Evaluation of Akhmatova’s work by classics and critics. Akhmatova's fate

If you arrange Akhmatova’s love poems in a certain order, you can build a whole story with many mise-en-scenes, twists and turns, characters, random and non-random incidents. Meetings and separations, tenderness, guilt, disappointment, jealousy, bitterness, languor, joy singing in the heart, unfulfilled expectations, selflessness, pride, sadness - in which facets and kinks we do not see love on the pages of Akhmatov’s books.

The main features of A. Akhmatova’s poetic language are the classical clarity and precision of the word, its transparency, restraint and laconic style of expression, rigor and harmony of the poetic structure. A. Akhmatova's poetry is characterized by laconic and succinct formulations that contain great power - the power of thought and the power of feeling. Akhmatova’s language is highly characterized by a sense of proportion, a lack of unnecessary words. Just enough is said so that the expressed truth appears in all its strength and completeness. “Powerful brevity” - this statement about the Russian language is quite applicable to Akhmatova’s poetic language. And, comprehending the world of a woman poet, we have the opportunity to discover in ourselves the ability to respond not only to joy, but also to grief and sadness that are diffused in our lives.

Akhmatova created a lyric system - one of the most remarkable in the history of poetry, but she never thought of lyrics as a spontaneous outpouring of the soul. She needed poetic discipline, self-constraint, self-restraint of the creative. Discipline and work. Pushkin liked to call the work of a poet - the work of a poet. And for Akhmatova, this is one of her Pushkin traditions. For her it was even physical labor in its own way.

It is in this sense that Anna Andreevna said: “Poems should be shameless.” This meant: according to the laws of poetic transformation, the poet dares to talk about the most personal - from personal it has already become general. Akhmatova was characterized by an unusually intense experience of culture. Lyrics and culture are an important topic. This is not the place to go into it; I will only say that culture gives lyrics the breadth and richness of associations it so needs.

Culture has always been present in Akhmatova’s work, but in different ways. In her later poems, culture comes out. In the early ones it is hidden, but makes itself felt by the literary tradition, subtle, hidden reminders of the work of their predecessors. When remembering Akhmatova, you certainly come across the theme of culture, tradition, heritage. Her work is perceived in the same categories. Akhmatova’s lyrics were nourished by earthly, everyday feelings and were not taken beyond the boundaries of “worldly vanity.” Somewhere in the diversity of everyday life, right next to the masonry, in the dust of everyday existence, the origins of Akhmatov’s poetry arose. Akhmatova sought and found new poetic values ​​in the most authentic life, which surrounds us on all sides with countless things and structures, colorful heaps of everyday life, and a multitude of everyday circumstances.

The peculiarity of A. Akhmatova’s early lyrics is that she revealed the spiritual intrinsic value of the female personality, it is also characterized by plot, differentiation, subtlety of lyrical experiences, trust, intimacy, intimacy. This “feminine essence” and at the same time the significance of the human personality. Often, A. Akhmatova’s lyrics look like miniatures, fragmentary poems, or diary entries. In them one can feel a fragment of an internal monologue, the fluidity and unintentionality of mental life. She still preferred lyrical fragmentation, blurriness and understatement.

Akhmatova is a master of fine and precise detail. According to critic A.I. Pavlovsky, “the most important thing in her craft is vitality and realism, the ability to see poetry in ordinary life.” Her “material” details, sparingly presented but distinct everyday interiors, boldly introduced prosaisms, and most importantly, the internal connection that can always be traced in her between the external environment and the turbulent life of the heart, everything is reminiscent of not only prose, but also poetic classics. Akhmatova's lyrical poems are characterized by narrative composition. In Akhmatova’s poetic world, artistic detail, material details, and household items are very significant. In the second collection of “Rosary Beads” we see that Akhmatova expands the semantic boundaries of the word, operates with a psychological detail that is symbolic in nature. In her poems, the reader encounters symbols that depend on the context, and stable symbols, to which she is constantly committed (ray, ring, mirror, sounds, window, rosary, abyss). The poetess herself was convinced that “The Rosary” no longer had anything in common with symbolism; she remained faithful to Acmeistic tastes and even said about later poems that they sounded like “Acmeistic word”. In the book of poems " White flock"included details of the landscape: "moist spring air", the dull blue color of the sky, "the cries of cranes and black fields", narrow autumn roads, drizzling rain, "noisy lindens and elms", black crosses. Behind them, shades of mood and psychological states are revealed.

Features of the late period of A. Akhmatova’s work: the transfer of an objective-realistic attitude to the depicted phenomena of life, the internal drama of the poems (full of tangible collisions), and their philosophical nature (they live in constant reflection on the passage of time, the call of space and man), historicism of thinking, expansion thematic range (she writes about her hometown, the ancient past, love, about loved ones, the secrets of the craft, the duty of a poet), biblical and evangelical motifs. All war poems contain courageous grief, the greatest feeling of compassion, immeasurable love for one’s long-suffering people.

“I didn’t stop writing poetry. For me, they represent my connection with time, with the new life of my people. When I wrote them, I lived by the rhythms that sounded in the heroic history of my country. I am happy that I lived during these years and saw events that had no equal,” Anna Akhmatova wrote about her life. Akhmatova’s poems, “where every step is a secret” - where “chasms to the left and right”, in which unreality, fog and the looking glass were combined with absolute psychological and even everyday, even interior, authenticity, forced us to talk about the “mystery of Akhmatova”. For a while, it even seemed that no one had ever written like her. Only gradually did they see that Akhmatova’s lyrics have deep and widely branched roots, going back not only to Russian classical poetry, but also in the psychological pose of Gogol and Tolstoy, and also actively captures layers of global verbal culture.

L. Kolobaeva

Immediately recognizing the “real” poet in young Akhmatova, Blok emphasized the “feminine” principle in her lyrics. And it sounded either like censure or recognition of her special nature. He wrote: “...I will never pass through your “I didn’t know at all”, “near the sea”, “the most gentle, the most meek (in the “Rosary”), constant “at all” (this is not yours at all, common for women, I won’t forgive all women for this).”

Seeing an unnecessary extreme degree in the word (“most ... most”, completely”, “at all”, etc.), Blok most likely warned the poetess against exaltation, complexity, insincerity - the sin of “common women”. In another case, Blok puts the feminine in Akhmatova’s poetry on a par with her “self-absorbed and painful” manner. In one of his articles, separating Akhmatova from the Acmeist school, which was alien to him, Blok argued: The real exception among them was Anna Akhmatova; in any case, “the flowering of physical and spiritual strength” could not be positively found in her tired, sickly, feminine and self-absorbed manner”, emphasis added. - OK.).

What did Blok mean, to what extent was he right when speaking about the “feminine” poetry of Akhmatova? How does the “general feminine” enter into the universal, how does it meet and correlate with the masculine principle in her poetry? Akhmatova liked to highlight one early comment about herself in criticism:

V. Nedobrovo discerned in her poetry “a lyrical soul that is rather hard than too soft, rather cruel than tearful, and clearly dominant rather than oppressed.”

Courage in Akhmatova’s poetry is not just a property of her nature, a feature of her biography, but rather an initial quality of attitude that influenced the originality of her lyrical heroine, the features of lyricism and the form of her poetry.

The ideal of courage was filled with deeply different concrete content in such original poets as Mandelstam and Akhmatova.

The author of “The Stone” is looking for support for his ideal of humanity in the culture of “the day before yesterday,” as he himself admits. But he is looking not outside of history, not in the pre-civilized, barbarically innocent naturalness of man, free from the burden of knowledge, but, on the contrary, in history and precisely that period of history that is highly marked by the power of reason, the materialistically clear consciousness of the enlighteners.

According to Mandelstam, the power of a solid mind that connects, holds and builds a stable “architecture of personality” had to be submitted again and subjugated to the most willful modern lyrics. These demands were undoubtedly close to Akhmatova as well.

The dramatic destiny of the poet, according to Akhmatova, begins with his need to give himself, “to squander, not to save,” which is not consistent with the calculating philistine world. The eccentric symbol of the “rope dancer” in one of Akhmatova’s early poems (“He left me on the new moon...”) is signified by the desire of the lyrical. The heroine prefers desperate risk and recklessness of love to the emptiness of life, although this choice is terrible with inevitable breakdowns and death (“Let my path be terrible, let it be clear, even more terrible is the path of melancholy...”).

The reason for the everyday drama of the heroine of pre-revolutionary creativity, Akhmatova, is her intransigence with the insignificant and vulgar, with the “pennies of happiness” that are offered to her by the too sober, measured, saturated with the spirit of bourgeois prose of life. In the poem “I do not ask for your love...” (1914) the state of the heroine, an abandoned woman, is sadly “solemn.” This tone was found by the poetess completely unmistakably. He has a calm strength and fullness of spirit, who knows the value of true joys (“friendships, bright conversations and the memory of the first tender days...”) and despises cheap temptations (“And these fools love consciousness full of victory..."). There is more dignity and dignity in her silent suffering mental health than in the hopeless happiness of the hero: “I don’t heal from happiness.” From the very beginning, Akhmatova’s lyrics grow and rise in pursuit of the ideal of courage and simplicity of life. In the poem “I have learned to live simply, wisely...” (1912), this ideal is seen in the ability to pacify passions, in the ability to find pure beauty in the everyday life of modest nature (“When the burdocks rustle in the ravine and the cluster of yellow-blooded rowan droops... "), in the creation of “cheerful” art (“I compose cheerful poems...” True, such simplicity is still very idyllic and is sometimes noted by the poetess herself as an illusion of her secluded life.

Akhmatova’s ideal of courageous simplicity was, of course, influenced in her own way by the concept of a strong, non-reflective, non-divided personality, put forward in the 10s by poets of the Acmeist “guild” close to her. However, Akhmatova comprehended the art of “simply, wisely living” in her own way, studying it all her life, over time discovering its real meaning more deeply and more accurately.

The science of courage also included overcoming Akhmatova’s initial intimacy, egocentric concentration in “feminine”, intimate themes. However, even in his early work it was not complete isolation. Marina Tsvetaeva once reproached Akhmatova in her notes: “Everything about herself, everything about love.” But then, as if refuting in bewilderment what had just been said, she added: “Yes, about herself, about love - and also - the amazingly silver voice of a deer, about the dim expanses of the Ryazan province, about the dark heads of the Kherson temple, about the red maple leaf broken on Song of Songs, about air, “a gift from God...”.

Impersonal, epic motifs and poetry of Akhmatova become, as we know, significant and widespread after the October Revolution. These are motives of loyalty to the fate of Russia, reflections on its history, on the fate of generations, on responsibility to the past and future. The fullness and impressiveness of Akhmatova’s poetic word during the Great Patriotic War was fueled by the fact that in her word the militant spirit of civil courage, defending all the values ​​of world culture from fascism, and the tenderness and care of motherhood, protecting the life, came together. Therefore, in poems about the war - “Courage”, “First Long-Range”, “To the Winners”, etc. - the image of children inevitably arises, all the children of “St. Petersburg orphans” and “my child”. Therefore, the antique statue (“Statue in the Summer Garden”) becomes a “daughter”; the star touches not with its proud beauty, but with the defenselessness of a tear-stained girl.

The odic solemnity of Akhmatova’s war poems, manifested in the firm chasing of rhythm, in the courageous laconicism of poetic speech, is combined with some amazing homely simplicity and openness of tone, possible only in communication with those closest to you.

The pathos of courage, which received historically significant content in Akhmatova’s work during the war years, noticeably colors her intimate and lyrical themes. This is manifested in the new sound of the motive of internal victory over oneself - over the bitterness of separation, the torment of memory, the pain of “non-meetings”, in the unspent ability for self-renewal: “We must learn to live again...”, “Resurrect and live...”, “Fall asleep.” upset, wake up in love..."

But the spirit of courage is embodied not only - and not so much - in the content of Akhmatov’s poetry, but in its very structure, in artistic form. Lyrics in Akhmatova’s work were transformed primarily due to the fact that everything through and through - in essence and in form - sprouted grains of drama. Moreover, it is completely different from that of its predecessors, say, romantically unrestrained, openly tragic, soaring from the “bottom” to the “heights” and again falling into the “abyss” (like Blok), but closed, hidden, silent, masculine drama. tamed.

It is not enough to say that in lyric poetry, that is, the most subjective art, “objective”, visible and audible expressions of human psychology acquire an unprecedented role - exchanges of remarks, snatches of conversation, changing psychological coloring of external pictures, interiors, things in the environment. It is necessary to realize something else. Akhmatova achieves an unmistakable artistic effect primarily through the details of the action, more precisely, its micro-details - images of gesture, external and internal movement, physical sensation - processes human psyche, flowing somewhere at its very depths, on the border of the clearly realized and the vaguely unaccountable. Anna Akhmatova’s artistic image is therefore always transparent, distinct and at the same time not deciphered. Let's re-read one of her early poems:

Do you want to know how it all happened? -
It struck three in the dining room,
And, saying goodbye, holding the railing,
She seemed to have difficulty speaking:
“That's all... Oh, no, I forgot,
I love you, I loved you back then!”
- “Yes.”

A woman’s declaration of love and her response to it are presented here as if in passing, by the way, in the circle of everyday trifles. It’s expressive that “oh, no, I forgot,” as if about a trifle before saying the most important and desperate thing - “I love you.” In the same unexpected, seemingly deaf tone, the response to the confession. Just a short, single “yes” at the end of the poem. It must be said that this ending was not long ago found by the poetess. In the first edition of the poem there was a completely different “yes” - with surprise, with a question, with a cry - “Yes?!” In a later version (“From the sixth book,” 1940), Akhmatova changes the ending - she removes the screaming intonation, removes the question marks and exclamation marks, and finds her dull and expressive “yes.” Such a “yes” in response to the revelation of love can most likely be said if you yourself love deeply, for a long time, when you secretly know, are ready for everything, expect everything and are not surprised by anything. Such a “yes” is not indifference, but the fullness of a prophetic, omniscient feeling. The new ending gave the work truly Akhmatovian artistic completeness and perfection.

The tension of Akhmatova's lyrical experience is always resolved in its own way, fundamentally different than, say, in Blok or Tsvetaeva. In Blok, the tension goes into an endless amplitude of tragic fluctuations, from the highest rises to desperate falls. Tsvetaeva resolves with an explosion, screaming notes of furious indignation or the most oblivious delight. The emotional peak of Akhmatovo’s poems is most often not a cry, but silence, not a rise in the voice, but its muffling to the point of breaking, as happens when breathing stops:

Lane, pereul... I tightened my throat with a loop...
(“The Third Zachatievsky”)

The struggle has not just begun and will not end today. In Akhmatova’s lyrical compositions, this is precisely why their beginnings are so unexpected and expressive. The first line is often the answer to a question that is unknown to us and is not asked in the poem. The beginning seems to be completely omitted, and this can be emphasized by the strange ellipsis in the first line. The experience is taken at its core, at its dramatic peak. Look how quickly, right off the bat, and how aggressively, defiantly many of A. Akhmatova’s poems begin:

Submissive to you? Are you crazy?
I am submissive to God’s will alone.
I don't want any thrill or pain
My husband is an executioner, and his house is a prison.
Which one is. I wish you another -
Better. I don't trade happiness anymore
Like charlatans and wholesalers...
Will they forget? - that's what surprised us!
I've been forgotten a hundred times
A hundred times I lay in my grave,
Where maybe I am now.

Akhmatova’s style gravitates towards the internal “eventfulness” of the word. In other words, in Akhmatova’s speech (as well as in genres) we recognize the law of “courageous” effectiveness that governs her poetry.

Thus, harmoniously combining and balancing two elements - femininity and masculinity, timid tenderness of feelings with a victorious rational-volitional, active-effective principle, Anna Akhmatova's lyrics acquire the fullness of their universal sound.

L-ra: Literary studies. – 1980. – No. 1. – P. 147-150.

