In addition to the grammatical basis (subject and predicate, or only the predicate, or only the subject), a sentence may also contain secondary members of the sentence.

The secondary members of the sentence include

additions,

circumstances,

definitions.

A sentence in which at least one minor member is present is called widespread. If there are no such sentence members, then it will be an unextended sentence.

Also, sentences can be complicated. They may contain homogeneous members, as well as words and various constructions that are not grammatically related to the rest of the sentence. These include, for example, addresses, introductory words and sentences, interjections.

Sentences can be complicated by participial and adverbial phrases, plug-in constructions.

When parsing a sentence by sentence members, you need to graphically underline all words depending on their syntactic role in the sentence. For example, the subject is underlined by one line,

predicate - two features,

addition - dotted,

circumstance - a dash with a dot,

definition - a wavy line.

Analysis of the proposal by composition is carried out in the following order.

First, the main members of the sentence are noted. Namely, the predicate and the subject.
Then we move on to the minor ones. They can be definitions, adjuncts and circumstances.
We indicate the type of sentence (two- or one-part).
Determine completeness (complete or not).
Let's find out if it is widespread?
Is it complicated?

Roma took a beautiful book. Two-part sentence, common, uncomplicated, complete

By composition, only the word can be parsed, and the sentence is parsed by members (i.e., syntactic parsing is performed)

To parse a proposal, you need to stick to a specific plan.

Now let's look at a few examples of parsing sentences to make it clearer.

If difficulties arise at any stage of parsing a proposal, it is necessary to learn the basic theoretical material on this topic. Below I will provide the main provisions and information that is required when analyzing proposals.

The composition of the proposal is not clear. The only way to parse a sentence is through syntactic parsing. That is, we find the main sentence, the predicate and the remaining members of the sentence (additions, circumstances, adverbs, etc.). You can also determine the type of subordination, if any.

I believe that you did not mean parsing a sentence by composition, but syntactic parsing of a sentence, or otherwise parsing by members of a sentence. First, you need to characterize the sentence according to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or motivating. Then indicate the emotional coloring of the sentence (exclamatory or non-exclamatory). Highlight the grammatical basics and characterize the sentence (simple or complex). Further:

1) If the sentence is simple:

Describe the proposal based on the presence of basics (two-part or one-part)

Write whether the sentence is widespread or not widespread by secondary members

Write a complicated or uncomplicated sentence using phrases, appeal, introductory words

Underline the parts of the sentence and make a diagram.

2) if the sentence is complex:

write which connection in the sentence is union or non-union

Indicate a means of communication (subordinating conjunction, coordinating conjunction or intonation)

Conclude which sentence (complex, complex or non-union)

Complete the steps for a simple sentence for each part of the sentence.

Make a diagram.

As a rule, in the Russian language, any sentence consists of two main members, the subject and the predicate, which form its basis. A sentence can also have either one subject or a predicate, and depending on this feature, they are divided into one-part (one main member in the sentence) and two-part (the sentence has both a subject and a predicate). When analyzing a sentence, it is imperative to find its basis, that is, to identify the subject and predicate, after which we determine the secondary members of the sentence, if there are any, of course. It is also necessary to identify the completeness of the sentence, indicate its type and type (one-part or two-part)

The sentence can be parsed by syntactic parsing. In this case, in the sentence you need to find and define the members of the sentence (subject, predicate, definition, complement and circumstance). A sentence can contain all members of the sentence, or only a subject with a predicate.

A sentence can be divided into subject and predicate. From the main words of the sentence we ask questions to other words. We identify the following parts of the sentence. See the analysis in the table.

Functional parts of speech, for example, prepositions, are considered a part of the sentence along with the noun to which they refer. And particles that refer to all words in a sentence are not members of the sentence. Conjunctions are not a part of a sentence if they are a connecting link in a complex sentence. And if they refer to individual words, then they are defined as a member of a sentence with that word.

To analyze a sentence by composition, it is first necessary to identify its main members, namely its grammatical basis, which includes both the subject and the predicate.

It should immediately be noted that a proposal can include all the main members or consist of just one.

You can determine the type of sentence by the composition of the grammatical basis. Sentences can be two-part or one-part. In a two-part sentence, we see the composition of the subject (subject + attribute) and the composition of the predicate (predicate, object and circumstance).

Yellow dandelions reach for the sun. What? dandelions - subject. Dandelions. what are they doing? stretch -- predicate. Dandelions are reaching - the grammatical basis of a two-part sentence. Are they reaching where? to the sun - circumstance. What are dandelions? yellow definition.

In a one-part sentence there is only one main member. If this is a predicate, then a distinction is made between definitely personal, indefinitely personal and impersonal sentences. If the main member of a sentence is expressed by a noun, then it is a nominative sentence. Example: Night. Cold dugout. Shootout. Silence.

In definite personal sentences, the predicate is expressed by a present or future tense verb in the 1st or 2nd person form or by an imperative verb, which always has the 2nd person singular or plural form.

