Quote:
Having shown the situation of the white population in South Africa and Europe, it is time to look into distant America, the birthplace of modern democracy, where the movement for human rights, which American rulers are spreading throughout the world, has won.
The proportion of whites in the United States is rapidly declining. Today, given the huge influx of illegal migrants from South America, whites make up about 66% of all residents (official statistics say 75%, but this does not take into account the 4 million migrants of color from the south who cross the border into Mexico every year under the cover of darkness). 30 years ago whites were 90%. So, there are consistently 210 million whites in the United States, and the number of non-whites is constantly growing and today is approaching 90 million. This includes blacks, Latin Americans, Arabs, Jews, Chinese, etc. Overall, a mind-blowing melting pot. The greatest problem for the existence of the white population of the United States is represented by the two most aggressive groups: blacks and Latin Americans. We will consider them (in addition to the Jewish tycoons who are behind the collapse of America, but about them in a separate post).
Black people
Blacks in America, as in the rest of the world, are distinguished by an extreme propensity for violence and an almost complete lack of ability to learn anything. 90% of blacks ruin the reputation of the other 10%. According to the research of the American racialist, Jerold Taylor, based on official crime figures published in FBI reports, for example, the murder rate among blacks is 45 per 100,000 population; and among white Americans, 5 per 100,000. The average number of all murders for the entire US population is 9.5 per 100,000. In Europe, this magic number ranges between 3 and 7, depending on the country. It is this figure of 9.5 that the world media uses to show that Americans are distinguished by some kind of increased aggressiveness at the everyday level, compared to Europe. But if you point to the official components of crime statistics, then you will certainly be accused of racism, and they will find connections in your past with the Ku Klux Klan, they will throw mud at you and smear your face on the asphalt. Therefore, everyone is silent in the conditions of the freest country on earth, where freedom of speech and other wonderful freedoms simply flourish. (The Color of Crime. Race, Crime and Justice in America. Jerold Taylor. 2005.)
Of the 770,000 thousand annual interracial attacks in the United States between whites and blacks, blacks commit 85% of such attacks, and whites 15%.
Like this video where blacks beat up white girls in their car. Their guilt is that they are white and moved into a black area, and in a thriving democracy - this is racism:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...16056758&hl=en
But if someone says that this is just hooliganism and the blacks have no far-reaching goals to exterminate the whites, then he will be very disappointed after watching this short clip from a live news broadcast on one of the main television channels in America, C-SPAN. The video features Professor Kamau Kambon, who teaches at one of the universities:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...22252982&hl=en
His words caused absolutely no storm of righteous indignation on the part of the progressive public and no one dug into his past for connections with the Black Panther organization or the Islamic Nation. Somehow it went unnoticed.
Here is the transcript, for those who did not catch the professor’s subtle turns of speech in English:
There is only one nigga on the planet who pollutes water, air, exploits peoples and resources. And this nigga is a white man and a white woman. А наши люди не ниггеры, нас пытаются выдать за ниггеров. In my research, I have come to only one conclusion, and that is that we must exterminate white people from the face of the earth to solve this problem. We must solve this problem. Because they are going to kill us. And I'll leave it at that. We need to create our own system, stop playing games, take this matter seriously and not let ourselves be led astray in solving this problem. And the problem on the planet is white people.
A normal person will ask what about the whites, why don’t they defend themselves.
They are defending themselves, but they are haunted by the ghost of the slaveholding South, just as the Germans in Germany are haunted by the ghost of the Third Reich, and therefore it is not difficult for the Jewish media to present any act of opposition to Negro tyranny as racism, and therefore prevent whites from uniting their forces. Therefore, in America, since the 1970s, there has been a so-called “White Exodus” from the cities, that is, the flight of white Americans to the suburbs in an attempt to save their lives and the lives of their children from the rampant Negro tyranny, supported by Jewish lawyers and the media.
However, at the beginning of the 21st century, a second round of relocation began, caused by the fact that due to the huge influx of illegal migrants, even the suburbs are now beginning to darken, and whites are again forced to look for new housing at a greater distance (The Decline of Inner Suburbs: The New Suburban Gothic in the United States
Geography Compass 1(3), 641–656).
For example, the white population of America's auto manufacturing hub of Detroit has dropped from 1.5 million to less than 90,000 over the past few decades. And this has nothing to do with the decline of the automobile industry in the city itself, since during the same time the number of blacks increased from 150 thousand to 800 thousand.
Detroit takes first place as the most destroyed city in the United States. In addition to the mass exodus of the white population, blacks began a tradition that spread to other cities - "Devil's Night". It is a custom to set fire to and destroy parts of the city the night before Halloween.
A huge non-white population, combined with annual arson, bankruptcy, crime and decay, have reduced Detroit, once the center of the US auto industry, to ruins comparable to the ruins of ancient civilizations. The reason is the same: replacing the white population that built the cities with a new non-white population.
Detroit's decline followed a demographic change that transformed Detroit from a prosperous white city into a crime-ridden, impoverished black city, living on government subsidies, bailouts, and self-deceptive handouts from corporations operating in the spirit of righteous atonement for blacks.
The more blacks, the higher the crime. And, as a result, a massive outflow of the white population from the city. The main factors that forced whites to leave their homes were domestic violence on the streets and in the schools where their children studied. Due to the inculcation of tolerance and integration, blacks began to be brought from distant parts of the city to white neighborhoods and schools, where they attacked passers-by, killed, robbed, and beat white children in schools. They were allowed, and any retaliatory actions of whites in their defense were regarded as racism and were severely punished by the courts (Ruins of Detroit).
NY
According to official census data for 2000, the white population of New York is 44% The concentration of people of color is even higher in the city center. Hidden from the view of tourists visiting chic business districts with skyscrapers and expensive shops are the city's residential areas with a non-white population. They are not talked about in tourist brochures, and they are not taken there on excursions.
In 1981, there were 6,500 robberies in Harlem alone.
At the beginning of the 21st century, the crime situation in Harlem has not improved. So in April 2006, a white student at New York University was killed in Harlem by black teenagers who were chasing him and shouting “get the white one.”
Another hotbed of color crime and decadence in New York is the Bronx, just across the river from Harlem. The unlimited influx of immigrants from South America since the mid-1960s has led to an increase in crime, drug addiction and murder. The white population, again as in other cities, unprotected by the government, hastily left their homes and habitable neighborhoods. According to official 2000 census data, the Bronx population is 23% white.
Chicago
According to the 2000 Census, Chicago's nonwhite population is 68%. The white population concentrated in the suburbs, and the central and main part of the city was left to the mercy of blacks and other people of color.
When, in the 1970s, the government began building entire black and colored communities right in middle-class white neighborhoods and children of color began attending schools, whites began to rush to sell their homes due to the deteriorating quality of life in their communities. blacks and the worsening crime situation in the schools where their children studied. Real estate prices plummeted, whites left and their place was taken by blacks. All this happened in a few short years.
Philadelphia
According to the 2000 Census, Philadelphia's nonwhite population is 58%. The white population concentrated in the suburbs, and the central and main part of the city, as in other cities, was abandoned to the tyranny of blacks and other people of color, and decline and destruction set in. The reason is still the same why only ruins remained of ancient civilizations: the disappearance of the white population.
The northern part of Philadelphia is almost entirely colored: blacks, Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Pakistanis and Arabs. Most residents in this part of the city live below the poverty line, and their neighborhoods are rife with crime.
Today, what remains of the times when this city was prosperous lies in a dilapidated or abandoned state. Of what remains, many historic buildings are falling apart, either from neglect or vandalism. Even more buildings stand empty and with boarded up windows. Only a few were taken under protection by the city government as historical heritage. Old luxurious churches were also given over to the local people of color to be destroyed.
Washington
According to official 2000 census data, the non-white population of Washington is 60%.
The white population was forced to move far beyond the American capital to the states of Maryland and the northern part of Virginia. At night, the city center is almost entirely devoid of white people.
Behind the glitter of the White House, Capitol Hill and monuments, the real state of affairs in a city with a population of two-thirds non-white is hidden: robberies, drug addiction, murders committed by blacks every day. But all this is kept silent in the official media in order to give Washington a decent appearance as the capital of the state.