Key words: Anna Akhmatova, acmeism, poets of the Silver Age, criticism of Anna Akhmatova’s work, criticism of Anna Akhmatova’s poems, analysis of Anna Akhmatova’s poems, download criticism, download analysis, download for free, Russian literature of the 20th century

Chapter 1. Anna Akhmatova in the reflection of domestic and 10 foreign literary scholars. General overview of domestic and foreign Akhmatova studies

3.3. The originality of “Poem without a Hero” 165 Conclusion 201 References 205 Appendices, I-IV

Introduction

Chapter 1. Anna Akhmatova in the reflection of domestic and 10. foreign literary scholars. General overview of domestic and foreign Akhmatova studies

1.1. Concepts and trends in Russian Akhmatology studies

1.2. Concepts and trends in Anglo-American 38 Akhmatova studies

1.3 Lyrics by A.A. Akhmatova in literary translation. 54 The problem of the identity of the author and translator.

Chapter 2. Creativity of the early period in the reception of 70 domestic and Anglo-American criticism of the 70-90s. XX century

2.1. Motives of A. Akhmatova’s early lyrics

2.3. The style of A. Akhmatova’s early lyrics as assessed by critics

Chapter 3. Creativity of the late period in the assessment of Russian and 143 Anglo-American literary criticism of the 70-90s. XX century

3.1. Themes and motives of late lyrics

3.2. The poetics of “Requiem” in the assessment of literary-critical thought 158

3.3. The originality of “Poem without a Hero” 165 Conclusion 201 References 205 Appendices I-IV

Introduction of the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic "A.A. Akhmatova in the artistic reception of Russian and Anglo-American literary criticism and literary criticism"

Review articles and reviews of recent decades devoted to English-language publications about Akhmatova to some extent reflect, although rather fragmentarily, a versatile and ambiguous approach to the personality and work of the poet, testifying at the same time to the uneven degree of development of Anglo-American Akhmatova studies as a whole. This study is devoted to the analysis of literary criticism and literary studies by Russian, English and American scientists about the life and work of A.A. Akhmatova. Here the established views and approaches of Russian and Anglo-American researchers to the literature of the Silver Age are assessed, and the main trends and theories in the study of A. Akhmatova’s work are identified. During the period of development of international cultural relations and due to high integration and interaction

INTRODUCTION

A.A. Akhmatova is an iconic figure in Russian literature of the 20th century. She lived and worked in an era of historical upheaval, a time of social catastrophes, revolutions and wars. At the end of the 20th century, there was still great interest in the work of A.A. Akhmatova both in Russia and abroad. In numerous modern domestic works on Akhmatova, the question of the peculiarities of the reception of A. Akhmatova’s work by foreign literary criticism has still remained unexamined. Naturally, domestic scientists constantly turn to the facts of publications of Akhmatova’s works in the USA and Europe, but there is no complete generalized idea about the peculiarities of Western Slavists’ perception of A. Akhmatova’s work and its place in the world literary process.

Studying the perception of Akhmatova’s work in English-speaking countries inevitably leads to the problem of the relationship and connections between Russian, American and English cultures. The problem that forms the basis of our research is included in the whole range of issues relevant to modern man questions about spiritual and historical ties between Russia and the West, as well as about the uniqueness of Russian cultural heritage.

Review articles and reviews of recent decades devoted to English-language publications about Akhmatova to some extent reflect, although rather fragmentarily, a versatile and ambiguous approach to the personality and work of the poet, testifying at the same time to the uneven degree of development of Anglo-American Akhmatova studies as a whole. This study is devoted to the analysis of literary criticism and literary studies by Russian, English and American scientists about the life and work of A.A. Akhmatova. Here the established views and approaches of Russian and Anglo-American researchers to the literature of the Silver Age are assessed, and the main trends and theories in the study of A. Akhmatova’s work are identified. During the period of development of international cultural relations and in connection with the high integration and interaction of cultures this work makes it possible to show the extent of the spread of interest in Russian literature and the work of Akhmatova in particular in English-speaking countries, and also allows us to clearly reflect some indicative features of the literary practice of foreign Slavic studies, which, without a doubt, gives relevance to this work.

The methodological basis of the dissertation research is cultures; this work makes it possible to show the extent of the spread of interest in Russian literature and the work of A. Akhmatova in particular in English-speaking countries, and also allows us to clearly reflect some indicative features of the literary practice of foreign Slavic studies, which, without a doubt, makes this topic relevant work.

The purpose of this dissertation research is to identify the features of receptive approaches to the facts of literary creativity and biography of A. Akhmatova, developed by domestic and foreign literary studies of the 20th century.

The goal motivates the formulation and solution of main research problems:

1. Consider the theoretical and methodological foundations of domestic Akhmatova studies.

2. Establish the main chronological stages in the development of English and American Akhmatova studies and trace the history of the reception of A.A.’s work. Akhmatova and foreign Slavists, combining a synchronic approach with a diachronic one.

3. Provide a description of the main English and American studies on the life and work of A.A. Akhmatova.

4. Compare the assessments of Anglo-American and Russian criticism and analyze them in interaction and collision.

To implement the assigned tasks and analyze complex material, structural-typological and comparative-historical research methods are used.

The subject of the study is the specifics of reception (perception and interpretation) by foreign Slavists of the life and literary work of A.A. Akhmatova through the prism of domestic Akhmatova studies, as well as scientific results(concepts, observations and conclusions) of research by representatives of Russian and English-language literary studies.

The methodological basis of the dissertation research is

Works of domestic and foreign scientists about the work of Akhmatova (V.M. Zhirmunsky, V.V. Vinogradov, B.M. Eikhenbaum [PO], L.H. Chukovskaya, T.V. Tsivyan, R.D. Timenchik, A. Heit, S. Driver, D-Wells, S. Ketchian, S. Emert, R. Reader, S. Lighter and many others), as well as sections. English books on the history of Russian literature of the 20th century, numerous articles in periodicals, scientific reports, critical responses, publications of Akhmatova’s works in English translation, articles in encyclopedias, anthologies and dictionaries, which represents a huge layer of literary criticism and literary studies materials that reveal the nature of the perception of creativity Russian writer by representatives of Western literary traditions;

Translations of Akhmatova's poems into English by famous Anglo-American translators L. Coffin, D.M. Thomas, J. Kenyon, S. Kunits, K. Proffer;

Correspondence materials with the editor-in-chief of SEEJ magazine, professor of modern and classical Russian language,

Works of domestic and foreign scientists about the work of Akhmatova (V.M. Zhirmunsky, V.V. Vinogradov, B.M. Eikhenbaum, L.K. Chukovskaya, T.V. Tsivyan, R.D. Timenchik, A. Heit, S. Driver, D. Wells, S. Ketchian, S. Emert, R. Reader, S. Laiter and many others), as well as sections of English books on the history of Russian literature of the 20th century, numerous articles in periodicals, scientific reports , critical responses, publications of Akhmatova’s works in English translation, articles in encyclopedias, anthologies and dictionaries, which represents a huge layer of literary criticism and literary criticism materials that reveal the nature of the perception of the Russian writer’s work by representatives of Western literary traditions;

Translations of Akhmatova's poems into English by famous Anglo-American translators L. Coffin, D.M. Thomas, J. Kenyon, S. Cunnitz*, K. Proffer;

An additional source representing the scientific research of foreign philologists on specific aspects of Akhmatova studies are periodicals in the USA and Great Britain: “The Slavic and East European Journal”; Slavic Review; " Russian Review"(Russian Review); "Russian Literature Quarterly" (The Russian Literature Triquarterly); “The Slavonic and East European Review”.

Correspondence materials with the editor-in-chief of SEEJ magazine, professor of modern and classical Russian language, literature and culture at the University of Kentucky, Gerald Janecek. The volume of English-language materials available to domestic researchers is very limited, and the number of works translated and published in Russia is limited to a few. For this reason, all foreign studies presented in this work were translated from English directly by the dissertation author.

The scientific novelty of the research lies in an integrated approach to the analysis of the works of Akhmatova scholars in Russia, England and the USA, it is determined by the lack of knowledge of the chosen perspective and is due to the lack of special dissertation research devoted to the study of literature and culture of the University of Kentucky by Gerald Janecek. The volume of English-language materials available to domestic researchers is is very limited, and the number of works translated and published in Russia is calculated in just a few. For this reason, all foreign studies presented in this work were translated from English directly by the dissertation author.

We considered it necessary to consider Anglo-American Akhmatova studies in a comparative historical comparison with domestic research. General method Our research is built in accordance with a trend recognized both in Russia and abroad, which boils down to an open understanding of the science of literature as an open system in which various ideas and concepts interact; Based on this, none of the theories should be considered the main one or more authoritative than the others. Thus, the criticism present in the dissertation is directed primarily against a one-sided, categorical and subjective view of Akhmatova’s life and work. Thus, we analyzed the positions of foreign authors and noted widespread errors, simplifications, tendentious opinions, as well as positive results in the interpretation of the most important features of A. Akhmatova’s lyrics.

This work does not distinguish between actual critical and critical-journalistic works, since researchers often act as authors of both, as a result of which it becomes difficult to draw a line between the concepts of literary criticism and journalistic criticism.

The scientific novelty of the study lies in an integrated approach to the analysis of the works of Akhmatova scholars in Russia, England and the USA; it is determined by the lack of knowledge of the chosen perspective and is due to the lack of special dissertation research devoted to the study of the reception of A.A. Akhmatova’s work by foreign Slavic studies. Provisions for defense:

3. The most developed direction of foreign literary criticism about Akhmatova is biographical, formed on initial stages development of Akhmatova studies, was transformed into psychological and adjacent psychoanalytic.

The structure of the dissertation is determined by the implementation of the assigned tasks. reception of creativity by A.A. Akhmatova foreign Slavic studies. Provisions for defense:

1. Creativity of A.A. Akhmatova allows us to consider international literary connections and relationships, similarities and differences between literary and artistic phenomena in Russia, England and the USA.

2. The most productive stage in the development of Akhmatology studies is the 70-80s and the adjoining 90s. XX century, which is why this period chronologically limits our study.

3. The most developed direction of foreign literary criticism, about Akhmatova, is biographical, formed at the initial stages of the development of Akhmatova studies, transformed into psychological and adjacent psychoanalytic.

4. The most complete picture of A. Akhmatova’s work can be obtained by combining the assessments of Western and domestic literary scholars. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the fact that it presents the personality and work of A. Akhmatova in the multi-valued and multi-level context of the tendencies of the literary process of the 20th century, determines the significance of A. Akhmatova’s creative heritage, which organically combined the traditions of Russian and European culture, for representatives of Western literary criticism.

The practical application of this dissertation research is possible with further study of the work of A. Akhmatova, both in general and in special courses, at lectures, seminars on the history of Russian literature of the 20th century. Moreover, the main provisions and observations can be used in the study of typologically similar phenomena of Russian and foreign literature of the 20th century.

Approbation of the research was carried out by publishing articles on the topic of the dissertation, reports at scientific and practical international conferences at the PI SFU (2005), (2007).

The structure of the dissertation is determined by the implementation of the assigned tasks.

The dissertation consists of an introduction, three chapters, and a conclusion. The introduction substantiates the relevance of the dissertation research, defines its goals, objectives and methods, and presents the sources of the research.

Conclusion of the dissertation on the topic "Russian Literature", Savelyeva, Elena Konstantinovna

Chapter 3 Conclusions

When working on the third chapter, we were able to determine the presence of a smaller number of works devoted to the late work of A. Akhmatova. We explained this fact for several reasons: interest in early creativity overshadowed the originality, uniqueness and originality of the later; the existing political system in the Soviet Union did not allow expanding the area of ​​scientific interest towards late creativity; The muse of the great Akhmatova was silent for a long time, forcing scientists to temporarily lose sight of the work of the poet of the late period. We also determined the range of interests of foreign literary scholars. Most of the research is devoted to the late lyric poetry itself, the poems “Requiem” and “Poem without a Hero.”

In the first paragraph of the third chapter we talk about the main themes analyzed by foreign criticism, and the first question is the theme of the poet and poetry in late lyric poetry. According to scientists, Akhmatova defined the role of the poet as the role of a voice capable of open expression of thought. The poet is called upon to glorify the courage and resilience of the people. In connection with this function, scholars turn to Akhmatova’s secret letter during the period of strict censorship. Scientists study in detail the socio-political situation in the country in order to familiarize foreign readers. Quite boldly exposing Akhmatova’s secret letter, foreign researchers point the reader to the myth of artistic and political freedom of speech in the Soviet state.

Also in the range of scientific interests lies the memory motif of late creativity, which is cultivated in another work - “A Poem without a Hero.” Anglo-American researchers methodically trace the development of this motif from its origins to its apotheosis in the “Poem”. Scientists continue to talk about A. Akhmatova’s imitative method, but emphasize that now imitation is not imitative, but accumulative, that is, Akhmatova does not imitate the manner of her teachers, but uses themes and motifs that are most characteristic of their work. Foreign scientists come to the conclusion that the poet sought to pay tribute to his teachers and contemporaries, thereby joining the classical literary tradition, creating in his poems an eternal image of the poet in the world community.

The theme of the city is also being continued. Now, as critics emphasize, St. Petersburg is a symbol of the survivors and survivors of Leningrad, it is a besieged “wired up” city. So, in this section we were able to identify the main problematic issues, studied by Anglo-American literary studies, based on the late poetry of A. Akhmatova.

And finally, the last paragraph of the chapter is devoted to the most mysterious work of A. Akhmatova - “Poem without a Hero.” We were able to determine that research on this work constitutes the majority of all works of the late period, namely: a monograph by a Dutch author published in America, two dissertations issued in 1982 and 1985, 10 articles and chapters of the above monographs. In the course of analyzing “A Poem without a Hero,” Anglo-American researchers turn to the history of the creation of the work, as well as to its historical and cultural origins. Foreign criticism widely uses the decipherments of domestic scientists. And without a doubt, the most widely studied question is the question of prototypes and reminiscences of teachers, and uses themes and motifs that are most characteristic of their work. Foreign scientists come to the conclusion that the poet sought to pay tribute to his teachers and contemporaries, thereby joining the classical literary tradition, creating in his poems an eternal image of the poet in the world community.

The theme of the city is also being continued. Now, as critics emphasize, St. Petersburg is a symbol of the survivors and survivors of Leningrad, it is a besieged “wired up” city. So, in this section we were able to identify the main problematic issues studied by Anglo-American literary criticism based on the late poetry of A. Akhmatova.

The next paragraph is devoted to consideration famous work late period, the poem "Requiem". Foreign researchers have determined that in this work A. Akhmatova mourned her generation, her contemporaries - it is like a hymn to the Russian woman and a hymn of patriotism. It is noteworthy that the foreign assessment of genre originality is quite unambiguous and to some extent simplified. This approach can be justified by the specific perception of the foreign recipient. Despite the visible shortcomings, the Anglo-American study of this work occupies an honorable place in the history of foreign Akhmatology studies.

And finally, the last paragraph of the chapter is devoted to the most mysterious work of A. Akhmatova - “Poem without a Hero.” We were able to determine that research on this work constitutes the majority of all works of the late period, namely: a monograph by a Dutch author published in America, two dissertations issued in 1982 and 1985, 10 articles and chapters of the above monographs. In the course of analyzing “A Poem without a Hero,” Anglo-American researchers turn to the history of the creation of the work, as well as to its historical and cultural origins. Foreign criticism widely uses the decipherments of domestic scientists. And without a doubt, the most widely studied question is the question of prototypes and reminiscences.

So, in the third chapter we found out that the volume of foreign research on late creativity is inferior to work on early creativity. Nevertheless, it was possible to consider the main trends in this aspect, namely, that the study of late lyric poetry is almost not represented in Anglo-American literary studies, and the main interest of foreign scientists is concentrated on the “Requiem” (to a lesser extent) and on the “Poem without a Hero” ( mostly). Thus, we were able to achieve our stated goal - to present the main themes and motives of Anglo-American studies of the late period.

