Kuhmo. The 9th Army launched an offensive from White Sea Karelia. It penetrated the enemy’s defenses at 35-45 km, but was stopped. The forces of the 14th Army, advancing on the Petsamo area, achieved the greatest success. Interacting with the Northern Fleet, the troops of the 14th Army were able to capture the Rybachy and Sredny peninsulas and the city of Petsamo (now Pechenga). Thus, they closed Finland's access to the Barents Sea.

Some researchers and memoirists try to explain Soviet failures also by the weather: severe frosts (up to −40 °C) and deep snow - up to 2 m. However, both meteorological observation data and other documents refute this: until December 20, 1939, On the Karelian Isthmus, temperatures ranged from +1 to −23.4 °C. Then, until the New Year, the temperature did not drop below −23 °C. Frosts down to −40 °C began in the second half of January, when there was a lull at the front. Moreover, these frosts hindered not only the attackers, but also the defenders, as Mannerheim also wrote about. There was also no deep snow before January 1940. Thus, operational reports of Soviet divisions dated December 15, 1939 indicate a depth of snow cover of 10-15 cm. Moreover, successful offensive operations in February took place in more severe weather conditions.

Significant problems for the Soviet troops were caused by Finland's use of mine-explosive devices, including homemade ones, which were installed not only on the front line, but also in the rear of the Red Army, along troop routes. On January 10, 1940, in the report of the authorized People's Commissariat of Defense, Army Commander II Rank Kovalev, to the People's Commissariat of Defense, it was noted that, along with enemy snipers, the main losses to the infantry were caused by mines. Later, at a meeting of the commanding staff of the Red Army to collect experience in combat operations against Finland on April 14, 1940, the chief of engineers of the North-Western Front, brigade commander A.F. Khrenov, noted that in the front action zone (130 km) the total length of the minefields was 386 km, with In this case, mines were used in combination with non-explosive engineering obstacles.

An unpleasant surprise was also the massive use of Molotov cocktails by the Finns against Soviet tanks, later nicknamed the “Molotov cocktail.” During the 3 months of the war, the Finnish industry produced over half a million bottles.

During the war, Soviet troops were the first to use radar stations (RUS-1) in combat conditions to detect enemy aircraft.

Terijoki government

On December 1, 1939, a message was published in the Pravda newspaper stating that the so-called “People's Government” had been formed in Finland, headed by Otto Kuusinen. In historical literature, Kuusinen’s government is usually called “Terijoki”, since after the outbreak of the war it was located in the village of Terijoki (now the city of Zelenogorsk). This government was officially recognized by the USSR.

On December 2, negotiations took place in Moscow between the government of the Finnish Democratic Republic, headed by Otto Kuusinen, and the Soviet government, headed by V. M. Molotov, at which a Treaty of Mutual Assistance and Friendship was signed. Stalin, Voroshilov and Zhdanov also took part in the negotiations.

The main provisions of this agreement corresponded to the requirements that the USSR had previously presented to Finnish representatives (transfer of territories on the Karelian Isthmus, sale of a number of islands in the Gulf of Finland, lease of Hanko). In exchange, the transfer of significant territories in Soviet Karelia and monetary compensation to Finland was provided. The USSR also pledged to support the Finnish People's Army with weapons, assistance in training specialists, etc. The agreement was concluded for a period of 25 years, and if one year before the expiration of the agreement, neither party declared its termination, it was automatically extended for another 25 years. The agreement came into force from the moment it was signed by the parties, and ratification was planned “as soon as possible in the capital of Finland - the city of Helsinki.”

In the following days, Molotov met with official representatives of Sweden and the United States, at which recognition of the People's Government of Finland was announced.

It was announced that the previous government of Finland had fled and therefore no longer governed the country. The USSR declared at the League of Nations that from now on it would negotiate only with the new government.

Accepted Comrade Molotov on December 4, the Swedish envoy Mr. Winter announced the desire of the so-called “Finnish government” to begin new negotiations on an agreement with the Soviet Union. Comrade Molotov explained to Mr. Winter that the Soviet government did not recognize the so-called “Finnish government”, which had already left Helsinki and headed in an unknown direction, and therefore there could now be no question of any negotiations with this “government”. The Soviet government recognizes only the people's government of the Finnish Democratic Republic, has concluded an agreement of mutual assistance and friendship with it, and this is a reliable basis for the development of peaceful and favorable relations between the USSR and Finland.

The “People's Government” was formed in the USSR from Finnish communists. The leadership of the Soviet Union believed that using in propaganda the fact of the creation of a “people's government” and the conclusion of a mutual assistance agreement with it, indicating friendship and alliance with the USSR while maintaining the independence of Finland, would influence the Finnish population, increasing the disintegration in the army and in the rear.

Finnish People's Army

On November 11, 1939, the formation of the first corps of the “Finnish People's Army” (originally the 106th Mountain Rifle Division), called “Ingria”, began, which was staffed by Finns and Karelians who served in the troops of the Leningrad Military District.

By November 26, there were 13,405 people in the corps, and in February 1940 - 25 thousand military personnel who wore their national uniform (made of khaki cloth and was similar to the Finnish uniform of 1927; claims that it was a captured Polish uniform army, are mistaken - only part of the overcoats were used from it).

This “people’s” army was supposed to replace the occupation units of the Red Army in Finland and become the military support of the “people’s” government. “Finns” in confederate uniforms held a parade in Leningrad. Kuusinen announced that they would be given the honor of hoisting the red flag over the presidential palace in Helsinki. The Directorate of Propaganda and Agitation of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks prepared a draft instruction “Where to begin the political and organizational work of communists (note: the word “ communists“crossed out by Zhdanov) in areas liberated from white power,” which indicated practical measures to create a popular front in occupied Finnish territory. In December 1939, this instruction was used in work with the population of Finnish Karelia, but the withdrawal of Soviet troops led to the curtailment of these activities.

Despite the fact that the Finnish People's Army was not supposed to participate in hostilities, from the end of December 1939, FNA units began to be widely used to carry out combat missions. Throughout January 1940, scouts from the 5th and 6th regiments of the 3rd SD FNA carried out special sabotage missions in the 8th Army sector: they destroyed ammunition depots in the rear of Finnish troops, blew up railway bridges, and mined roads. FNA units took part in the battles for Lunkulansaari and the capture of Vyborg.

When it became clear that the war was dragging on and the Finnish people did not support the new government, Kuusinen's government faded into the shadows and was no longer mentioned in the official press. When Soviet-Finnish consultations on concluding peace began in January, it was no longer mentioned. Since January 25, the government of the USSR recognizes the government in Helsinki as the legitimate government of Finland.

Foreign military assistance to Finland

Soon after the outbreak of hostilities, detachments and groups of volunteers from around the world began to arrive in Finland. In total, over 11 thousand volunteers arrived in Finland, including 8 thousand from Sweden (“Swedish Volunteer Corps (English) Russian”), 1 thousand from Norway, 600 from Denmark, 400 from Hungary (“Detachment Sisu"), 300 from the USA, as well as citizens of Great Britain, Estonia and a number of other countries. A Finnish source puts the figure at 12 thousand foreigners who arrived in Finland to participate in the war.

• Among those who fought on the side of Finland were Russian White emigrants: in January 1940, B. Bazhanov and several other Russian White emigrants from the Russian All-Military Union (ROVS) arrived in Finland; after a meeting on January 15, 1940 with Mannerheim, they received permission to form anti-Soviet armed detachments from captured Red Army soldiers. Subsequently, several small “Russian People’s Detachments” were created from the prisoners under the command of six White emigrant officers from the EMRO. Only one of these detachments - 30 former prisoners of war under the command of "Staff Captain K." for ten days he was on the front line and managed to take part in the hostilities.
• Jewish refugees who arrived from a number of European countries joined the Finnish army.

Great Britain supplied Finland with 75 aircraft (24 Blenheim bombers, 30 Gladiator fighters, 11 Hurricane fighters and 11 Lysander reconnaissance aircraft), 114 field guns, 200 anti-tank guns, 124 automatic small arms, 185 thousand artillery pieces shells, 17,700 aerial bombs, 10 thousand anti-tank mines and 70 Boyce anti-tank rifles model 1937.

France decided to supply Finland with 179 aircraft (transfer 49 fighters free of charge and sell another 130 aircraft of various types), but in fact during the war 30 M.S.406C1 fighters were transferred free of charge and six more Caudron C.714 arrived after the end of hostilities and in the war did not participate; Finland also received 160 field guns, 500 machine guns, 795 thousand artillery shells, 200 thousand hand grenades, 20 million rounds of ammunition, 400 sea mines and several thousand sets of ammunition. Also, France became the first country to officially allow the registration of volunteers to participate in the Finnish war.

Sweden supplied Finland with 29 aircraft, 112 field guns, 85 anti-tank guns, 104 anti-aircraft guns, 500 automatic small arms, 80 thousand rifles, 30 thousand artillery shells, 50 million rounds of ammunition, as well as other military equipment and raw materials. In addition, the Swedish government allowed the country's "Finland's Cause - Our Cause" campaign to collect donations for Finland, and the Swedish Bank provided a loan to Finland.

The Danish government sold Finland about 30 pieces of 20-mm anti-tank guns and shells for them (at the same time, in order to avoid accusations of violating neutrality, the order was called “Swedish”); sent a medical convoy and skilled workers to Finland, and also authorized a campaign to raise funds for Finland.

Italy sent 35 Fiat G.50 fighters to Finland, but five of the aircraft were destroyed during their transportation and development by personnel. The Italians also transferred to Finland 94.5 thousand Mannlicher-Carcano rifles mod. 1938, 1500 Beretta pistols mod. 1915 and 60 Beretta M1934 pistols.

The Union of South Africa donated 22 Gloster Gauntlet II fighters to Finland.

A representative of the US government made a statement that the entry of American citizens into the Finnish army does not contradict the US neutrality law, a group of American pilots was sent to Helsinki, and in January 1940 the US Congress approved the sale of 10 thousand rifles to Finland. Also, the United States sold Finland 44 Brewster F2A Buffalo fighters, but they arrived too late and did not have time to take part in hostilities.

Belgium supplied Finland with 171 MP.28-II submachine guns, and in February 1940 - 56 P-08 Parabellum pistols.

Italian Foreign Minister G. Ciano in his diary mentions assistance to Finland from the Third Reich: in December 1939, the Finnish envoy to Italy reported that Germany “unofficially” sent to Finland a batch of captured weapons captured during the Polish campaign. In addition, on December 21, 1939, Germany entered into an agreement with Sweden in which it promised to supply Sweden with the same amount of weapons as it would transfer to Finland from its own reserves. The agreement caused an increase in the volume of military assistance from Sweden to Finland.

In total, during the war, 350 aircraft, 500 guns, more than 6 thousand machine guns, about 100 thousand rifles and other weapons, as well as 650 thousand hand grenades, 2.5 million shells and 160 million cartridges were delivered to Finland.

Fighting in December - January

The course of hostilities revealed serious gaps in the organization of command and supply of the Red Army troops, poor preparedness of the command staff, and the lack of specific skills among the troops necessary to wage war in winter in Finland. By the end of December it became clear that fruitless attempts to continue the offensive would lead nowhere. There was relative calm at the front. Throughout January and early February, troops were strengthened, material supplies were replenished, and units and formations were reorganized. Units of skiers were created, methods of overcoming mined areas and obstacles, methods of combating defensive structures were developed, and personnel were trained. To storm the “Mannerheim Line”, the North-Western Front was created under the command of Army Commander 1st Rank Timoshenko and member of the Leningrad Military Council Zhdanov. The front included the 7th and 13th armies. In the border areas, a huge amount of work was carried out on the hasty construction and re-equipment of communication routes for uninterrupted supply of the active army. The total number of personnel was increased to 760.5 thousand people.

To destroy the fortifications on the Mannerheim Line, the first echelon divisions were assigned destruction artillery groups (AD) consisting of from one to six divisions in the main directions. In total, these groups had 14 divisions, which had 81 guns with calibers of 203, 234, 280 m.

During this period, the Finnish side also continued to replenish troops and supply them with weapons coming from the allies. At the same time, fighting continued in Karelia. The formations of the 8th and 9th armies, operating along roads in continuous forests, suffered heavy losses. If in some places the achieved lines were held, in others the troops retreated, in some places even to the border line. The Finns widely used guerrilla warfare tactics: small autonomous detachments of skiers armed with machine guns attacked troops moving along the roads, mainly in the dark, and after the attacks they went into the forest where bases were established. Snipers caused heavy losses. According to the strong opinion of the Red Army soldiers (however, refuted by many sources, including Finnish ones), the greatest danger was posed by “cuckoo” snipers who fired from the trees. The Red Army formations that broke through were constantly surrounded and forced their way back, often abandoning their equipment and weapons.

The Battle of Suomussalmi became widely known in Finland and abroad. The village of Suomussalmi was occupied on December 7 by the forces of the Soviet 163rd Infantry Division of the 9th Army, which was given the responsible task of striking Oulu, reaching the Gulf of Bothnia and, as a result, cutting Finland in half. However, the division was subsequently surrounded by (smaller) Finnish forces and cut off from supplies. The 44th Infantry Division was sent to help her, which, however, was blocked on the road to Suomussalmi, in a defile between two lakes near the village of Raate by the forces of two companies of the 27th Finnish regiment (350 people). Without waiting for its approach, the 163rd Division at the end of December, under constant attacks from the Finns, was forced to break out of the encirclement, losing 30% of its personnel and most of its equipment and heavy weapons. After which the Finns transferred the released forces to encircle and liquidate the 44th Division, which by January 8 was completely destroyed in the battle on the Raat Road. Almost the entire division was killed or captured, and only a small part of the military personnel managed to escape from the encirclement, abandoning all equipment and convoys (the Finns received 37 tanks, 20 armored vehicles, 350 machine guns, 97 guns (including 17 howitzers), several thousand rifles, 160 vehicles , all radio stations). The Finns won this double victory with forces several times smaller than the enemy (11 thousand, according to other sources - 17 thousand) people with 11 guns versus 45-55 thousand with 335 guns, more than 100 tanks and 50 armored vehicles. The command of both divisions was placed under tribunal. The commander and commissar of the 163rd division were removed from command, one regimental commander was shot; Before the formation of their division, the command of the 44th division (brigade commander A.I. Vinogradov, regimental commissar Pakhomenko and chief of staff Volkov) was shot.

The victory at Suomussalmi had enormous moral significance for the Finns; Strategically, it buried plans for a breakthrough to the Gulf of Bothnia, which were extremely dangerous for the Finns, and so paralyzed Soviet troops in this area that they did not take active action until the very end of the war.

At the same time, south of Suomussalmi, in the Kuhmo area, the Soviet 54th Infantry Division was surrounded. The winner of Suomussalmi, Colonel Hjalmar Siilsavuo, was promoted to major general, but he was never able to liquidate the division, which remained surrounded until the end of the war. The 168th Rifle Division, which was advancing on Sortavala, was surrounded at Lake Ladoga and was also surrounded until the end of the war. There, in South Lemetti, at the end of December and beginning of January, the 18th Infantry Division of General Kondrashov, along with the 34th Tank Brigade of Brigade Commander Kondratyev, was surrounded. Already at the end of the war, on February 28, they tried to break out of the encirclement, but upon exiting they were defeated in the so-called “valley of death” near the city of Pitkyaranta, where one of the two exiting columns was completely destroyed. As a result, out of 15,000 people, 1,237 people left the encirclement, half of them wounded and frostbitten. Brigade commander Kondratyev shot himself, Kondrashov managed to get out, but was soon shot, and the division was disbanded due to the loss of the banner. The number of deaths in the “valley of death” amounted to 10% of the total number of deaths in the entire Soviet-Finnish war. These episodes were vivid manifestations of the Finnish tactics, called mottitaktiikka, the tactics of motti - “pincers” (literally motti - a pile of firewood that is placed in the forest in groups, but at a certain distance from each other). Taking advantage of their advantage in mobility, detachments of Finnish skiers blocked roads clogged with sprawling Soviet columns, cut off the advancing groups and then wore them down with unexpected attacks from all sides, trying to destroy them. At the same time, the surrounded groups, unable, unlike the Finns, to fight off roads, usually huddled together and occupied a passive all-round defense, making no attempt to actively resist the attacks of Finnish partisan detachments. Their complete destruction was made difficult for the Finns only by the lack of mortars and heavy weapons in general.

On the Karelian Isthmus the front stabilized by December 26. Soviet troops began careful preparations for breaking through the main fortifications of the Mannerheim Line and conducted reconnaissance of the defense line. At this time, the Finns unsuccessfully tried to disrupt the preparations for a new offensive with counterattacks. So, on December 28, the Finns attacked the central units of the 7th Army, but were repulsed with heavy losses.

On January 3, 1940, off the northern tip of the island of Gotland (Sweden), with 50 crew members, the Soviet submarine S-2 sank (probably hit a mine) under the command of Lieutenant Commander I. A. Sokolov. S-2 was the only RKKF ship lost by the USSR.

Based on the Directive of the Headquarters of the Main Military Council of the Red Army No. 01447 of January 30, 1940, the entire remaining Finnish population was subject to eviction from the territory occupied by Soviet troops. By the end of February, 2080 people were evicted from the areas of Finland occupied by the Red Army in the combat zone of the 8th, 9th, 15th armies, of which: men - 402, women - 583, children under 16 years of age - 1095. All resettled Finnish citizens were placed in three villages of the Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic: in Interposelok, Pryazhinsky district, in the village of Kovgora-Goimae, Kondopozhsky district, in the village of Kintezma, Kalevalsky district. They lived in barracks and were required to work in the forest at logging sites. They were allowed to return to Finland only in June 1940, after the end of the war.

February offensive of the Red Army

On February 1, 1940, the Red Army, having brought up reinforcements, resumed its offensive on the Karelian Isthmus across the entire width of the front of the 2nd Army Corps. The main blow was delivered in the direction of Summa. Artillery preparation also began. From that day on, every day for several days the troops of the North-Western Front under the command of S. Timoshenko rained down 12 thousand shells on the fortifications of the Mannerheim Line. Five divisions of the 7th and 13th armies carried out a private offensive, but were unable to achieve success.