St. Louis
According to official 2000 census data, the nonwhite population of St. Louis is 57%.
Like other American cities, St. Louis was unable to avoid the loss of its white population, which moved beyond the city limits into the suburbs in the second half of the 20th century. This was again caused by the growth of the black population, and the accompanying increase in crime and devastation in residential areas.
A significant example of anti-white racism in the United States is the murder of a young couple, Shannon Christian and Chris Nusom, in Knoxville, Tennessee, in January 2007. They were on one of their first dates, getting into a car in the parking lot near the house, when they were attacked by a group of blacks, taken to the apartment of one of the blacks, where they were tortured, raped and mutilated their genitals. As it was later established, the girl was raped orally, vaginally and anally. The guy's body, after he was shot, was wrapped in a blanket, set on fire and thrown near the railroad tracks. It also turned out at the trial that he was anally raped. The media was not interested in this crime because the victims were white and the perpetrators were black. This means there was no racism and nothing to discuss. However, the brutality of the crime agitated Knoxville residents and they began to protest in front of city administration buildings and media offices. At first, journalists attributed all this to the machinations of white extremists, but when more and more people began to be drawn into the protests and it was no longer possible to ignore it, the media reluctantly began to cover the crime, without specifically indicating the race of the killers. The news eventually broke on national television, although it was immediately said that the murder was not motivated by racial hatred. Well, sensible people understand that when it is officially stated that the conflict has no ethnic or racial overtones, this means that this is the main motive for the crime (http://mylifeofcrime.wordpress.com/2007 ... is-newsom/).
And in this video, a black man beats an old woman at the entrance of her house when she returns with purchases from the store. It’s also better not to report this on television, otherwise the blacks will be offended.
The beginning of the importation of slaves into the territory of the modern United States of America coincided with the entry of England into the era of colonial conquests,
The first permanent settlement of English colonists in America, James Town, was founded in 1607. Twelve years later, in 1619, the first ship bringing blacks landed on the shores of North America 2 .
The importation of blacks and the introduction of slavery were a consequence of the need for labor "in the south of North America, where large agricultural farms - tobacco, rice and other plantations - were established on lands distributed by kings to their confidants. In the North, where plantation farming, by virtue special economic and climatic conditions, was less common, slavery was never used on such a scale as in the South. However, in the northern states there were slaves, mainly domestic servants, agricultural laborers, etc.
The first blacks were brought to America as indentured laborers, but very soon the indenture system was officially replaced by the more profitable system of slavery. In 1641, in Massachusetts, the term of service for slaves was changed to life, and a law in 1661 in Virginia made maternal slavery hereditary for children. Similar laws enshrining slavery were passed in Maryland (1663), New York (1665), South (1682) and North Carolina (1715), etc.
So the blacks became slaves.
The black slaves imported to America were mostly residents of the western coast of Africa, a much smaller part belonged to the tribes of Central and Southern Africa, as well as North Africa and the island of Madagascar. Among them were blacks from the Fulbe, Wolof, Yoruba, Ibo, Ashanti, Fanti, Hausa, Dahomey, Bantu and others tribes 1 .
The black tribes of Africa were at different stages of social and economic development, had their own customs and spoke languages distributed among three main linguistic families - Bantu, Semitic-Hamitic and Sudanese 2 . Some tribes had slavery for prisoners of war and criminals, as well as economic (debt) slavery.
Until the end of the 17th century. The slave trade in the English colonies in America was a monopoly of the Royal African Company, but in 1698 this monopoly was eliminated, and the colonies received the right to independently engage in the slave trade. The slave trade took on even wider dimensions after 1713, when England achieved the right of asiento - the exclusive right to trade in black slaves. Blacks were caught, bought, goods were exchanged for them, they were loaded into the stinking holds of ships and taken to America. All of Africa has turned, in the words of K. Marx, into a “reserved hunting ground for blacks” 3 . Slave factories grew along the western coast of Africa from Cape Verde to the equator, where slaves were driven in batches, tied by the neck with ropes and chained. Here, in dirty, cramped barracks, they awaited the arrival of slave ships. Documents show that the 120-ton ship was loaded with at least 600 slaves. The blacks shackled were forced into the hold onto shelves, the distance between which was so small that each person had less space than in a coffin.
Slaves died in droves in the barracks of trading posts and during transportation. But although for every Negro who survived, there were often five who died on the road - suffocated from lack of air, died from illness, went crazy, or simply threw themselves into the sea, preferring death to slavery - slave traders received fabulous profits: the demand for Negroes was so great , and slaves were so cheap and paid for themselves so quickly. Negroes were so cheap that it was more profitable for planters to torture a slave in backbreaking work in a short time than to exploit him longer, but more carefully. The average life expectancy of a slave on plantations in some areas of the South did not exceed six or seven years.
Slavery developed slowly at first. Thus, in 1670 there were only about 2 thousand slaves in Virginia (about 5% of the total population). But by 1715, slaves made up about one-third of the population of Virginia, North and South Carolina and Maryland (46 thousand out of 123 thousand). As the plantation economy grew, there was a further increase in the import of slaves. According to the US Census Bureau, before January 1, 1808, when the importation of slaves was prohibited by law, about 400 thousand blacks were imported into the United States. From the beginning of the 19th century. by 1860 the number of slaves increased from 893 thousand to 4 million.
Despite the ban on the import of slaves in 1808, the slave trade did not stop. It existed in a hidden form until the official emancipation of blacks during the Civil War of 1861-1865. Blacks were now smuggled, which further increased the mortality rate during transportation. It is estimated that between 1808 and 1860 about half a million slaves were smuggled into the United States. In addition, the subject of trade was blacks, specially “raised” for sale in some slave states of the South (especially in South Carolina and Virginia).
Bourgeois racist historians like to contrast Indians with blacks - free hunters who died but did not submit to slave owners. From this it is concluded that slavery is the natural condition of the Negroes. However, the very premise of such a opposition is a falsification of history. “A Negro is a Negro, only under certain conditions does he become a slave,” wrote K. Marx 1 . Negroes were made slaves, but they were never submissive slaves. Often blacks started uprisings on ships. This is evidenced by a special type of insurance for shipowners to cover losses specifically in the event of a slave rebellion on the ship. But even on the plantations, where blacks brought from different parts of Africa lived, representatives of different tribes speaking different languages, slaves managed to overcome inter-tribal strife and unite in the fight against their common enemy - the planters. So, already in 1663 and 1687. Major conspiracies of blacks in Virginia were discovered, and in 1712 the garrison of New York with great difficulty managed to prevent the capture of the city by rebellious black slaves. During the period from 1663 to 1863, when Negro slavery was abolished, over 250 Negro uprisings and conspiracies 2 were recorded, including such large ones as the uprisings led by Cato (1739) in Stono (South Carolina), Gabriel, sometimes called named after the owner by Gabriel Prosser (1800), in Henrico (Virginia), Denmark Vesey (1822) in Charleston (South Carolina), and Nat Turner (1831) in Southampton (Virginia).
Black uprisings were brutally suppressed. But even these isolated outbursts of despair among the oppressed slaves made the planters tremble with fear. Almost every plantation had its own weapons depot, and groups of planters maintained security detachments that prowled the roads at night. “The entire social system in the southern states,” notes F. Foner, “was based on the direct suppression of blacks by force of arms” 1 .
Negro slaves expressed their protest in other forms, such as damage to tools, murder of overseers and owners, suicide, escape, etc. Escape required great courage and courage from the Negro, because if a runaway slave was caught, his ears were cut off , and sometimes, if he offered armed resistance, their hands or branded him with a hot iron. Nevertheless, blacks - men, women and even children - fled to the forests, to the Indians, to the North, where by the end of the 18th century. slavery was abolished (see below). According to G. Epteker 2, at least 60 thousand fugitives reached the northern states in the period from 1830 to 1860. The number of blacks who died on the road or were captured and executed by slave owners will never be known.