We have come to the conclusion that the judgments of Anglo-American literary scholars are emotionally restrained and historically and biographically oriented, which naturally simplifies the approach to the study of late creativity. Only a comparative typological method of analyzing domestic and foreign works can give a complete picture of the work of A. Akhmatova.

Poems", as well as the question of its genre uniqueness. In conclusion, Anglo-American criticism comes to the conclusion that “A Poem without a Hero” is unique work the great Akhmatova, which is a cultural and historical essay about the events of the early 20th century. And we emphasize that in the process of analysis, foreign critics managed to identify the main features of the work and emphasize its specificity.

So, in the third chapter we found out that the volume of foreign research on late creativity is inferior to work on early creativity. Nevertheless, it was possible to consider the main trends in this aspect, namely, that the study of late lyric poetry is almost not represented in Anglo-American literary studies, and the main interest of foreign scientists is concentrated on the “Requiem” (to a lesser extent) and on the “Poem without a Hero” (mostly). Thus, we were able to achieve our stated goal - to present the main themes and motives of Anglo-American studies of the late period.

We have come to the conclusion that the judgments of Anglo-American literary scholars are emotionally restrained and historically and biographically oriented, which naturally simplifies the approach to the study of late creativity. Only the comparative typological method of analyzing domestic and foreign works can give a complete picture of the work of A. Akhmatova.

Conclusion

After analyzing domestic works, we established that the development of Russian Akhmatova studies began with the publication of Akhmatova’s first collections, and her contemporaries N. Gumilyov, A. Blok, N. Nedobrovo, M. Kuzmin were critics. The simplicity of Akhmatova’s syntax, the colloquial nature of her lyrics, and the materiality of her symbolism were immediately noted. A. Blok noted that Anna Akhmatova was very different from all the Acmeists in her ease and innovation. It is Blok who will become the “famous contemporary” with whom Akhmatova will arrange a “literary game”, which will give rise to many rumors. V. Zhirmunsky will describe these creative and intimate relationships, but with his characteristic tact he will note that this is why it is personal, in order to remain untouched. Unfortunately, not all scientists adhere to this point of view; others reveal facts of personal biography, sometimes too deliberately and dirtyly, trying to erase the significance of A. Akhmatova’s personality and creativity.

We grouped all further research according to the principle: periodicals, memoirs, literary criticism, identifying the features of each of the directions. Among the outstanding memoirists, we noted the works of JI. Chukovskaya, A. Naiman, Y. Annenkov and many others. etc. These researchers depicted A. Akhmatova in living, everyday situations. As for literary criticism itself, among the monumental studies on which all further domestic and foreign literary studies on Akhmatova’s work will be built, we noted the scientific works of V. Vinogradov, B. Eikhenbaum, V. Zhirmunsky. They immediately set the tone for Russian Akhmatova studies, defining the peculiarity of Akhmatova’s verse, its poetic manner and unusual system of symbols. Note that in the 40s. In the 20th century, there was a ban on Akhmatova in connection with the statement of A. A. Zhdanov, which could not but resonate in modern literary criticism, we mean “anti-Akhmatova studies,” the followers of which are A. Zholkovsky and T.

We devoted the second half of the first chapter to considering the basic concepts of Anglo-American Akhmatova studies. We have established that Anglo-American Akhmatova studies are an independent branch of foreign Slavic studies, which became more widespread in the 70-80s. XX century. At this stage of scientific thought, the leading method is biographical, which served as the basis for the development of other methods. The works of biographers made an invaluable contribution to the history of Akhmatova studies and allowed followers to develop the science of the life and work of the great Akhmatova, based on the facts of her biography, studied in such detail by luminaries. Among the outstanding Akhmatova scholars we will name: A. Heit, K. Verhel, S. Driver, R. Reader, S. Ketchian, D. Wells, V. Rosslyn, S. Laiter, J. Niva, G. Klein, F. Fodd, S. .

Also in the first chapter, we were able to consider the most popular question in the science of Akhmatova’s work - the decoding of “Poem without a Hero.” Indeed, this is the most mysterious work with a complex ideological world, artistic originality and historiosophy. Nevertheless, scientists manage to determine the cultural origins of the “Poem” and decipher Akhmatova’s secret writing, which we outline in sufficient detail in the first paragraph of the first chapter. This question also worries modern foreign researchers, and, taking the judgments of Russian scientists as a basis, they also managed to present original decipherments of the work.

Next, we indicated modern trends in Akhmatova studies: Akhmatova in comparison with other poets (Akhmatova and Blok, Akhmatova and Yesenin), the study of Pushkin studies by Akhmatova, as well as studies of the mythopoetics of her lyrics, is widely developing.

Thus, having devoted the first paragraph of the first chapter to a review of domestic Akhmatovian concepts, we came to the conclusion that Russian critical thought about the life and work of A. Akhmatova is monumental and is an informative basis for the construction of concepts by foreign Akhmatova scholars.

We devoted the second half of the first chapter to considering the basic concepts of Anglo-American Akhmatova studies. We have established that Anglo-American Akhmatova studies are an independent branch of foreign Slavic studies, which became more widespread in the 70-80s. XX century. At this stage of scientific thought, the leading method is biographical, which served as the basis for the development of other methods. The works of biographers made an invaluable contribution to the history of Akhmatova studies and allowed followers to develop the science of the life and work of the great Akhmatova, based on the facts of her biography, studied in such detail by luminaries. Among the outstanding Akhmatova scholars we will name: A. Heit, K. Verhel, S. Driver, R. Reader, S. Ketchian, D. Wells, V. Rosslin, S. Laiter, J. Niva, G. Klein, F. Fotz, S. .

Emert et al.

In the second chapter, we analyzed the research materials of Slavists in the USA and England in comparison with domestic theses, identifying the main criteria for assessing and analyzing the early work of A. Akhmatova. Having presented a description of the main English and American studies, we have determined that there are much more works on early creativity than on the later period. Thus, in the range of scientific interests of foreign scientists are the motives of lyrics (religious, urban, love), questions about the diversity of the heroine and the autobiographical nature of poetry and, of course, studies of the poet’s style (nationality, novelism, intertextuality, the desire for cyclization, imitation). All this has been analyzed by us in

Emert et al.

It is noteworthy that Akhmatova studies developed within the university environment, and third-wave emigrants contributed to the celebration of Akhmatova’s work. In this work, it was possible to show the formation and development of Anglo-American Akhmatova studies, and also emphasize that the development of Akhmatova studies in England and the USA at the present stage is carried out in two equivalent directions: in detailing Akhmatova’s biography (in psychological and psychoanalytic Akhmatova studies) and in moving away from the biographical method to studies of mythopoetics. An unconditional contribution to the development of Akhmatova studies was made by translators who sought to bring their translations as close as possible to the original and convey to the English-speaking reader all the uniqueness of the poet’s creative manner, which was established in paragraph 1.2.

Nevertheless, we also talk about some of the shortcomings of Anglo-American thought, paying attention to inaccuracies, and we come to the conclusion that foreign Akhmatova studies in the USA and England are particularly diverse in their judgments, and the conclusions of scientists are not always correct, although they are very interesting. Thus, the criticism present in the dissertation is directed against a one-sided, categorical and subjective view of Akhmatova’s life and work.

In the second chapter, we analyzed the research materials of Slavists in the USA and England in comparison with domestic theses, identifying the main criteria for assessing and analyzing the early work of A. Akhmatova. Having presented a description of the main English and American studies, we have determined that there are much more works on early creativity than on the later period. Thus, in the range of scientific interests of foreign scientists are the motives of lyrics (religious, urban, love), questions about the diversity of the heroine and the autobiographical nature of poetry and, of course, studies of the poet’s style (nationality, novelism, intertextuality, the desire for cyclization, imitation). We analyzed all this in comparison with the works of domestic scientists.

The third chapter of our study is devoted to the late period of A. Akhmatova’s work, although it aroused less interest among foreign critics compared to the early period. Here we study the analysis of the work of D. Wells, who examined in detail Akhmatova’s secret letter during the years of repression. His point of view seems interesting, although it is not without some shortcomings. The investigation of the secret writing found its highest point in the “Poem without a Hero,” which was successfully deciphered by foreign scientists. Another poem - "Requiem" - was called by Anglo-American Akhmatov studies a hymn to the Russian woman, the Russian people. The conclusions on this work are less controversial, so the research in the third chapter does not cause us almost any complaints. Thus, having made an attempt to compare Russian and Anglo-American Akhmatova studies, we came to the conclusion that the most complete picture of A. Akhmatova’s work can be obtained by comparing the assessments of Western and domestic literary scholars. comparison with the works of domestic scientists.

We emphasized that the most developed direction of foreign literary criticism about Akhmatova is biographical, formed at the initial stages of the reception of her work, it was transformed into psychological and adjacent psychoanalytic Akhmatova studies. Of course, due to the heterogeneity of foreign Akhmatova studies, as mentioned above, we consider some thoughts to be one-sided and simplified, while at the same time emphasizing fair and interesting arguments. Thus, in the second chapter, during the analysis, we systematized and assessed the problems and questions about the life and work of A.A. Akhmatova at an early stage, formulated and reviewed by foreign scientists.

The third chapter of our study is devoted to the late period of A. Akhmatova’s work, although it aroused less interest among foreign critics compared to the early period. Here we study the analysis of the work of D. Wells, who examined in detail Akhmatova’s secret letter during the years of repression. His point of view seems interesting, although it is not without some shortcomings. The investigation of the secret writing found its highest point in the “Poem without a Hero,” which was successfully deciphered by foreign scientists. Another poem - "Requiem" - was called by Anglo-American Akhmatov studies a hymn to the Russian woman, the Russian people. The conclusions on this work are less controversial, so the research in the third chapter does not cause us almost any complaints. Thus, having made an attempt to compare Russian and Anglo-American Akhmatova studies, we came to the conclusion that the most complete picture of A. Akhmatova’s work can be obtained by comparing the assessments of Western and domestic literary scholars.

List of references for dissertation research Candidate of Philological Sciences Savelyeva, Elena Konstantinovna, 2008

1. Aikhenvald Yu. Silhouettes of Russian writers. M, 1994.

2. Almi I.L. ABOUT lyrical stories Pushkin in the poems of Anna Akhmatova // Secrets of craft. Akhmatov readings. Vol. 2. M., 1992. P. 5-19.

3. Aminova O.N. Poetics of the lyrical cycle by A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Ulyanovsk, 1997.

4. Antokolsky P. Book by Marina Tsvetaeva // New world. No. 4, 1966

5. Annenkov Yu.P. Diary of my meetings. M., 2001.

6. Anninsky L. Anna Akhmatova: “...came to Russia from nowhere” // Anninsky L. Silver and mob. M., 1997.

7. Akhmatova A. Poems and poems. M., 2005.

8. Akhmatova A. Evening. St. Petersburg "Workshop of Poets", 1912.

9. Akhmatova A. About the poems of N. Lvova // Russian Thought. 1914 No. 1 P. 2728.

10. Babaev Eduard. Memories. St. Petersburg, 2000. - pp. 49-73.

11. I. Blok A.A. Collected works in 8 volumes. T. 6. L., 1962

12. Bronskaya L.I. Genre originality of A. Akhmatova’s early lyrics. // Poetics and poetry: Interuniversity collection scientific works. - Ryazan: Ryazan ped. Institute, 1984

13. Bronskaya L.I. Lyrical cyclization in the early work of A. Akhmatova // Genre and creative individualityb Interuniversity collection of scientific works. - Vologda: Vologda State. ped. Institute, 1990.

14. Burdina S.V. Poems by A. Akhmatova: the role of “eternal images”, culture in the formation of the genre: dis. Dr. Phil. Sci. 10.01.01. M., 2003.

15. Bychenkova Yu.A. The world of images of early Akhmatova, 1909-1921: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Smolensk, 2001.

16. Verblovskaya I.S. Anna Akhmatova’s beloved Petersburg with bitter love. St. Petersburg, 2002.

17. Vilenkin V.Ya. In the one hundred and first mirror. M., 1990.

18. Vilenkin V. The image of the shadow in the poetics of A. Akhmatova // Questions of literature, 1994, No. 1, p. 57-67.

19. Vinogradov V.V. Stylistic sketches // V.V. Vinogradov. Poetics of Russian literature. M., 1976.

20. Volkov S. History of culture of St. Petersburg from its foundation to the present day. M., 2003

21. Garshin V.G. St. Petersburg A. Akhmatova. St. Petersburg, 2002.

22. Ginzburg L.Ya. Akhmatova. Several pages of memoirs / Memories of Anna Akhmatova, M., 1991, pp. 126-141.

23. Golka N. Typological aspects of literary creativity and the problem of artistic translation: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 10.01.08.M., 1999.1. References

24. Aikhenvald Yu. Silhouettes of Russian writers. M., 1994.

25. Almi I.L. About Pushkin’s lyrical plots in Anna Akhmatova’s poems // Secrets of craft. Akhmatov readings. Vol. 2. M., 1992. P. 5-19.

26. Aminova O.N. Poetics of the lyrical cycle by A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Ulyanovsk, 1997.

27. Antokolsky P. Book by Marina Tsvetaeva // New World. No. 4, 1966

28. Annenkov Yu.P. Diary of my meetings. M., 2001.

29. Anninsky L. Anna Akhmatova: “...came to Russia from nowhere” // Anninsky L. Silver and mob. M., 1997.

30. Akhmatova A. Poems and poems. M., 2005.

31. Akhmatova A. Evening. St. Petersburg "Workshop of Poets", 1912.

32. Akhmatova A. About the poems of N. Lvova // Russian Thought. 1914 No. 1 P. 2728.

33. Babaev Eduard. Memories. St. Petersburg, 2000. - pp. 49-73.

34. Blok A.A. Collected works in 8 volumes. T. 6. L., 1962

35. Bronskaya L.I. Genre originality of A. Akhmatova’s early lyrics. // Poetics and poetry: Interuniversity collection of scientific works. - Ryazan: Ryazan ped. Institute, 1984

36. Bronskaya L.I. Lyrical cyclization in the early work of A. Akhmatova // Genre and creative individualityb Interuniversity collection of scientific works. - Vologda: Vologda State. ped. Institute, 1990.

37. Burdina S.V. Poems by A. Akhmatova: the role of “eternal images”, culture in the formation of the genre: dis. Dr. Phil. Sci. 01/10/01. M., 2003.

38. Bychenkova Yu.A. The world of images of early Akhmatova, 1909-1921: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Smolensk, 2001.

39. Verblovskaya I.S. Anna Akhmatova’s beloved Petersburg with bitter love. St. Petersburg, 2002.

40. Vilenkin V.Ya. In the one hundred and first mirror. M., 1990.

41. Vilenkin V. The image of the shadow in the poetics of A. Akhmatova // Questions of literature, 1994, No. 1, p. 57-67.

42. Vinogradov V.V. Stylistic sketches // V.V. Vinogradov. Poetics of Russian literature. M., 1976.

43. Volkov S. History of culture of St. Petersburg from its foundation to the present day. M., 2003

44. Garshin V.G. St. Petersburg A. Akhmatova. St. Petersburg, 2002.

45. Ginzburg L.Ya. Akhmatova. A few pages of memories/Memories of Anna Akhmatova. M., 1991. S. 126-141.

46. ​​Golka N. Typological aspects of literary creativity and the problem of literary translation: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 10.01.08.M., 1999.

47. Gumilev N.S. Beads. Anna Akhmatova // Anna Akhmatova: Pro et Contra. St. Petersburg, 2001, pp. 89-91.

48. Darwin M.N. The problem of the cycle is in the study of lyrics. Kemerovo, 1983.

49. Demidova A. Akhmatov’s mirrors, ed. Weinstein, 2004

50. Demidova A. I needed to know everything about Akhmatova // Culture, 2004, No. 47.

51. Dobin E. Poetry of Anna Akhmatova. L., 1968.

52. Dovlatov S. In memory of Karl Proffer // Seven Days, New York, 1984, No. 48. P. 6-7.

53. Esin A.B. Principles and techniques of analyzing a literary work. M., 2005.

54. Zhirmunsky V.M. Conquering death and the word. Tomsk, 2000.

55. Zhirmunsky V.M. The work of Anna Akhmatova. L., 1973.

56. Zhirmunsky V.M. Theory of verse. L., 1975.

57. Western literary criticism of the 20th century. M., 2004.

58. Foreign literary studies of the 70s. Directions, trends, problems. M., 1984.

60. Karpov A.S. Unquenchable light. M., 2001.

61. Kataeva T.Anti-Akhmatova.M, 2007.

62. Kikhney L, G. The motif of Christmas fortune telling on the mirror as a semantic key to Anna Akhmatova’s “Poem without a Hero” // Anna Akhmatova’s Poetry: Secrets of the Craft. M., 1997. pp. 103-121.