On February 6, the attack on the Summa strip began. In the following days, the offensive front expanded both to the west and to the east.

On February 9, the commander of the troops of the North-Western Front, Army Commander of the first rank S. Timoshenko, sent directive No. 04606 to the troops, according to which, on February 11, after powerful artillery preparation, the troops of the North-Western Front were to go on the offensive.

On February 11, after ten days of artillery preparation, the general offensive of the Red Army began. The main forces were concentrated on the Karelian Isthmus. In this offensive, ships of the Baltic Fleet and the Ladoga Military Flotilla, created in October 1939, acted together with the ground units of the North-Western Front.

Since the attacks of Soviet troops on the Summa region were unsuccessful, the main attack was moved east, to the direction of Lyakhde. At this point, the defending side suffered huge losses from artillery bombardment and Soviet troops managed to break through the defense.

During three days of intense battles, the troops of the 7th Army broke through the first line of defense of the Mannerheim Line, introduced tank formations into the breakthrough, which began to develop their success. By February 17, units of the Finnish army were withdrawn to the second line of defense, as there was a threat of encirclement.

On February 18, the Finns closed the Saimaa Canal with the Kivikoski dam, and the next day the water began to rise in Kärstilänjärvi.

By February 21, the 7th Army reached the second defense line, and the 13th Army reached the main defense line north of Muolaa. By February 24, units of the 7th Army, interacting with coastal detachments of sailors of the Baltic Fleet, captured several coastal islands. On February 28, both armies of the Northwestern Front began an offensive in the zone from Lake Vuoksa to the Vyborg Bay. Seeing the impossibility of stopping the offensive, the Finnish troops retreated.

At the final stage of the operation, the 13th Army advanced in the direction of Antrea (modern Kamennogorsk), the 7th Army - towards Vyborg. The Finns put up fierce resistance, but were forced to retreat.

England and France: plans for military operations against the USSR

Great Britain provided assistance to Finland from the very beginning. On the one hand, the British government tried to avoid turning the USSR into an enemy, on the other hand, it was widely believed that because of the conflict in the Balkans with the USSR, “we would have to fight one way or another.” The Finnish representative in London, Georg Achates Gripenberg, approached Halifax on December 1, 1939, asking for permission to ship war materials to Finland, provided they were not re-exported to Nazi Germany (with which Britain was at war). The head of the Northern Department, Laurence Collier, believed that British and German goals in Finland could be compatible and wanted to involve Germany and Italy in the war against the USSR, while opposing, however, the proposed Finland used the Polish fleet (then under British control) to destroy Soviet ships. Thomas Snow (English) Thomas Snow), the British representative in Helsinki, continued to support the idea of ​​​​an anti-Soviet alliance (with Italy and Japan), which he had expressed before the war.

Amid government disagreements, the British Army began supplying weapons, including artillery and tanks, in December 1939 (while Germany refrained from supplying heavy weapons to Finland).

When Finland requested bombers to attack Moscow and Leningrad and to destroy the railway to Murmansk, the latter idea received support from Fitzroy MacLean in the Northern Department: helping the Finns destroy the road would allow Britain to "avoid the same operation" later, independently and in less favorable conditions.” McLean's superiors, Collier and Cadogan, agreed with McLean's reasoning and requested an additional supply of Blenheim aircraft to Finland.

According to Craig Gerrard, plans for intervention in the war against the USSR, then emerging in Great Britain, illustrated the ease with which British politicians forgot about the war they were currently waging with Germany. By the beginning of 1940, the prevailing view in the Northern Department was that the use of force against the USSR was inevitable. Collier, as before, continued to insist that appeasement of the aggressors was wrong; Now the enemy, unlike his previous position, was not Germany, but the USSR. Gerrard explains the position of MacLean and Collier not on ideological, but on humanitarian grounds.

Soviet ambassadors in London and Paris reported that in “circles close to the government” there was a desire to support Finland in order to reconcile with Germany and send Hitler to the East. Nick Smart believes, however, that at a conscious level the arguments for intervention did not come from an attempt to exchange one war for another, but from the assumption that the plans of Germany and the USSR were closely linked.

From the French point of view, the anti-Soviet orientation also made sense due to the collapse of plans to prevent the strengthening of Germany through a blockade. Soviet supplies of raw materials meant that the German economy continued to grow, and the French began to realize that after some time, as a result of this growth, winning the war against Germany would become impossible. In such a situation, although moving the war to Scandinavia posed a certain risk, inaction was an even worse alternative. The Chief of the French General Staff, Gamelin, ordered the planning of an operation against the USSR with the aim of waging war outside French territory; plans were soon prepared.

Great Britain did not support some French plans: for example, an attack on oil fields in Baku, an attack on Petsamo using Polish troops (the Polish government in exile in London was formally at war with the USSR). However, Britain was also moving closer to opening a second front against the USSR.

On 5 February 1940, at a joint war council (at which Churchill attended but did not speak), it was decided to seek Norwegian and Swedish consent to a British-led operation in which an expeditionary force would land in Norway and move east.

French plans, as Finland's situation worsened, became more and more one-sided.

On March 2, 1940, Daladier announced his readiness to send 50,000 French soldiers and 100 bombers to Finland for the war against the USSR. The British government was not informed in advance of Daladier's statement, but agreed to send 50 British bombers to Finland. A coordination meeting was scheduled for March 12, 1940, but due to the end of the war the plans remained unrealized.

The end of the war and the conclusion of peace

By March 1940, the Finnish government realized that, despite demands for continued resistance, Finland would not receive any military assistance other than volunteers and weapons from the allies. After breaking through the Mannerheim Line, Finland was obviously unable to hold back the advance of the Red Army. There was a real threat of a complete takeover of the country, which would be followed by either joining the USSR or a change of government to a pro-Soviet one.

Therefore, the Finnish government turned to the USSR with a proposal to begin peace negotiations. On March 7, a Finnish delegation arrived in Moscow, and on March 12, a peace treaty was concluded, according to which hostilities ceased at 12 o'clock on March 13, 1940. Despite the fact that Vyborg, according to the agreement, was transferred to the USSR, Soviet troops launched an assault on the city on the morning of March 13.

According to J. Roberts, Stalin's conclusion of peace on relatively moderate terms could have been caused by the awareness of the fact that an attempt to forcefully Sovietize Finland would have encountered massive resistance from the Finnish population and the danger of Anglo-French intervention to help the Finns. As a result, the Soviet Union risked being drawn into a war against the Western powers on the German side.

For participation in the Finnish war, the title of Hero of the Soviet Union was awarded to 412 military personnel, over 50 thousand were awarded orders and medals.

Results of the war

All officially declared territorial claims of the USSR were satisfied. According to Stalin, " the war ended after 3 months and 12 days, only because our army did a good job, because our political boom set for Finland turned out to be correct».

The USSR gained full control over the waters of Lake Ladoga and secured Murmansk, which was located near Finnish territory (Rybachy Peninsula).

In addition, according to the peace treaty, Finland assumed the obligation to build a railway on its territory connecting the Kola Peninsula through Alakurtti with the Gulf of Bothnia (Tornio). But this road was never built.

On October 11, 1940, the Agreement between the USSR and Finland on the Åland Islands was signed in Moscow, according to which the USSR had the right to place its consulate on the islands, and the archipelago was declared a demilitarized zone.

For starting the war on December 14, 1939, the USSR was expelled from the League of Nations. The immediate reason for the expulsion was the mass protests of the international community over the systematic bombing of civilian targets by Soviet aircraft, including the use of incendiary bombs. US President Roosevelt also joined the protests.

US President Roosevelt declared a “moral embargo” on the Soviet Union in December. On March 29, 1940, Molotov stated in the Supreme Council that Soviet imports from the United States had even increased compared to the previous year, despite the obstacles put in place by the American authorities. In particular, the Soviet side complained about obstacles to Soviet engineers gaining access to aircraft factories. In addition, under various trade agreements in the period 1939-1941. The Soviet Union received 6,430 machine tools from Germany worth 85.4 million marks, which compensated for the decrease in equipment supplies from the United States.

Another negative result for the USSR was the formation among the leadership of a number of countries of the idea of ​​​​the weakness of the Red Army. Information about the course, circumstances and results (a significant excess of Soviet losses over Finnish ones) of the Winter War strengthened the position of supporters of the war against the USSR in Germany. At the beginning of January 1940, the German envoy in Helsinki Blucher presented a memorandum to the Foreign Ministry with the following assessments: despite superiority in manpower and equipment, the Red Army suffered one defeat after another, left thousands of people in captivity, lost hundreds of guns, tanks, aircraft and decisively failed to conquer the territory. In this regard, German ideas about Bolshevik Russia should be reconsidered. The Germans proceeded from false premises when they believed that Russia was a first-class military factor. But in reality, the Red Army has so many shortcomings that it cannot cope even with a small country. Russia in reality does not pose a threat to such a great power as Germany, the rear in the East is safe, and therefore it will be possible to speak with the gentlemen in the Kremlin in a completely different language than it was in August - September 1939. For his part, Hitler, based on the results Winter War, called the USSR a colossus with feet of clay.

W. Churchill testifies that "failure of Soviet troops" caused in public opinion in England "contempt"; “In British circles many congratulated themselves on the fact that we were not very zealous in trying to win the Soviets to our side<во время переговоров лета 1939 г.>, and were proud of their foresight. People too hastily concluded that the purge destroyed the Russian army and that all this confirmed the organic rottenness and decline of the Russian state and social system.”.

On the other hand, the Soviet Union gained experience in waging war in winter, in wooded and swampy areas, experience in breaking through long-term fortifications and fighting an enemy using guerrilla warfare tactics. In clashes with Finnish troops equipped with the Suomi submachine gun, the importance of submachine guns, previously removed from service, was clarified: the production of PPD was hastily restored and technical specifications were given for the creation of a new submachine gun system, which resulted in the appearance of the PPSh.

Germany was bound by a treaty with the USSR and could not publicly support Finland, which it made clear even before the outbreak of hostilities. The situation changed after major defeats of the Red Army. In February 1940, Toivo Kivimäki (later ambassador) was sent to Berlin to test out possible changes. Relations were initially cool, but changed dramatically when Kivimäki announced Finland's intention to accept help from the Western Allies. On February 22, the Finnish envoy was urgently arranged for a meeting with Hermann Goering, the number two in the Reich. According to the memoirs of R. Nordström at the end of the 1940s, Goering unofficially promised Kivimäki that Germany would attack the USSR in the future: “ Remember that you should make peace on any terms. I guarantee that when in a short time we go to war against Russia, you will get everything back with interest" Kivimäki immediately reported this to Helsinki.

The results of the Soviet-Finnish war became one of the factors that determined the rapprochement between Finland and Germany; in addition, they could in a certain way influence the leadership of the Reich regarding plans for an attack on the USSR. For Finland, rapprochement with Germany became a means of containing the growing political pressure from the USSR. Finland's participation in World War II on the side of the Axis powers was called the "Continuation War" in Finnish historiography, in order to show the relationship with the Winter War.

Territorial changes

1. Karelian Isthmus and Western Karelia. As a result of the loss of the Karelian Isthmus, Finland lost its existing defense system and began to rapidly build fortifications along the new border (Salpa Line), thereby moving the border from Leningrad from 18 to 150 km.
2. Part of Lapland (Old Salla).
3. Part of the Rybachy and Sredny peninsulas (the Petsamo (Pechenga) region, occupied by the Red Army during the war, was returned to Finland).
4. Islands in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland (Gogland Island).
5. Rent of the Hanko (Gangut) peninsula for 30 years.

In total, as a result of the Soviet-Finnish War, the Soviet Union acquired about 40 thousand km² of Finnish territories. Finland reoccupied these territories in 1941, in the early stages of the Great Patriotic War, and in 1944 they again ceded to the USSR (see Soviet-Finnish War (1941-1944)).

Finnish losses

Military

According to 1991 data:

• killed - ok. 26 thousand people (according to Soviet data in 1940 - 85 thousand people);
• wounded - 40 thousand people. (according to Soviet data in 1940 - 250 thousand people);
• prisoners - 1000 people.

Thus, the total losses in the Finnish troops during the war amounted to 67 thousand people. Brief information about each of the victims on the Finnish side was published in a number of Finnish publications.

Modern information about the circumstances of the death of Finnish military personnel:

• 16,725 killed in action, remains evacuated;
• 3,433 killed in action, remains not evacuated;
• 3671 died in hospitals from wounds;
• 715 died from non-combat causes (including diseases);
• 28 died in captivity;
• 1,727 missing and declared dead;
• The cause of death for 363 military personnel is unknown.

In total, 26,662 Finnish military personnel were killed.

Civil

According to official Finnish data, during air raids and bombings of Finnish cities (including Helsinki), 956 people were killed, 540 were seriously and 1,300 slightly injured, 256 stone and about 1,800 wooden buildings were destroyed.

Losses of foreign volunteers

During the war, the Swedish Volunteer Corps lost 33 people killed and 185 wounded and frostbite (with frostbite making up the vast majority - about 140 people).

Two Danes were killed - pilots who fought in the LLv-24 fighter air group, and one Italian who fought as part of the LLv-26.

USSR losses

Monument to those who fell in the Soviet-Finnish war (St. Petersburg, near the Military Medical Academy)

The first official figures for Soviet casualties in the war were published at a session of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on March 26, 1940: 48,475 dead and 158,863 wounded, sick and frostbitten.

According to reports from the troops on March 15, 1940:

• wounded, sick, frostbitten - 248,090;
• killed and died during the sanitary evacuation stages - 65,384;
• died in hospitals - 15,921;
• missing - 14,043;
• total irrecoverable losses - 95,348.

Name lists

According to the lists of names compiled in 1949-1951 by the Main Personnel Directorate of the USSR Ministry of Defense and the General Staff of the Ground Forces, the losses of the Red Army in the war were as follows:

• died and died from wounds during the sanitary evacuation stages - 71,214;
• died in hospitals from wounds and illnesses - 16,292;
• missing - 39,369.

In total, according to these lists, irretrievable losses amounted to 126,875 military personnel.

Other loss estimates

In the period from 1990 to 1995, new, often contradictory data about the losses of both the Soviet and Finnish armies appeared in Russian historical literature and in journal publications, and the general trend of these publications was an increasing number of Soviet losses and a decrease in Finnish ones from 1990 to 1995. So, for example, in the articles of M. I. Semiryagi (1989) the number of killed Soviet soldiers was indicated at 53.5 thousand, in the articles of A. M. Noskov, a year later - 72.5 thousand, and in the articles of P. A . According to data from Soviet military archives and hospitals, sanitary losses amounted to (by name) 264,908 people. It is estimated that about 22 percent of the losses were due to frostbite.

Losses in the Soviet-Finnish war of 1939-1940. based on the two-volume “History of Russia. XX century":

"Karelian Question"

After the war, local Finnish authorities and provincial organizations of the Karelian Union, created to protect the rights and interests of the evacuated residents of Karelia, tried to find a solution to the issue of returning lost territories. During the Cold War, Finnish President Urho Kekkonen repeatedly negotiated with the Soviet leadership, but these negotiations were unsuccessful. The Finnish side did not openly demand the return of these territories. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the issue of transferring territories to Finland was raised again.

In matters relating to the return of ceded territories, the Karelian Union acts together with and through the foreign policy leadership of Finland. In accordance with the “Karelia” program adopted in 2005 at the congress of the Karelian Union, the Karelian Union seeks to ensure that the political leadership of Finland actively monitors the situation in Russia and begins negotiations with Russia on the issue of the return of the ceded territories of Karelia as soon as a real basis arises and both sides will be ready for this.

Propaganda during the war

At the beginning of the war, the tone of the Soviet press was bravura - the Red Army looked ideal and victorious, while the Finns were portrayed as a frivolous enemy. On December 2 (2 days after the start of the war), Leningradskaya Pravda will write:

You can’t help but admire the valiant soldiers of the Red Army, armed with the latest sniper rifles and shiny automatic light machine guns. The armies of two worlds collided. The Red Army is the most peace-loving, the most heroic, powerful, equipped with advanced technology, and the army of the corrupt Finnish government, which the capitalists force to rattle their sabers. And the weapon, let’s be honest, is old and worn. There is not enough gunpowder for more.

However, within a month the tone of the Soviet press changed. They began to talk about the power of the “Mannerheim Line”, difficult terrain and frost - the Red Army, losing tens of thousands killed and frostbitten, was stuck in the Finnish forests. Starting with Molotov’s report on March 29, 1940, the myth of the impregnable “Mannerheim Line”, similar to the “Maginot Line” and the “Siegfried Line”, begins to live. which have not yet been crushed by any army. Later Anastas Mikoyan wrote: “ Stalin, an intelligent, capable man, in order to justify the failures during the war with Finland, invented the reason that we “suddenly” discovered a well-equipped Mannerheim line. A special film was released showing these structures to justify that it was difficult to fight against such a line and quickly win a victory.».

If Finnish propaganda portrayed the war as the defense of the homeland from cruel and merciless invaders, combining communist terrorism with traditional Russian great power (for example, in the song “No, Molotov!” the head of the Soviet government is compared with the tsarist governor-general of Finland Nikolai Bobrikov, known for his Russification policy and fight against autonomy), then Soviet Agitprop presented the war as a struggle against the oppressors of the Finnish people for the sake of the latter’s freedom. The term White Finns, used to designate the enemy, was intended to emphasize not the interstate or interethnic, but the class nature of the confrontation. “Your homeland has been taken away more than once - we are coming to return it”, says the song "Receive us, Suomi beauty", in an attempt to fend off accusations of taking over Finland. The order for the Leningrad Military District troops dated November 29, signed by Meretskov and Zhdanov, states:

We are going to Finland not as conquerors, but as friends and liberators of the Finnish people from the oppression of landowners and capitalists.