Escapes of slaves from plantations became especially widespread during the revolution of 1774-1783. Blacks played an important role in the struggle of the American colonies against English rule. George Washington, who for a long time hesitated to recruit blacks as soldiers, was forced to resort to this measure in 1776 due to the advance of the British and the general difficult situation in the country. According to some estimates, there were at least 5 thousand blacks in Washington’s army, many of whom distinguished themselves in the struggle: Crispus Attucks, Peter Salem, Austin Debney, James Armistead, Deborah Gennett and others. Negro veterans, released for military merit from the Rao- ties, increased the number of free blacks of the North and South. But the revolution of 1774-1783 did not resolve the issue of slavery and its abolition. The new constitution was essentially based on the recognition of slavery, as can be seen from a number of its articles 3 . Under pressure from slave owners, a nationwide fugitive slave law was passed in 1793. Other questions about slavery were left to the discretion of individual states. However, during and shortly after the Revolution, slavery was abolished in the northern and northwestern states.
The slave uprisings and their struggle for their emancipation not only sowed fear among the planters; they awakened the consciousness of Americans and contributed to the development of a broad democratic movement, which, together with the struggle of the blacks themselves, ultimately led to the abolition of slavery.
The earliest anti-slavery protests in North America date back to the late 17th century. Their authors - Quakers and representatives of some other religious sects - denied slavery as contrary to the principles of the Christian religion and morality. In 1775, America's first local anti-slavery society was formed in Philadelphia. One of the organizers of the society was Benjamin Franklin. In the 90s of the XVIII century. similar societies already existed in many states. But at the beginning of the 19th century. there is a certain decline in the movement for the liberation of blacks, and the illusion is widespread that after the prohibition of the importation of slaves, slavery should die out of its own accord. In reality, however, it happened differently.
The invention of the cotton gin (gin), which greatly accelerated the cleaning of cotton, caused the rise of cotton growing and significantly increased the demand for slaves, and the beginning of the industrial revolution in Europe, and then in the United States, further increased the demand for both cotton and slaves. The price of a slave rose from $300 in 1795 to $900 in 1849 and to $1,500 to $2,000 on the eve of the Civil War. The intensification of slave labor and the exploitation of slaves increased sharply.
All this led to a new aggravation of class contradictions, to a new rise in the liberation movement of blacks and their white allies. The wave of black uprisings that swept through the first half of the 19th century. the entire south of the United States, was also associated with the revolutionary movement of blacks in the West Indies at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries. By the 30s of the 19th century. refers to the formation in the United States of a nationwide organized abolitionist movement (the movement of supporters of black liberation).
Prominent abolitionist leaders were William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass. Harrison (1805-1879) is credited with creating the American Anti-Slavery Society in Philadelphia in 1833 and a whole network of abolitionist societies, the number of which in the 50s of the 19th century. exceeded 2 thousand. The American Anti-Slavery Society united both white abolitionists and free blacks. The society's declaration, adopted at a convention in Philadelphia in December 1833, stated that slavery in which Americans held their fellow citizens was contrary to "the principles of natural justice, republican government and the Christian religion, undermines the welfare of the country and threatens the peace, union and liberties states." Further, a demand was put forward for the immediate liberation of blacks, without resettlement to Africa, by “convincing fellow citizens with arguments addressed to their reason and conscience” 1 .
The main demand contained in the declaration - the demand for the immediate release of slaves without ransom and without expatriation - was revolutionary. The weakness of the society's program lies in the lack of understanding of the real path to the liberation of blacks, in the refusal of political struggle and the overestimation of the role of moral exhortation and propaganda.
W.-L. For 34 years until 1865, Harrison published and edited the central organ of the abolitionists, the Liberator magazine, which denounced slavery and slave owners. The first issue of the magazine was published in 1831, the year of the slave rebellion led by Nat Turner.
Douglas (1817-1895), an illustrious black leader, was vice president of the Anti-Slavery Society. His mother is a black slave, his father is white; Douglas himself and his brothers and sisters were slaves. In 1838, Douglas fled to the North and became a remarkable public figure - a fighter for his people, for their political organization, a brilliant speaker and writer. Beginning in 1838, Douglas published the most popular newspaper before the Civil War, the North Star, later known as the Frederick Douglass' paper.
Abolitionism was not a homogeneous movement. Here, the struggle of farmers and workers against slavery, the activities of part of the northern industrial bourgeoisie interested in the elimination of slavery as economically unprofitable, and the sincere indignation of the liberal, democratically minded intelligentsia at the shame of slavery merged into a single democratic front. The most active abolitionists were the blacks themselves. There were serious disagreements between various currents in the abolitionist movement on many political issues, and, in particular, on the issue of the use of force in the fight against slavery - disagreements that later led to a split.
The activities of the abolitionists took place in an atmosphere of terror and persecution from the planters and their accomplices. Nuyasha had extraordinary courage to oppose slavery not only in the southern states, but also in the North. Thus, in 1837, prominent abolitionist I. Lovejoy was killed in the northern state of Illinois.
Among the abolitionists, the names of Wendell Phillips, Harriet Beecher Stowe, whose novel “Uncle Tom's Cabin” (1851) significantly contributed to the gathering of the forces of the abolitionists, and others should also be mentioned. American Marxists Joseph Weidemeyer, Friedrich Sorge, Adolf played a major role in the abolitionist movement Douay and others. Some of them fought during the Civil War in the ranks of the northerners.
A significant contribution to the development of the abolitionist movement was made by pamphlets and books by Negro abolitionists: the famous “Walker's Appeal” (1829), which called slaves to an armed uprising, articles and open letters by G. Garnet, pamphlets by W. Nell, an appeal by F. Douglas “Claims of Negroes ethnologically concerned”, 1854 and others. W. W. Brown and D. Pennington traveled to cities in the USA and other countries, conducting propaganda against slavery and collecting funds, necessary for the fight.
One of the most remarkable figures of the abolitionist movement is the former slave Harriet Tubman, an active participant in the “secret road” (underground railway). The "Secret Road" was a chain of refuges for fugitive slaves on their way from the slave states to Canada. Thousands of blacks and whites took part in the work of the “secret road,” many of whom are known only by pseudonyms. Making trip after trip from the southern states to the North, G. Tubman personally freed over 300 blacks from slavery and inspired thousands to escape. In 1856, the planters announced a reward of 40 thousand dollars for the head of G. Tubman, but they failed to seize it. During the Civil War, G. Tubman fought in the northern troops and in partisan detachments.
By the middle of the 19th century. slavery has become obsolete. The invention of spinning machines and the introduction of various technical improvements increased labor productivity in industry and sharply increased the need for cotton. The labor of slaves, even under conditions of the most severe exploitation, remained unproductive; its productivity did not meet the new requirements of industry. The slavery system also hampered the development of capitalism in the United States and the formation of a single internal national market. The abolition of slavery thus became a necessary condition for the further development of capitalism. In addition, by denying all human rights to part of the people, the slavery system was a threat to the welfare and civil liberties of the entire American people and caused growing protest among blacks and a broad movement against slavery among various segments of the American population.
However, the planters were not going to voluntarily give up power. In 1820, as a result of the Missouri Compromise, they achieved the establishment of the boundary of slavery at 36°30" north latitude. In 1850, under pressure from the planters, Congress passed a new fugitive slave law, much more severe than the law of 1793. 1 J and in 1854, thanks to the Kansas and Nebraska Bill, which left the issue of slavery in a given new territory to the settlers themselves, any legal barriers to the spread of slavery throughout the United States were destroyed. However, all this in turn led to increased slave unrest and the growth of the abolitionist movement in the decade leading up to the Civil War.
The precursor to the Civil War in the United States was the Kansas Civil War, followed by John Brown's Rebellion (1859). Brown (1800-1859), a white farmer from Richmond (Ohio), a prominent abolitionist and leader of the "Secret Road", planned to make a campaign in Virginia, raise a general uprising of slaves and form a free state in the mountains of Maryland and Virginia as a base for the fight for freeing all slaves. On the night of October 16, 1859, Brown with a small detachment of 22 people (five of them blacks) moved to Harpers Ferry and captured the arsenal. However, John Brown's campaign turned out to be insufficiently prepared. Left without support, Brown's detachment was surrounded and defeated after a fierce battle. John Brown, severely wounded, was captured, charged with treason and inciting slaves to revolt, and sentenced to hang. In his last speech at the trial, Brown denied all the charges brought against him and pleaded guilty to only one - the intention to free slaves 2.