63. Kikhney L.G., Temirshina O.R. “A Poem without a Hero” by Anna Akhmatova and the poetics of postmodernism, Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 9. Philology. 2002. No. 3. P. 53-62.

64. Kormilov S.I. Poetic creativity of A. Akhmatova. M., 1998

65. Kraineva N.I. On the creative history of “Poems without a Hero”: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 10.01.01., Veliky Novgorod, 2003.

66. Kralin M., Victorious over death and the word: Articles about Anna Akhmatova, Tomsk, 2002.

67. Krasavchenko T. N. Akhmatova in the mirrors of foreign criticism // Secrets of the craft. Akhmatov readings. Vol. 2. M., 1992. pp. 113-123.

68. Krasavchenko T.N. English literary criticism of the 20th century. M., 1994.

69. Krasavchenko T.N. Russian literature in foreign studies of the 80s (Rozanov, Khlebnikov, Akhmatova, Mandelstam, Bakhtin). M., 1990.

70. Krutiy S.M. "Architecturality" artistic images in the poetry of the Acmeists (O. Mandelstam, A. Akhmatova): dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 01/10/01. Magnitogorsk, 2005.

71. Kuleshov V.I. Russian literature in the assessment of modern foreign criticism. M., 1981.

72. Lisnyanskaya I.L. The mystery of the music “Poem without a Hero” // Friendship of Peoples. - 1991. - No. 7. - pp. 235-251.

73. Lisnyanskaya I.L. Casket with a triple bottom. Kaliningrad, 1995.

74. Gumilev N.S. Beads. Anna Akhmatova // Anna Akhmatova: Pro et Contra. St. Petersburg, 2001, pp. 89-91.

75. Darwin M.N. The problem of the cycle is in the study of lyrics. Kemerovo, 1983.

76. Demidova A. Akhmatov’s mirrors, ed. Weinstein, 2004

77. Demidova A. I needed to know everything about Akhmatova / TKultura, 2004, No. 47.

78. Dobin E. Poetry of Anna Akhmatova. L., 1968.

79. Dovlatov S. In memory of Karl Proffer // Seven days, New York, 1984, No. 48. P. 6-7."

80. Esin A.B. Principles and techniques of analyzing a literary work. M., 2005.

81. Zhirmunsky V.M. Conquering death and the word. Tomsk, 2000.

82. Zhirmunsky V.M. The work of Anna Akhmatova. L., 1973.

83. Zhirmunsky V.M. Theory of verse. L., 1975.

84. Western literary criticism of the 20th century. M., 2004.

85. Foreign literary criticism of the 70s. Directions, trends, problems. M., 1984.

87. Karpov A.S. Unquenchable light. M., 2001.

88. Kataeva T.Anti-Akhmatova.M, 2007.

89. Kikhney L, G. The motif of Christmas fortune telling on the mirror as a semantic key to Anna Akhmatova’s “Poem without a Hero” // Anna Akhmatova’s Poetry: Secrets of the Craft. M., 1997. pp. 103-121.

90. Kikhney L.G., Temirshina O.R. “A Poem without a Hero” by Anna Akhmatova and the poetics of postmodernism, Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 9. Philology. 2002. No. 3. P. 53-62.

91. Kormilov S.I. Poetic creativity of A. Akhmatova. M., 1998

92. Kraineva N.I. On the creative history of “Poems without a Hero”: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 10.01.01., Veliky Novgorod, 2003.

93. Kralin M., Victorious over death and the word: Articles about Anna Akhmatova, Tomsk, 2002.

94. Krasavchenko T. N. Akhmatova in the mirrors of foreign criticism // Secrets of the craft. Akhmatov readings. Vol. 2. M., 1992. pp. 113-123.

95. Krasavchenko T.N. English literary criticism of the 20th century. M., 1994.

96. Krasavchenko T.N. Russian literature in foreign studies of the 80s (Rozanov, Khlebnikov, Akhmatova, Mandelstam, Bakhtin). M., 1990.

97. Krutiy S.M. “Architecturality” of artistic images in the poetry of the Acmeists (O. Mandelstam, A. Akhmatova): dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 01/10/01. Magnitogorsk, 2005.

98. Kuleshov V.I. Russian literature in the assessment of modern foreign criticism. M., 1981.

99. Lisnyanskaya I.L. The mystery of the music “Poem without a Hero” // Friendship of Peoples. - 1991. - No. 7. - P. 235-251.

100. Lisnyanskaya I.L. Casket with a triple bottom. Kaliningrad, 1995.

101. Losev A.V. The problem of artistic style. Kyiv, 1994

102. Lyapina L.E. Cyclization in Russian literature of the 19th century. - St. Petersburg, 1999

103. Mandelstam O. Works in 2 volumes. Volume 1: Poems, translations. Comp. S. Averintsev and P. Nerler. Moscow, 1990.

104. Mashinsky S. Russian literature in British universities // Questions of literature. 1968. No. 3. P. 193-203.

105. Naiman A.G. Stories about Anna Akhmatova. M., 1999.

106. Nasrullaeva S.F. Chronotope in Akhmatova’s early lyrics. Books of poems “Evening” and “Rosary”: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Makhachkala, 1997.

107. Nevinskaya I.N. The genre of the poem in the works of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. M., 1996.

108. Nedobrovo N.V. // Russian thought. 1915. No. 7.

109. Nedoshivin V.M. Walks through the Silver Age: houses and destinies: very personal stories from the life of St. Petersburg. buildings. St. Petersburg, 2005

110. Niva Georges. Baroque poem // Akhmatov collection / Comp. S. Dedyulin and G. Superfin, Paris, 1989.P. 99-108.

111. New organization Slavists of Great Britain //Information bulletin/International Association for the Study and Dissemination of Slavs and Cultures. -M., 1991. Issue. 21,

112. Pavlovsky A. A. Anna Akhmatova: Life and creativity. M., 1991.

113. Pakhareva T.A. The artistic system of A. Akhmatova. Kyiv, 1994.

114. Popova N. On the theme of St. Petersburg in “Poem without a Hero” // La Pietroburgo di Anna Achmatova, - Bologna, Grafis Edizioni, 1996. - p. 20-29.

115. Rubinchik O. In a hundred mirrors. Akhmatov Readings 2000 and current state Akhmatova Studies // Russian Thought. No. 4312. April 6-12, 2000. P. 12.; No. 4313. April 13-19, 2000. P. 16.

116. Rudenko M. S. Art, a different understanding of religious images and motifs in the poetry of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Sciences: 10.01.01.M., 1995

117. Russian literature in foreign studies of the 1980s. under. ed. Tsybenko E.Z. M., 1994.

118. Ryzhenkov V. There is a basement in the second yard. Literary and artistic cabaret “Stray Dog” // Questions of literature. 1994. No. 1. P. 57-67.

119. Safonova N.S. Literary associations in late lyric poetry

120. A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Kursk, 1998.

121. Slavic studies and Balkan studies in foreign European countries and the USA (collection of articles and materials). M., 1989.

122. Dictionary of literary terms, Timofeev L. I., Turaev S. V., M., 1974.

123. Dictionary of foreign expressions and words, Babkin A.M., Shendetsov

124. V.V., 3 vols., St. Petersburg, “KVOTAM”, 1 vol.

125. Smirnov Ya.M. Poetic associative connections “Poems without a hero” // Tradition in the history of culture. M., 1978. S. 228-230.

126. Losev A.V. The problem of artistic style. Kyiv, 1994

127. Lyapina L.E. Cyclization in Russian literature of the 19th century. - St. Petersburg, 1999

128. Mandelstam O. Works in 2 volumes. Volume 1: Poems, translations. Comp. S. Averintsev and P. Nerler. Moscow, 1990.

129. Mashinsky S. Russian literature in British universities // Questions of literature. 1968. No. 3. P. 193-203.

130. Naiman A.G. Stories about Anna Akhmatova. M., 1999.

131. Nasrullaeva S.F. Chronotope in Akhmatova’s early lyrics. Books of poems “Evening” and “Rosary”: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Makhachkala, 1997.

132. Nevinskaya I.N. The genre of the poem in the works of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. M., 1996.

133. Nedobrovo N.V. // Russian thought. 1915. No. 7.

134. Nedoshivin V.M. Walks through the Silver Age: houses and destinies: very personal stories from the life of St. Petersburg. buildings. St. Petersburg, 2005

135. Niva Georges. Baroque poem // Akhmatov collection / Comp. S. Dedyulin and G. Superfin. Paris, 1989.P. 99-108.

136. New organization of Slavists in Great Britain //Information bulletin/International association. for the study and dissemination of glories and cultures. -M., 1991. Issue. 21.

137. Pavlovsky A. A. Anna Akhmatova: Life and creativity. M., 1991.

138. Pakhareva T.A. The artistic system of A. Akhmatova. Kyiv, 1994.

139. Popova N. On the theme of St. Petersburg in “Poem without a Hero” // La Pietroburgo di Anna Achmatova. - Bologna, Grafis Edizioni, 1996. - p. 20-29.

140. Rubinchik O. In a hundred mirrors. Akhmatova readings 2000 and the current state of Akhmatova studies // Russian Thought. No. 4312. April 6-12, 2000. P. 12.; No. 4313. April 13-19, 2000. P. 16.

141. Rudenko M.S. Artistic understanding of religious images and motifs in the poetry of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Sciences: 10.01.01.M., 1995

142. Russian literature in foreign studies of the 1980s. under. ed. Tsybenko E.Z. M., 1994.

143. Ryzhenkov V. There is a basement in the second yard. Literary and artistic cabaret “Stray Dog” // Questions of literature. 1994. No. 1.0. 57-67.

144. Safonova N.S. Literary associations in late lyric poetry

145. A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Kursk, 1998.

146. Slavic studies and Balkan studies in foreign European countries and the USA (collection of articles and materials). M., 1989.

147. Dictionary of literary terms, Timofeev L. I., Turaev S. V., M., 1974.

148. Dictionary of foreign expressions and words, Babkin A.M., Shendetsov

149. V.V., 3 vols., St. Petersburg, “KVOTAM”, 1 vol.

150. Smirnov Ya.M. Poetic associative connections “Poems without a hero” // Tradition in the history of culture. M., 1978. S. 228-230.

151. Smith J. A view from the outside: articles on Russian poetry and poetics / Gerald Smith; (translation from English by Gasparova M. J1., Skulacheva T. V.). M., 2002.

152. Modern foreign literary criticism. M., 1999.

153. Stavrovskaya I.V. The motive of duality in Russian poetry of the early 20th century: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 01/10/01. Ivanovo, 2002.

154. Struve N. Eight hours with Anna Akhmatova // Zvezda, 1989, No. 36.

155. Sycheva V.P. American Society of Slavic Studies: Past and Present // Study on the Historiosophy of the Countries of Central and Southeast Europe. M., 1991.

156. Temnenko G. M. / Lyrical hero and myth about the poet (based on the early lyrics of Akhmatova) / Anna Akhmatova: era, fate, creativity: Crimean Akhmatova scientific collection. - 2005. - P. 127-152.

157. Temnenko G.M. Pushkin traditions in the works of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 01/10/01. M., 1997.

158. Timenchik R.D., Toporov V.N., Tsivyan T.V. Akhmatova and Kuzmin // Russian Literature. 1978. VI-3. P. 213-305.

159. Timenchik R.D. A few notes on the article by T. Tsivyan (Notes on the decipherment of “Poem without a Hero”) // Proceedings on sign systems. V. Tartu, 1971. pp. 279-280.

160. Timenchik R.D. Notes on “Poem without a hero”, Poem without a hero: In 5 books. /Join Art. R. D. Timenchik. M., 1989. P. 3-25.

161. Timenchik R. Riga episode in “Poem without a Hero” by A. Akhmatova // Daugava. 1984. No. 2. pp. 113-121.

162. Timofeev L.I. Fundamentals of literary theory. M., 1976.

163. Toporov V.N. “A Poem without a Hero” by A. Akhmatova in a ritual aspect // Anna Akhmatova and Russian culture of the early 20th century. Thesis, conf. (IMLI). M., 1989. P. 15-21.

164. Toporov V.N. But, God, how to silence them! // Sight. Business Newspaper. 2007, from 18.08

165. Trotsik O.A. The Bible in the artistic world of A. Akhmatova. Poltava, 2001.

166. Tyapkov I.S. Russian symbolism in the reception of Anglo-American and German literary criticism: questions of history and theory: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Ivanovo, 2002.

167. Urnov D.M. A literary work in the assessment of the Anglo-American “new criticism”. M., 1982.

168. Fomenko I.V. Lyrical cycle: the formation of the genre, poetics. Tver, 1992.

169. Freud 3. Interpretation of dreams, Minsk, 1998.

170. Khalizev V.E. Theory of literature. M., 2000.

171. Heit A. A. Akhmatova. Poetic journey M., 1991.

172. Khrenkov D.T., Anna Akhmatova in St. Petersburg. L., 1989.

173. Tsivyan T., Notes on deciphering // Scientific notes of Tart. University. Tartu, 1971, Vol. 284.

174. Smith J. A view from the outside: articles on Russian poetry and poetics / Gerald Smith; (translation from English by Gasparova M. L., Skulacheva T. V.). M., 2002.

175. Modern foreign literary criticism. M., 1999.

176. Stavrovskaya I.V. The motive of duality in Russian poetry of the early 20th century: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 01/10/01. Ivanovo, 2002.

177. Struve N. Eight hours with Anna Akhmatova // Zvezda, 1989, No. 36.

178. Sycheva V.P. American Society of Slavic Studies: Past and Present // Study on the Historiosophy of the Countries of Central and South-Eastern Europe. M., 1991.

179. Temnenko G. M. / Lyrical hero and myth about the poet (based on the early lyrics of Akhmatova) / Anna Akhmatova: era, fate, creativity: Crimean Akhmatova scientific collection. - 2005. - P. 127-152.

180. Temnenko G.M. Pushkin traditions in the works of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Sci. 01/10/01. M., 1997.

181. Timenchik R.D., Toporov V.N., Tsivyan T.V. Akhmatova and Kuzmin // Russian Literature. 1978. VI-3. P. 213-305.

182. Timenchik R.D. A few notes on the article by T. Tsivyan (Notes on the decipherment of “Poem without a Hero”) // Proceedings on sign systems. V. Tartu, 1971. pp. 279-280.

183. Timenchik R.D. Notes on “Poem without a hero”, Poem without a hero: In 5 books. /Join Art. R. D. Timenchik. M., 1989. P. 3-25.

184. Timenchik R. Riga episode in “Poem without a Hero” by A. Akhmatova // Daugava. 1984. No. 2. pp. 113-121.

185. Timofeev L.I. Fundamentals of literary theory. M., 1976.

186. Toporov V.N. “A Poem without a Hero” by A. Akhmatova in a ritual aspect // Anna Akhmatova and Russian culture of the early 20th century. Abstract. conf. (IMLI). M, 1989. P. 15-21.

187. Toporov V.N. But, God, how to silence them! // Sight. Business Newspaper. 2007, from 18.08

188. Trotsik O.A. The Bible in the artistic world of A. Akhmatova. Poltava, 2001.

189. Tyapkov I.S. Russian symbolism in the reception of Anglo-American and German literary criticism: questions of history and theory: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. Ivanovo, 2002.