We are not going against the Finnish people, but against the government of Kajander-Erkno, which oppresses the Finnish people and provoked a war with the USSR.
We respect the freedom and independence of Finland, gained by the Finnish people as a result of the October Revolution.

Mannerheim Line - alternative

Throughout the war, both Soviet and Finnish propaganda significantly exaggerated the significance of the Mannerheim Line. The first is to justify the long delay in the offensive, and the second is to strengthen the morale of the army and the population. Accordingly, the myth of the “incredibly strongly fortified” “Mannerheim Line” was firmly entrenched in Soviet history and penetrated into some Western sources of information, which is not surprising, given the glorification of the line by the Finnish side literally - in song Mannerheimin linjalla(“On the Mannerheim Line”). The Belgian General Badu, a technical adviser on the construction of fortifications, a participant in the construction of the Maginot Line, stated:

Nowhere in the world were natural conditions as favorable for the construction of fortified lines as in Karelia. At this narrow place between two bodies of water - Lake Ladoga and the Gulf of Finland - there are impenetrable forests and huge rocks. The famous “Mannerheim Line” was built from wood and granite, and where necessary from concrete. The anti-tank obstacles made in granite give the Mannerheim Line its greatest strength. Even twenty-five ton tanks cannot overcome them. Using explosions, the Finns built machine-gun and artillery nests in the granite, which were resistant to the most powerful bombs. Where there was a shortage of granite, the Finns did not spare concrete.

According to the Russian historian A. Isaev, “in reality, the Mannerheim Line was far from the best examples of European fortification. The vast majority of long-term Finnish structures were one-story, partially buried reinforced concrete structures in the form of a bunker, divided into several rooms by internal partitions with armored doors. Three bunkers of the “million-dollar” type had two levels, another three bunkers had three levels. Let me emphasize, precisely the level. That is, their combat casemates and shelters were located at different levels relative to the surface, casemates slightly buried in the ground with embrasures and completely buried, connecting their galleries with the barracks. There were negligibly few buildings with what could be called floors.” It was much weaker than the fortifications of the Molotov Line, not to mention the Maginot Line with multi-story caponiers equipped with their own power plants, kitchens, rest rooms and all amenities, with underground galleries connecting pillboxes, and even underground narrow-gauge railways. Along with the famous gouges made of granite boulders, the Finns used gouges made of low-quality concrete, designed for outdated Renault tanks and which turned out to be weak against the guns of new Soviet technology. In fact, the Mannerheim Line consisted mainly of field fortifications. The bunkers located along the line were small, located at a considerable distance from each other, and rarely had cannon armament.

As O. Mannien notes, the Finns had enough resources to build only 101 concrete bunkers (from low-quality concrete), and they used less concrete than the building of the Helsinki Opera House; the rest of the fortifications of the Mannerheim line were wood and earthen (for comparison: the Maginot line had 5,800 concrete fortifications, including multi-story bunkers).

Mannerheim himself wrote:

... Even during the war, the Russians floated the myth of the “Mannerheim Line.” It was argued that our defense on the Karelian Isthmus relied on an unusually strong defensive rampart built with the latest technology, which can be compared with the Maginot and Siegfried lines and which no army has ever broken through. The Russian breakthrough was “a feat unparalleled in the history of all wars”... All this is nonsense; in reality, the state of affairs looks completely different... There was a defensive line, of course, but it was formed only by rare long-term machine-gun nests and two dozen new pillboxes built at my suggestion, between which trenches were laid. Yes, the defensive line existed, but it lacked depth. The people called this position the “Mannerheim Line”. Its strength was the result of the stamina and courage of our soldiers, and not the result of the strength of the structures.

- Mannerheim, K. G. Memoirs. - M.: VAGRIUS, 1999. - P. 319-320. - ISBN 5-264-00049-2.

Perpetuation of memory

Monuments

• “Cross of Sorrow” is a memorial to Soviet and Finnish soldiers who fell in the Soviet-Finnish War. Opened June 27, 2000. Located in the Pitkyaranta region of the Republic of Karelia.
• The Kollasjärvi Memorial is a memorial to fallen Soviet and Finnish soldiers. Located in the Suoyarvi region of the Republic of Karelia.

Museums

• School Museum “The Unknown War” - opened on November 20, 2013 at the municipal educational institution “Secondary School No. 34” in the city of Petrozavodsk.
• The “Military Museum of the Karelian Isthmus” was opened in Vyborg by historian Bair Irincheev.

Fiction about war

• Finnish wartime song “No, Molotov!” (mp3, with Russian translation)
• “Receive us, Suomi beauty” (mp3, with Finnish translation)
• The song "Talvisota" by Swedish power metal band Sabaton

• “Song about battalion commander Ugryumov” - a song about captain Nikolai Ugryumov, the first Hero of the Soviet Union in the Soviet-Finnish war
• Alexander Tvardovsky.“Two Lines” (1943) - a poem dedicated to the memory of Soviet soldiers who died during the war
• N. Tikhonov, “Savolaksky huntsman” - poem
• Alexander Gorodnitsky, “Finnish Border” - song.
• film “Frontline Girlfriends” (USSR, 1941)
• film “Behind Enemy Lines” (USSR, 1941)
• film “Mashenka” (USSR, 1942)
• film “Talvisota” (Finland, 1989).
• film “Angel's Chapel” (Russia, 2009).
• film “Military Intelligence: Northern Front (TV series)” (Russia, 2012).
• Computer game "Blitzkrieg"
• Computer game “Talvisota: Ice Hell”.
• Computer game "Squad Battles: Winter War".

Documentaries

• "The Living and the Dead." Documentary film about the “Winter War” directed by V. A. Fonarev
• “Mannerheim Line” (USSR, 1940)
• “Winter War” (Russia, Viktor Pravdyuk, 2014)

1939-1940 (Soviet-Finnish War, in Finland known as the Winter War) - an armed conflict between the USSR and Finland from November 30, 1939 to March 12, 1940.

Its reason was the desire of the Soviet leadership to move the Finnish border away from Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) in order to strengthen the security of the northwestern borders of the USSR, and the refusal of the Finnish side to do this. The Soviet government asked to lease parts of the Hanko Peninsula and some islands in the Gulf of Finland in exchange for a larger area of ​​Soviet territory in Karelia, with the subsequent conclusion of a mutual assistance agreement.

The Finnish government believed that accepting Soviet demands would weaken the state's strategic position and lead to Finland's loss of neutrality and its subordination to the USSR. The Soviet leadership, in turn, did not want to give up its demands, which, in its opinion, were necessary to ensure the security of Leningrad.

The Soviet-Finnish border on the Karelian Isthmus (Western Karelia) ran just 32 kilometers from Leningrad, the largest center of Soviet industry and the second largest city in the country.

The reason for the start of the Soviet-Finnish war was the so-called Maynila incident. According to the Soviet version, on November 26, 1939, at 15.45, Finnish artillery in the Mainila area fired seven shells at the positions of the 68th Infantry Regiment on Soviet territory. Three Red Army soldiers and one junior commander were allegedly killed. On the same day, the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs of the USSR addressed a note of protest to the Finnish government and demanded the withdrawal of Finnish troops from the border by 20-25 kilometers.

The Finnish government denied the shelling of Soviet territory and proposed that not only Finnish, but also Soviet troops be withdrawn 25 kilometers from the border. This formally equal demand was impossible to fulfill, because then Soviet troops would have to be withdrawn from Leningrad.

On November 29, 1939, the Finnish envoy in Moscow was handed a note about the severance of diplomatic relations between the USSR and Finland. On November 30 at 8 a.m., troops of the Leningrad Front received orders to cross the border with Finland. On the same day, Finnish President Kyusti Kallio declared war on the USSR.

During "perestroika" several versions of the Maynila incident became known. According to one of them, the shelling of the positions of the 68th regiment was carried out by a secret unit of the NKVD. According to another, there was no shooting at all, and in the 68th regiment on November 26 there were neither killed nor wounded. There were other versions that did not receive documentary confirmation.

From the very beginning of the war, the superiority of forces was on the side of the USSR. The Soviet command concentrated 21 rifle divisions, one tank corps, three separate tank brigades (a total of 425 thousand people, about 1.6 thousand guns, 1,476 tanks and about 1,200 aircraft) near the border with Finland. To support ground forces, it was planned to attract about 500 aircraft and more than 200 ships of the Northern and Baltic fleets. 40% of Soviet forces were deployed on the Karelian Isthmus.

The group of Finnish troops had about 300 thousand people, 768 guns, 26 tanks, 114 aircraft and 14 warships. The Finnish command concentrated 42% of its forces on the Karelian Isthmus, deploying the Isthmus Army there. The remaining troops covered separate directions from the Barents Sea to Lake Ladoga.

The main line of defense of Finland was the “Mannerheim Line” - unique, impregnable fortifications. The main architect of Mannerheim's line was nature itself. Its flanks rested on the Gulf of Finland and Lake Ladoga. The shore of the Gulf of Finland was covered by large-caliber coastal batteries, and in the Taipale area on the shore of Lake Ladoga, reinforced concrete forts with eight 120- and 152-mm coastal guns were created.

The "Mannerheim Line" had a front width of 135 kilometers, a depth of up to 95 kilometers and consisted of a support strip (depth 15-60 kilometers), a main strip (depth 7-10 kilometers), a second strip, 2-15 kilometers from the main one, and rear (Vyborg) defense line. Over two thousand long-term fire structures (DOS) and wood-earth fire structures (DZOS) were erected, which were united into strong points of 2-3 DOS and 3-5 DZOS in each, and the latter - into resistance nodes (3-4 strong points point). The main line of defense consisted of 25 resistance units, numbering 280 DOS and 800 DZOS. Strong points were defended by permanent garrisons (from a company to a battalion in each). In the gaps between the strong points and the nodes of resistance there were positions for field troops. Strongholds and positions of field troops were covered by anti-tank and anti-personnel barriers. In the support zone alone, 220 kilometers of wire barriers in 15-45 rows, 200 kilometers of forest debris, 80 kilometers of granite obstacles up to 12 rows, anti-tank ditches, scarps (anti-tank walls) and numerous minefields were created.

All fortifications were connected by a system of trenches and underground passages and were supplied with food and ammunition necessary for long-term independent combat.

On November 30, 1939, after lengthy artillery preparation, Soviet troops crossed the border with Finland and began an offensive on the front from the Barents Sea to the Gulf of Finland. In 10-13 days, in separate directions they overcame the zone of operational obstacles and reached the main strip of the “Mannerheim Line”. Unsuccessful attempts to break through it continued for more than two weeks.

At the end of December, the Soviet command decided to stop further offensive on the Karelian Isthmus and begin systematic preparations for breaking through the Mannerheim Line.

The front went on the defensive. The troops were regrouped. The North-Western Front was created on the Karelian Isthmus. The troops received reinforcements. As a result, Soviet troops deployed against Finland numbered more than 1.3 million people, 1.5 thousand tanks, 3.5 thousand guns, and three thousand aircraft. By the beginning of February 1940, the Finnish side had 600 thousand people, 600 guns and 350 aircraft.

On February 11, 1940, the assault on the fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus resumed - the troops of the North-Western Front, after 2-3 hours of artillery preparation, went on the offensive.

Having broken through two lines of defense, Soviet troops reached the third on February 28. They broke the enemy's resistance, forced him to begin a retreat along the entire front and, developing an offensive, enveloped the Vyborg group of Finnish troops from the northeast, captured most of Vyborg, crossed the Vyborg Bay, bypassed the Vyborg fortified area from the northwest, and cut the highway to Helsinki.

The fall of the Mannerheim Line and the defeat of the main group of Finnish troops put the enemy in a difficult situation. Under these conditions, Finland turned to the Soviet government asking for peace.

On the night of March 13, 1940, a peace treaty was signed in Moscow, according to which Finland ceded about a tenth of its territory to the USSR and pledged not to participate in coalitions hostile to the USSR. On March 13, hostilities ceased.

In accordance with the agreement, the border on the Karelian Isthmus was moved away from Leningrad by 120-130 kilometers. The entire Karelian Isthmus with Vyborg, the Vyborg Bay with islands, the western and northern coasts of Lake Ladoga, a number of islands in the Gulf of Finland, and part of the Rybachy and Sredniy peninsulas went to the Soviet Union. The Hanko Peninsula and the maritime territory around it were leased to the USSR for 30 years. This improved the position of the Baltic Fleet.

As a result of the Soviet-Finnish war, the main strategic goal pursued by the Soviet leadership was achieved - to secure the northwestern border. However, the international position of the Soviet Union worsened: it was expelled from the League of Nations, relations with England and France worsened, and an anti-Soviet campaign unfolded in the West.

The losses of Soviet troops in the war were: irrevocable - about 130 thousand people, sanitary - about 265 thousand people. Irreversible losses of Finnish troops are about 23 thousand people, sanitary losses are over 43 thousand people.

(Additional

From September 28 to October 10, the USSR concluded mutual assistance agreements with Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, according to which these countries provided the USSR with their territory for the deployment of Soviet military bases. On October 5, the USSR invited Finland to consider the possibility of concluding a similar mutual assistance pact with the USSR. The Finnish government stated that the conclusion of such a pact would be contrary to its position of absolute neutrality. In addition, the non-aggression pact between the USSR and Germany had already eliminated the main reason for the Soviet Union's demands on Finland - the danger of a German attack through Finnish territory.

Moscow negotiations on the territory of Finland

On October 5, 1939, Finnish representatives were invited to Moscow for negotiations “on specific political issues.” The negotiations took place in three stages: October 12-14, November 3-4 and November 9. For the first time, Finland was represented by the envoy, State Councilor J. K. Paasikivi, the Finnish Ambassador to Moscow Aarno Koskinen, Foreign Ministry official Johan Nykopp and Colonel Aladar Paasonen . On the second and third trips, Finance Minister Tanner was authorized to negotiate along with Paasikivi. On the third trip, State Councilor R. Hakkarainen was added.

At these negotiations, the proximity of the border to Leningrad was discussed for the first time. Joseph Stalin remarked: " We can’t do anything about geography, just like you... Since Leningrad cannot be moved, we will have to move the border further away from it" The version of the agreement presented by the Soviet side looked like this:

Finland transfers part of the Karelian Isthmus to the USSR.

Finland agrees to lease the Hanko Peninsula to the USSR for a period of 30 years for the construction of a naval base and the deployment of a four-thousand-strong military contingent there for its defense.

The Soviet navy is provided with ports on the Hanko Peninsula in Hanko itself and in Lappohja (Finnish) Russian.

Finland transfers the islands of Gogland, Laavansaari (now Moshchny), Tytjarsaari and Seiskari to the USSR.

The existing Soviet-Finnish non-aggression pact is supplemented by an article on mutual obligations not to join groups and coalitions of states hostile to one side or the other.

Both states disarm their fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus.

The USSR transfers to Finland territory in Karelia with a total area twice as large as the Finnish one received (5,529 km²).

The USSR undertakes not to object to the armament of the Åland Islands by Finland's own forces.

The USSR proposed a territorial exchange in which Finland would receive larger territories in Eastern Karelia in Reboli and Porajärvi. These were the territories that declared [ source not specified 656 days] independence and tried to join Finland in 1918-1920, but according to the Tartu Peace Treaty they remained with Soviet Russia.

The USSR made its demands public before the third meeting in Moscow. Germany, which had concluded a non-aggression pact with the USSR, advised the Finns to agree to them. Hermann Goering made it clear to Finnish Foreign Minister Erkko that the demands for military bases should be accepted, and that one should not hope for German help. The State Council did not comply with all the demands of the USSR, since public opinion and parliament were against it. The Soviet Union was offered the cession of the islands of Suursaari (Gogland), Lavensari (Moshchny), Bolshoy Tyuters and Maly Tyuters, Penisaari (Small), Seskar and Koivisto (Berezovy) - a chain of islands that stretches along the main shipping fairway in the Gulf of Finland and those closest to Leningrad territories in Teriokki and Kuokkala (now Zelenogorsk and Repino), deep into Soviet territory. Moscow negotiations ended on November 9, 1939. Previously, a similar proposal was made to the Baltic countries, and they agreed to provide the USSR with military bases on their territory. Finland chose something else: to defend the inviolability of its territory. On October 10, soldiers from the reserve were called up for unscheduled exercises, which meant full mobilization.

Sweden has made its position of neutrality clear, and there have been no serious assurances of assistance from other states.

Since mid-1939, military preparations began in the USSR. In June-July, the Main Military Council of the USSR discussed the operational plan for the attack on Finland, and from mid-September the concentration of units of the Leningrad Military District along the border began.

In Finland, the Mannerheim Line was being completed. On August 7-12, major military exercises were held on the Karelian Isthmus, where they practiced repelling aggression from the USSR. All military attaches were invited, except the Soviet one.

Declaring the principles of neutrality, the Finnish government refused to accept Soviet conditions - since, in their opinion, these conditions went far beyond the issue of ensuring the security of Leningrad - while at the same time trying to achieve the conclusion of a Soviet-Finnish trade agreement and Soviet consent to armament of the Åland Islands, whose demilitarized status was regulated by the Åland Convention of 1921. In addition, the Finns did not want to give the USSR their only defense against possible Soviet aggression - a strip of fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus, known as the “Mannerheim Line”.

The Finns insisted on their position, although on October 23-24, Stalin somewhat softened his position regarding the territory of the Karelian Isthmus and the size of the proposed garrison of the Hanko Peninsula. But these proposals were also rejected. “Do you want to provoke a conflict?” /V.Molotov/. Mannerheim, with the support of Paasikivi, continued to insist to his parliament on the need to find a compromise, declaring that the army would hold out on the defensive for no more than two weeks, but to no avail.

On October 31, speaking at a session of the Supreme Council, Molotov outlined the essence of the Soviet proposals, while hinting that the hard line taken by the Finnish side was allegedly caused by the intervention of third-party states. The Finnish public, having first learned about the demands of the Soviet side, categorically opposed any concessions [ source not specified 937 days ] .