The execution of John Brown caused an explosion of indignation throughout the world, and brought closer the crisis that erupted in 1861. The first blow was dealt by the planters: in 1860, after the election of President A. Lincoln, a representative of the North, they announced the secession of a number of southern states from the Union , and at the beginning of 1861 they attacked the northern troops at Fort Sumter. Thus began the civil war between North and South.
In the civil war of 1861-1865. the tasks were the bourgeois-democratic transformation of society, the abolition of slavery and the transfer of political and economic power throughout the country into the hands of the industrialists of the North. In the article “The Civil War in North America,” K. Marx characterized the situation as follows: “The modern struggle between the South and the North is ... nothing more than a struggle between two social systems - the system of slavery and the system of free labor ... It can end only the victory of one of these systems” 3.
The war became protracted due to the indecisive policies of the government of Abraham Lincoln, which reflected the real contradictions of the forces confronted in the war, and at the same time the hesitations of the bourgeoisie. Lincoln saw the main goal of the war in preserving the union of states, in returning the 11 rebellious states of the South to the union, and not in the abolition of slavery. And only when the northerners suffered a series of defeats and the situation on the fronts became threatening, under pressure from the popular masses and with the enormous activity of the blacks themselves, Lincoln signed a law on the confiscation of slaves of rebel planters (August 6, 1861), on the prohibition of the extradition of fugitive slaves (March 31, 1862). g.) and on the release with ransom of blacks in the District of Columbia (April 16, 1862). And finally, on September 22, 1862, the historic Emancipation Proclamation was published, according to which, as of January 1, 1863, all slaves in the rebellious states, if the rebellion was not stopped, received freedom “from now on and forever.” On January 1, 1863, slaves, although only in the seceded states, received personal freedom.
After the victory of the northerners and the liberation of the blacks, the most important issue became the question of restructuring the entire political and economic life in the South, the question of reconstructing the South. In March 1865, the Bureau of freedmen, refugees and abandoned lands was established, headed by General O.-O. Howard. The Bureau's tasks included comprehensive assistance to freed blacks in new conditions. The bureau existed until 1868, and its activities had a great positive impact.
However, the blacks were released without ransom, but also without land and without means of subsistence. Large plantation landownership was not destroyed, the political power of slave owners was only shaken for a while, but not broken. And although the blacks themselves took part in the struggle for their liberation with arms in hand, although over 200 thousand blacks fought in the army of the northerners and 37 thousand of them died in this war, the blacks received neither real freedom, nor, moreover, equality. Having freed themselves from slavery to the planters, they fell into bondage to the same planters and were forced to work under enslaving conditions for their former masters as hired workers or tenants. “Slavery is abolished, long live slavery!” - this is how one of the reactionary figures of that era defined the situation.
After the assassination of Lincoln on April 14, 1865 and the coming to power of E. Johnson, who pursued a policy of concessions towards the planters, reaction in the southern states again raised its head. In 1865-1866, the so-called “Black codes” were introduced in various states of the South, essentially restoring the slavery of blacks. Typical, for example, are the laws passed in 1865 in the state of Mississippi 1 . Under these laws, blacks, under penalty of life imprisonment, were denied the right to marry whites, were prohibited from carrying weapons, blacks' civil liberties were curtailed, and their right to own land was limited. In almost all southern states, blacks' voting rights were contested, and blacks were virtually excluded from participation in political life. According to the Apprentice law, all blacks - teenagers under 18 years of age, without parents, or children of poor parents (poor minors), were given into the service of whites, who could forcibly keep them in service, return them in case of escape in court and subject to corporal punishment. Blacks were allowed only to the most difficult and dirty jobs. Many states had Vagrant laws, under which blacks who were not employed on a regular basis were declared vagrants, imprisoned and sent to convict brigades, or forcibly returned to work for their former planters. Vagrancy laws were applied extremely widely, and they were always given an interpretation that suited the planters. In the southern states, a system of indentured servitude flourished, the use of convict labor, who were often chained and had to perform road-building or other hard work carried out in a particular state. A “system of social isolation and segregation (separation) of blacks, a system of Jim Crowism 2 , was also established. This meant that blacks could settle only in certain, strictly limited areas, visit only certain and lower-class hotels, restaurants, theaters, and travel only in cars marked “for coloreds.” This meant thousands of small and large humiliations to which blacks are still subjected to one degree or another in modern America.
The result of a mass movement of protest by both blacks and white Republicans against the “black codes” and events in the US South was the approval by Congress of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution abolishing slavery (1865), the 14th Amendment on the civil rights of blacks (1868) and the 15th Amendment. 1st Negro Suffrage Amendment (1870). In 1867-1868 Congress approved laws on the reconstruction of the South, according to which the southern states were divided into five military districts and a military dictatorship was introduced there, carried out by northern troops. The states elected their provisional authorities on the basis of universal suffrage (including blacks), and Confederates, former active participants in the rebellion, were deprived of the right to vote. Blacks found themselves elected to legislative bodies in a number of states. Thus, G. Epteker points out 1 that in the state of Mississippi after the elections of 1870 there were 30 blacks in the House of Representatives, and five in the Senate. “In 1866,” writes W. Foster about the South, “a decade of the most extensive democratic development of the states began, the like of which had never been seen before or since” 2 . During this period, a number of progressive bourgeois-democratic transformations were carried out: universal suffrage for men and new rights for women were established, a state school system and a system for providing for the elderly were created, civil equality was introduced, the “black codes” were abolished, etc.
But the main task of the revolution - the redistribution of land, the destruction of the plantation economy, and thereby the political and economic power and dominance of slave owners - was not solved. This made it possible for the reaction in the southern states to gather forces and go on the offensive. Numerous terrorist groups began to form, committing murders, beatings and other acts of violence against blacks and their white allies and inciting racial hatred.
One such group was the Ku Klux Klan, organized in 1865 in Tennessee. The Ku Klux Klan 3 arose as a counter-revolutionary terrorist organization of slave owners to suppress and intimidate freed blacks. The Ku Klux Klan was a secret organization, its activities were surrounded by an atmosphere of mystery, and the ritual of Masonic lodges was adopted 4 . Dressed in the now traditional uniform - white robes with slits for the eyes and mouth, with a cross on the chest, on dark nights the “knights” of the Ku Klux Klan committed their bloody and dirty deeds - raids, arson, murders - and disappeared without a trace. They killed blacks and progressive white leaders and organized pogroms against blacks. One of the bloodiest pogroms occurred in 1866 in New Orleans.
The favorite method of the Ku Klux Klan was lynching. Lynching 1 - lynching, cruel and bloody reprisal without trial. Lynching is not just murder. It is accompanied by the most sophisticated sadistic torture and abuse of the victim, who is usually hanged or burned alive, doused with kerosene or pitch. Lynching was used by planters to establish a regime of terror over freed blacks. In 1871, the terror of the Ku Klux Klan reached such proportions that President W. Grant was forced to appoint an investigation and issue a law banning the Ku Klux Klan. After this, the Ku Klux Klan went underground, but its criminal activities did not stop.
Having achieved their goals and fearing a further deepening of the revolution, the bourgeoisie of the North made a deal with slave owners to organize a united front against the labor and farmer movement and the national liberation struggle of the black people. By the 80s of the XIX century. a conspiracy took shape between the capitalists of the North and the planters of the South, which in history is called the compromise, or betrayal, by Hayes - Tilden (1877). Hayes, the presidential candidate of the Republican Party, the party of the northern bourgeoisie, received the support of the planters and was elected president after promising to withdraw northern troops from the South. This compromise ended the reconstruction period.
Liberated blacks found themselves in extremely difficult conditions in the South. The American bourgeoisie “... tried, on the basis of “free” republican-democratic capitalism, to restore everything possible, to do everything possible and impossible for the most shameless and vile oppression of blacks... Isolation, callousness, lack of fresh air, some kind of prison for the “liberated” blacks - that’s what the American South is,” wrote V.I. Lenin 2.