190. Urnov D.M. A literary work in the assessment of the Anglo-American “new criticism”. M., 1982.

191. Fomenko I.V. Lyrical cycle: the formation of the genre, poetics. Tver, 1992.

192. Freud 3. Interpretation of dreams, Minsk, 1998.

193. Khalizev V.E. Theory of literature. M., 2000.

194. Heit A. A. Akhmatova. Poetic journey M., 1991.

195. Khrenkov D.T. Anna Akhmatova in St. Petersburg. L., 1989.

196. Tsivyan T., Notes on deciphering // Scientific notes of Tart. University. Tartu, 1971, Vol. 284.

197. Tsivyan T.V. Semiotic travel. St. Petersburg, 2001.S. 159-168.

198. Tsivyan T.V., About the metapoetic in “Poem without a Hero” // Lotmanov collection. No. 1. M., 1995. P. 611-618.

199. Tsurganova E.A. Innovations of foreign literary criticism in the 20th century. M., 2001.

200. Tsybenko E.Z., Belova T.N. Russian literature in foreign studies in the 1980s. M., 1994.

202. Chernykh V.A. Chronicle of the life and work of A. Akhmatova, M., 1998.

203. Chukovskaya L.K. Notes about A. Akhmatova. Paris, 1984.

204. Chukovsky K.I. High art. M., 1988.

205. Chukovsky K.I. Anna Akhmatova // Reader of critical materials. Russian literature at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries. M., 1999

206. Chukovsky. K.I. Akhmatova and Mayakovsky, A.A. Akhmatova: Pro et contra. St. Petersburg, 2001, pp. 208-235.

207. Shevchuk Yu.V. The tragic in the lyrics of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Sciences: 10.01.01. Ufa, 2004.

208. Shorkina V.V. Tragic motives in the lyrics of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. M., 1997.

209. Shakespeare V. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Translated by B. Pasternak. Izhevsk, 1981.

210. Eikhenbaum B.M. Anna Akhmatova. Experience of analysis, Akhmatova A.A. Favorites. M., 1993,

211. Etkind. E. Immortality of memory: Anna Akhmatova’s poem “Requiem” // Etkind E. There, inside: On Russian poetry of the 20th century: essays, St. Petersburg, 1996.

212. Tsivyan T.V. Semiotic travel. St. Petersburg, 2001.S. 159-168.

213. Tsivyan T.V., About the metapoetic in “Poem without a Hero” // Lotmanov collection. No. 1.M., 1995. P. 611-618.

214. Tsurganova E.A. Innovations of foreign literary criticism in the 20th century. M., 2001.

215. Tsybenko E.Z., Belova T.N. Russian literature in foreign studies in the 1980s. M., 1994.

217. Chernykh V.A. Chronicle of the life and work of A. Akhmatova. M., 1998.

218. Chukovskaya L.K. Notes about A. Akhmatova. Paris, 1984.

219. Chukovsky K.I. High art. M., 1988.

220. Chukovsky K.I. Anna Akhmatova // Reader of critical materials. Russian literature at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries. M., 1999

221. Chukovsky. K.I. Akhmatova and Mayakovsky, A.A. Akhmatova: Pro et contra. St. Petersburg, 2001, pp. 208-235.

222. Shevchuk Yu.V. The tragic in the lyrics of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Sciences: 10.01.01.U fa, 2004.

223. Shorkina V.V. Tragic motives in the lyrics of A. Akhmatova: dis. .candidate of phil. Science: 10.01.01. M., 1997.

224. Shakespeare V. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Translated by B. Pasternak. Izhevsk, 1981.

225. Eikhenbaum B.M. Anna Akhmatova. Experience of analysis, Akhmatova A.A. Favorites. M., 1993.

226. Etkind. E. Immortality of memory: Anna Akhmatova’s poem “Requiem” // Etkind E. There, inside: On Russian poetry of the 20th century: essays, St. Petersburg, 1996.

227. Sources in English

228. Amert, Susan. Akhmatova's "Song Of The Motherland": Rereading The Opening Texts Of Rekviem//Slavic Review 49, no. 3 fall. 1990. PP. 374-89.

229. Amert, Susan. Axmatova's Later Lyrics: The Poetics of Mediation. Yale University, Ph. D. Thesis, 1983

230. Amert, Susan. In a Shattered Mirror: The Later Poetry about f Anna Akhmatova. Stanford, CA, 1992

231. Anna Akhmatova/ 1889-1989/.Oakland, California, 1993

232. Anthology Of Russian Women's Writhing.com.by Kelly C.H.M. Oxford Univ.Press., 1994

233. Bailey, Sharon M. An Elegy For Russia: Anna Akhmatova's Requiem .//SEE J, vol. 43, No. 2. 1999 summer, Pp.324-46

234. Basker M. Dislocation and Relocation in Akhmatova's Rekviem, in Rosslyn, The Speech of Unknown Eyes: Akhmatova's Readers on her Poetry, vol.2, Nottingham, 1990

235. Brostrone Kenneth N. Russia Literature And American Critics. Michigan, 1984

236. Brown, Clarence. Mandelstam. Cambridge, 1973

237. Brown, Edward James. Russian Literature Since The Revolution. London, 1969

238. Childers R., Crone A.L.The Mandelshtam's Presence in the Dedications of the Poema bez Geroja// Russian Literature, XV,#1,1984, P.69

239. Collected narrative and Lyrical poetry. Alexander Pushkin, Ann Arbor, Ardis, 1984

240. Comwell Neil, Christian Nicole. Reference Guide To Russian Literature. Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1998

241. Crone, A. L. Anna Axmatova and the Imitation of Annenski // Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 7. 1981. Pp. 81-93.

242. Dalos, The Guest From The Future. A.Akhmatova And Isaiah Berlin. London, 1988.

243. Davies, Jessie Anna Of All The Russia.Liverpool,1988

244. Dhingra, K. S. Anna Akhmatova's Poetry of the Later Period // Journal of the School of Languages ​​(New Delhi), 4/2 (1976), 1-11

245. Dhingra, K.S. Anna Akhmatova's Poetry of the Later Period/ZJournal of the School of Languages ​​(New Delhi), 4/2. 1976. Pp. 1-11.

246. Dramond J., Akhmatova's Poetry // Russ. lit. Amsterdam, 1984. Vol. 15. No. l.P. 51-82.

247. Doherty, Justin.The Acmeist Movement.Oxford, 1995

248. Driver Sam. Directions in Axmatova's Poetry since the Early Period // Russian Language Journal Supplement, ed. D. Mickiewitz (Spring, 1975)

249. Driver, Sam, Anna Akhmatova, New-York, 1972

250. Driver, Sam. Acmeism//SEEJ, vol. 12, No. 3, summer 1968. Pp.141-156

251. Sources in English

252. Amert, Susan. Akhmatova's "Song Of The Motherland": Rereading The Opening Texts Of Rekviem//Slavic Review 49, no. 3 fall. 1990. PP. 374-89.

253. Amert, Susan. Axmatova's Later Lyrics: The Poetics of Mediation. Yale University, Ph. D. Thesis, 1983

254. Amert, Susan. In a Shattered Mirror: The Later Poetry about f Anna Akhmatova. Stanford, CA, 1992

255. Anna Akhmatova/ 1889-1989/.Oakland, California, 1993

256. Anthology Of Russian Women's Writhing.com.by Kelly C.H.M. Oxford Univ.Press., 1994

257. Bailey, Sharon M. An Elegy For Russia: Anna Akhmatova's Requiem.//SEEJ, vol. 43, No. 2. 1999 summer, Pp.324-46

258. Basker M. Dislocation and Relocation in Akhmatova's Rekviem, in Rosslyn, The Speech of Unknown Eyes: Akhmatova's Readers on her Poetry, vol.2, Nottingham, 1990

259. Brostrone Kenneth N. Russia Literature And American Critics. Michigan, 1984

260. Brown, Clarence. Mandelstam. Cambridge, 1973

261. Brown, Edward James. Russian Literature Since The Revolution. London, 1969

262. Childers R., Crone A.L.The Mandelshtam's Presence in the Dedications of the Poema bez Geroja // Russian Literature, XV, # 1, 1984, P.69

263. Collected narrative and Lyrical poetry. Alexander Pushkin, Ann Arbor, Ardis, 1984

264. Cornwell Neil, Christian Nicole. Reference Guide To Russian Literature. Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1998

265. Crone, A. L. Anna Axmatova and the Imitation of Annenski // Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 7. 1981. Pp. 81-93.

266. Dalos, The Guest From The Future. A.Akhmatova And Isaiah Berlin. London, 1988.

267. Davies, Jessie Anna Of All The Russia.Liverpool,1988

268. Dhingra, K. S. Anna Akhmatova's Poetry of the Later Period // Journal of the School of Languages ​​(New Delhi), 4/2 (1976), 1-11

269. Dhingra, K.S. Anna Akhmatova's Poetry of the Later Period//Journal of the School of Languages ​​(New Delhi), 4/2. 1976. Pp. 1-11.

270. Dramond J., Akhmatova's Poetry // Russ. lit. Amsterdam, 1984. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 51-82.

271. Doherty, Justin.The Acmeist Movement.Oxford, 1995

272. Driver Sam. Directions in Axmatova's Poetry since the Early Period // Russian Language Journal Supplement, ed. D. Mickiewitz (Spring, 1975)

273. Driver, Sam, Anna Akhmatova, New-York, 1972

274. Driver, Sam. Acmeism//SEEJ, vol. 12, No. 3, summer 1968. Pp.141-156

275. Driver, Sam. Akhmatova Anna Andreevna//Modern Encyclopaedia Of Russian And Soviet Literature, Vol.1/Academic International Press., 1977. Pp.67-77.

276. Driver, Sam. Akhmatova: A Selective, Annotated Bibliography//Russian Literature Triquarterly, No. 1 1971, P.432

277. Driver, Sam. Anna Akhmatova: Early Love Poems//Russian Literature Triquarterly, No. 1. 1971. Pp.297-325

278. Driver, Sam.Akhmatova"s "Poema Bez Geroja" And Blok"s "VozmezdieV/Aleksandr Blok: Centennial Conference, 4-5.Columbus., 1984. Pp.89-99

279. Erlich Victor. Modernism And Revolution: Russian Literature In Transition, Cambridge, Mass, London, 1994

280. Erlich, Victor. The Double Image.Baltimore.,1964

281. Finberg, Lawrence E. Measure And Complementarily In Axmatova. Oxford, 1977.

282. Frankland. Poetess Of Genius. New York, 1966

283. Goldman, H.A. Anna Axiaatova's Hamlet the Immortality of Personality and the Discontinuity of Time // Slavic and East European Journal, No. 22.1978. pp. 484-93

284. Goscilo, Helena. Russia. Women. Culture. Bloomington, 1996

285.Guests from the Future: Poems of Anna Akhmatova, Osip Mandelshtam, Boris Pasternak, Moscow, 1998

286. Haight, Amanda, Anna Akhmatova: A Poetic Pilgrimage. London, 1976

287. Hartman A.J., The Metrical Typology of Anna Akhmatova, Columbus, Ohio, 1982

288. Hayward Max, Labedz Leopold. Literature And The Revolution In Soviet Russia, 1917-62: A Symposium. London, Oxford Univ.Pressro, 1963

289. Hay ward Max. Writers In Russia: 1917-1978, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1983

290. Heldt B.Terrible Perfection: Women & Russian Literature.Bloomington, Indiana Univ.Press., 1987

291. Hemschemeyer Tr. Judith, ed. Roberta Reeder The Complete Poems of Anna Akhmatova. London., 1990

292. Hemschemeyer, Tr. Judith. A Word About Translating Anna Akhmatova // Northwest Review, 23/3. 1985. pp. 92-93

293. Hingley, Ronald. Nightingale Fever. Russian Poets In Revolution. Knopf, New York, 1981

294. Holmgren, Beth. Women's Works In Stalin's Time: On Lidia Chukovskaia & Nadezda Mandelstam Bloomington. 1993

295. Hosking, G., Russia: People And Empire. 1552-1917., London., 1997

296. Jobes Gertrude, Dictionary of Mythology, Folklore ad Symbols, New York, Scarecrow Press, 1961

297. Jones, Lawrence Gaylord. Anna Akhmatova's Quiet "Tenderness". Paris., 1973

298. Driver, Sam. Akhmatova Anna Andreevna/ZModem Encyclopaedia Of Russian And Soviet Literature, Vol.1/Academic International Press., 1977. Pp.67-77.

299. Driver, Sam. Akhmatova: A Selective, Annotated Bibliography/ZRussian Literature Triquarterly, No. 1 1971.P.432

300. Driver, Sam. Anna Akhmatova: Early Love Poems/ZRussian Literature Triquarterly, No. 1. 1971. Pp.297-325

301. Driver, Sam. Akhmatova's "Poema Bez Geroja" And Blok's "VozmezdieV/Aleksandr Blok: Centennial Conference, 4-5. Columbus., 1984. Pp. 89-99

302. Erlich Victor. Modernism And Revolution: Russian Literature In Transition, Cambridge, Mass, London, 1994

303. Erlich, Victor. The Double Image.Baltimore.,1964

304. Finberg, Lawrence E. Measure And Complementarily In Axmatova. Oxford, 1977.

305. Frankland. Poetess Of Genius. New York, 1966

306. Goldman, H.A. Anna Axiaatova's Hamlet the Immortality of Personality and the Discontinuity of Time // Slavic and East European Journal, No. 22.1978. pp. 484-93

307. Goscilo, Helena. Russia. Women. Culture. Bloomington, 1996

308. Guests from the Future: Poems of Anna Akhmatova, Osip Mandelshtam, Boris Pasternak, Moscow, 1998

309. Haight, Amanda, Anna Akhmatova: A Poetic Pilgrimage. London, 1976

310. Hartman A.J., The Metrical Typology of Anna Akhmatova, Columbus, Ohio, 1982

311. Hayward Max, Labedz Leopold. Literature And The Revolution In Soviet Russia, 1917-62: A Symposium. London, Oxford Univ. Pressio, 1963

312. Hayward Max. Writers In Russia: 1917-1978. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich., 1983

313. Heldt B.Terrible Perfection: Women & Russian Literature.Bloomington, Indiana Univ.Press., 1987

314. Hemschemeyer Tr. Judith, ed. Roberta Reeder The Complete Poems of Anna Akhmatova. London., 1990

315. Hemschemeyer, Tr. Judith. A Word About Translating Anna Akhmatova // Northwest Review, 23/3. 1985. pp. 92-93

316. Hingley, Ronald. Nightingale Fever. Russian Poets In Revolution. Knopf, New York, 1981

317. Holmgren, Beth. Women's Works In Stalin's Time: On Lidia Chukovskaia & Nadezda Mandelstam Bloomington. 1993

318. Hosking, G., Russia: People And Empire. 1552-1917., London., 1997

319. Jobes Gertrude, Dictionary of Mythology, Folklore ad Symbols, New York, Scarecrow Press, 1961

320. Jones, Lawrence Gaylord. Anna Akhmatova's Quiet "Tenderness". Paris., 1973

321. Kahler, E. The Nature Of Symbol// Symbolism In Religion And Literature. New-York. 1960.Pp.50-74

322. Kelly Catriona. History Of Russian Women's Poetry. Oxford Univ. Press., 1994

323. Kelly, Catriona Utopias: Russian Modernist Text, 1905-1940. London., 1999.

324. Kelly, Catriona. Constructing Russian Culture In The Age Of Revolution: 1881-1940.0xford., 1998

325. Kelly, Catriona. The Impossibility Of Imitation: Anna Akhmatova And Innokentii Annenskii (Pp.238-243) in W.A.Rosslyn (ed.), The Speech of Unknown Eyes: Akhmatova's Readers on her Poetry, vol.2 Nottingham. 1990

326. Kemball, R. Some Metrical Problems of Russian-English Verse Translation (with Special Reference to Blok and Akhmatova), // in siSchwelzerischer Beltrage zum VIII Internatlonalen Slavlstenkongress In Zagreb und Ljubljana, September 1978, pp. 105-30