Causes of the war

According to statements from the Soviet side, the goal of the USSR was to achieve by military means what could not be done peacefully: to ensure the security of Leningrad, which was dangerously close to the border even in the event of war breaking out (in which Finland was ready to provide its territory to the enemies of the USSR as a springboard) would inevitably be captured in the first days (or even hours). In 1931, Leningrad was separated from the region and became a city of republican subordination. Part of the borders of some territories subordinate to the Leningrad City Council was also the border between the USSR and Finland.

True, the very first demands of the USSR in 1938 did not mention Leningrad and did not require moving the border. Demands for the lease of Hanko, located hundreds of kilometers to the west, increased the security of Leningrad. The only constant in the demands was the following: to obtain military bases on the territory of Finland and near its coast and to oblige it not to ask for help from third countries.

Already during the war, two concepts emerged that are still being debated: one, that the USSR pursued its stated goals (ensuring the security of Leningrad), the second, that the true goal of the USSR was the Sovietization of Finland. M.I. Semiryaga notes that on the eve of the war both countries had claims against each other. The Finns were afraid of the Stalinist regime and were well aware of the repressions against Soviet Finns and Karelians in the late 30s, the closure of Finnish schools, etc. The USSR, in turn, knew about the activities of ultranationalist Finnish organizations that aimed to “return” Soviet Karelia. Moscow was also worried about Finland’s unilateral rapprochement with Western countries and, above all, with Germany, which Finland agreed to, in turn, because it saw the USSR as the main threat to itself. Finnish President P. E. Svinhuvud said in Berlin in 1937 that “Russia’s enemy must always be Finland’s friend.” In a conversation with the German envoy, he said: “The Russian threat to us will always exist. Therefore, it is good for Finland that Germany will be strong.” In the USSR, preparations for a military conflict with Finland began in 1936. On September 17, 1939, the USSR expressed support for Finnish neutrality, but literally on the same days (September 11-14) it began partial mobilization in the Leningrad Military District, which clearly indicated the preparation of a military solutions

Progress of hostilities

Military operations by their nature fell into two main periods:

First period: From November 30, 1939 to February 10, 1940, i.e. military operations until the Mannerheim Line was broken.

Second period: From February 11 to March 12, 1940, i.e. military operations to break through the Mannerheim Line itself.

In the first period, the most successful advance was in the north and Karelia.

1. Troops of the 14th Army captured the Rybachy and Sredniy peninsulas, the cities of Lillahammari and Petsamo in the Pechenga region and closed Finland’s access to the Barents Sea.

2. The troops of the 9th Army penetrated 30-50 km deep into enemy defenses in Northern and Central Karelia, i.e. insignificantly, but still went beyond the state border. Further advancement could not be ensured due to the complete lack of roads, dense forests, deep snow cover and the complete absence of settlements in this part of Finland.

3. Troops of the 8th Army in South Karelia penetrated up to 80 km into enemy territory, but were also forced to pause the offensive because some units were surrounded by Finnish mobile ski units of the Shutskor, who were well familiar with the terrain.

4. The main front on the Karelian Isthmus in the first period experienced three stages in the development of military operations:

5. Conducting heavy fighting, the 7th Army advanced 5-7 km per day until it approached the “Mannerheim Line,” which happened in different sections of the offensive from December 2 to 12. In the first two weeks of fighting, the cities of Terijoki, Fort Inoniemi, Raivola, Rautu (now Zelenogorsk, Privetninskoye, Roshchino, Orekhovo) were taken.

During the same period, the Baltic Fleet captured the islands of Seiskari, Lavansaari, Suursaari (Gogland), Narvi, and Soomeri.

At the beginning of December 1939, a special group of three divisions (49th, 142nd and 150th) was created as part of the 7th Army under the command of the corps commander V.D. Grendal to break through the river. Taipalenjoki and reaching the rear of the Mannerheim Line fortifications.

Despite crossing the river and heavy losses in the battles of December 6-8, the Soviet units failed to gain a foothold and build on their success. The same thing was revealed during attempts to attack the “Mannerheim Line” on December 9-12, after the entire 7th Army reached the entire 110-kilometer strip occupied by this line. Due to huge losses in manpower, heavy fire from pillboxes and bunkers, and the impossibility of advancing, operations were suspended virtually along the entire line by the end of December 9, 1939.

The Soviet command decided to radically restructure military operations.

6. The Main Military Council of the Red Army decided to suspend the offensive and carefully prepare to break through the enemy’s defensive line. The front went on the defensive. The troops were regrouped. The front section of the 7th Army was reduced from 100 to 43 km. The 13th Army was created on the front of the second half of the Mannerheim Line, consisting of a corps commander group V.D. Grendal(4 rifle divisions), and then a little later, by the beginning of February 1940, the 15th Army, operating between Lake Ladoga and the Laimola point.

7. A restructuring of troop control and a change of command was carried out.

Firstly, the Active Army was withdrawn from subordination to the Leningrad Military District and came directly under the jurisdiction of the Headquarters of the Main Command of the Red Army.

Secondly, the North-Western Front was created on the Karelian Isthmus (formation date: January 7, 1940).

Front Commander: 1st Rank Army Commander S.K. Tymoshenko.

Chief of Front Staff: Army Commander 2nd Rank I.V. Smorodinov

9. The main task during this period was to actively prepare the troops in the theater of operations for the assault on the Mannerheim Line, as well as to prepare the command of the troops for the best conditions for the offensive.

To solve the first task, it was necessary to eliminate all obstacles in the forefield, covertly clear the mines in the forefield, make numerous passages in the rubble and wire fences before directly attacking the fortifications of the “Mannerheim Line” itself. Over the course of a month, the “Mannerheim Line” system itself was thoroughly explored, many hidden pillboxes and bunkers were discovered, and their destruction began through methodical daily artillery fire.

In a 43-kilometer area alone, the 7th Army fired up to 12 thousand shells at the enemy every day. Aviation also caused destruction to the enemy’s front line and depth of defense. During preparation for the assault, bombers carried out over 4 thousand bombings along the front, and fighters made 3.5 thousand sorties.10. To prepare the troops themselves for the assault, food was seriously improved, traditional uniforms (budyonnovkas, overcoats, boots) were replaced with earflap hats, sheepskin coats, and felt boots. The front received 2.5 thousand mobile insulated houses with stoves. In the near rear, the troops practiced new assault techniques, the front received the latest means for blowing up pillboxes and bunkers, for storming powerful fortifications, new reserves of people, weapons, and ammunition were brought up.

As a result, by the beginning of February 1940, at the front, Soviet troops had double superiority in manpower, triple superiority in artillery firepower, and absolute superiority in tanks and aviation.

Second period of the war: Assault on the Mannerheim Line. February 11 - March 12, 1940

11. The front troops were given the task: to break through the “Mannerheim Line”, defeat the main enemy forces on the Karelian Isthmus and reach the Kexholm - Antrea station - Vyborg line. The general offensive was scheduled for February 11, 1940.

It began at 8.00 with a powerful two-hour artillery barrage, after which the infantry, supported by tanks and direct-fire artillery, launched an offensive at 10.00 and broke through the enemy’s defenses by the end of the day in the decisive sector and by February 14 had wedged 7 km deep into the line, expanding the breakthrough up to 6 km along the front. These successful actions of the 123rd Infantry Division. (Lieutenant Colonel F.F. Alabushev) created the conditions for overcoming the entire “Mannerheim Line”. To build on the success of the 7th Army, three mobile tank groups were created.12. The Finnish command brought up new forces, trying to eliminate the breakthrough and defend an important fortification site. But as a result of 3 days of fighting and the actions of three divisions, the breakthrough of the 7th Army was expanded to 12 km along the front and 11 km in depth. From the flanks of the breakthrough, two Soviet divisions began to threaten to bypass the Karkhul resistance node, while the neighboring Khottinensky node had already been taken. This forced the Finnish command to abandon counterattacks and withdraw troops from the main line of fortifications Muolanyarvi - Karhula - Gulf of Finland to the second defensive line, especially since at that time the troops of the 13th Army, whose tanks approached the Muola-Ilves junction, also went on the offensive.

Pursuing the enemy, units of the 7th Army reached the main, second, internal line of Finnish fortifications by February 21. This caused great concern for the Finnish command, which understood that another such breakthrough and the outcome of the war could be decided.13. Commander of the Karelian Isthmus troops in the Finnish army, Lieutenant General H.V. Esterman was suspended. In his place was appointed on February 19, 1940, Major General A.E. Heinrichs, commander of the 3rd Army Corps. Finnish troops tried to firmly gain a foothold on the second, fundamental line. But the Soviet command did not give them time for this. Already on February 28, 1940, a new, even more powerful offensive by the troops of the 7th Army began. The enemy, unable to withstand the blow, began to retreat along the entire front from the river. Vuoksa to Vyborg Bay. The second line of fortifications was broken through in two days.

On March 1, the bypass of the city of Vyborg began, and on March 2, the troops of the 50th Rifle Corps reached the rear, internal line of enemy defense, and on March 5, the troops of the entire 7th Army surrounded Vyborg.

14. The Finnish command hoped that by stubbornly defending the large Vyborg fortified area, which was considered impregnable and, in the conditions of the coming spring, had a unique system of flooding the forefield for 30 km, Finland would be able to prolong the war for at least a month and a half, which would make it possible for England and France to deliver Finland with a 150,000-strong expeditionary force. The Finns blew up the locks of the Saimaa Canal and flooded the approaches to Vyborg for tens of kilometers. The chief of the main staff of the Finnish army, Lieutenant General K.L., was appointed commander of the troops of the Vyborg region. Esh, which testified to the Finnish command’s confidence in its abilities and the seriousness of its intentions to hold back the long siege of the fortress city.

15. The Soviet command carried out a deep bypass of Vyborg from the north-west with the forces of the 7th Army, part of which was supposed to storm Vyborg from the front. At the same time, the 13th Army attacked Kexholm and Art. Antrea, and the troops of the 8th and 15th armies were advancing in the direction of Laimola. Part of the troops of the 7th Army (two corps) was preparing to cross the Vyborg Bay, since the ice still withstood tanks and artillery, although the Finns, fearing an attack by Soviet troops across the bay , they set up ice-hole traps on it, covered with snow.

The Soviet offensive began on March 2 and continued until March 4. By the morning of March 5, the troops managed to gain a foothold on the western coast of the Vyborg Bay, bypassing the defenses of the fortress. By March 6, this bridgehead was expanded along the front by 40 km and in depth by 1 km. By March 11, in this area, west of Vyborg, Red Army troops cut the Vyborg-Helsinki highway, opening the way to the capital of Finland. At the same time, on March 5-8, the troops of the 7th Army, advancing in a north-eastern direction towards Vyborg, also reached the outskirts of the city. On March 11, the Vyborg suburb was captured. On March 12, a frontal assault on the fortress began at 11 p.m., and on the morning of March 13 (at night) Vyborg was taken

The end of the war and the conclusion of peace

By March 1940, the Finnish government realized that, despite demands for continued resistance, Finland would not receive any military assistance from the allies other than volunteers and weapons. After breaking through the Mannerheim Line, Finland was obviously unable to hold back the advance of the Red Army. There was a real threat of a complete takeover of the country, which would be followed by either joining the USSR or a change of government to a pro-Soviet one. Therefore, the Finnish government turned to the USSR with a proposal to begin peace negotiations. On March 7, a Finnish delegation arrived in Moscow, and already on March 12, a peace treaty was concluded, according to which hostilities ceased at 12 o'clock on March 13, 1940. Despite the fact that Vyborg, according to the agreement, was transferred to the USSR, Soviet troops launched an assault on the city on the morning of March 13. Mannerheim Line(Finnish: Mannerheim-linja) - a complex of defensive structures on the Finnish part of the Karelian Isthmus, created in 1920 - 1930 to deter a possible offensive attack from the USSR. The length of the line was about 135 km, the depth was about 90 km. Named after Marshal Karl Mannerheim, on whose orders plans for the defense of the Karelian Isthmus were developed back in 1918. On his initiative, the largest structures of the complex were created. In addition to the Finnish territory in the Leningrad region, areas in the region of northern Karelia and the Rybachy Peninsula, as well as part of the islands of the Gulf of Finland and the Hanko region were transferred to the USSR. Territorial changes 1. Karelian Isthmus and Western Karelia. As a result of the loss of the Karelian Isthmus, Finland lost its existing defense system and began to rapidly build 2. fortifications along the new border (Salpa Line), thereby moving the border from Leningrad from 18 to 150 km. 3. Part of Lapland (Old Salla). 4. The Petsamo (Pechenga) region, occupied by the Red Army during the war, was returned to Finland. 5. Islands in the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland (Gogland Island). 6. Lease of the Hanko Peninsula (Gangut) for 30 years. Mannerheim Line - an alternative point of view Throughout the war, both Soviet and Finnish propaganda significantly exaggerated the significance of the Mannerheim Line. The first is to justify the long delay in the offensive, and the second is to strengthen the morale of the army and the population. Accordingly, the myth of the “incredibly strongly fortified” “Mannerheim Line” was firmly entrenched in Soviet history and penetrated some Western sources of information, which is not surprising, given the Finnish side’s glorification of the line in the literal sense - in the song “Mannerheimin linjalla” (“On the Mannerheim Line”). It is believed that the Mannerheim Line consisted mainly of field fortifications. The bunkers located along the line were small, located at a considerable distance from each other, and rarely had cannon armament.

6. Expansion of the western borders of the USSR in 1939-1941. Baltic countries. Bessarabia. Western Ukraine and Western Belarus. On August 23, 1939, after three hours of negotiations in Moscow, the so-called Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact was signed. Attached to the non-aggression treaty was a secret additional protocol, which provided for “the delimitation of spheres of mutual interests in Eastern Europe.” The sphere of influence of the USSR included Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Eastern Poland and Bessarabia. These documents radically changed both Soviet foreign policy and the situation in Europe. From now on, the Stalinist leadership turned into an ally of Germany in the division of Europe. The last obstacle to attacking Poland and thus starting World War II had been removed. In 1939, Germany in any case could not start a war against the USSR, since it did not have common borders on which it was possible to deploy troops and carry out an attack. Moreover, she was completely unprepared for a “big” war.

September 1, 1939 Hitler attacked Poland. The Second World War began.. On September 17, when the outcome of the battle in Poland was no longer in doubt, the Red Army occupied the western regions of Ukraine and Belarus, which were part of this state.

On July 31, 1940, Hitler announced that the primary goal from now on was war with Russia, the outcome of which was to decide the fate of England. On December 18, 1940, the plan for an attack on the USSR (Barbarossa Plan) was signed. In deep secrecy, troops began to be transferred to the east. In 1939-1940. Stalin was concerned, first of all, with the annexation of the territories of Eastern Europe, assigned to him under secret agreements with Nazi Germany, into the USSR, and with further rapprochement with Hitler

On September 28, an agreement on friendship and borders with Germany and three secret protocols to it were signed. In these documents, the parties pledged to wage a joint fight against “Polish agitation” and clarified their spheres of influence. In exchange for Lublin and part of the Warsaw Voivodeship, the USSR received Lithuania. Based on these agreements, Stalin demanded that the Baltic states conclude agreements on mutual assistance and locate Soviet military bases on their territory. In September-October 1939, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were forced to agree to this. On June 14-16, 1940, after the actual defeat of France by Nazi Germany, Stalin gave these Baltic states an ultimatum to introduce contingents of Soviet troops into their territories (to “ensure security”) and form new governments ready to “honestly” fulfill treaties concluded with the USSR. Within a few days, “people’s governments” were created in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which, with the help of local communists, established Soviet power in the Baltic states. At the end of June 1940 Stalin achieved the return of Bessarabia, occupied by Romania in 1918. Then in June 1940, at the request of the USSR, Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina, occupied by Romania in 1918, were returned to him. In August 1940, the Moldavian SSR was formed, into which Bessarabia entered, and Northern Bukovina was included in the Ukrainian SSR. As a result of all the mentioned territorial acquisitions, the borders of the USSR were moved west by 200-300 km, and the country's population increased by 23 million people.

7.German attack on the Soviet Union. The beginning of the Great Patriotic War. Activities of the Soviet government during the initial period of the war.

On June 22, at 3:30 a.m., the German army began its powerful invasion along the entire border of our country from the Black Sea to the Baltic Sea. The Patriotic War broke out. The aggressor's invasion was preceded by powerful artillery preparation. Thousands of guns and mortars opened fire on border outposts, troop areas, headquarters, communications centers, and defensive structures. Enemy aircraft launched the first strike along the entire border strip. Murmansk, Liepaja, Riga, Kaunas, Smolensk, Kyiv, Zhitomir were subjected to massive aerial bombing; naval bases (Kronstadt, Izmail, Sevastopol). In order to paralyze the control of Soviet troops, saboteurs were dropped by parachute. The most powerful attacks were carried out on airfields, since air supremacy was the main task of the German Air Force. Due to crowded deployment of units, Soviet aviation in the border districts lost about 1,200 aircraft on the first day of the war. In addition, front-line and army aviation were given an order: not to fly over borders under any circumstances, to destroy the enemy only over their territory, to keep aircraft in constant readiness to withdraw from attack. On the very first day of the war, the Baltic, Western and Kiev special military districts were transformed into the North-Western (commander General F. Kuznetsov), Western (commander General D. Pavlov), South-Western (commander General M. Kirponos) fronts. On June 24, the Leningrad Military District was transformed into the Northern Front (commanded by General M. Popov), and the Southern Front (commanded by General I. Tyulenev) was formed from the 9th and 18th armies. On June 23, the Headquarters of the Main Command of the Armed Forces of the USSR was created under the chairmanship of the People's Commissar of Defense, Marshal S. Timoshenko (on August 8, it was transformed into the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command, headed by I. Stalin).