Most blacks continued to work as sharecroppers in the cotton fields and on farms, often owned by their previous owners or their children. The sharecropping system that developed in the southern states after the Civil War left the tenant completely at the mercy of the landowner. The sharecropper had no property, no land, no means of production, no livestock, no money, nothing except labor. Sharecroppers lived in deep poverty, paying the planter half and sometimes two-thirds of the harvest for the right to use the land. At the same time, “black codes” were being restored everywhere in the southern states and laws were being introduced that, under one pretext or another, would deprive blacks of voting and civil rights. Segregation of blacks and whites is again established in public places, in schools, etc.
The US entry into the stage of imperialism was marked by an intensification of reaction in all areas of life. Anti-Negro protests and pogroms also became more frequent. The lynching curve went up sharply. At the same time, literary pogromists (Dixon, Page, etc.) spoke out, whose works contained direct calls for reprisals against blacks. The tried and tested ideological weapon of the slave owners was again put into use - the “theory” of white supremacy. The reactionary forces of capitalism found more and more new forms of enslavement of the black population, considering them as a source of super-profits. By 1915, the Ku Klux Klan was reorganized and turned into a weapon in the struggle of big capital and monopolies against the communists, the trade union movement, the black national liberation movement and against other progressive forces in America.
During the First World War, in order to justify the US entry into the imperialist massacre and to attract blacks into the army, the American bourgeoisie declared its goal to protect world civilization, culture and democracy from the German barbarians and promised the blacks to radically change their situation after the war. Many blacks were deceived by these promises. Over 400 thousand blacks served in the American army during the First World War. Hundreds of American blacks received the highest French, Belgian and American awards for bravery and courage. But when black soldiers began to understand the aggressive, unjust goals and essence of the First World War, they refused to sail overseas and serve as cannon fodder for the interests of the American imperialists. Thus, in August 1917, rebel soldiers of a black regiment in Houston (Texas) killed officers and refused to go to Europe. The uprising was brutally suppressed, many black soldiers were shot, and 200 soldiers were sentenced to long-term hard labor.
When the war ended and the black soldiers returned to America, nothing had changed for them. Negroes who had entered factories during the war were now fired. In connection with the post-war crisis, the situation of black farmers and agricultural laborers, in particular, deteriorated sharply. Many black soldiers who returned from the army were lynched because they dared to go out into the streets in military uniforms and with orders. Frightened by the ever-increasing anger of the black people, the American bourgeoisie switched to methods of direct violence and inspired in 1917 and 1919. mass black pogroms that swept across the country. The pogrom in St. Louis in the summer of 1917 was especially bloody. In 1919, real street battles took place in Chicago, where the rioters were repulsed by black workers and former soldiers.
The acute discontent and indignation of the black soldiers, the petty bourgeoisie and part of the workers and farm laborers was used by the adventurer Mark Garvey, who led the movement of blacks to return to Africa 1 . Garvey's reactionary utopian bourgeois-nationalist slogans - the creation of an African black empire, "Africa for Africans" - did not receive the support of the advanced part of the black people. It was soon discovered that Garvey had entered into an agreement with the Ku Klux Klan and secured its non-interference in its affairs by declaring his organization anti-communist. These revelations caused a mass exodus of blacks from Garvist organizations. After Garvey's arrest for fraud with public money, Garveyism gradually fades away. In the 1920s, the black nationalist movement weakened due to America's entry into the so-called "prosperity" period.
The crisis of 1929-1933, which unfolded on the basis of the general crisis of the capitalist economic system, put an end to illusions about the strength of American “prosperity” and caused a further intensification of the class struggle. In these years, with greater clarity than ever before in America, there is a demarcation between the forces of democracy and progress, on the one hand, and the forces of reaction and fascism, on the other. Numerous fascist and pro-fascist organizations and groups are appearing in the USA, the lynching curve is going up again (according to official data, in the 1920s 19-20 lynchings were recorded per year, in 1631 - 79, in 1934 - 84), there was the anti-lynching law was failed in the Senate due to the obstruction of southern senators (to remove lynching cases from the jurisdiction of individual state courts and transfer them to federal authorities and the federal court). But the 1930s were a period of growing unity and organization of the American working class, which it demonstrated in enormous mass strikes. This was a time of great political activity among the American proletariat and the progressive intelligentsia, especially in the election campaigns of 1932 and 1936, when the Communist Party of the USA nominated its candidates William Foster and the black communist James Ford.
In the 1930s, the nature of the black liberation movement changed. Until then, the liberation movement was led by the black bourgeoisie, which sought to direct it along a false, bourgeois-nationalist path. Now the leader of the movement is the black proletariat, which grew up as a result of the proletarianization of blacks and their movement to the industrial areas of the North during the First World War and after it.
For the first time in the broad labor movement of the 1930s, black workers felt part of the American working class. Their struggle against racial discrimination joined the common front of the struggle against capitalist slavery. That is why American workers responded so passionately to the trials in Scottsboro, Alabama, in 1931, and in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1937. In 1931, nine black men were sentenced to death in Scottsboro on false charges of raping white women. young men, the youngest of whom was thirteen years old, and the eldest had barely reached nineteen. The joint action of white and black workers, the protest of the public around the world forced the US Supreme Court to reconsider the case; seven young men were released, two were sentenced to prison, but their lives were saved.
In Atlanta, the black communist Angelo Herndon, who organized a joint demonstration of white and black unemployed people in 1932 and proclaimed the class solidarity of workers regardless of skin color, was sentenced to 20 years of hard labor under the sedition law introduced during the Civil War. A widespread protest campaign by workers in America and around the world forced the court to release Herndon on bail. In the shortest possible time, the amount required to pay the bail was collected in the form of voluntary donations. And in July 1937, the law under which Angelo Herndon was convicted was declared unconstitutional.
In 1936-1938, when the people were fighting in Spain against the fascist rebels, the Negro Committee for Assistance to Spanish Democracy was created. Many blacks fought in the ranks of the volunteers of the International Brigade. Some of them died heroic deaths in this struggle - Alonzo Watson, Oliver Lowe, Milton Herndon (brother of Angelo Herndon), etc.
During these years, the American Communist Party carried out a great deal of explanatory and organizational work among blacks, the only party that consistently defended the interests of the black people to the end. At the call of the Communist Party, a powerful demonstration was held on March 6, 1930, and a number of other demonstrations of white and black unemployed people. Communists involved black workers and sharecroppers in the strike movement, fought in trade unions against discrimination against blacks carried out by reactionary leaders, and led campaigns for the liberation of the Scottsboro boys and Angelo Herndon. Numerous books and pamphlets by American communists popularized the Communist Party's point of view on the Negro question 1 .
During the years of the so-called “New Deal,” blacks achieved some specific concessions from the government of F. D. Roosevelt, who attracted individual blacks to the government apparatus, albeit in minor positions. However, the Roosevelt government did not carry out any significant reforms - lynching and segregation were not legally prohibited, the poll tax, which exists in many states, and discrimination against blacks, etc. were not abolished.
Blacks took part in the Second World War; they hated fascism and its racist theories and understood that if there was no democracy for them now, then it would be even worse if fascism won. Of great importance was also the fact that the United States acted in the Second World War in the same camp with the Soviet Union - a country of freedom and equality of nations.
About 1 million blacks joined or were drafted into the US Army during this war. In the liberation struggle against fascism, blacks showed themselves to be excellent soldiers, many of them were awarded orders and medals for military valor. However, the policy of racial discrimination, segregation and Jim Crowism continued to be the official policy of the US ruling circles. Blacks were discriminated against even during conscription and service. They did military service in special units, they tried not to admit them to naval and flight schools, they tried not to give them special qualifications. Thus, of the 19 thousand blacks who served in the navy, over 4 thousand were used as cooks and waiters, and the rest in hard non-combatant work. In most cases, the so-called Negro aviation units also did auxiliary work. By the end of the Second World War, only 8,600 blacks had officer ranks (of which: 1 general and 34 colonels and lieutenant colonels; the highest rank of a black in the navy was lieutenant).