327. Kenyon J., A Hundred White Daffodils: Essays, Interviews, the Akhmatova Translations, Newspaper Columns, and One Poem, N-Y, 1999

328. Kenyon J., Twenty Poems: A. Akhmatova, St. Paul, Minn., 1985

329. Ketchian S.I. Anna Akhmatova 1889-1989: Papers From The Akhmatova Centennial Conference. Oakland, 1993

330. Ketchian, S.I.The Genre of "Podrazenie" and Anna Axmatova // Russian Literature, No. 5, 1984, 151-68

331. Ketchian, S.I. A Unique Device For Axmatova Tribute To MandePstam)//SEEJ, No. 20, 1976 Pp.400-404

332. Ketchian, S.I. An Inspiration for Anna Akhmatova's "Requiem" Hovannes Tumanlan"//in Studies In Russian Literature In Honor of Vsevolod Setchkarev, ed by J W Connolly A SI Ketchian Columbus, Slavica, 1987, pp 175-88

333. Ketchian, S. I. Metempsychosis In The Verse Of Anna Axmatova // SEEJ, No. 25, 1981. Pp.44-60

334. Ketchian, S. I. Axmatova's "UciteP: Lessons Learned From Annensky //SEEJ, No. 22., 1978. Pp. 22-29

335. Ketchian, S. I. Anna Akhmatova//In Handbook of Russian Literature, (ed. by V. Terras) New Haven., 1985 Pp. 14-16

336. Ketchian, S. I. Imitation As A Poetic Mode In Axmatova's "Podrazanie AnnenskomuV/Scando-Slavica, No. 25, 1979 Pp. 57-70

337. Ketchian, S. I,. A Source For Anna Axmatova's: "A String Of Quatrains" Hovannes Tumanian's Quatrains // SEEJ, No. 31, 1987 Pp. 520-532

338. Ketchian, S.I. The poetry of A. Akhmatova, a Conquest of time and Space, Munchen, 1986

339. Kiaer, Christina & Naiman Eric, Everyday Life in Early Soviet Russia: Taking the Revolution Inside. Bloomington, Indiana, 2006

340. Knight.Akhmatova As Witness.Tribune., 1976

341. Kahler, E. The Nature Of Symbol// Symbolism In Religion And Literature. New-York.l960.Pp.50-74

342. Kelly Catriona. History Of Russian Women's Poetry. Oxford Univ.Press., 1994

343. Kelly, Catriona Utopias: Russian Modernist Text, 1905-1940. London., 1999.

344. Kelly, Catriona. Constructing Russian Culture In The Age Of Revolution: 1881-1940.0xford.,1998

345. Kelly, Catriona. The Impossibility Of Imitation: Anna Akhmatova And Innokentii Annenskii (Pp.23 8-243) in W.A. Rosslyn (ed.), The Speech of Unknown Eyes: Akhmatova's Readers on her Poetry, vol.2 Nottingham. 1990

346. Kemball, R. Some Metrical Problems of Russian-English Verse Translation (with Special Reference to Blok and Akhmatova), // in siSchwelzerischer Beltrage zum VIII Internatlonalen Slavlstenkongress In Zagreb und Ljubljana, September 1978, pp. 105-30

347. Kenyon J., A Hundred White Daffodils: Essays, Interviews, the Akhmatova Translations, Newspaper Columns, and One Poem, N-Y, 1999

348. Kenyon J., Twenty Poems: A. Akhmatova, St. Paul, Minn., 1985

349. Ketchian S.I. Anna Akhmatova 1889-1989: Papers From The Akhmatova Centennial Conference. Oakland, 1993

350. Ketchian, S.I.The Genre of "Podrazenie" and Anna Axmatova // Russian Literature, No. 5, 1984, 151-68

351. Ketchian, S.I. A Unique Device For Axmatova Tribute To Mandel" stam) // SEE J, No. 20, 1976 Pp.400-404

352. Ketchian, S.I. An Inspiration for Anna Akhmatova's "Requiem" Hovannes Tumanlan"7/in Studies In Russian Literature In Honor of Vsevolod Setchkarev, ed by J W Connolly A SI Ketchian Columbus, Slavica, 1987, pp 175-88

353. Ketchian, S. I. Metempsychosis In The Verse Of Anna Axmatova // SEEJ, No. 25, 1981. Pp.44-60

354. Ketchian, S. I. Axmatova's "UciteP: Lessons Learned From Annensky //SEEJ, No. 22., 1978. Pp. 22-29

355. Ketchian, S. I. Anna Akhmatova/Lp Handbook of Russian Literature, (ed. by V. Terras) New Haven., 1985 Pp. 14-16

356. Ketchian, S. I. Imitation As A Poetic Mode In Axmatova's "Podrazanie AnnenskomuV/Scando-Slavica, No. 25, 1979 Pp. 57-70

357. Ketchian, S. I. A Source For Anna Axmatova's: "A String Of Quatrains" Hovannes Tumanian's Quatrains // SEEJ, No. 31, 1987 Pp. 520-532

358. Ketchian, S.I. The poetry of A. Akhmatova, a Conquest of time and Space, Munchen, 1986

359. Kiaer, Christina & Naiman Eric, Everyday Life in Early Soviet Russia: Taking the Revolution Inside. Bloomington, Indiana, 2006

360. Knight.Akhmatova As Witness.Tribune., 1976

361. Leiter, S. Akhmatova's Petersburg. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania U.P., 1983

362. Lord, R. Russian And Soviet Literature. London, 1972

363. Lord, R. Russian Literature. New York, 1980

364. Lysaght, T.A. Anna Akhmatova In The View Of The Critics. New Zealand, 1966

365. Massie Susan. The Living Mirror: Five Young Poets From Leningrad. London, 1972

366. Michele Roberts, City Limits // Rev. by B. Heldt in Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 18, 1984, 445-446

367. Moore Harry T. Parry Albert Twentieth-Century Russian Literature. Southern Illinois University Press, 1974

368. O"Bell, L. The Russian Symbolists. An Anthology Of Critical And Theoretical Writings. Ann Arbor., 1986

369. Ostrovskaya, S.K. Memoirs Of A. Akhmatova's Years. Liverpool., 1988

370. Papers from the Akhmatova Centennial Conference, Oakland, California, 1993

371. Patera, T. A Concordance To The Poetry Of Anna Akhmatova., 1995

372. Patricia Blake, Hayward Max. Dissonant Voices in Soviet Literature. London., 1964.

373. Poems of A. Akhmatova, Boston-Toronto/tr.by Kunitz Stanley, Hayward Max /, 1973

374. Poems. A. Akhmatova, New-York-London/tr.by Coffin Lyn /, 1983

375. Poem without a Hero // The Slavonic & East European Rev. July 1967. Vol. XLY. No. 105. p. 474-496

376. Proffer, Carl R. A Poem Without A Hero: Notes And Commentary //In "A Poem without Hero". Ann Arbor., 1973

377. Proffer, Carl. R. Russian Literature Of The Twenties, An Anthology .Ann Arbor., 1987

378. Proffer, Carl. R. The Widows Of Russia: And Other Writings Ann Arbor, 1987

379. Proffer, Ellandea. The Ardis Anthology Of Russian Futurism.Ann Arbor., 1980

380. Reeder, Roberta, Anna Akhmatova. Poet And Prophet, New York 1995

381. Reeve, Franklin D. Alexander Blok: Between Image and Idea. New York, 1965.

382. Leiter, S. Akhmatova's Petersburg. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania U.P., 1983

383. Lord, R. Russian And Soviet Literature. London, 1972

384. Lord, R. Russian Literature. New York, 1980

385. Lysaght, T.A. Anna Akhmatova In The View Of The Critics. New Zealand, 1966

386. Massie Susan. The Living Mirror: Five Young Poets From Leningrad. London, 1972

387. Michele Roberts, City Limits // Rev. by B. Heldt in Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 18, 1984, 445-446

388. Moore Harry T. Parry Albert Twentieth-Century Russian Literature. Southern Illinois University Press, 1974

389. O"Bell, L. The Russian Symbolists. An Anthology Of Critical And Theoretical Writings. Ann Arbor., 1986

390. Ostrovskaya, S.K. Memoirs Of A. Akhmatova's Years. Liverpool., 1988

391. Papers from the Akhmatova Centennial Conference, Oakland, California, 1993

392. Patera, T. A Concordance To The Poetry Of Anna Akhmatova., 1995

393. Patricia Blake, Hayward Max. Dissonant Voices in Soviet Literature. London., 1964.

394. Poems of A. Akhmatova, Boston-Toronto/tr.by Kunitz Stanley, Hayward Max/, 1973

395. Poems. A. Akhmatova, New-York-London/tr.by Coffin Lyn /, 1983

396. Poem without a Hero // The Slavonic & East European Rev. July 1967. Vol. XLY. No. 105. p. 474-496

397. Proffer, Carl R. A Poem Without A Hero: Notes And Commentary //In "A Poem without Hero". Ann Arbor., 1973

398. Proffer, Carl. R. Russian Literature Of The Twenties, An Anthology.Ann Arbor., 1987

399. Proffer, Carl. R. The Widows Of Russia: And Other Writings Ann Arbor, 1987

400. Proffer, Ellandea. The Ardis Anthology Of Russian Futurism.Ann Arbor., 1980

401. Reeder, Roberta, Anna Akhmatova. Poet And Prophet, New York 1995

402. Reeve, Franklin D. Alexander Blok: Between Image And Idea. New York, 1965.

403. Reeve, Franklin D. Inconstant Translation: Life Into Art//Anna Akhmatova 1889-1989 Papers from the Akhmatova Centennial Conference. Oakland, California, 1993

404. Reeve, Franklin D. Contemporary Russian Drama. New York, 1968

405. Rosslyn, W. The Function of Architectural Imagery In Akhmatova's Poetry" Irish Slavonic Studies, No. 6 (1985), 19-34

406. Rosslyn, Wendy The Prince, The Fool And The Nunnery: The Religious Theme In The Early Poetry Of Anna Akhmatova. Avebury, 1984

407. Rosslyn, Wendy. Boris Anrep And The Poems Of Anna Akhmatova.//Modern Language Review. No. 74. 1979. Pp.884-896

408. Rosslyn, Wendy. A Propos Of Anna Akhmatova: Boris Vasilyevich Anrep (1883-1969). // New Zealand Slavonic Journal, No. 1. 1980. pp. 25-34

409. Rosslyn, Wendy, The Function Of Architectural Imagery In Akhmatova's Poetry.//Irish Slavonic Studies, No. 6. 1985. Pp. 19-34

410. Rosslyn, Wendy. The Theme Of Light In The Early Poetry Of Anna Akhmatova.//Renaissance and Modern Studies, No. 24. 1980. Pp.79-91

411. Scherr B. Russia Poetry: Meter, Rhythm And Rhyme. Berkely, Los Angeles, London, 1986.

412. Seagul C. Orpheus: The Myth Of He Poet. Baltimore. 1989.

413. Selected Poems. A. Akhmatova, Ann Arbor/tr. by Arndt Walter, Kemball Robin, Proffer Carl R /, Ardis, 1976

414. Selected poems. A. Akhmatova / tr. by Thomas D.M./, London, 1988

415. Selected Poems. A, Akhmatova / tr. by Kunitz Stanley&Hayward Max /, London, 1992

416. Selected Poems. A. Akhmatova/tr.by McKane Richard / N-Y, 1989.

418. Shwartzband S., Anna Akhmatova's Second Book Chetki, in W.A. Rosslyn (ed.), The Speech of Unknown Eyes: Akhmatova's Readers on her Poetry, Nottingham, 1990, vol.1, p. 123.

419. Slavic Studies/ed. by A. Kaun and . Simmons. N. Y. 1943 p. 2.

420. Slonim Marc. From Chekhov To The Revolution: Russian Literature, 1900-1917. Oxford University Press, 1962.

421. Taubman J. A. Tsvetaeva And Akhmatova, Two Female Voices In A Poetic Quartet) Russian Literature Triquarterly, 1974, 9, 335-363,

422. The Pillar of Fire and Selected Poems/N. Gumilev London, 1999.

423. The Silver Age Of Russian Culture. Ann Arbor, Ardis, 1975,

424. Thompson D.B. The Anapaestic Dol"nik In The Poetry Of Axmatova And Gumilev // Russian Language Journal, supplementary issue. New Delhi., 1975,

425. Thompson E.M. Imperial Knowledge: Russian Literature And Colonialism. Greenwood Press, 2000.

426. Thompson E.M. Russian Formalism And Anglo-American New Criticism, A Comparative Study. Hague, 1971

427. Todd, Albert C. and Max Hayward, eds., 20th Century Russian Poetry: Silver and Steel, New York. Doubleday, 1993.

428. Reeve, Franklin D. Inconstant Translation: Life Into Art//Anna Akhmatova 1889-1989 Papers from the Akhmatova Centennial Conference. Oakland, California, 1993

429. Reeve, Franklin D. Contemporary Russian Drama. New York, 1968

430. Rosslyn, W. The Function of Architectural Imagery In Akhmatova's Poetry" Irish Slavonic Studies, No. 6 (1985), 19-34

431. Rosslyn, Wendy The Prince, The Fool And The Nunnery: The Religious Theme In The Early Poetry Of Anna Akhmatova. Avebury, 1984

432. Rosslyn, Wendy. Boris Anrep And The Poems Of Anna Akhmatova.//Modern Language Review. No. 74. 1979. Pp.884-896

433. Rosslyn, Wendy. A Propos Of Anna Akhmatova: Boris Vasilyevich Anrep (1883-1969).//New Zealand Slavonic Journal, No. 1. 1980. pp. 25-34

434. Rosslyn, Wendy. The Function Of Architectural Imagery In Akhmatova's Poetry.//Irish Slavonic Studies, No. 6. 1985. Pp.19-34

435. Rosslyn, Wendy. The Theme Of Light In The Early Poetry Of Anna Akhmatova./ZRenaissance and Modern Studies, No. 24. 1980. Pp.79-91

436. Scherr B. Russia Poetry: Meter, Rhythm And Rhyme. Berkely, Los Angeles, London, 1986.

437. Seagul C. Orpheus: The Myth Of He Poet. Baltimore. 1989.

438. Selected Poems. A. Akhmatova, Ann Arbor/tr. by Arndt Walter, Kemball Robin, Proffer Carl R/, Ardis, 1976

439. Selected poems. A. Akhmatova / tr. by Thomas D.M./, London, 1988

440. Selected Poems. A. Akhmatova / tr. by Kunitz Stanley&Hayward Max /, London, 1992

441. Selected Poems. A. Akhmatova/tr.by McKane Richard / N-Y, 1989.

443. Shwartzband S., Anna Akhmatova's Second Book Chetki, in W.A. Rosslyn (ed.), The Speech of Unknown Eyes: Akhmatova's Readers on her Poetry, Nottingham, 1990, vol.1, p. 123.

444. Slavic Studies/ed. by A. Kaun and . Simmons. N. Y. 1943 p. 2.

445. Slonim Marc. From Chekhov To The Revolution: Russian Literature, 1900-1917. Oxford University Press, 1962.

446. Taubman J. A. Tsvetaeva And Akhmatova, Two Female Voices In A Poetic Quartet) Russian Literature Triquarterly, 1974, 9, 335-363.

447. The Pillar of Fire and Selected Poems/N. Gumilev London, 1999.

448. The Silver Age Of Russian Culture. Ann Arbor, Ardis, 1975.

449. Thompson D.B. The Anapaestic Dol"nik In The Poetry Of Axmatova And Gumilev // Russian Language Journal, supplementary issue. New Delhi., 1975.