The sudden invasion of Germany into the territory of the USSR required quick and precise action from the Soviet government. First of all, it was necessary to ensure the mobilization of forces to repel the enemy. On the day of the fascist attack, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR issued a decree on the mobilization of those liable for military service in 1905-1918. birth. In a matter of hours, detachments and units were formed. Soon the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and the Council

The People's Commissars of the USSR adopted a resolution approving the mobilization national economic plan for the fourth quarter of 1941, which provided for an increase in the production of military equipment and the creation of large tank-building enterprises in the Volga region and the Urals. Circumstances forced the Central Committee of the Communist Party at the beginning of the war to develop a detailed program for restructuring the activities and life of the Soviet country on a military basis, which was set out in the directive of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks dated June 29, 1941 to party and Soviet organizations in the front-line regions. The slogan “Everything for the front, everything for victory!” became the motto of the life of Soviet people. The Soviet government and the Central Committee of the Party called on the people to renounce their mood and personal desires, go over to a sacred and merciless fight against the enemy, fight to the last drop of blood, rebuild the national economy on a war footing, and increase the output of military products. In the occupied areas, create unbearable conditions for the enemy and all his accomplices, pursue and destroy them at every step, and disrupt all their activities.” Among other things, local conversations were held with the population. The nature and political goals of the outbreak of the Patriotic War were explained. The main provisions of the directive of June 29 were outlined in a radio speech on July 3, 1941 by J.V. Stalin. Addressing the people, he explained the current situation at the front, revealed the program for defending the goals that had already been achieved, and expressed unshakable faith in the victory of the Soviet people against the German occupiers.” Together with the Red Army, many thousands of workers, collective farmers, and intellectuals are rising to war against the attacking enemy. The millions of our people will rise up.” On June 23, 1941, the Headquarters of the Main Command of the Armed Forces of the USSR was formed for strategic leadership of military operations. Later it was renamed the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command (SHC), headed by the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars I.V. Stalin, who was also appointed People's Commissar of Defense, and then Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the USSR. Military victory over Nazi Germany and its allies would have been impossible without victory on the front of economic confrontation with the aggressor. Germany began to surpass the USSR in total industrial production by three to four times. An Operational Bureau for monitoring the implementation of military orders, an evacuation council, a transport committee and other permanent or temporary working bodies were established under the State Defense Committee. The powers of local representatives of the State Defense Committee were, if necessary, received by the secretaries of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Union Republics, regional committees, leading economic and scientific workers.

From the first days of hostilities, four main lines for creating a coherent military economy were determined

Evacuation of industrial enterprises, material assets and people from the front-line zone to the east.

The transition of thousands of factories in the civilian sector to the production of military equipment and other defense products.

Accelerated construction of new industrial facilities capable of replacing those lost in the first months of the war, establishment of a system of cooperation and transport communications between and within individual industries, disrupted as a result of the unprecedented scale of movement of productive forces to the east.

Reliable supply of the national economy, especially industry, with workers in new emergency conditions.

8. Reasons for the defeat of the Red Army in the initial period of the war.

The reasons for the failures of the Red Army at the initial stage of the war were not only that the Soviet troops, attacked suddenly, were forced to engage in heavy battles without proper strategic deployment, that many of them were understaffed to wartime levels, had limited material and vehicles and communications, often operated without air and artillery support. The damage suffered by our troops in the first days of the war also had a negative impact, but it cannot be overestimated, since in fact only 30 divisions of the first echelon of the covering army were attacked by the aggressor troops on June 22. The tragedy of the defeat of the main forces of three fronts - Western, North-Western and South-Western - emerged later, during counter-fighting on June 23-30, 1941 between the new and old borders. The entire course of border battles showed that our troops at all levels - from the Headquarters of the Main Command to the tactical level command staff - were for the most part not prepared not only for the first, unexpected attacks of German troops, but also for war in general. The Red Army had to master the skills of modern warfare during battles, while suffering enormous losses in manpower and military equipment. The deficiencies in the combat readiness of our troops, revealed at Khalkhin Gol and during the Soviet-Finnish War, were not and could not be eliminated in a short time. The army grew quantitatively, but to the detriment of the quality of training, and especially of officers and non-commissioned officers. The main emphasis in combat training was on the infantry: the training of armored forces and aviation was not given due attention, and therefore our troops could not become a strike force like the Wehrmacht, mainly due to a lack of personnel, professional command staff and headquarters. Our troops were unable to realize the technical and human potential that exceeded the potential of the aggressor at the beginning of the war. The disruption of constant communication between troops and headquarters deprived the command, right up to the General Staff and Headquarters, of the opportunity to receive regular information about the state of affairs at the front. The order of the Headquarters to hold occupied lines at all costs, even in the conditions of a deep flanking bypass of the enemy, often became the reason for exposing entire groups of Soviet troops to enemy attacks, which forced heavy fighting in the encirclement, entailed large losses in men and military equipment, and increased panic in the troops. A significant part of Soviet commanders did not have the necessary military and combat experience. Headquarters also lacked the necessary experience, hence the most serious miscalculations at the very beginning of the war. The more successful the campaign to the east developed, the more boastful the statements of the German command became. Noting the steadfastness of the Russian soldier, they, however, did not consider him as a decisive factor in the war. They considered their main success, in accordance with the “blitzkrieg” plan, to be the rapid advance of German troops, the seizure of vast territories and trophies, and huge human losses. losses. The resilience of the Russian warrior was demonstrated during the defense of the Brest Fortress. The heroism of the defenders of the fortress will appear even more obvious if we consider that the German troops had superiority in experience, manpower and technology, while our fighters did not have a harsh and long school of war behind them, were cut off from their units and mandates, experienced an acute shortage of water and food, ammunition, and medicine. And yet we continued to fight the enemy.

The Red Army was not prepared for the conditions of modern industrial warfare - the war of engines. This is the main reason for its defeats in the initial period of hostilities.

9. The situation on the fronts of the Soviet Union in June 1941. – November 1942 Moscow battle. On the very first day of the war, the Baltic, Western and Kiev special military districts were transformed into the North-Western (commander General F. Kuznetsov), Western (commander General D. Pavlov), South-Western (commander General M. Kirponos) fronts. On June 24, the Leningrad Military District was transformed into the Northern Front (commanded by General M. Popov), and the Southern Front was formed from the 9th and 18th armies (commanded by General I. Tyulenev). On June 23, the Headquarters of the Main Command of the Armed Forces of the USSR was created under the chairmanship of the People's Commissar of Defense, Marshal S. Timoshenko (on August 8, it was transformed into the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command, headed by I. Stalin).

On June 22 at 7:15 a.m., the Main Military Council issued a directive to Soviet troops to begin active military operations. When it was received at the front headquarters, the first echelon divisions were already drawn into defensive battles, but the tank and motorized formations were not ready to deliver a quick powerful strike due to the great distance from the border. By the end of the first day of the war, a difficult situation had arisen at the junction of the North-Western and Western fronts, on the left wing of the Western Front. The corps and division commanders could not act on the situation, since they had no data on the number of forces and military actions enemy. There was no constant relationship between the units, no one knew anything about the true losses, it was assumed that the troops raised on alert would be sufficiently combat-ready. But by the end of the day on June 22, under enemy attacks, our units were driven back from the state border by about 40 km. As a result, in just two days, with heavy losses in manpower and equipment, the troops moved 100 km from the border. A similar situation was observed in other sectors of the front. The operational results of the counterattacks, despite the selfless actions of our soldiers, were insignificant, and the losses incurred were incredibly large. At best, individual formations of the Western Front managed to delay the enemy’s offensive only for a short time. After successful breakthroughs of the border defenses in the Western Front, enemy tank groups, with the support of large air forces, managed to complete the encirclement and defeat of the backbone of the Western Front’s troops by July 9. As a result, 323 thousand people were in German captivity in the Bialystok-Minsk region, and the casualties of the troops of the Western Front and the Pinsk military flotilla amounted to 418 thousand people. However, the main Wehrmacht group suffered significant damage, and the pace of its advance on Smolensk and Moscow was slowed down. Having suffered heavy losses in the first days of the war, the troops of the Northwestern Front were unable to organize a stable defense either on the right bank of the Western Dvina or at the last major defensive line near Pskov - the Velikaya River. Pskov was captured by the Nazis on July 9, which resulted in a real danger of their breakthrough to Luga and further to Leningrad, but the Wehrmacht failed to destroy the large Kra Ar forces in this direction. A more favorable situation developed on the South-Western Front. Despite enormous difficulties, the command managed to pull up large forces in the direction of the enemy’s main attack and bring them into battle in a fairly organized, although not simultaneous, manner. On June 23, in the Lutsk-Brody-Rivne area, the largest tank battle in the entire initial period of the war unfolded. Here the enemy was not only detained for a whole week, but also his plan to encircle the main forces of the front in the Lvov salient was thwarted. Enemy aircraft carried out air strikes simultaneously on the front line and the outback. The bombing was carried out methodically and clearly, which greatly exhausted the Soviet troops. The power of the enemy suppressed the hearts, desertion from the battlefield, self-mutilation, and sometimes suicide took place. By the end of June, it became obvious that the troops of the South-Western, as well as other fronts, were unable to defeat the intervening enemy group. Enemy aircraft firmly maintained air supremacy. Our aviation suffered serious damage; The mechanized corps suffered heavy losses in personnel and tanks. The results of military operations on the Soviet-German front were catastrophic for the Red Army. During the three weeks of the war, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, and a significant part of Ukraine and Moldova were abandoned. During this period, the German army advanced into the interior of the country in the northwestern direction by 450-500 km, in the western direction by 450-600 km, and in the southwestern direction by 300-350 km. The hastily withdrawn strategic reserves of the High Command were only able to detain the enemy for the shortest possible time in certain sectors of the front, but did not eliminate the threat of his breakthrough to Leningrad, Smolensk and Kiev. Moscow battle. On September 6, 1941, Hitler issued a new directive to attack Moscow. The main focus in it was on tank formations and aviation. Particular attention was paid to the secrecy of the preparation of the operation. Initially, it was planned to defeat Soviet troops in the areas of Vyazma and Bryansk, then, pursuing the formations of the Western Front retreating to Moscow in the zone from the upper Volga to the Oka, to capture the capital. The general offensive on Moscow began on September 30 with a strike from the enemy’s 2nd Tank Army on the left wing Bryansk Front in the Shostka region, and on October 2, the main forces of the Germans attacked the positions of the Western Front troops. The fight immediately became fierce. As a result of the breakthrough of the defenses in the sector of the 43rd Army and in the center of the Western Front, the threat of encirclement loomed over the Soviet troops. An attempt to withdraw the army from the attack failed due to the rapid advance of the enemy's motorized corps, which cut off the escape route. On October 7, the Germans in the Vyazma area completed the encirclement of the 19th, 20th, 24th and 32nd armies. Heavy fighting broke out in the Bryansk Front. On October 3, the Germans broke into Orel and, moving along the Orel-Tula highway, occupied Karachev and Bryansk on October 6. The armies of the Bryansk Front were cut into pieces, and their escape routes were intercepted. Units of the 3rd, 13th, and 50th armies fell into the cauldron near Bryansk. Tens of thousands, including volunteers of the people's militia divisions, died on the battlefield. Among the main reasons for the disaster of this period are the enemy's superiority in technology, maneuverability of troops, air supremacy, possession of the initiative, blunders of the headquarters and front command in organizing defense Lack of a continuous line defense in the western direction and the necessary reserves to close the gap created a real threat of the appearance of enemy tanks near Moscow. The current situation required tough measures to control troops at all command levels. During this time, the Soviet command managed to take urgent measures to organize defense on the Mozhaisk line, which the GKO in the current situation chose as the main bridgehead of resistance. To concentrate troops covering the approaches to Moscow and for clearer control, the Headquarters transferred the armies of the Reserve Front to the Western Front. The command was entrusted to G. Zhukov. Combat-ready formations transferred to Moscow from the Far East and Central Asia, as well as reserve formations from the European part of the country, were hastily moving towards the front, but were still at a considerable distance. Zhukov, having insignificant reserves at his disposal so far, built his defenses in such a way that the most vulnerable areas along highways and railways were covered, hoping that as he moved towards Moscow his forces would become denser, since the capital is a major transport hub. By October 13, the troops of the Western Front deployed on the following approaches to Moscow: Volokolamsk fortified area - 16th army (commander K. Rokossovsky), Mozhaisky - 5th army (commander L. Govorov), Maloyaroslavetsky - 43rd army (commander K. Golubev ), Kaluga -49 army (commander I. Zakharkin). To strengthen the immediate approaches to the capital, another line was created, which also included the city defense line. Particularly fierce fighting broke out in the Moscow direction on October 13-18. The Nazis were rushing towards Moscow with all their might. On October 18, they took Mozhaisk, Maloyaroslavets and Tarusa, and there was a threat of their reaching Moscow. On the morning of October 17, volunteer formations began to take up defensive positions on the immediate approaches to the capital. The fighter battalions created in July, which had previously patrolled the city, also moved here. Moscow enterprises switched to working in three shifts; The labor of women and teenagers began to be used increasingly. On October 15, the State Defense Committee adopted a resolution “On the evacuation of the capital of the USSR, Moscow,” according to which part of the party and government institutions and the entire diplomatic corps accredited to the Soviet government were transferred to Kuibyshev. Alarming rumors about the surrender of the capital began to spread, and thousands of residents began to leave the city. The situation was aggravated by the lack of reliable information about events at the front. On October 19, the State Defense Committee adopted a resolution on introducing a state of siege in Moscow and its surrounding areas. The defense of the capital on lines located 100-120 km west of Moscow is entrusted to G. Zhukov. On November 15-16, the enemy resumed the attack on Moscow. The balance of power was still unequal. German troops tried to bypass Moscow from the north - through Klin and Solnechnogorsk, from the south through Tula and Kashira. Bloody battles ensued. On the night of November 28, the Germans crossed the Moscow-Volga canal in the Yakhroma area, but their further advance on this section of the front was thwarted. According to von Bock, the command of Army Group Center saw the further attack on Moscow as “having neither purpose nor meaning, since the moment when the group’s forces would be completely exhausted was approaching very close.” The end of November - beginning of December 1941 became the culmination of the battle: it was by this time that the Germans' miscalculations exceeded a critical level; for the first time in the entire war the enemy was faced with the fact of his powerlessness before the enemy; the huge losses of the ground forces had an overwhelming effect on him. In early December, about 47 divisions of Army Group Center, while continuing to rush towards Moscow, could not withstand the counterattacks of the Soviet troops and went on the defensive. Only on December 8, having received reports from the commanders of the 3rd, 4th and 2nd Panzer Armies about the intensification of the Red Army's attacks, Hitler gave the order for strategic defense on the entire Eastern Front. By the beginning of December, the enemy on the immediate approaches to the capital was completely stopped. In the Moscow direction, the reserve armies of the Kalinin, Western and Southwestern fronts advanced to the areas of upcoming operations, thanks to which it was possible to create a new strategic grouping, larger in composition than the previous one, which began defensive operations near Moscow. Simultaneously with the counteroffensive, our troops conducted active military operations southeast of Lenin and in the Crimea, which deprived the Germans of the opportunity to transfer reinforcements to their troops near Moscow. at dawn on December 5, the troops of the left wing of the Kalinin Front (commander I. Konev) delivered a powerful blow to the enemy, and in the morning of the next day, strike groups of the Western and right wing of the Southwestern (commander S. Timoshenko) fronts launched a counter-offensive. At the beginning of February 1942, the Western Front reached the Naro-Fominsk - Maloyaroslavets line, then west of Kaluga to Sukhinichi and Belev.

This was the first major offensive operation of strategic importance, as a result of which enemy strike groups were thrown back 100, and in some places - 250 km west of the capital. The immediate threat to Moscow was eliminated and Soviet troops launched a counteroffensive along the entire line of the Western direction. The plan of Hitler’s “blitzkrieg” was thwarted, and during the war a turn in favor of the USSR began.

10. Battle of Stalingrad. Counteroffensive at Stalingrad November 19, 1942 Military and international significance.

The counter-offensive of Soviet troops near Stalingrad began on November 19, 1942. As part of this strategic operation (November 19, 1942 - February 2, 1943), the November encirclement of the Stalingrad enemy group (Uran), Kotelnikovskaya and Middle Don ( “Little Saturn”) operations that deprived the enemy of the opportunity to support the group encircled at Stalingrad from the west and weakened its offensive from the south, as well as Operation “Ring” to eliminate the enemy group that was surrounded in Stalingrad itself.

The decision to launch a counteroffensive was made by the Headquarters in mid-September 1942 after an exchange of views between I. Stalin, G. Zhukov and A. Vasilevsky. The military’s plan was to defeat the enemy in a 400-kilometer zone in the Stalingrad area, wrest the initiative from him and create conditions for conducting offensive operations on the southern wing,

The operation was entrusted to the troops of the newly formed Southwestern Front (commander N. Vatutin), Don and Stalingrad (commanders K. Rokossovsky and A. Eremenko). In addition, long-range aviation units, the 6th Army and the 2nd Air Army of the neighboring Voronezh Front (front commander F. Golikov), and the Volga Military Flotilla were involved here. The success of the operation largely depended on the surprise and thoroughness of the preparation of the strike; all events were carried out in the strictest secrecy. Headquarters entrusted the leadership of the counteroffensive to G. Zhukov and A. Vasilevsky. The Soviet command managed to create powerful groups superior to the enemy in the direction of the main attacks.