Discrimination against blacks especially intensified after the end of the Second World War due to the general offensive of reaction in the United States. On August 27, 1949, in Peekskill, near New York, a fascist provocation was committed against the black people and the solidarity of American workers. On this day, a gang of fascist hooligans attacked spectators who had gathered to listen to the songs of the wonderful black singer and progressive public figure Paul Robeson, and wanted to lynch him. Over the course of the whole evening, several dozen whites and blacks selflessly fought off the attacks of drunken thugs, who acted with the connivance of the police. However, the brazen attack of the American fascists did not intimidate the working people. Exactly a week later, on September 3, a Paul Robeson concert took place in Peekskill, which was attended by at least 25 thousand people. This was a great victory for the progressive people of the United States. The concert was guarded by special detachments of black and white volunteer workers who thwarted all attempts by hooligans to stop Robeson from singing.
1955-1956 marked by a new upsurge in the black struggle for freedom and equality. The national liberation movement of the black people is one of the most widespread democratic movements in modern America. As indicated in the draft resolution of the XVI Congress of the Communist Party of the USA 1, the current stage of development of the black liberation movement is characterized, in particular, by the increased role of the black urban population and the black proletariat, the strengthening of ties with the trade union movement, the transfer of the center of struggle to the South, to the citadel of racism, where in connection with industrialization, the number of workers has increased significantly and where, along with black workers, broad sections of the intelligentsia, priests, etc. are included in the struggle. The slogan “Achieve freedom by 1963” is now very popular among blacks. (i.e., the centennial anniversary of the liberation from slavery). Indicative facts are given, for example, in the article by Eslanda Robson 2. Negroes are intensifying their struggle in all spheres of life: moving from the ghetto to nearby “white” areas, despite the fierce resistance of the Ku Klux Klan, fighting stubbornly in trade unions, etc. Negro political figures began a campaign against racist congressmen, seeking their recall from Congress.
Blacks began to realize their political power. Nowadays, headed by priest M.-JI, is becoming increasingly widespread. King's movement to ensure that at least 5 million blacks from the southern states took part in the 1960 presidential elections. Blacks intend to exercise their political rights and force the government to abandon its policy of racial discrimination. Blacks also realized their great economic strength, successfully using it in economic boycotts. For example, blacks in Montgomery (Alabama) showed excellent endurance and organization, where for a year from December 1955 the population boycotted a bus company that discriminated against blacks. Rallies were held throughout the country in support of Montgomery blacks and funds were raised. Local authorities arrested and tried 90 boycott leaders, including all the city's black priests, on charges of conspiracy. But they failed to break or intimidate the blacks. The struggle ended in victory for the black population of Montgomery, who forced the bus company in December 1956 to abolish discriminatory practices and segregation. Similar boycotts were carried out in other cities in the South.
On May 17, 1954, as a result of many years of struggle by blacks and all democratic forces in the United States, as well as strong pressure from world public opinion, the US Supreme Court decided to prohibit racial segregation in public schools. However, the implementation of this decision was largely left to the blacks themselves.
In Washington and some cities in the states of Oklahoma, Missouri, Kentucky and others, notable successes have been achieved 3 . But in the deep South, reactionary local authorities refused to implement the decision of the Supreme Court, as a result of which an extremely tense situation was created in the southern states. Serious clashes occurred in a number of cities and federal troops were brought in to restore order.
Nevertheless, the blacks are determined to achieve their rights. This is evidenced, for example, by the grand demonstration that took place in Washington at the Lincoln Monument on May 17, 1957, on the third anniversary of the Supreme Court decision banning segregation. On this day, more than 50 thousand blacks came from all over the country to Washington to express their protest against anti-Negro terror in the southern states and to declare their solidarity with those fighting for civil rights and freedom.
The events that took place in September 1957 in Little Rock (Arkansas), where the racist governor Faubus tried to forcefully prevent nine black children from entering a school that previously accepted only whites, became known throughout the world. The actions of Faubus and the outrages of local Ku Klux Klansmen caused enormous indignation throughout the country. Federal troops were sent to Little Rock. For three months, black schoolchildren went to school under the guard of soldiers, bravely fighting their way through the ranks of brutal hooligans, and won a difficult victory.
On the side of American blacks are all the honest people of the United States and the whole world who understand that the struggle of American blacks for freedom and equality is part of the general struggle against imperialism, racism and colonial oppression that is going on all over the world.
The ancestors of American blacks were taken from Africa approximately 300 years ago. Factories of slave dealers were created in Africa, who captured blacks in every possible way (by violence, soldering, deception), and shackled them in stocks or chains. Ships regularly arrived from the USA, on which blacks were driven into the holds, battened down and taken away into slavery.
By the way, the cost of one slave in the USA reached 2000 dollars, while in Africa he was bought from dealers for 400 liters of rum or 20 dollars. Slave traders explained the considerable value of blacks at that time by their high mortality rate on the way from Africa to America. In fact, according to historical sources, out of every ten blacks, only one often reached the shores of the United States. Between 1661 and 1774 alone, about a million living slaves were brought from Africa to the United States, and over nine million died along the way.
The ratio of blacks to whites in the USA
Since 1790, censuses have been regularly conducted in the United States every 10 years. I think that no one will be surprised by the fact that the absolute number of blacks is growing every year. If in 1790 there were 757,208 people, then at the time of the last census in 2000 there were already 37,104,248 blacks in the United States.
However, if you look at the relative figures, a rather interesting situation arises here. In 1790, the United States was 19.3% black and 80.7% white, and in 2000 the ratio of blacks to whites was 13 and 82%, respectively. Don't you notice the strangeness? The relative number of whites remains virtually unchanged and makes up about 80% of the population, while the relative number of blacks has decreased by almost a third over 200 years. Why? To answer this question, let's turn to genetics...
Gene migration
In the United States, the offspring of mixed marriages between whites and blacks belong to the black population. The frequency of the allele that controls the Rh factor in the white population of the United States is 0.028. In black African tribes, the frequency of this allele is 0.630. However, among the modern black population of the United States, whose ancestors were taken from Africa 300 years (about 10 generations) ago, the frequency of this allele is already 0.446. Thus, the flow of genes from the white population to the black population occurred at a rate of 3.6% per generation. As a result, after 10 generations, the share of genes of African ancestors is now 0.694 of the total number of genes of the modern black population of the United States. Or, in other words, American blacks inherited about 30% of their genes from the white population.
If things continue like this, then in 600 years the blacks of the United States will be no different from the whites. Moreover, the lower the percentage of Negro blood in a Negro, the more likely is inbreeding between him and a representative of the white race, so miscegenation can occur faster. Compare the likelihood of conceiving a child between a blue-black black slave of the 18th century and a white man with the likelihood of a relationship between a modern American mulatto woman and a white American raised on the principles of political correctness.
But I think it’s difficult to convince anyone with numbers and statistics. Therefore, let us turn to more obvious facts, namely, a comparison of the appearance of the population of Liberia and blacks in the United States.
Liberia, Liberia is a free country...
By the way, what do you know about such an African country as Liberia? Is it really only what is shown on TV in the news? That some rebels are fighting there, and the population is asking the United States to send troops there to maintain peace? Do you know why Liberians love and trust the United States so much that they ask them, and not, for example, the UN, to intervene in their internal problems?
Well, it's quite a long story, but I'll try to keep it short. Look at the picture of the Liberian flag. Doesn't he remind you of anything? ;-) And it was like this...
In 1816, a group of white Americans founded the American Colonization Society in the United States, which set itself the goal of solving the “Negro problem” by settling freed black slaves in Africa. In 1818, two representatives of the society were sent to Africa to find a place to settle, and in 1820, 88 black colonists, led by three white Americans, headed to the shores of Sierra Leone. Before leaving, they signed a document stating that a representative of the American Colonization Society would manage the future settlement. True, already in Africa, due to the outbreak of a malaria epidemic, 25 of these colonists died, including all three whites. Of the 63 blacks who survived, some remained in Sierra Leone (the capital of which, in memory of this, is called Freetown, that is, “the city of freedom”), and some founded their own settlement.
In 1824, the entire territory of this settlement was named Liberia (from the English liberty - freedom), and its capital - Monrovia in honor of US President James Monroe. About 5 thousand freed blacks from the United States, having learned about Liberia, went to live in this “land of freedom.”