450. Thompson E.M. Imperial Knowledge: Russian Literature And Colonialism. Greenwood Press, 2000.

451. Thompson E.M. Russian Formalism And Anglo-American New Criticism, A Comparative Study. Hague, 1971

452. Todd, Albert C. and Max Hayward, eds., 20th Century Russian Poetry: Silver and Steel. New York. Doubleday, 1993.

453. Tucker Janet G. Innokentij Annenskij And The Acmeist Doctrine. Columbus, Ohio, 1986.

454. Turner, S. E., Studies in Russian Literature. London, 1982

455. Twenty Poems: A. Akhmatova (tr. by Jane Kenyon), St. Paul, Minn., 1985.

456. Verheul K., The Theme of Time in the Poetry of Anna Akhmatova, The Hague, 197.

457. Vickery Walter N. Aleksandr Blok//Centennial Conference. Columbus, Ohio., 1984.

458. Way of all the Earth: Poems. A. Akhmatova./tr.by Thomas D.M/, London, 1979.

460. Wells David N. Anna Akhmatova. Her Poetry. Berg. Oxford. Washington, D.C. 1996.

461. Wells David N. Folk Ritual In Anna Akhmatova's "Poema Bez GeroyaV/Scottish Slavonic Review, No. 7. 1986. pp. 69-89

462. Werth A. Akhmatova. Tragic Queen Anna. Oxford, 1977,

463. Tucker Janet G. Innokentij Annenskij And The Acmeist Doctrine. Columbus, Ohio, 1986.

464. Turner, S. E., Studies in Russian Literature. London, 1982

465. Twenty Poems: A. Akhmatova (tr. by Jane Kenyon), St. Paul, Minn., 1985.

466. Verheul K., The Theme of Time in the Poetry of Anna Akhmatova, The Hague, 197.

467. Vickery Walter N. Aleksandr Blok//Centennial Conference. Columbus, Ohio., 1984.

468. Way of all the Earth: Poems. A. Akhmatova./tr.by Thomas D.M/, London, 1979.

470. Wells David N. Anna Akhmatova. Her Poetry. Berg. Oxford. Washington, D.C. 1996.

471. Wells David N. Folk Ritual In Anna Akhmatova's "Poema Bez GeroyaV/Scottish Slavonic Review, No. 7. 1986. pp. 69-89

472. Werth A. Akhmatova. Tragic Queen Anna. Oxford, 1977.

473. The memory of the sun in the heart weakens. The grass is yellower.

474. The wind barely blows early snowflakes.

475. The water in the narrow canals no longer flows and gets cold.

476. Nothing will ever happen here, oh, never!

477. The willow tree spread out a through fan in the empty sky.

478. Maybe it’s better that I didn’t become your wife.

479. The memory of the sun in the heart weakens. What is this? Darkness?

481. The memory of the sun weakens in my heart1. Grass turns yellow,

482. Wind blows the early flakes of snow1.ghtly, lightly

483. Already the narrow canals have stopped flowing Water freezes

484. Nothing will ever happen here Not ever

485. Against the empty sky the willow opens A transparent fan-Maybe it is a good thing I"m not your wife

486. The memory of the sun in the heart weakens. The grass is yellower. .

487. The wind barely blows early snowflakes.

488. The water in the narrow canals no longer flows and gets cold.

489. Nothing will ever happen here, oh, never!

490. The willow tree spread out a through fan in the empty sky.

491. Maybe it’s better that I didn’t become your wife.

492. The memory of the sun in the heart weakens. What is this? Darkness?

494. The memory of the sun weakens in my heart1. Grass turns yellow,

495. Wind blows the early flakes of snow1.ghtly, lightly

496. Already the narrow canals have stopped flowing Water freezes

497. Nothing will ever happen here Not ever

498. Against the empty sky the willow opens A transparent fan. Maybe it is a good thing I"m not your wife1. What"s this? Darkness?1."s possible. And this night be the first night1. Of winter.1. D.M.Thomas (211.17)

499. Memory of the sun sees from the heart.1. Grass grows yellower

500. Faintly if at all the early snowflakes1. Hover, hover.

501. Water becoming ice is snowing in The narrow channels Nothing at all will happen here again Will ever happen

502. Against the sky the willows spreads a fan The silk"s torn off Maybe it"s better I did not become Your wife

503. Memory of sun sees from the heart What is it? Dark?

504. Perhaps! Winter will have occupied us In the night.1. S. Kunitz (212, 45)

505. Heart's memory of the sun grows fainter, Sallow is grass A few flakes toss in the wind Scarcely, scarcely

506. The narrow canals no longer flow They are frozen over Nothing will ever happen here Oh, never!1. What"s this? Darkness?1."s possible. And this night be the first night1. Of winter.1. D.M. Thomas (211.17)

507. Memory of the sun sees from the heart.1. Grass grows yellower

508. Faintly if at all the early snowflakes1. Hover, hover.

509. Water becoming ice is snowing in The narrow channels Nothing at all will happen here again Will ever happen

510. Against the sky the willows spreads a fan The silk"s torn off Maybe it"s better I did not become Your wife

511. Memory of the sun sees from the heart What is it? Dark?

512. Perhaps! Winter will have occupied us In the night.1. S. Kunitz (212, 45)

513. Heart's memory of the sun grows fainter, Sallow is grass A few flakes toss in the wind Scarcely, scarcely

514. The narrow canals no longer flow They are frozen over Nothing will ever happen here Oh, never!1. the bleak sky the willows spreads Its bare-boned fan Maybe I"m better off as I am Not as your wife

515. Heart's memory of sun grows fainter What now? Darkness? Perhaps! This very night unfolds The winter.1.n Coffin (192, 5)

516. Memories of the sun fade as my heart grows numb The wind toys with what snowflakes have already Come -So few, so few.1. narrow canals, there"s already nothing what flows Water stands still

517. Nothing ever happens here, nothing grows -It never will!

518. Against the sky, the willow lifts its skeletal life, Its see through shawl Maybe it"s better that I"m not your wife, After all

519. Memories of the sun fade as my heart grows numb What"s this? Darkness in town? Maybe! And during the night, winter may come And settle down.1.n Coffin (192, 2)

520. The tree things he loved most in life Were white peacocks, music at mass And tattered maps of America. He didn't like kids who cried and he1. the bleak sky the willows spreads Its bare-boned fan Maybe I"m better off as I am Not as your wife

521. Heart's memory of sun grows fainter What now? Darkness? Perhaps! This very night unfolds The winter.1.n Coffin (192, 5)

522. Memories of the sun fade as my heart grows numb The wind toys with what snowflakes have already Come - So few, so few.1. narrow canals, there"s already nothing what flows Water stands still

523. Nothing ever happens here, nothing grows - It never will!

524. Against the sky, the willow lifts its skeletal life, Its see - through shawl Maybe it"s better that I"m not your wife, After all

525. Memories of the sun fade as my heart grows numb What"s this? Darkness in town? Maybe! And during the night, winter may come And settle down.1.n Coffin (192, 2)

526. The tree things he loved most in life Were white peacocks, music at mass And tattered maps of America. He didn't like kids who cried and he

527. Didn't like raspberry jam with tea1. Or womanish hysteriaand I was, like it or not, his wife1. D.M. Thomas (211.18)

528. He loved three things alone: ​​White peacocks evensong Old maps of America He hated children crying And raspberry jam with tea, And womanish hysteria. and he had married me.1. S.Kunitz (212.47)

529. Three things enchanted him: White peacocks, evensong, And faded maps of America He couldn't stand bawling brats Or raspberry jam with his tea, Or womanish hysteria .and he was tied to me

530. Didn't like raspberry jam with tea1. Or womanish hysteriaand I was, like it or not, his wife1. DM. Thomas (211.18)

531. He loved three things alone: ​​White peacocks evensong Old maps of America He hated children crying And raspberry jam with tea, And womanish hysteria. and he had married me.1. S.Kunitz (212, 47)

532. Three things enchanted him: White peacocks, evensong, And faded maps of America He couldn't stand bawling brats Or raspberry jam with his tea, Or womanish hysteria .and he was tied to me

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for informational purposes only and were obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors associated with imperfect recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

NEW COLLECTION BY ANNA AKHMATOVA

Recently, a collection of poems by Anna Akhmatova was published in Tashkent by the publishing house "Soviet Writer".

Long loved and valid in any selection, strong, clear and deep poems about Russian life, the worries of youth, the vicissitudes of history and the beauties of nature. Among the numerous additions are new items about the war, which came out differently than Akhmatov’s famous lines about the year 14 - fast-paced, exciting poems written by a great man from a great nature.

A new and grateful reason for restoring the appearance of the glorious writer from the very beginning, in her role as a bold renovator, balancing the gigantic, disorderly, spiritual influence of the reformer Blok with the features of her new, agreed-upon realism to the last words.

Two bloody wars, their traces on almost every page, and between them a well-known silhouette with a proudly raised head - the life and work of an unbending, devoted, straightforward daughter of the people and the century, hardened, accustomed to losses, courageously ready for the trials of immortality. What else can I add to this quick list?

Our eye finds with satisfaction the records of recent years, thirty-nine, forty and forty-first, among the delightfulness of the rest. Akhmatova's long-standing conciseness, smoothness and freedom from coercion are qualities that are now Pushkin's to infinity after they were Pushkin's squared and cubed in her always winning work.

"FAVORITES" BY ANNA AKHMATOVA

The chosen Akhmatova came out. The collection convinces us that the writer never remained silent and, with short breaks, always responded to the demands of the time.

The collection is compressed three times compared to the recent collection “From six books”. It has been updated with a lot of new things. These things, mostly reminiscent of the lively and fascinating style of "Willow", Akhmatova's last book, develop its peculiarity and probably go back to Akhmatova's new modern poem, her central work, publicly read but not yet published by the discerning author.

The collection once again shows main feature Akhmatova - equal artistic value its early and late periods. The compiler could, without fear of stylistic inconsistency, place her poems from the tenth and forties side by side. Thus, between the poem “The First Long-Range in Leningrad,” where the current Akhmatova’s technique records the feeling of enemy shelling:

How indifferently death brought my Child...

We grew a hundred years old, and then it happened at one hour...

a gap of 27 years. But this is the secret of their chronology. Just as these wars followed one after another in the history of Russian existence, so the thoughts contained in both poems are spoken in one voice and, as it were, simultaneously.

There is no other poem in the collection with a similar title, “July 1914,” of extraordinary power. Its absence, as well as a number of the best from “The Rosary” and “The White Flock,” such as the poems “In the Evening” or “The Sky Sows a Small Rain,” upsets and leaves one perplexed.

It would be strange to call Akhmatova a war poet. But the predominance of thunderstorms in the atmosphere of the century gave her work a touch of civic significance. This patriotic note, especially dear now, is distinguished by Akhmatova’s complete lack of pomposity and tension. Faith in her native sky and loyalty to her native land break through in her by themselves with the naturalness of her natural gait.

To give credit to a great artist for his personal virtues is to belittle the dignity of his all-consuming gift. Akhmatova expressed the current war more vividly than the previous one, not because of the increased warmth and sophistication of her heart, but because, as the greatest mirror of Russian life, she reflected these wars in their actual historical dissimilarity.

In the current war there is a cruelty and deliberate inhumanity unknown in the past. Fascism is not at war with armies, but with peoples and historical habits. Everyone faces a personal challenge. Air bombing turned large cities into front-line areas. It is not surprising that the Leningrad woman Akhmatova wrote a poem to Londoners, as direct as a letter, and that her poems about a murdered Leningrad boy are full of heartbreaking bitterness and written as if under the dictation of her mother or an old Sevastopol soldier.

Along with the note of national pride, Akhmatova’s distinctive feature, we will call her artistic realism, as her main and constant difference.

Akhmatova contrasted the erotic abstraction into which the conventionally living “you” of most poetic outpourings often degenerates with the voice of feeling in the sense of real intrigue. She shared this frankness in approaching life with Blok, who was still barely emerging as Mayakovsky, who walked on stage with Ibsen and Chekhov, Hamsun and Gorky, with an interest in meaningful evidence and strong people. This gave “Evening” and “The Rosary,” Akhmatova’s first books, original drama and narrative freshness of the prose. Samples of these poems are in the book under review (“Song of the Last Meeting”, “Clenched my hands under a dark veil”, “My beloved always has so many requests”, “You can’t confuse true tenderness”, etc.). However, there are few of them and there could be more.

It was they who etched themselves most deeply into the memory of readers and primarily created a name for Akhmatova’s lyrics. Once they had a huge influence on the manner of feeling, not to mention the literary school of their time. It is now impossible to judge these poems without judging imitators, and Akhmatova’s characterization from this side gives more of an idea of ​​the extent of her fame and popularity than of the true essence of her pathetic muse.

However, her words about a woman’s heart would not have been so ardent and bright if, when looking at the wider world of nature and history, Akhmatova’s eye had not struck with its sharpness and correctness. All her images, be it the image of a forest outback or the noisy everyday life of the capital, are based on a rare sense of detail. The ability to choose them with inspiration and designate them briefly and accurately saved her from the unnecessary and false imagery of many of her contemporaries. Her descriptions always contain features and particulars that turn them into historical pictures of the century. In their ability to illuminate the era, they stand next to the visual authenticity of Bunin.

The compiler has selected precious and long-famous material with due taste and understanding.

Submitting your good work to the knowledge base is easy. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

OBOUSPO "Lipetsk Regional College of Arts named after. K.N. Igumnova"

Text of a public speech

“Creativity of Anna Akhmatova

Lipetsk 2015

Anna Andreevna Akhmatova ( real name- Gorenko) was born in the family of a marine engineer, retired captain of the 2nd rank at the station. Big Fountain near Odessa. A year after the birth of their daughter, the family moved to Tsarskoe Selo. Here Akhmatova became a student at the Mariinsky Gymnasium, but spent every summer near Sevastopol. “My first impressions are Tsarskoye Selo,” she wrote in a later autobiographical note, “the green, damp splendor of the parks, the pasture where my nanny took me, the hippodrome where small motley horses galloped, the old train station and something else that was later included in the “Ode to Tsarskoye Selo” "".

In 1905, after her parents’ divorce, Akhmatova and her mother moved to Yevpatoria. In 1906 - 1907 she studied in the graduating class of the Kiev-Fundukleevskaya gymnasium, in 1908 - 1910. - at the legal department of the Kyiv Higher Women's Courses. On April 25, 1910, “beyond the Dnieper in a village church,” she married N. S. Gumilyov, whom she met in 1903. In 1907, he published her poem “There are many shiny rings on his hand...” in the book he published. in the Paris magazine "Sirius". The style of Akhmatova’s early poetic experiments was significantly influenced by her acquaintance with the prose of K. Hamsun, the poetry of V. Ya. Bryusov and A. A. Blok. Akhmatova spent her honeymoon in Paris, then moved to St. Petersburg and from 1910 to 1916 lived mainly in Tsarskoe Selo. She studied at the Higher Historical and Literary Courses of N.P. Raev. On June 14, 1910, Akhmatova made her debut on the Vyach Tower. Ivanova. According to contemporaries, “Vyacheslav listened to her poems very sternly, approved only one, kept silent about the rest, and criticized one.” The “master’s” conclusion was indifferently ironic: “What dense romanticism...”

In 1911, having chosen the surname of his great-grandmother as a literary pseudonym maternal line, she began to publish in St. Petersburg magazines, including Apollo. Since the founding of the "Workshop of Poets" she became its secretary and active participant.

In 1912, Akhmatova’s first collection “Evening” was published with a foreword by M. A. Kuzmin. “A sweet, joyful and sorrowful world” opens to the gaze of the young poet, but the condensation of psychological experiences is so strong that it evokes a feeling of approaching tragedy. In fragmentary sketches, little things, “concrete fragments of our life” are intensely shaded, giving rise to a feeling of acute emotionality. These aspects of Akhmatova’s poetic worldview were correlated by critics with trends characteristic of the new poetic school. In her poems they saw not only a refraction of the idea of ​​Eternal Femininity, no longer associated with symbolic contexts, in keeping with the spirit of the times, but also that extreme “thinness”. Psychological drawing, which became possible at the end of symbolism. Through the “cute little things,” through the aesthetic admiration of joys and sorrows, a creative longing for the imperfect broke through - a trait that S. M. Gorodetsky defined as “acmeistic pessimism,” thereby once again emphasizing Akhmatova’s belonging to a certain school. The sadness that breathed in the poems of “Evening” seemed to be the sadness of a “wise and already weary heart” and was permeated with the “deadly poison of irony,” according to G. I. Chulkov, which gave reason to trace Akhmatova’s poetic pedigree to I. F. Annensky, whom Gumilyov called it a “banner” for “seekers of new paths,” meaning Acmeist poets. Subsequently, Akhmatova told what a revelation it was for her to become acquainted with the poems of the poet, who revealed to her a “new harmony.”