The offensive of the Southwestern and right wing of the Don Front began at 7:30 a.m. on November 19, 1942. Heavy fog and snowfall that day prevented the departure of Soviet attack aircraft, which sharply reduced the effectiveness of artillery fire. And yet, on the very first day, the enemy’s defense was broken through. On November 20, the troops of the Stalingrad Front went on the offensive. His tank and mechanized corps, without getting involved in battles for populated areas and skillfully maneuvering, moved forward. Panic began in the enemy camp. On November 23, the troops of the Southwestern and Stalingrad fronts closed in the area of ​​​​the cities of Kalach and Sovetsky. Units of the enemy's 6th field and 4th tank armies with a total number of 330 thousand people. were surrounded. The same fate befell the Romanian group of troops. In parallel with the internal one, the external encirclement of the enemy was also envisaged. It was clear that the enemy would try to break out of the “cauldron.” Therefore, the Headquarters ordered the Don and Stalingrad fronts, in cooperation with aviation, to eliminate the enemy group, and the troops of the Voronezh and Southwestern fronts to push the encirclement line to the west by about 150-200 km. Initially, the idea of ​​​​Operation Saturn boiled down to the delivery of attacks by the Southwestern and Voronezh fronts in converging directions: one to the south in the direction of Rostov, the other from east to west in the direction of Likhaya. To unblock the ring, the German command created the Gotha strike group from a tank corps, a number of infantry and remnants of cavalry divisions. On December 12, it went on the offensive from the Kotelnikovsky area along the Tikhoretsk-Stalingrad railway and on December 19, overcoming the fierce resistance of the few Soviet troops in this direction, it reached the line of the Myshkova River. On December 16, 1942, Operation Little Saturn began. As a result of 3 days of fierce fighting, troops of the Southwestern and left wing of the Voronezh front broke through the heavily fortified enemy defenses in several directions and crossed the Don and Bogucharka with battles. In order to prevent the enemy from gaining a foothold, it was decided not to slow down the pace of the offensive, strengthening the troops of the Southwestern Front at the expense of the 6th Army of the Voronezh Front, especially tank and mechanized formations. The offensive was carried out in harsh winter conditions, it was difficult, however, the 24th Tank Corps under the command of V. Badanov advanced 240 km in depth in five days, smashing the rear of the 8th Italian Army, and on December 24, with a surprise attack, took Tatsinskai station, destroying the airfield and capturing over 300 enemy aircraft as trophies. The most important communication line between Likhai and Stalingrad, along which the German command was concentrating the troops of the Hollidt group and supplying them with everything necessary for combat operations, was interrupted. The advance of the Goth group was put to an end. The Germans began to strengthen their positions in particularly threatened areas of the front. But by the end of December, Soviet troops advanced to a depth of about 200 km and firmly established themselves on new frontiers. As a result, the main forces of the Hollidt task force, the 8th Italian and 3rd Romanian armies were defeated. The position of the German troops at Stalingrad became hopeless. The final stage of the Battle of Stalingrad was Operation Ring. According to Rokossovsky, her plan provided for the defeat of the enemy in the western and southern parts of the encirclement, followed by the dissection of the enemy group into two parts and their liquidation separately. The difficulty of completing the task was due to the fact that the necessary reserves were transferred by the Headquarters to other fronts, as required by the actual situation. surrounded by troops - was thwarted. Despite enormous hardships, the German side rejected the Soviet command’s offer of surrender; on January 10, our troops launched a round-the-clock offensive and on the morning of January 15 captured the Pitomnik airfield. On January 31, 1943, the southern enemy group surrendered, and on February 2, the northern group of the enemy. During three operations - "Uranus", "Little Saturn" and "Ring" - 2 German, 2 Romanian and 1 Italian armies were defeated. The defeat at Stalingrad caused a deep political crisis in Germany. Three days of mourning were declared in the country. Faith in victory was undermined, defeatist sentiments gripped wide sections of the population. The morale of the German soldier fell, he became increasingly afraid of being surrounded, and believed less and less in victory. The defeat at Stalingrad caused a deep military-political crisis in the fascist coalition. Italy, Romania, and Hungary faced serious difficulties associated with large losses at the front, a drop in the combat effectiveness of troops, and growing discontent among the masses. The victory at Stalingrad seriously influenced the relations of the USSR with Great Britain and the USA. Both sides were well aware that the Red Army could achieve a decisive turning point in the war and defeat the Germans before the Allies transferred troops to Western France. Since the spring of 1943 The American General Staff, taking into account the change in the military situation, began to instruct F. Roosevelt that the United States, in the event of the defeat of Germany, should have a large military contingent in Great Britain. The victory at Stalingrad marked the beginning of a radical turning point in the war and had a decisive influence on its further move. The Red Army seized the strategic initiative from the enemy and held it until the end. The people believed in the final victory over fascism, although it came at the cost of heavy losses.

10.Battle of Stalingrad. Counteroffensive at Stalingrad November 19, 1942 Military and international significance. The radical turning point in the war came at Staling. In this large industrial center, named after the leader, German motorized groups of troops met the most fierce resistance, which had never been seen before, even in this brutal war of “total annihilation.” If the city could not withstand the onslaught and fell, then the German troops could cross the Volga, and this, in turn, would allow them to completely surround Mos and Lenin, after which Sov. the union would inevitably have turned into a truncated northern Asian state, pushed beyond the Ural Mountains. But Sta did not fall. Soviet troops defended their positions, proving their ability to fight in small units. Sometimes the territory they controlled was so small that German aircraft and artillery were afraid to bombard the city for fear of causing damage to their own troops. Street fighting prevented the Wehrmacht from using its usual advantages. Tanks and other equipment in narrow streets got stuck and turned into a good target for Soviet soldiers. In addition, the German troops were now fighting in conditions of extreme overstrain of resources, which were supplied to them only by one railway line and by air. The battles for the city exhausted and bled the enemy, creating the conditions for the Red Army to launch a counteroffensive. In the offensive Operation Uranus near Stalingrad, two stages were envisaged: the first was supposed to break through the enemy’s defenses and create a strong encirclement ring, the second was to destroy the encircled fascist troops if they did not accept the ultimatum to surrender. For this, the forces of three fronts were involved: the Southwestern (commander - General N.F. Vatutin), Don (General K.K. Rokossovsky) and Staling (General A.I. Eremenko). The equipment of Kra Ar with new military equipment was accelerated. To its superiority over the enemy in tanks, achieved in the spring of 1942, at the end of the year was added a predominance in guns, mortars, and aircraft. The counterattack began on November 19, 1942, and five days later the advanced units of the Southwestern and Stalingrad fronts closed in, encircling more than 330 thousand German soldiers and officers. On January 10, Soviet troops under the command of K.K. Rokossovsky began to eliminate the group blocked in the Steel area. On February 2, its remnants surrendered. More than 90 thousand people were taken prisoner, including 24 generals led by Field General F. Paulus. As a result of the counter-offensive of Soviet troops near Stalingrad, the Nazi 6th Army and the 4th Tank Army, the 3rd and 4th Armies and the 8th Italian Army were defeated. During the Battle of Steel, which lasted 200 days and nights, the fascist bloc lost 25% of the forces operating at that time on the Soviet-German front. The victory at Stalingrad was of great military and political significance. She made a huge contribution to achieving a radical turning point in the war and had a decisive influence on the further course of the entire war. As a result of Stalin's battle, the armed forces wrested the strategic initiative from the enemy and retained it until the end of the war. The outstanding significance of the Stalin battle was highly appreciated by the USSR's allies in the war with Germany. Prime Minister Great W. Churchill in November 1943, at the conference of leaders of the Allied Powers in Tehran, gave the Soviet delegation an honorary sword - a gift from King George VI to the citizens of Stal in commemoration of the victory over the fascist invaders. In May 1944, US President Franklin Roosevelt, on behalf of the American people, sent a letter to Stalin. By this time, Soviet industry had established the production of a sufficient number of tanks and other weapons of various types, and did this with unprecedented success and in huge quantities. The battle and the victory of the Soviet troops in it contributed to the liberation of most of the North Caucasus, Rzhev, Voronezh, Kursk were liberated , most of Donbass.

11.Military-strategic operations of the Soviet Union in 1943. Battle of Kursk . Crossing of the Dnieper. Tehran Conference. The question of opening a second front. In preparation for the summer campaign, Nazi strategists concentrated their attention on the Kursk Bulge. This was the name given to the protrusion of the front line facing west. It was defended by troops of two fronts: Central (General K.K. Rokossovsky) and Voronezh (General N.F. Vatutin). It was here that Hitler intended to take revenge for the defeat at Stalingrad. Two powerful tank wedges were supposed to break through the defenses of the Soviet troops at the base of the ledge, encircle them and create a threat to Moscow. The Headquarters of the Supreme High Command, having received timely information from intelligence about the planned offensive, was well prepared for defense and response actions. When the Wehrmacht attacked the Kursk Bulge on July 5, 1943, the Red Army managed to withstand it, and seven days later launched a strategic offensive along a front of 2 thousand km. The Battle of Kursk, which lasted from July 5 to July 23, 1943, and victory in it, Soviet troops had enormous military and political significance. It became the most important stage on the path to the victory of the USSR over Nazi Germany. More than 4 million people took part in the battles on both sides. 30 selected enemy divisions were defeated. In this battle, the offensive strategy of the German armed forces finally collapsed. The victory at Kursk and the subsequent advance of Soviet troops to the Dnieper marked a radical turning point in the course of the war. Germany and its allies were forced to go on the defensive on all fronts of the Second World War, which had a huge impact on its course. Under the influence of the victories of the Red Army, the Resistance movement in the countries occupied by the Nazis became increasingly active. By this time, all the resources of the Soviet state were mobilized as fully as could be done in war conditions. By government decree of February 1942, the entire working population of the country was mobilized for military purposes. People worked 55 hours a week, with only one day off a month, and sometimes no days off at all, sleeping on the floor of the workshop. As a result of the successful mobilization of all resources, by mid-1943, Soviet industry was already far superior to German, which, moreover, was partially destroyed by aerial bombing. In areas where industry was still weak, shortages were made up by constant supplies from Great Britain and the United States under the Lend-Lease agreement. The Soviet Union received a significant amount of tractors, trucks, car tires, explosive materials, field telephones, telephone wires, and food products. This superiority allowed the Red Army to confidently conduct combined military operations in the same spirit as the German troops were able to do at the initial stage of the war. In August 1943, Orel, Belgorod, and Kharkov were liberated, and in September, Smolensk. At the same time, the crossing of the Dnieper began; in November, Soviet units entered the capital of Ukraine, Kyiv, and by the end of the year they had advanced far to the west. By mid-December 1943, Soviet troops liberated part of the Kalinin, all of the Smolensk regions, part of the Polotsk, Vitebsk, Mogilev, Gomel regions; crossed the Desna, Sozh, Dnieper, Pripyat, and Berezina rivers and reached Polesie. By the end of 1943, Soviet troops liberated about 50% of the territory occupied by the enemy. The partisans caused great damage to the enemy. In 1943, the partisans carried out major operations to destroy communication lines under the code names “Rail War” and “Concert”. In total, during the war, over 1 million partisans operated behind enemy lines. As a result of the victories of the Red Army, the prestige of the Soviet Union in the international arena and its role in resolving the most important issues of world politics increased immeasurably. This was also evident at the Tehran Conference of 1943, where the leaders of the three powers - the USSR, the USA, and Great Britain - agreed on plans and deadlines for joint actions to defeat the enemy, as well as agreements on the opening of a second front in Europe during May 1944. The Tehran Conference took place in the capital of Iran on November 28 – December 1, 1943. One of the main topics of the conference was the question of opening a second front. By this time, a radical change had occurred on the eastern front. The Red Army went on the offensive, and the Allies saw the real prospect of a Soviet soldier appearing in the heart of Europe, which was by no means part of their plans. This especially irritated the leader of Great Britain, who did not believe in the possibility of cooperation with Soviet Russia. At the conference, Churchill and Roosevelt agreed to open a second front, although resolving this issue was not easy for them. Churchill tried to convince the Allies of the extreme importance of military operations in Italy and the Eastern Mediterranean. Stalin, on the contrary, demanded the opening of a second front in Western Europe. In choosing the direction of the main attack of the allied forces, Stalin found support from Roosevelt. The political and military leadership of England and the USA agreed to open a second front in the spring of 1944 in Normandy. Stalin promised by this time to launch a powerful offensive operation on the eastern front. The Big Three also discussed future borders in Europe. The most painful question was Polish. Stalin proposed moving the Polish border west, to the Oder. The Soviet-Polish border was supposed to run along the line established in 1939. At the same time, Stalin announced Moscow's claims to Konigsberg and new borders with Finland. The Allies decided to agree to Moscow's territorial demands. Stalin, in turn, promised to enter the war against Japan after Germany signed the act of surrender. The Big Three were discussing the future of Germany, which was generally agreed to be divided. However, no concrete decision was made, since each side had its own view on the future borders of the German lands. Starting from the Tehran Conference, the issue of borders in Europe became the most important for all subsequent meetings. Implementing the decisions of the Tehran Conference, with some delay, on June 6, 1944, the Allied landing in Normandy began (Operation Overlord) with simultaneous support for the Allied landing in the south of France ( Operation Dragoon). On August 25, 1944, they liberated Paris. At the same time, the offensive of Soviet troops, launched along the entire front, continued in northwestern Russia, Finland, and Belarus. The joint actions of the allies confirmed the effectiveness of the coalition and led to the collapse of the fascist bloc in Europe. Particular attention should be paid to the interaction of the allies during the Ardennes counter-offensive of Germany (December 16, 1944 - January 26, 1945), when Soviet troops launched an offensive from the Baltic Sea to the Carpathians earlier than planned (January 12, 1945), at the request of the allies, thereby saving Anglo-American troops from defeat in the Ardennes. It should be noted that in 1944-1945. The Eastern Front continued to be the main one, with 150 German divisions operating against 71 divisions and 3 brigades on the Western Front and 22 divisions in Italy.

12.Military-strategic operations of the Soviet Union in 1944-May 1945. Crimean (Yalta) conference. The third period of the Great Patriotic War - the defeat of the fascist bloc, the expulsion of enemy troops from the USSR, liberation from the occupation of European countries - began in January 1944. This year was marked by a series of new grandiose and victorious operations of the Red Army. In January, the offensive of the Leningrad (General L. A. Govorov) and Volkhov (General K. A. Meretskov) fronts began, finally lifting the blockade of heroic Leningrad. In February-March, the armies of the 1st Ukrainian (General N.F. Vatutin) and 2nd Ukrainian (General I.S. Konev) fronts, having defeated Korsun-Shevchenkovskaya and a number of other powerful enemy groups, reached the border with Romania. In the summer, major victories were won in three strategic directions at once. As a result of the Vyborg-Petrozavodsk operation, the forces of the Leningrad (Marshal L. A. Govorov) and Karelian (General K. A. Meretskov) fronts drove the Finnish units out of Karelia. Finland stopped hostilities on the side of Germany, and in September the USSR signed an armistice agreement with it. In June - August, troops of four fronts (1st, 2nd, 3rd Belorussian, 1st Baltic) under the command of Marshal K.K. Rokossovsky, generals G.F. Zakharov, I.D. Chernyakhovsky, and I.Kh. Bagramyan expelled the enemy from the territory of Belarus during Operation Bagration. In August, the 2nd Ukrainian (General R. Ya. Malinovsky) and 3rd Ukrainian (General F. I. Tolbukhin) fronts, having carried out a joint Iasi-Kishinev operation, liberated Moldova. In early autumn, German troops retreated from Transcarpathian Ukraine and the Baltic states. Finally, in October, a German group on the extreme northern section of the Soviet-German front was defeated by a strike on Pechenga. The state border of the USSR was restored all the way from the Barents to the Black Sea. In general, the Soviet armed forces in 1944 carried out about 50 offensive operations that had enormous military and political significance. As a result, the main groups of Nazi troops were defeated. In the summer and autumn of 1944 alone, the enemy lost 1.6 million people. Nazi Germany lost almost all of its European allies, the front approached its borders, and in East Prussia crossed them. With the opening of the second front, Germany's military-strategic position worsened. However, Hitler's leadership launched a large-scale offensive in the Ardennes (Western Europe). As a result of the German offensive, the Anglo-American troops found themselves in a difficult situation. In this regard, at the request of Winston Churchill, Soviet troops in January 1945 earlier than planned, they went on the offensive along the entire Soviet-German front. The offensive of the Red Army was so powerful that already at the beginning of February its separate formations reached the approaches to Berlin. In January - the first half of April 1945, Soviet troops carried out the East Prussian, Vistula-Oder, Vienna, East Pomeranian, Lower Silesian and Upper Silesian offensive operations. The student needs to talk about the liberation campaign of the Red Army - the liberation of Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Czechoslovakia. The final strategic offensive operation in the Great Patriotic War was the Berlin operation, carried out by the Red Army on April 16 - May 8, 1945. In the spring of 1945, On the territory of Germany, the Armed Forces of the Soviet Union, the USA, Great Britain, and France conducted military operations. During the Berlin operation, Soviet troops defeated 70 infantry, 23 tank and motorized divisions, most of the aviation, and captured about 480 thousand people. On May 8, 1945, in Karlhorst (a suburb of Berlin), an act of unconditional surrender of the armed forces of Nazi Germany was signed. With the surrender of Germany, the war in Europe ended, but the war with Japan in the Far East and the Pacific, waged by the USA, Great Britain and their allies, continued . Having fulfilled its allied obligations adopted at the Crimean Conference, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan on August 8. The Manchurian strategic offensive operation lasted from August 9 to September 2, 1945. Its goals were the defeat of the Japanese Kwantung Army, the liberation of Manchuria and North Korea, and the elimination of the bridgehead of aggression and the military-economic base of Japan on the Asian continent. On September 2, 1945, in Tokyo Bay on board the American battleship Missouri, Japanese representatives signed the Act of Unconditional Surrender, which led to the end of World War II. The southern part of Sakhalin and the islands of the Kuril chain were transferred to the Soviet Union. His sphere of influence extended to North Korea and China. Successful actions in 1944 led to the need to convene a new Allied conference on the eve of Germany's surrender. The Yalta (Crimean) Conference, held on February 4-11, resolved issues primarily related to the post-war structure of Europe. An agreement was reached on the occupation of Germany, its demilitarization, denazification and demonopolization, and on German reparations. It was decided to create four occupation zones on German territory and create a special control body of the commanders-in-chief of the three powers, headquartered in Berlin. In addition to the three great powers, France was also invited to occupy and rule Germany. However, having made this decision, the parties did not stipulate procedural issues and did not define the boundaries of these zones. The Soviet delegation initiated a discussion of the reparation issue, proposing two forms: removal of equipment and annual payments. Roosevelt supported Stalin, who proposed determining the total amount of reparations at 20 billion dollars, of which 50% was to be paid to the Soviet Union. The focus of the conference participants was again on the Polish question. The borders of Poland, according to the decisions of the conference, ran in the east along the “Curzon Line” with compensation for territorial losses by gains in the northwest at the expense of Germany. This secured the accession of Western Belarus and Ukraine to the USSR. The conference participants discussed a number of issues related to other European countries. Stalin agreed to Anglo-American influence in Italy and British influence in Greece. Despite the fact that London and Washington were not satisfied with the position of the Soviet Union on Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania, where Moscow acted virtually independently, they were forced to agree to resolve these issues in the future through normal diplomatic channels. De facto, Eastern Europe was coming under Soviet influence. It is this result of the Yalta conference that many American researchers cannot forgive Roosevelt, although the decisions taken at Yalta were the result of a compromise.