In 1847, the Declaration of Independence was promulgated and a constitution was adopted. This is how the first independent state in Africa emerged, called the Republic of Liberia. English became the official language, and the Liberian dollar became the currency. True, many years later, English in Liberia turned into “Liberian English”, and the US dollar became the currency.
But I will not tell further the history of Liberia, although it is full of very interesting facts and curious events. In particular, I won’t say anything about the world’s largest merchant fleet, which sails under Liberian flags. About how the government of Liberia, secretly trading diamonds from Sierra Leone, almost destroyed the entire world diamond market. About how the American company “Firestone” bought several hundred hectares of Liberian territory, where until the Second World War (and perhaps still) slaves worked on plantations extracting rubber for car tires produced by “Firestone”. About how Ukraine sold weapons to Liberia, and what came of it. Perhaps I will tell all these stories some other time, but for now I will continue the story about the blacks.
Let's look at photographs of blacks in Liberia, in particular photographs of the descendants of former American slaves, and compare them with photographs of blacks living in the United States (hover your mouse over the photo to see the captions):
White Americans move to reservations
Indulging in my morning coffee and thinking about the imperfections of life, I leafed through the latest issue of Time magazine. And I came across an entertaining article by African-American writer Rich BENJAMIN, who, based on the results of a two-year investigation, wrote the book “In Search of White Utopia: An Incredible Journey into the Heart of White America.” In it, this same Benjamin told a simply extraordinary thing. It turns out that in the United States, more and more wealthy white people are leaving big cities and establishing all-white settlements - enclaves. These are not isolated examples, but almost a mass phenomenon. To the writer’s question, why are you doing all this, they answered him softly but intelligibly: “We are not racists.” We don't consider ourselves better than you, we just want to be separate from you.
- It's just terrible! - black Benjamin is surprised. In short, something unprecedented is happening in the promised land, American...
So what is it? The end of the American Dream, the famous melting pot of all nations and races? The end of peace, friendship, chewing gum in America? Yes, sure. The melting pot is long gone! All major cities in the United States have designated areas where exclusively black residents live. With their own ideas about morality, with their black police officers, restaurants, cinemas where they show special African-American films. Lately this has been considered the norm.
African Americans make up 12.4 percent of US citizens, 14.8 percent are Hispanic. According to the Census Bureau, by 2042 people of color will make up the majority of Americans. These are only those legally living in the States. In reality, there are already more people of color than white people.
And so, if white Americans wanted to live separately, Mr. Benjamin immediately panicked.
Dumb
The Americans are building a barrier wall on the border with Mexico, think about it, eight meters high! You can go crazy. And still the number of illegal immigrants is not decreasing. Twig and twig... Entire cities already speak only their native Spanish. They don’t want to learn English at all. But this is nonsense, the main thing is that the majority categorically do not want to integrate into American culture. And they bring to America all the filthiest things they have. Drugs, crime, illiteracy...
I'm not anti-American at all. But I'm offended that in the country of my loved ones Mark Twain, Jack London, Steinbeck And Hemingway According to a 2004 survey, only half of Americans have read at least one book. Illiteracy in the United States has reached 20 percent and continues to rise. 30 percent of Americans believe that the US population is between one and two billion people. National Geographic magazine found that more than three-quarters of those surveyed could not find Japan on a map. 20 percent of Americans believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth. 17 percent of respondents rightly believe that the Earth revolves around the Sun, but are convinced that a complete revolution of our planet around the Sun takes place in a day, and not in a year. One in five US adults cannot name any European country. Among Americans aged 18 to 24, one in seven cannot find their own country on a map, and one in four confuses the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.
What does this have to do with the black and Hispanic population of America? Yes at that! Because it's mostly about them! If this continues, and it definitely will, then the only thing left in US history will be rap and basketball. Plus, of course, the vegetable garden planted by the first lady on the White House lawn.
Lazy
Somehow I dug up statistics on benefits for black families in Chicago. Poverty benefits, not unemployment, - $658 - 822 per month. Food stamp benefits, food stamps, - $140 - 288. Additional payments for a single mother - $145 - 265. Additional payment for a child under 18 years of age - $670 - 980. Food stamp benefits for a child - $220 - 295. Benefit for paying utilities - 96 - 100 percent. Medical insurance "MedicAid" - 85 - 100 percent.
The average family is a single mother with three children. Even if we count the minimum, she receives $2,813 per month without food stamps. Cool, yeah?! But this is all on condition that she is a black woman born in the USA. Americans of other skin colors have lower prices. Of course, I partially understand the government. It’s better that the blacks don’t work and play basketball, otherwise, if you trust them with an important matter, they’ll do something like this - mom, don’t worry. But African Americans are not eager to work.
Lustful
According to a report from the US Department of Justice, last year there were more than 37 thousand cases proven in court in the country in which a white woman was the victim of sexual violence by a black man. During the same period, there were fewer than 10 thousand such facts associated with white men and black women.
I read a funny incident about how several years ago the US public became concerned about a case of a sergeant forcing a female recruit into cohabitation. Feminist organizations began to collect information about similar cases. They had raised quite a lot, were preparing to submit them to some hearings, and were already anticipating a resounding victory over “sexism” on a nationwide scale. But then it turned out that all the women forced into cohabitation were white, and the sergeants were black. Well, since even though a woman is taller than a man, a black man is “more important” than a woman and racism is worse than sexism, I had to quickly shut up.
Insolent
Why does all this American bullshit bother me? Who knows, I'm just thinking. I saw the same thing in Paris. I was walking one evening in a lyrical mood and took a wrong turn. Lo and behold, not a single white face glows in the dark, only the whites of the eyes, frankly speaking, sparkle disapprovingly and get closer and closer. Well, I blew... By the way, the secular columnist of Izvestia wrote very well about France Bozena Rynska. I quote the passage verbatim, preserving the author’s literary inflections:
“We ate bouillabaisse at the Miramar restaurant in the old port. Back we got on a monstrous train. In the second class carriage, where my mother sat on principle, the air conditioner did not work. The whole train was suffocating, the windows were tightly sealed. Like in a bathhouse - not figuratively, but literally. A real gas chamber. As a result, I dragged my mother to first grade. It was hell there too. The air conditioner, of course, worked. But disgusting Arab gopniks climbed into our carriage. Gopniks walked naked to the waist. The Gopniks smoked. The gopniks blasted the music and sat with their asses on the arms of the seats of people who had specifically spent money on first class so that this kind of trash wouldn’t hang out there. Disgusting, vile lessons.
There were four of them. There are at least forty of us in the carriage. Everyone spent money on first class. Nobody except us tried to do anything. In the USSR, such hooliganism would have been taken out by the whole bus. Healthy men seemed to be traveling, and no one kicked their turnips.
Having become enraged by the unruly cattle, I went to look for at least someone from SNCF. There was not a single person on the entire train. You can't get to the driver. Mother, I say, you are a kung fu player. Can you get away with at least one?
- Well, in principle, if the client stands calmly and doesn’t twitch, then I can hit him.
Half an hour from home, the mother could not stand it, clenched her fists and almost rushed into battle. We shouted at the French that this was their country, and that they needed to protect themselves from the inhabitants of the former colonies, and that they themselves deserved Clichy, because they put cattle on their necks.
The naked Arabs, seeing the fists, became subdued. It felt like they were testing their patience on purpose. Like, they asked for a punch in the face. Passing by my mother’s chair, they said “sorry.” Before leaving the train, they announced to the carriage that they were getting off and the show was over.”
Do we need this?
Just don’t accuse me of Negro-Arab-Latin-all other nations phobias! I grew up in a Soviet school where internationalism was cultivated. And I was a fan of the Soviet film "Circus", where the famous artist Volodin rocks a black child in his arms and sings a song: “Bears and elephants are sleeping, uncles and aunts are sleeping...” Yes, yes!
It’s just that, looking at America, I think about the fate of Russia! I’m not against Tajiks, Uzbeks, Chinese, Kyrgyz... But the great one came to Moscow before Muslim Magomaev, director of "The Elusive Avengers" Edmond Keosayan, and many wonderful, smart people are still coming. Musicians, doctors, writers, who is against them! But along with them there are still tons of unknown people! And even they, individually, are nice guys, but when there are many of them, it’s just a separate life, believe me, alien to us.