Her lyrics turned out to be close not only to “schoolgirls in love,” as Akhmatova ironically noted. Among her enthusiastic fans were poets who were just entering literature - M. I. Tsvetaeva, B. L. Pasternak. A. A. Blok and V. Ya. Bryusov reacted more reservedly, but still approved of Akhmatova. During these years, Akhmatova became a favorite model for many artists and the recipient of numerous poetic dedications. Her image is gradually turning into an integral symbol of St. Petersburg poetry of the Acmeism era. During the First World War, Akhmatova did not add her voice to the voices of poets who shared the official patriotic pathos, but she responded with pain to the wartime tragedies (“July 1914”, “Prayer”, etc.). The collection "The White Flock", published in September 1917, was not as resoundingly successful as the previous books. But the new intonations of mournful solemnity, prayerfulness, and a super personal beginning destroyed the usual stereotype of Akhmatova’s poetry that had formed among the reader of her early poems. These changes were caught by O. E. Mandelstam, noting: “The voice of renunciation is becoming stronger and stronger in Akhmatova’s poems, and at present her poetry is close to becoming one of the symbols of the greatness of Russia.” After the October Revolution, Akhmatova did not leave her homeland, remaining in “her deaf and sinful land.” In the poems of these years (the collections "Plantain" and "Anno Domini MCMXXI", both from 1921) there is grief over fate home country merges with the theme of detachment from the vanity of the world, the motives of “great earthly love” are colored by the mood of the mystical expectation of the “groom”, and the understanding of creativity as divine grace spiritualizes thoughts about poetic word and the vocation of the poet and transfers them to the “eternal” plane.

In the tragic 1930-1940s, Akhmatova shared the fate of many of her compatriots, having survived the arrest of her son, husband, the death of friends, and her excommunication from literature by a party resolution of 1946. Time itself gave her the moral right to say together with the “hundred-million people”: “We They didn’t deflect a single blow.” Akhmatova’s works of this period - the poem “Requiem” (1935? published in the USSR in 1987), poems written during the Great Patriotic War, testified to the poet’s ability not to separate the experience of personal tragedy from the understanding of the catastrophic nature of history itself. B. M. Eikhenbaum considered the most important aspect of Akhmatova’s poetic worldview to be “the feeling of her personal life as a national, people’s life, in which everything is significant and universally significant.” “From here,” the critic noted, “an exit into history, into the life of the people, hence a special kind of courage associated with the feeling of being chosen, a mission, a great, important cause...” A cruel, disharmonious world bursts into Akhmatova’s poetry and dictates new themes and new poetics: the memory of history and the memory of culture, the fate of a generation, considered in historical retrospect... Narrative plans of different times intersect, the “alien word” goes into the depths of the subtext, history is refracted through the “eternal” images of world culture, biblical and evangelical motifs. Significant understatement becomes one of the artistic principles of Akhmatova’s late work. The poetics of the final work, “Poems without a Hero” (1940 - 65), was built on it, with which Akhmatova said goodbye to St. Petersburg in the 1910s and to the era that made her a Poet. Akhmatova’s creativity as the largest cultural phenomenon of the 20th century. received worldwide recognition.

In 1964 she became a laureate of the international Etna-Taormina Prize, and in 1965 she received an honorary degree of Doctor of Literature from Oxford University. On March 5, 1966, Akhmatova ended her days on earth. On March 10, after the funeral service in the St. Nicholas Naval Cathedral, her ashes were buried in the cemetery in the village of Komarovo near Leningrad.

Creativity A.A.Akhmatova

In 1912, Akhmatova’s first book of poems, “Evening,” was published, followed by the collections “Rosary” (1914), “White Flock” (1917), “Plantain” (1921), and others. Akhmatova joined the group of Acmeists. Akhmatova’s lyrics grew on real, life-based soil, drawing from it the motives of “great earthly love.” Contrast is the hallmark of her poetry; melancholic, tragic notes alternate with bright, jubilant ones.

Far from revolutionary reality, Akhmatova sharply condemned white emigration, people who broke with their homeland (“I am not with those who abandoned the earth...”). Over the course of a number of years, new features of Akhmatova’s creativity were formed in a difficult and contradictory manner, overcoming the closed world of refined aesthetic experiences.

Since the 30s. Akhmatova's poetic range is expanding somewhat; the sound of the theme of the Motherland, the poet’s calling, intensifies. During the Great Patriotic War, patriotic poems stood out in A.'s poetry. The motives of blood unity with the country are heard in the lyrical cycles “Moon at the Zenith”, “From the Plane”.

The pinnacle of Akhmatova’s creativity is the large lyrical-epic “Poem without a Hero” (1940-62). The tragic plot of the young poet's suicide echoes the theme of the impending collapse of the old world; The poem is distinguished by its richness of figurative content, refinement of words, rhythm, and sound.

Speaking about Anna Andreevna, one cannot fail to mention the memories of people who knew her. In these stories you feel Akhmatova’s entire inner world. We invite you to plunge into the world of K.I.’s memories. Chukovsky: “I knew Anna Andreevna Akhmatova since 1912. Thin, slender, looking like a timid fifteen-year-old girl, she never left her husband, the young poet N. S. Gumilyov, who then, at the first meeting, called her his student.

That was the time of her first poems and extraordinary, unexpectedly noisy triumphs. Two or three years passed, and in her eyes, in her posture, and in her behavior with people, one of the most important features of her personality emerged: majesty. Not arrogance, not arrogance, not arrogance, but rather “royal” majesty, a monumentally important gait, an indestructible sense of respect for oneself, for one’s high writing mission.

Every year she became more majestic. She didn’t care about it at all; it came naturally to her. In the entire half century that we knew each other, I don’t remember a single pleading, ingratiating, petty or pitiful smile on her face.

Akhmatova biography lyrics Acmeism

She was completely devoid of any sense of ownership. She didn’t love or keep things; she parted with them surprisingly easily. She was a homeless nomad and did not value property to such an extent that she willingly freed herself from it as from a burden. Her close friends knew that if they gave her some kind of, say, rare engraving or brooch, in a day or two she would give these gifts to others. Even in her youth, during the years of her brief “prosperity,” she lived without bulky wardrobes and chests of drawers, often even without a desk.

There was no comfort around her, and I don’t remember a period in her life when the environment around her could be called cozy.

These very words “ambiance”, “coziness”, “comfort” were organically alien to her - both in life and in the poetry she created. Both in life and in poetry, Akhmatova was most often homeless... It was habitual poverty, which she did not even try to get rid of.

Even books, with the exception of her favorite ones, she gave to others after reading them. Only Pushkin, the Bible, Dante, Shakespeare, Dostoevsky were her constant interlocutors. And she often took these books - first one or the other - on the road. The rest of the books, having been with her, disappeared...

She was one of the most well-read poets of her era. I hated wasting time reading sensational fashionable things that magazine and newspaper critics were screaming about. But she read and re-read each of her favorite books several times, returning to it again and again.

When you leaf through Akhmatova’s book, suddenly, among the mournful pages about separation, about orphanhood, about homelessness, you come across poems that convince us that in the life and poetry of this “homeless wanderer” there was a Home that served her at all times as faithful and saving refuge.

This House is the homeland, the native Russian land. From a young age, she gave all her brightest feelings to this House, which were fully revealed when it was subjected to an inhumane attack by the Nazis. Her menacing lines, deeply in tune with popular courage and popular anger, began to appear in the press.

Anna Akhmatova is a master of historical painting. The definition is strange, extremely far from previous assessments of her skill. This definition has hardly appeared even once in books, articles and reviews dedicated to her - in all the vast literature about her.

Her images never lived a life of their own, but always served to reveal the poet’s lyrical experiences, his joys, sorrows and anxieties. She expressed all these feelings in few words and with restraint. Some barely noticeable microscopic image was saturated with such great emotions that it alone replaced dozens of pathetic lines.

There were a few people with whom she had a particularly “good laugh,” as she liked to say. These were Osip Mandelstam and Mikhail Leonidovich Lozinsky - her comrades, her closest ones....

Akhmatova’s character contained many diverse qualities that did not fit into one or another simplified scheme. Her rich, complex personality was replete with traits that are rarely combined in one person.

Akhmatova's "mournful and modest greatness" was her inalienable quality. She remained majestic always and everywhere, in all occasions of life - both in small talk, and in intimate conversations with friends, and under the blows of a fierce fate - “even now in bronze, on a pedestal, on a medal”!

Love lyrics in the works of A.A. Akhmatova

Immediately after the release of the first collection “Evening,” a kind of revolution took place in Russian literature - Anna Akhmatova appeared, “the second great lyrical poetess after Sappho.” What was revolutionary about Akhmatova’s appearance? Firstly, she had practically no period of literary apprenticeship; After the release of “Evening,” critics immediately ranked her among the Russian poets. Secondly, contemporaries recognized that it was Akhmatova who “after Blok’s death undoubtedly holds first place among Russian poets.”

Modern literary critic N. N. Skatov subtly noted: “... if Blok is really the most characteristic hero of his time, then Akhmatova, of course, is his most characteristic heroine, revealed in the endless variety of women’s destinies.”

And this is the third feature of the revolutionary nature of her work. Before Akhmatova, history knew many female poets, but only she managed to become the female voice of her time, a female poet of eternal, universal significance.

She, like no one else, managed to reveal the most cherished depths of the feminine inner world, experiences, states and moods. To achieve stunning psychological persuasiveness, she uses a capacious and laconic artistic device of telling detail, which becomes a “sign of trouble” for the reader. Akhmatova finds such “signs” in unexpected traditional poetry everyday world. These can be parts of clothing (hat, veil, glove, ring, etc.), furniture (table, bed, etc.), furs, candles, seasons, natural phenomena (sky, sea, sand, rain, flood, etc.) etc.), smells and sounds of the surrounding, recognizable world. Akhmatova established the “civil rights” of “non-poetic” everyday realities in the high poetry of feelings. The use of such details does not reduce, does not “ground” or trivialize traditional high topics. On the contrary, the depth of feelings and thoughts of the lyrical heroine receives additional artistic persuasiveness and almost visible authenticity. Many laconic details of Akhmatova the artist not only concentrated a whole range of experiences, but became generally accepted formulas and aphorisms expressing the state of a person’s soul. This is the “right hand glove” worn on the left hand, and the proverb “The beloved always has so many requests! // The one who has fallen out of love has no requests,” and much more. Reflecting on the craft of a poet, Akhmatova introduced another brilliant formula into poetic culture.

Akhmatova pays tribute to the high universal role of love, its ability to inspire those who love. When people fall under the power of this feeling, they are delighted by the smallest everyday details seen with loving eyes: linden trees, flower beds, dark alleys, streets, etc. They change their emotional coloring even such constant “signs of trouble” in world culture as “the sharp cry of a crow in the black sky, // And in the depths of the alley the arch of a crypt” - they also become contrasting signs of love in Akhmatova’s context. Love sharpens the sense of touch:

After all, the stars were larger.

After all, the herbs smelled different,

Autumn herbs.

(Love conquers deceitfully...)

And yet Akhmatova’s love poetry is, first of all, the lyrics of a breakup, the end of a relationship or the loss of feelings. Almost always, her poem about love is a story about the last meeting (“Song of the Last Meeting”) or about a farewell explanation, a kind of lyrical fifth act of the drama." Even in poems based on images and plots of world culture, Akhmatova prefers to address the situation of denouement, as, for example, in poems about Dido and Cleopatra, But her states of separation are surprisingly varied and comprehensive: this is a cooled feeling (for her, for him, for both), and misunderstanding, and temptation, and mistake, and the tragic love of the poet In a word, all the psychological facets of separation were embodied in Akhmatov’s lyrics.

It is no coincidence that Mandelstam traced the origins of her work not to poetry, but to the psychological prose of the 19th century. “Akhmatova brought into Russian lyric poetry all the enormous complexity and psychological richness of the Russian novel of the nineteenth century. There would be no Akhmatova if it weren’t for Tolstoy and Anna Korenena, Turgenev and “A Noble Nest,” all of Dostoevsky and partly even Leskov... She developed her poetic form, sharp and martial, with an eye on prose.”

It was Akhmatova who managed to give love the right female voice" (“I taught women to speak,” she grins in the epigram “Could Biche...”) and embody in the lyrics women’s ideas about the ideal of masculinity, present, according to contemporaries, a rich palette of “male charms” - objects and addressees of women’s feelings.

Posted on Allbest.ru

...

Similar documents

    The beginning of A. Akhmatova’s creative development in the world of poetry. Analysis of the poetess's love lyrics. Display female soul in her poems. Characteristic features of her poetic manner. Love - "The Fifth Season". Fidelity to the theme of love in the work of the poetess of the 20-30s.

    abstract, added 01/11/2014

    Theoretical background terms " lyrical hero", "lyrical self" in literary criticism. Lyrics of Anna Akhmatova. The lyrical heroine of Anna Akhmatova and the poetics of symbolism and acmeism. A new type of lyrical heroine in the work of Anna Akhmatova and its evolution.

    course work, added 04/10/2009

    A brief biography of the Russian poetess, literary scholar and literary critic of the 20th century Anna Akhmatova. The stages of the poetess’s creativity and their assessment by contemporaries. Love and tragedy in the life of Anna Akhmatova. A comprehensive analysis of the works and publications of the poetess.

    presentation, added 04/18/2011

    The life path of Anna Andreevna Akhmatova and the mystery of the popularity of her love lyrics. Traditions of contemporaries in the works of A. Akhmatova. "Great earthly love" in early lyrics. Akhmatov's "I" in poetry. Analysis of love lyrics. Prototypes of lyrical heroes.

    abstract, added 10/09/2013

    Russian literature of the 20th century. Contribution to the development of Russian literature by Anna Andreevna Akhmatova and her poetry. Source of inspiration. The world of Akhmatova's poetry. Analysis of the poem "Native Land". Reflections on the fate of the poet. Lyric system in Russian poetry.

    abstract, added 10/19/2008

    The creative development of A. Akhmatova in the world of poetry. Studying her work in the field of love lyrics. An overview of sources of inspiration for the poetess. Fidelity to the theme of love in Akhmatova’s work of the 20s and 30s. Analysis of statements literary critics about her lyrics.

    abstract, added 02/05/2014

    An oxymoron is an epithet that contradicts what it defines. Explicit and implicit oxymoron. Oxymoron in early and late lyrics. The role of Innokenty Annensky in the development of Akhmatova as a poetess. The main examples of the use of oxymoron in the works of Anna Akhmatova.

    test, added 02/05/2011

    Biography of the Russian poetess Anna Andreevna Akhmatova. Getting an education, starting a family with the poet Nikolai Gumilev. The “dense romanticism” of Akhmatova’s poetry, its strength in deep psychologism, comprehension of the nuances of motivations, sensitivity to the movements of the soul.

    presentation, added 11/13/2011

    Familiarization with the life and creative paths of Anna Akhmatova. Publication of the first book “Evening” and the collections “Rosary Beads”, “White Flock”, “Plantain”, and the lyrical-epic “Poem without a Hero”. Strengthening the sound of the theme of the Motherland, blood unity in Anna’s poetry during the war.

    abstract, added 03/18/2010

    Childhood and youth, the Akhmatova family. Marriage of Akhmatova and Gumilyov. The poet and Russia, personal and public themes in Akhmatova’s poems. Akhmatova's life in the forties. The main motives and themes of Anna Akhmatova’s work after the war and in the last years of her life.



Did you like the article? Share with your friends!