13.The entry of the USSR into the war with Japan. Strategic operations of the Red Army. End of World War II . In the spring of 1945, the redeployment of troops of the USSR and its allies began to the Far East. The forces of the United States and England were quite sufficient to defeat Japan. But the political leadership of these countries, fearing possible losses, insisted on the USSR entering the war on Dal Vos. The S Arm had the goal of destroying the striking force of the Japanese - the Kwantung Army, stationed in Manchuria and Korea and numbering about a million people. In accordance with the allied duty, on April 5, 1945, the USSR denounced the Soviet-Japanese neutrality treaty of 1941 and on August 8 declared war on Japan. On August 9, a group of Soviet troops consisting of Transbaikal (commander - Marshal R.Ya. Malinovsky), 1st (commander - Marshal K.A. Meretskov) and 2nd (coma - General M.A. Purkaev) Far Front, as well as the Quiet Fleet (commander - Admiral I.S. Yumashev) and Amur military flotilla (commander - counter- Admiral N.V. Antonov), numbering 1.8 million people, launched military operations. For strategic leadership of the armed struggle, on July 30, the Main Command of the Soviet troops on Da Vo was created, headed by Marshal A.M. Vasilevsky. The offensive of the Soviet fronts developed quickly and successfully. During 23 days of stubborn battles on a front stretching over 5 thousand km, Soviet troops and naval forces, successfully advancing during the Manchurian, South Sahal and Kuril landing operations, liberated Northeast China, North Korea, the southern part of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands -va. Soldiers of the Mongolian People's Army also took part in the war with Japan along with Soviet troops. Soviet troops captured about 600 thousand enemy soldiers and officers, and many weapons and equipment were captured. The enemy's losses were almost twice as high as those suffered by the Soviet army. The USSR's entry into the war finally broke Japanese resistance. On August 14, its government decided to ask for surrender. On September 2, 1945, in Tokyo Bay on board the American battleship Missouri, representatives of Japan signed the Act of Unconditional Surrender. This meant the end of the Second World War. The victory of the USSR and the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition over the Nazi Germany and Militia Japan in the Second World War was of world-historical significance and had a huge impact on the entire post-war development of mankind. Fatherland was its most important component. The Soviet Voore Forces defended the freedom and independence of the Motherland, participated in the liberation of the peoples of 11 European countries from fascist oppression, and expelled the Japanese occupiers from Northeast China and Korea. During the four-year armed struggle (1,418 days and nights) on the Soviet-German front, the main forces of the fascist bloc were defeated and captured: 607 divisions of the Wehrmacht and its allies. In the battles with the Soviet Armed Forces, Nazi Germany lost over 10 million people (80% of all military losses), over 75% of all military equipment. In the fierce battle with fascism, the question was about life and death of the Slavic peoples. At the cost of a colossal effort, the Russian people, in alliance with all other large and small nations of the USSR, were able to defeat the enemy. However, the cost of the victory of the Soviet people over fascism was enormous. More than 29 million people passed through the war in the ranks of the Sov Vooru Forces. The war claimed over 27 million lives of our fellow citizens, including military losses amounting to 8,668,400 people. The ratio of losses between Kra Ar and the Wehrmacht is determined as 1.3: 1. About 4 million partisans and underground fighters died behind enemy lines and in the occupied territories. About 6 million Soviet citizens found themselves in fascist captivity. The USSR lost 30% of its national wealth. The occupiers destroyed 1,710 Soviet cities and towns, over 70 thousand villages and villages, 32 thousand industrial enterprises, 98 thousand collective farms and 2 thousand state farms, 6 thousand hospitals, 82 thousand schools, 334 universities,

14.Culture during the Great Patriotic War . From the first days of the Great Patriotic War, all the achievements of national culture, science and technology were put into the service of victory and defense of the Motherland. The country was turning into a single combat camp. All spheres of culture had to be subordinated to the tasks of fighting the enemy. Cultural figures fought with weapons in their hands on the war fronts, worked in the front-line press and propaganda brigades. Representatives of all cultural trends made their contribution to the victory. Many of them gave their lives for their homeland, for victory. This was an unprecedented social and spiritual upsurge of the entire people. (See additional illustrative material.) The war with Nazi Germany required a restructuring of all spheres of society, including culture. At the first stage of the war, the main efforts were aimed at explaining the nature of the war and the goals of the USSR in it. Preference was given to operational forms of cultural work, such as radio, cinematography, and print. From the first days of the war, the importance of mass information, mainly radio, increased. The Information Bureau's reports were broadcast 18 times a day in 70 languages. Using the experience of political education during the civil war - "Windows of GROWTH", they began to publish posters "Windows of TASS". A few hours after the declaration of war, a poster of the Kukryniksys appeared (Kukryniksy is a pseudonym (based on the first syllables of their last names) of a creative team of graphic artists and painters: M.V. Kupriyanov, P.F. Krylov and N.A. Sokolov). “We will ruthlessly defeat and destroy the enemy!”, which was reproduced in newspapers in 103 cities. I.M.’s poster carried a great emotional charge. Toidze “The Motherland is Calling!”, stylistically related to the poster by D.S. Moore's Civil War "Have you volunteered?" Posters by V.B. were also extremely popular. Koretsky "Warrior of the Red Army, save!" and Kukryniksov “I Lost a Ring,” depicting Hitler, who “dropped a ring” from 22 divisions defeated at Stalingrad. Posters were an effective means of mobilizing people to fight the enemy. Since the beginning of the war, the evacuation of cultural institutions has been intensive. By November 1941, about 60 theaters in Moscow, Leningrad, Ukraine and Belarus were evacuated to the eastern regions of the country. 53 universities and academic institutions, about 300 creative unions and organizations were evacuated to the Uzbek SSR alone. Kustanay houses the collections of the Historical Museum, the Museum of the Revolution, the most valuable part of the collections of the Library named after. IN AND. Lenin, Foreign Language Library and Historical Library. The treasures of the Russian Museum and the Tretyakov Gallery were taken to Perm, and the Hermitage to Sverdlovsk. The Writers' Union and the Literary Fund moved to Kazan, and the USSR Union of Artists and the Art Fund moved to Sverdlovsk. Soviet art devoted itself entirely to the cause of saving the Fatherland. Soviet poetry and song achieved an extraordinary sound during this period. The song “Holy War” by V. Lebedev-Kumach and A. Alexandrov became a true anthem of the people’s war. Songs by composers A. Aleksandrov, V. Solovyov-Sedoy, M. Blanter, A. Novikov, B. Mokrousov, M. Fradkin, T. Khrennikov and others were very popular. The battle lyrical song became one of the leading genres of literature. “Dugout”, “Evening on the roadstead”, “Nightingales”, “Dark Night” - these songs entered the golden treasury of Soviet song classics. During the war years, one of the greatest musical works of the 20th century was created. - D. Shostakovich’s 7th symphony, dedicated to the heroic defenders of Leningrad. At one time, L. Beethoven liked to repeat that music should strike fire from the courageous human heart. It was these thoughts that were embodied by D. Shostakovich in his most significant work.D. Shostakovich began writing the 7th Symphony a month after the start of the Great Patriotic War and continued to work in Leningrad, besieged by the Nazis. On the original score of the symphony, the composer’s notes “VT” are visible, meaning “air raid warning”. When it came, D. Shostakovich interrupted work on the symphony and went to drop incendiary bombs from the roof of the conservatory. The first three movements of the symphony were completed by the end of September 1941, when Leningrad was already surrounded and subjected to brutal artillery shelling and aerial bombardment. The victorious finale of the symphony was completed in December, when the fascist hordes stood on the outskirts of Moscow. “I dedicate this symphony to my hometown Leningrad, our fight against fascism, our upcoming victory” - this was the epigraph to this work. In 1942, the symphony was performed in the USA and other countries of the anti-fascist coalition. The musical art of the whole world does not know of another composition that would have received such a powerful public response. During the war years, Soviet drama created true masterpieces of theatrical art. In the initial period of the war, the plays of L. Leonov “Invasion”, K. Simonov “Russian People”, A. Korneichuk “Front”, which quickly became popular, were published. Works of domestic literature that are well-known and loved by many today also appeared, such as chapters of the novel by M. Sholokhov “They Fought for the Motherland”, “The Science of Hate”, story by V. Vasilevskaya "Rainbow". The Battle of Stalingrad is dedicated to the stories of K. Simonov “Days and Nights” and V. Grossman “The Direction of the Main Strike”. The heroism of home front workers was described in the works of M.S. Shaginyan and F.V. Gladkova. During the war, the first chapters of A. Fadeev’s novel “The Young Guard” were published. Journalism of those years is represented by articles by K. Simonov, I. Ehrenburg. Military lyrics by M. Isakovsky, S. Shchipachev, A. Tvardovsky, A. Akhmatova, A. Surkov, N. Tikhonov were created in the form of an oath, lamentation, curse, and direct appeal. O. Berggolts, B. Pasternak, M. Svetlova, K. Simonov. Thus, the images of the defenders of Leningrad were created by O. Berggolts in the “Leningrad Poem” and V. Inber in the poem “Pulkovo Meridian”. The poem by A.T. was extremely popular. Tvardovsky "Vasily Terkin", poem by M.I. Aliger "Zoya". More than a thousand writers and poets in the ranks of the active army worked as war correspondents. Ten writers were awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union: Musa Jalil, P.P. Vershigora, A. Gaidar, A. Surkov, E. Petrov, A. Bek, K. Simonov, M. Sholokhov, A. Fadeev, N. Tikhonov. The coming to power of fascism in a number of countries and the beginning of the Great Patriotic War revived the Russian patriotic theme in cinema ("Alexander Nevsky", "Suvorov", "Kutuzov"). On the basis of the evacuated film studios "Lenfilm" and "Mosfilm" in Almaty, the Central United Film Studio (CUKS) was created. During these years, film directors S. Eisenstein, V. Pudovkin, the Vasiliev brothers, F. Ermler, I. Pyryev, G. Roshal worked at the film studio. About 80% of all domestic feature films during the war years were produced at this film studio. In total, during the war years, 34 full-length films and almost 500 film magazines were created. Among them is “Secretary of the District Committee” I.A. Pyryeva, “Invasion” by A. Room, “Rainbow” by M.S. Donskoy, “Two Fighters” by L.D. Lukova, “She Defends the Motherland” F.M. Ermler, documentary film “The Defeat of German Troops near Moscow” by L. Varlamov and I. Kopalin. There were more than 150 cameramen on the front line and in partisan detachments.

To provide cultural services to the front, front-line brigades of artists, writers, painters and front-line theaters were created (by 1944 there were 25 of them). The first of them was the Iskra Theater, made up of actors from the theater. Lenin Komsomol - volunteers of the people's militia, then front-line branches of the Maly Theater, the Theater named after. E. Vakhtangov and the Komsomol theater of GITIS. During the war years, more than 40 thousand artists visited the fronts as part of such brigades. Among them were the luminaries of the Russian stage I.M. Moskvin, A.K. Tarasova, N.K. Cherkasov, M.I. Tsarev, A.A. Yablochkina and others. During the war years, the concerts of the Leningrad Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra under the direction of E. Mravinsky, the Song and Dance Ensemble of the Soviet Army under the direction of A. Alexandrov, and the Russian Folk Choir named after A. Aleksandrov enjoyed exceptional success during the war years. M. Pyatnitsky, soloists K. Shulzhenko, L. Ruslanova, A. Raikin, L. Utesov, I. Kozlovsky, S. Lemeshev and many others. etc. The 13-meter statue of a Soviet liberator warrior with a girl in his arms and a lowered sword, erected after the war in Berlin in Treptower Park (sculptor - E.V. Vuchetich), became a sculptural symbol of the war years and the memory of fallen wars. War, heroism of the Soviets people are reflected in the paintings of artists A.A. Deineki "Defense of Sevastopol", S.V. Gerasimov "Mother of the Partisan", painting by A.A. Plastov “The Fascist Flew” and others. Assessing the damage to the cultural heritage of the country, the Extraordinary State Commission to investigate the atrocities of the invaders named 430 museums out of 991 located in the occupied territory, 44 thousand palaces of culture and libraries among those plundered and destroyed. The house-museums of L.N. were looted. Tolstoy in Yasnaya Polyana, I.S. Turgenev in Spassky-Lutovinovo, A.S. Pushkin in Mikhailovsky, P.I. Tchaikovsky in Klin, T.G. Shevchenko in Kanev. The frescoes of the 12th century were irretrievably lost. in the St. Sophia Cathedral of Novgorod, manuscripts by P.I. Tchaikovsky, canvases by I.E. Repina, V.A. Serova, I.K. Aivazovsky, who died in Stalingrad. Ancient architectural monuments of ancient Russian cities - Novgorod, Pskov, Smolensk, Tver, Rzhev, Vyazma, Kyiv - were destroyed. Suburban architectural ensembles-palaces of St. Petersburg and architectural monastery complexes of the Moscow region were damaged. The human losses were irreparable. All this affected the development of domestic culture after the war. Thus, despite the period of totalitarianism in the history of the country preceding the Great Patriotic War, severe ideological pressure on the entire domestic culture, in the face of tragedy, the danger of foreign conquest, ideological vocabulary is leaving genuine culture and coming to the fore eternal, deep, truly national values ​​are put forward. Hence the amazing unity of the culture of those years, the desire of people to protect their Earth and its traditions.

15.The international significance of the victory of the Soviet Union in the Great Patriotic War. Sources of victory. Results. Berlin (Potsdam Conference).

The victory over fascist Germany and its allies was achieved through the joint efforts of the states of the anti-fascist coalition, the peoples who fought against the occupiers and their accomplices. But the Soviet Union played a decisive role in this armed battle. It was the Soviet country that was the most active and consistent fighter against the fascist invaders who sought to enslave the peoples of the whole world.

The world-historical significance of the Victory lies in the fact that it was the Soviet people and their Armed Forces who blocked the path of German fascism to world domination, bore the brunt of a war unprecedented in human history and made a decisive contribution to the defeat of Nazi Germany and its allies.

The victory over Nazi Germany was the result of the joint efforts of all countries of the anti-Hitler coalition. But the main burden of the struggle against the shock forces of world reaction fell to the lot of the Soviet Union. It was on the Soviet-German front that the most fierce and decisive battles of the Second World War took place.

The Great Patriotic War ended with the complete military-political, economic and ideological victory of the Soviet Union. This predetermined the outcome of the Second World War as a whole. The victory over fascism is an event of world-historical significance. What are the most important results of the war?

The main result of the victorious conclusion of the Great Patriotic War is that, in the most difficult trials, the Soviet people crushed fascism - the darkest creation of the era, and defended the freedom and independence of their state. Having overthrown fascism, together with the armies of other states of the anti-Hitler coalition, the Soviet Union saved humanity from the threat of enslavement.

The victory of the Soviet people over German fascism had a huge impact on the entire further course of world history and on the solution of the fundamental social problems of our time.

The war imposed on the Soviet Union had socio-political consequences that were unforeseen for its organizers. The hopes of the reactionary circles of the Western powers to weaken our country were dashed. The USSR emerged from the war even stronger politically and militarily, and its international authority rose immeasurably. Governments and people listened to his voice; without his participation, essentially, not a single important problem affecting the fundamental interests of the world was solved. This was expressed, in particular, in the establishment and restoration of diplomatic relations with many states. So, if in 1941 26 countries maintained diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union, then in 1945 - already 52 states.

Victory in the war brought the USSR into the ranks of the leading powers of the post-war world and created a real basis for a new stage in international relations. First of all, this is the creation of the United Nations, joint measures to eradicate Nazism and militarism in Germany, the formation of international mechanisms for discussing post-war problems, etc.

The moral, political and spiritual unity of Soviet society was of great importance for achieving victory. By attacking the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany also bet on the fact that the Soviet multinational state would not withstand severe military tests, anti-Soviet, nationalist forces would become more active in the country, and a “fifth column” would appear.

The coordinated organizational work of the country's political and military leadership played a huge role in achieving victory. Thanks to targeted and well-coordinated work at the center and locally, the country was quickly transformed into a single military camp. The program for defeating the enemy, scientifically grounded and understandable to the majority of the population, was set out already in the first documents and speeches of state leaders: the appeal of the Soviet government to the people on June 22, the directive of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks to party and Soviet organizations in the front-line regions on June 29, the speech of I. IN. Stalin on the radio July 3, 1941. They clearly defined the nature and goals of the war, and named the most important measures aimed at repelling aggression and defeating the enemy. The most important source of victory in the Great Patriotic War was the powerful potential of the Soviet Armed Forces. The victory in the Great Patriotic War showed the superiority of Soviet military science and military art, the high level of strategic leadership and combat skill of our military personnel, and the military organization as a whole.

Victory in the war was also achieved thanks to the high patriotism of Soviet soldiers, their love for their Fatherland, and loyalty to their constitutional duty. These qualities were embedded in the consciousness of military personnel in the pre-war years during a well-organized system of patriotic and military-patriotic education, which permeated all layers of Soviet society and accompanied the citizen at all stages of his life - at school, in the army, at work. Soviet losses at the fronts , according to various estimates, vary from 8.5 to 26.5 million people. The total material damage and military costs are estimated at $485 billion. 1,710 cities and towns and more than 70 thousand villages were destroyed. But the USSR defended its independence and contributed to the full or partial liberation of a number of European and Asian countries - Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria , Yugoslavia, China and Korea. He made a huge contribution to the overall victory of the anti-fascist coalition over Germany, Italy and Japan: on the Soviet-German front, 607 Wehrmacht divisions were defeated and captured, and almost 3/4 of all German military equipment was destroyed. The USSR played an important role in the post-war peace settlement; its territory expanded to include East Prussia, Transcarpathian Ukraine, the Petsamo region, southern Sakhalin, and the Kuril Islands. It became one of the leading world powers and the center of an entire system of communist states on the Euro-Asian continent.