I understand that there is no work in their homeland, and unlike Gorbachev who destroyed a great country, they can be understood. But don’t force their habits on me from the Karakum desert! Why not establish a visa regime, why not strengthen the border? Previously, they held the border even without the eight-meter American walls, but with a bobby on a leash it was okay.
I read a conversation with the head of the investigative department of the Investigative Committee for the Moscow Region Andrey Markov. He says that over the past year, crime among migrants has increased by almost 40 percent. And he also says that he doesn’t know how unregistered foreigners get into our country; they seem to dissolve after crossing the border.
They don't disappear anywhere. They live... And here are the numbers: 6,392 crimes were committed by foreign citizens in the Moscow region in the first half of 2009. Compared to the same period last year, there was an increase of 39.6 percent. In Moscow, from a third to half of the crimes are on their own conscience.
Why do residents of villages or Chinese outbacks need Moscow? If they want to work, please do so. Strictly on visas and strictly on those specialties that the country needs. And they pay taxes, otherwise, according to the most conservative estimates, about $15 billion floats uncontrollably to the former fraternal republics.
Why did I talk about the Americans in such detail? I don’t want to run away from my native place to the pampas! This is a journalist-writer Rich Benjamin called white enclaves utopias - like a white man's fairy tale. I don't want such fairy tales! And I don’t want them to become reality! And everything goes towards this.
And as a result, the example of Kosovo is before our eyes. At first, the Albanians slowly entered, then they incredibly began to grow demographically, then they became the majority, and then bam, and the cradle of Serbian civilization was no longer Serbia at all, but another state. This will happen to the USA, and maybe to us too.
Hello, dear lovers of interesting facts. Today we will look in detail at why blacks have a large reproductive organ. This question is often discussed on various Internet resources devoted to topics and medicine. Indeed, why can representatives of the Negroid race boast more impressive “merits” than their white counterparts?
Where do legs grow from?
The topic of penis size causes a lot of controversy. The interested community is divided into two parts. Some gentlemen argue that stories about the inherent “gigantism” of Africans are nothing more than myths. The question is very intriguing. So a lot of gossip and fiction appear, each more fantastic than the other.
Lovers films for adults Having compared the parameters of white and black actors, they tend to the opposite opinion. Europeans are not at all consoled by their relatively modest size, but rather the opposite. Many Europeans were literally devastated by the fact that blacks had more than whites. Anyone who has been to Asian countries and could contemplate local men “in all their glory” claims that white guys have absolutely nothing to be sad about.
The excitement around penis size did not arise since the heyday of the porn industry, which provided viewers from different countries with the opportunity to compare. It all started much earlier and for a different reason.
White slavery
Jealous and envious comparison of genital organs arose during the era of colonization and Christianization of Africa. Arriving at the new shores, the white hidalgos of the Old World were amazed at the picture that opened up. It turned out that the natives living in the thick of the mainland had penises of very respectable size.
Historians who study the southern United States before the Civil War believe that the physical characteristics of black slaves - who were exported from Africa - inspired genuine horror in their masters. This partly explains the cruelty of many slave owners. It is much easier to spread rot on a giant slave than to constantly wait for his own wife to cheat on him (which happened not so rarely).
White conquerors of new continents fell into slavery of their own stereotypes and the inexorable laws of nature. A hardy black man with great “dignity” is a strong contender in the struggle for the attention of southern women who are not spoiled by sexual diversity. Puritan morals reigned in Europe at that time, and aristocratic girls were brought up very strictly.
With a ruler around the world
One can argue endlessly about whether Africans have particularly large penises or not. For the sake of truth, it is worth getting acquainted with statistical data. Many researchers have studied the issue of penis size among representatives of different nations.
In 2005, the famous Institute of Men's Health (Tomsk) published the results of an unusual survey. About 6 thousand men of different nationalities took part in it. The study was conducted in countries that were formerly part of the USSR.
Doctors have found that those with the largest reproductive organs live in the south of the CIS, in Georgia. The average length of the penis here is 17.6 cm. In second place are Russians and Ukrainians with an indicator of 16.2 cm. The Baltic people are quite a bit behind them (16 cm).
Globally, the study was carried out by different scientists. The data they obtained was collected and systematized by Sujata Gundersen, a researcher of Syrian origin. The lady presented the results of this work in the form of a unique map of penis sizes, which was posted on the Target Map platform.
Inexorable statistics
The victory in this secret international competition was won exclusively by naturally gifted gentlemen of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The average length of an erect penis here is 17.9 cm. At the same time, owners of 20- tiscentimeter organs are quite common.
The Gabonians and Guineans are inferior to them by only 0.1-0.2 cm. In general, nature gave the largest reproductive organs to dark-skinned men in Central America, Brazil and Africa (17.9-16.1 cm). In second place are Canadians, Argentines, Arabs and, oddly enough, residents of cold Greenland (14.8 cm).
The average parameter of 13.4 cm was recorded in the USA, Russia and Australia. The Indians, Chinese and Indonesian aborigines (10-11 cm) were not at all lucky. So the rumors about the royal size of the reproductive organs of black men are not fiction at all.
Why are blacks' penises larger?
Scientists believe that the reason for the rapid growth of certain parts of the body of Africans or African Americans lies in a combination of factors. It is influenced by genetics, diet, cultural characteristics and, to a lesser extent, climate.
Checking Gundersen's map, it's easy to see that men with larger penises live closer to the equator. It’s warmer here, and the locals have a more assertive temperament. The heat promotes the boiling of blood in the veins and the growth of everything that can grow.
On the other hand, why are Indians and Indonesians - also southerners - so modestly gifted? After all, they live in the same latitudes as “large-sized” Africans. The conclusion suggests itself: climate is not a decisive factor when it comes to the penis. Even in ice-bound Greenland, guys' penises are 3-4 cm longer than those of people in China, Thailand and India.
Lots of meat - lots of sex
This is precisely the relationship between the described male parameters and diet. This explains the difference between men from Africa and India. Equatorial pagan tribes lived by hunting for thousands of years. You won't find farmers in the wilds of Africa.
The population here is raised on the meat of freshly killed game, which, due to the favorable climate, is always abundant. High-quality animal protein is an excellent building material for organs and tissues. So why shouldn’t men here be gifted in the physical sense?
In India and China it is a completely different story. World religions such as Buddhism and Hinduism were born in this part of the globe. While Africans hunted macaques, wild pigs and their neighbors, Indians and Tibetans preached love for all living beings inhabiting the planet.
Tibet is the cradle of humanism, the search for spiritual truth and, of course, vegetarianism. Plant foods perfectly cleanse the body, promote spiritual enlightenment and tranquility, but certainly do not give physical strength.
The population of these countries switched en masse to a vegetarian diet more than a thousand years ago. During this time, not only men's penises greatly decreased in size, but the people themselves became stunted. It is not for nothing that the Chinese, Japanese and their southern neighbors are considered the smallest inhabitants of the planet.
Hello Darwin!
The decisive word in this matter still remains with genetics. If the father has a “king-size”, then the son will probably not blush for his “well done” in the bedroom. But why are king sizes found among people from Africa? This is where local cultural traditions played a role.
Black ladies, unburdened by puritanical morality, could always choose the strongest sexual partners. For this, they had all the trump cards in their hands: naked male bodies before their eyes, the cult of fertility, free sexual relations.
From time immemorial, African natives have professed the cult of the body. They emphasize their virtues with tattoos, paintings, jewelry, and scars. Only in an environment of such sexual emancipation could a device called a “koteka” (a special sheath for the penis) appear. A true symbol of male power!
Under such conditions, it is unlikely that guys with tiny penises could pass on their genes to their descendants. Women simply did not choose them. So it turned out that from generation to generation in the African forests hardy men with large reproductive organs bred. Law of natural selection.
I hope now you roughly understand why blacks have such a large reproductive organ, so we don’t think that anyone needs to have a complex about this. Size doesn't really matter, at least in most cases.
The editors of Webfacts magazines do not use the word "Negro" as a racist statement. We apologize if this word offended anyone.