Potsdam Conference 1945, Berlin Conference, conference of heads of government of the USSR, USA and Great Britain: Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR I.V. Stalin, US President G. Truman, British Prime Minister W. Churchill, who was replaced on July 28 by the new Prime Minister K. Attlee . It took place from July 17 to August 2 at the Cecilienhof Palace in Potsdam, near Berlin. The Minister of Foreign Affairs, military advisers and experts participated in the work of the PK. The decisions of the Political Committee were a development of the decisions of the Crimean Conference of 1945.

Issues related to the demilitarization, denazification, and democratization of Germany, as well as many other important aspects of the German problem, occupied a central place in the work of the PK.

The participants of the PK reached an agreement on the main directions of the general policy towards Germany, which was considered as a single economic and political whole. The Potsdam Agreements provided for the complete disarmament of Germany, the dissolution of its armed forces, the destruction of monopolies and the liquidation in Germany of all industry that could be used for: military production, the destruction of the National Socialist Party, organizations and institutions controlled by it, the prevention of all Nazi and militaristic activities or propaganda in the country. The conference participants signed a special agreement on reparations, which confirmed the rights of the peoples who suffered from the Germans. aggression, for compensation and determining the sources of reparation payments. An agreement was reached on the establishment of central German administrative departments (finance, transport, communications, etc.).

At the conference, a system of quadripartite occupation of Germany was finally agreed upon, which was supposed to serve its demilitarization and democratization; it was envisaged that during the occupation, supreme power in Germany would be exercised by the commanders-in-chief of the armed forces of the USSR, USA, Great Britain and France, each in its own zone of occupation; on matters affecting Germany as a whole, they were to act jointly as members of the Control Council.

The Potsdam Agreement defined a new Polish-German border along the Oder-West Neisse line, the establishment of which was reinforced by the PK decision to evict the German population remaining in Poland, as well as in Czechoslovakia and Hungary. The PK confirmed the transfer of Koenigsberg (since 1946 - Kaliningrad) and the adjacent region to the Soviet Union. She established the Council of Foreign Ministers (CMFA), entrusting it with the preparation of a peace settlement with Germany and its former allies.

At the suggestion of the Soviet delegation, the conference discussed the fate of the German fleet and decided to divide the entire German surface, naval and merchant fleet equally between the USSR, the USA and Great Britain. At the suggestion of Great Britain, it was decided to sink most of the German submarine fleet, and divide the rest equally.

The Soviet government proposed to extend the competence of the Austrian provisional government to the entire country, that is, also to those areas of Austria that were occupied by the troops of the Western powers. As a result of the negotiations, it was decided to study this issue after the entry of US and British troops into Vienna.

The three governments confirmed at the PK their intention to bring the main war criminals to trial at the International Military Tribunal. The participants of the PK expressed their opinions on some other issues of international life: the situation in the countries of Eastern Europe, the Black Sea Straits, the attitude of the United Nations towards the Franco regime in Spain, etc.

"WINTER WAR"

Having signed mutual assistance agreements with the Baltic states, the USSR turned to Finland with a proposal to conclude a similar agreement. Finland refused. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of this country, E. Erkko, stated that “Finland will never make a decision similar to those made by the Baltic states. If this happens, it will only be in the worst case scenario.” The origins of the Soviet-Finnish confrontation are largely explained by the extremely hostile, aggressive position of the ruling circles of Finland towards the USSR. Former Finnish President P. Svinhuvud, under whom Soviet Russia voluntarily recognized the independence of its northern neighbor, said that “any enemy of Russia must always be a friend of Finland.” In the mid-30s. M. M. Litvinov, in a conversation with the Finnish envoy, stated that “in no neighboring country is there such open propaganda for an attack on the USSR and the seizure of its territory as in Finland.”

After the Munich Agreement of Western countries, the Soviet leadership began to show particular persistence towards Finland. During 1938-1939 Negotiations were held during which Moscow sought to ensure the security of Leningrad by moving the border on the Karelian Isthmus. In exchange, Finland was offered the territories of Karelia, much larger in size than the lands that were supposed to be transferred to the USSR. In addition, the Soviet government promised to allocate a certain amount for the resettlement of residents. However, the Finnish side stated that the territory ceded to the USSR was insufficient compensation. The Karelian Isthmus had a well-developed infrastructure: a network of railways and highways, buildings, warehouses and other structures. The territory transferred by the Soviet Union to Finland was an area covered with forests and swamps. In order to transform this territory into an area suitable for living and economic needs, it was necessary to invest considerable funds.

Moscow did not give up hope for a peaceful resolution of the conflict and offered various options for concluding an agreement. At the same time, he firmly stated: “Since we cannot move Leningrad, we will move the border to secure it.” At the same time, he referred to Ribbentrop, who explained the German attack on Poland by the need to secure Berlin. Large-scale military construction began on both sides of the border. The Soviet Union was preparing for offensive operations, and Finland for defensive operations. Finnish Foreign Minister Erkko, expressing the mood of the government, confirmed: “Everything has its limits. Finland cannot agree to the proposal of the Soviet Union and will defend its territory, its inviolability and independence by any means.”

The Soviet Union and Finland did not follow the path of finding a compromise acceptable to them. Stalin's imperial ambitions made themselves felt this time too. In the second half of November 1939, diplomatic methods gave way to threats and saber-rattling. The Red Army hastily prepared for military operations. On November 27, 1939, V. M. Molotov issued a statement in which he said that “yesterday, November 26, the Finnish White Guards undertook a new vile provocation by firing artillery fire at a military unit of the Red Army located in the village of Mainila on the Karelian Isthmus.” Disputes are still ongoing as to from whose side these shots were fired. The Finns already in 1939 tried to prove that the shelling could not have been carried out from their territory, and the whole story with the “Maynila incident” was nothing more than a provocation by Moscow.

On November 29, taking advantage of the shelling of its border positions, the USSR terminated the non-aggression pact with Finland. On November 30, hostilities began. On December 1, on Finnish territory, in the city of Terijoki (Zelenogorsk), where Soviet troops entered, on the initiative of Moscow, a new “people's government” of Finland was formed, headed by the Finnish communist O. Kuusinen. The next day, an agreement on mutual assistance and friendship was concluded between the USSR and the Kuusinen government, called the government of the Finnish Democratic Republic.

Events, however, did not develop as well as the Kremlin had hoped. The first stage of the war (November 30, 1939 - February 10, 1940) was especially unsuccessful for the Red Army. To a large extent, this was due to an underestimation of the combat capability of the Finnish troops. Break through the Mannerheim Line on the move - a complex of defensive fortifications built in 1927-1939. and stretching along the front for 135 km, and in depth up to 95 km, failed. During the fighting, the Red Army suffered huge losses.

In December 1939, the command stopped unsuccessful attempts to advance deep into Finnish territory. Careful preparations for the breakthrough began. The North-Western Front was formed, led by S.K. Timoshenko and member of the Military Council A.A. Zhdanov. The front included two armies, led by K. A. Meretskov and V. D. Grendal (replaced in early March 1940 by F. A. Parusinov). The total number of Soviet troops was increased by 1.4 times and brought to 760 thousand people.

Finland also strengthened its army by receiving military equipment and equipment from abroad. 11.5 thousand volunteers arrived from Scandinavia, the USA and other countries to fight the Soviets. England and France developed their plans for military action, intending to enter the war on the side of Finland. In London and Paris they did not hide their hostile plans towards the USSR.

On February 11, 1940, the final stage of the war began. Soviet troops went on the offensive and broke through the Mannerheim Line. The main forces of the Karelian Army of Finland were defeated. On March 12, a peace treaty was concluded in the Kremlin after short negotiations. Military operations along the entire front ceased from 12 o'clock on March 13. In accordance with the signed agreement, the Karelian Isthmus, the western and northern coasts of Lake Ladoga, and a number of islands in the Gulf of Finland were included in the USSR. The Soviet Union received a 30-year lease on the Hanko Peninsula to create a naval base on it “capable of defending the entrance to the Gulf of Finland from aggression.”

The cost of victory in the “winter war” turned out to be extremely high. In addition to the fact that the Soviet Union as an “aggressor state” was expelled from the League of Nations, during the 105 days of the war the Red Army lost at least 127 thousand people killed, died from wounds and went missing. About 250 thousand military personnel were wounded, frostbitten, and shell-shocked.

The "Winter War" demonstrated major miscalculations in the organization and training of the Red Army troops. Hitler, who closely followed the course of events in Finland, formulated the conclusion that the Red Army was a “colossus with feet of clay” that the Wehrmacht could easily cope with. Certain conclusions from the military campaign of 1939-1940. They did it in the Kremlin too. Thus, K.E. Voroshilov was replaced as People's Commissar of Defense by S.M. Timoshenko. The implementation of a set of measures aimed at strengthening the defense capability of the USSR began.

However, during the “winter war” and after its end, no significant strengthening of security in the north-west was achieved. Although the border was moved away from Leningrad and the Murmansk railway, this did not prevent Leningrad from falling into the siege during the Great Patriotic War. In addition, Finland did not become a friendly or at least neutral country to the USSR - revanchist elements prevailed in its leadership, who relied on supporting Nazi Germany.

I.S. Ratkovsky, M.V. Khodyakov. History of Soviet Russia

POET'S VIEW

From a shabby notebook

Two lines about a boy fighter,

What happened in the forties

Killed on ice in Finland.

It lay somehow awkwardly

Childishly small body.

The frost pressed the overcoat to the ice,

The hat flew far away.

It seemed that the boy was not lying down,

And he was still running

Yes, he held the ice behind the floor...

Among the great cruel war,

I can’t imagine why,

I feel sorry for that distant fate

Like dead, alone,

It's like I'm lying there

Frozen, small, killed

In that unknown war,

Forgotten, small, lying.

A.T. Tvardovsky. Two lines.

NO, MOLOTOV!

Ivan goes to war with a cheerful song,

but, running into the Mannerheim line,

he starts to sing a sad song,

as we hear it now:

Finland, Finland,

Ivan is headed there again.

Since Molotov promised that everything would be fine

and tomorrow in Helsinki they will be eating ice cream.

No, Molotov! No, Molotov!

Finland, Finland,

The Mannerheim Line is a serious obstacle,

and when terrible artillery fire began from Karelia

he silenced many Ivans.

No, Molotov! No, Molotov!

You lie even more than Bobrikov!

Finland, Finland,

The invincible Red Army is afraid.

Molotov already said to look for a dacha,

otherwise the Chukhons are threatening to capture us.

No, Molotov! No, Molotov!

You lie even more than Bobrikov!

Go beyond the Urals, go beyond the Urals,

there is a lot of space for a Molotov dacha.

We will send the Stalins and their henchmen there,

political instructors, commissars and Petrozavodsk swindlers.

No, Molotov! No, Molotov!

You lie even more than Bobrikov!

MANNERHEIM LINE: MYTH OR REALITY?

It is good form for supporters of the theory of a strong Red Army that broke through an impregnable defense line, always quoting General Badu, who built the “Mannerheim Line.” He wrote: “Nowhere in the world were natural conditions so favorable for the construction of fortified lines as in Karelia. In this narrow place between two bodies of water - Lake Ladoga and the Gulf of Finland - there are impenetrable forests and huge rocks. The famous “Mannerheim Line” was built from wood and granite, and where necessary from concrete. The anti-tank obstacles made in granite give the Mannerheim Line its greatest strength. Even twenty-five ton tanks cannot overcome them. Using explosions, the Finns built machine-gun and artillery nests in the granite, which were resistant to the most powerful bombs. Where there was a shortage of granite, the Finns did not spare concrete.”

In general, reading these lines, a person imagining the real “Mannerheim Line” will be terribly surprised. In Badu’s description, one sees before one’s eyes some gloomy granite cliffs with firing points carved into them at a dizzying height, over which vultures circle in anticipation of mountains of corpses of the attackers. Badu's description actually fits more closely to the Czech fortifications on the border with Germany. The Karelian Isthmus is a relatively flat area, and there is no need to cut down in the rocks simply due to the absence of the rocks themselves. But one way or another, the image of an impregnable castle was created in the mass consciousness and became firmly entrenched in it.

In reality, the Mannerheim Line was far from the best examples of European fortification. The vast majority of long-term Finnish structures were one-story, partially buried reinforced concrete structures in the form of a bunker, divided into several rooms by internal partitions with armored doors. Three bunkers of the “million-dollar” type had two levels, another three bunkers had three levels. Let me emphasize, precisely the level. That is, their combat casemates and shelters were located at different levels relative to the surface, slightly buried casemates with embrasures in the ground and completely buried galleries connecting them with the barracks. There were negligibly few buildings with what could be called floors. Below each other - such placement - small casemates directly above the premises of the lower tier were only in two bunkers (Sk-10 and Sj-5) and the gun casemate in Patoniemi. This is, to put it mildly, unimpressive. Even if you do not take into account the impressive structures of the Maginot Line, you can find many examples of much more advanced bunkers...

The survivability of the gouges was designed for Renault-type tanks in service in Finland, and did not meet modern requirements. Contrary to Badu's assertions, Finnish anti-tank guns showed during the war their low resistance to attacks from T-28 medium tanks. But it wasn’t even a matter of the quality of the “Mannerheim Line” structures. Any defensive line is characterized by the number of long-term fire structures (DOS) per kilometer. In total, on the “Mannerheim Line” there were 214 permanent structures for 140 km, of which 134 were machine gun or artillery DOS. Directly on the front line in the combat contact zone in the period from mid-December 1939 to mid-February 1940 there were 55 bunkers, 14 shelters and 3 infantry positions, about half of which were obsolete structures from the first period of construction. For comparison, the Maginot Line had about 5,800 DOS in 300 defense nodes and a length of 400 km (density 14 DOS/km), the Siegfried Line had 16,000 fortifications (weaker than the French ones) on a front of 500 km (density - 32 structures per km) ... And the “Mannerheim Line” is 214 DOS (of which only 8 artillery) on a front of 140 km (average density 1.5 DOS/km, in some areas - up to 3-6 DOS/km).

On the eve of the World War, both Europe and Asia were already in flames with many local conflicts. International tension was due to the high probability of a new big war, and all the most powerful political players on the world map before it began tried to secure favorable starting positions for themselves, without neglecting any means. The USSR was no exception. In 1939-1940 The Soviet-Finnish war began. The reasons for the inevitable military conflict lay in the same looming threat of a major European war. The USSR, increasingly aware of its inevitability, was forced to look for an opportunity to move the state border as far as possible from one of the most strategically important cities - Leningrad. Taking this into account, the Soviet leadership entered into negotiations with the Finns, offering their neighbors an exchange of territories. At the same time, the Finns were offered a territory almost twice as large as what the USSR planned to receive in return. One of the demands that the Finns did not want to accept under any circumstances was the USSR’s request to locate military bases on Finnish territory. Even the admonitions of Germany (Helsinki’s ally), including Hermann Goering, who hinted to the Finns that they could not count on Berlin’s help, did not force Finland to move away from its positions. Thus, the parties who did not come to a compromise came to the beginning of the conflict.

Progress of hostilities

The Soviet-Finnish war began on November 30, 1939. Obviously, the Soviet command was counting on a quick and victorious war with minimal losses. However, the Finns themselves were also not going to surrender to the mercy of their big neighbor. The president of the country, the military Mannerheim, who, by the way, received his education in the Russian Empire, planned to delay the Soviet troops with a massive defense for as long as possible, until the start of assistance from Europe. The complete quantitative advantage of the Soviet country in both human resources and equipment was obvious. The war for the USSR began with heavy fighting. Its first stage in historiography is usually dated from November 30, 1939 to February 10, 1940 - the time that became the bloodiest for the advancing Soviet troops. The line of defense, called the Mannerheim Line, became an insurmountable obstacle for the Red Army soldiers. Fortified pillboxes and bunkers, Molotov cocktails, which later became known as “Molotov cocktails,” severe frosts that reached 40 degrees - all this is considered to be the main reasons for the failures of the USSR in the Finnish campaign.

The turning point in the war and its end

The second stage of the war begins on February 11, the moment of the general offensive of the Red Army. At this time, a significant amount of manpower and equipment was concentrated on the Karelian Isthmus. For several days before the attack, the Soviet army carried out artillery preparations, subjecting the entire surrounding area to heavy bombardment.

As a result of the successful preparation of the operation and the further assault, the first line of defense was broken within three days, and by February 17 the Finns had completely switched to the second line. During February 21-28, the second line was also broken. On March 13, the Soviet-Finnish war ended. On this day, the USSR stormed Vyborg. The leaders of Suomi realized that there was no longer a chance to defend themselves after a breakthrough in the defense, and the Soviet-Finnish war itself was doomed to remain a local conflict, without outside support, which is what Mannerheim was counting on. Given this, a request for negotiations was a logical conclusion.

Results of the war

As a result of protracted bloody battles, the USSR achieved satisfaction of all its claims. In particular, the country became the sole owner of the waters of Lake Ladoga. In total, the Soviet-Finnish war guaranteed the USSR an increase in territory by 40 thousand square meters. km. As for losses, this war cost the Soviet country dearly. According to some estimates, about 150 thousand people left their lives in the snows of Finland. Was this company necessary? Considering the fact that Leningrad was the target of German troops almost from the very beginning of the attack, it is worth admitting that yes. However, large losses seriously called into question the combat effectiveness of the Soviet army. By the way, the end of hostilities did not mark the end of the conflict. Soviet-Finnish War 1941-1944 became a continuation of the epic, during which the Finns, trying to regain what they had lost, failed again.