Don't break the silver strings. Let's go for a walk in the park. Seek and you will find a life partner.

In indefinite-personal sentences, the predicate is expressed by a 3rd person verb of the present and future tense or a plural past tense verb, as well as a conditional verb.

I was awarded. Passengers were invited to board the plane. They're calling.

In impersonal sentences, the predicate is, first of all, expressed by an impersonal verb (It’s getting dark. It’s getting dark. I’m not feeling well.), an infinitive (You can’t catch up with a crazy three.), a predicative adverb (It’s stuffy in captivity in the carriage.), a short passive participle of the neuter gender (Sent for doctor.), impersonal verb + infinitive (I had to wait for the train), predicative adverb + infinitive (It’s bad to live without work).

In tasks in the Russian language, words are analyzed by composition, but what they do with a sentence is syntactic analysis.

At the first stage of syntactic analysis, the main members of the sentence are found - the subject and the predicate. Then they determine the role of the remaining words that are minor members of the sentence - additions, definitions, circumstances.

The order of parsing a simple sentence

1. Parse the sentence into members and indicate how they are expressed (first, the subject and predicate are analyzed, then the minor members related to them).

2. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, incentive, interrogative).

3. Determine the type of sentence by emotional coloring (exclamatory, non-exclamatory).

4. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence and prove that it is simple.

5. Determine the type of sentence by structure:

a) two-part or one-part (definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal, nominal);

b) widespread or not widespread;

c) complete or incomplete (indicate which part of the sentence is missing);

d) complicated (indicate how it is complicated: homogeneous members, isolated members, appeal, introductory words).

6. Draw up a sentence diagram and explain punctuation marks.

Parsing samples

1) My bonfire shining in the fog(A.K. Tolstoy).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, uncomplicated.

Grammar basis - the fire is shining my expressed by a possessive pronoun. The predicate refers to the adverb of place in the fog expressed by a noun in the prepositional case with a preposition V.

Sentence outline At the end of a given declarative sentence there is a period.

2) At the end of January, surrounded by the first thaw, cherry trees smell good gardens (Sholokhov).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, complicated by a separate agreed definition, expressed by a participial phrase.

Grammar basis - the gardens smell. The subject is expressed by a noun in the nominative case, the predicate is a simple verb, expressed by a verb in the indicative mood. The subject includes an agreed definition cherry expressed as an adjective. The predicate refers to the circumstance of time in the end of January, expressed by the phrase (noun + noun) in the prepositional case with a preposition V, and the circumstance of the course of action Fine expressed by an adverb.

Sentence outline At the end of a given declarative sentence there is a period; commas in the sentence highlight the participial phrase, which, although it stands before the word being defined, is isolated because it is separated from it in the sentence by other words.

Ways to emphasize sentence members

When parsing a sentence into members, standard underlines are used: one line for the subject, two lines for the predicate, a dotted line for the object, a wavy line for the definition, alternating dots and dashes for the circumstance.

In some schools, the main member of a one-part sentence is emphasized with three features, but more common is the underlining, in which the main member of the noun sentence is marked as the subject, and the main members of other one-part sentences are marked as predicates.

When emphasizing the minor members of a sentence, it is advisable to be guided by the following principles.

An isolated member of a sentence is emphasized as a single member.

Accordingly, non-isolated members should be emphasized as detailed as possible in accordance with the questions asked to them.

Designation of words and phrases that are not parts of the sentence

As is known from morphology, auxiliary parts of speech are not parts of a sentence, but during syntactic parsing certain problems can be associated with them.

Conjunctions are not members of a sentence and are not distinguished when homogeneous members are combined, but in some cases they can be part of non-uniform members of a sentence.

Firstly, these are comparative conjunctions as part of comparative phrases, for example: The surface of the bay was like a mirror.

Secondly, these are unions consisting of isolated members of a sentence, for example: Stopping often and for a long time, we got to the place only on the third day.

Prepositions also cannot act as independent members of a sentence, but they are used as part of a prepositional-case group, together with the case form, expressing a certain meaning.

Therefore, it is customary to emphasize the preposition together with the noun to which it refers. In this case, it is necessary to pay attention to cases when the preposition and noun are separated by adjectives or participles, for example: instead of older brother. In this case, it would be a mistake to emphasize the preposition together with the adjective as a modifier; the underscore should be as follows: instead of older brother.

Formative particles are part of compound verb forms and are emphasized together with the verb both in contact and non-contact positions, for example: Let him call me!

Semantic (non-shape-forming) particles are not members of a sentence, however, in school practice, a negative particle is not usually emphasized as a single member of a sentence together with the word to which it refers, for example: No smoking here. I didn't really count on help.

It is permissible not to highlight both prepositions and all semantic particles.

Some teachers teach to highlight conjunctions by circling them, and prepositions by circling them with a triangle. This allocation is not generally accepted.

Introductory words and addresses are not parts of the sentence. Sometimes students enclose these components in square brackets or underline them with crosses. This is undesirable, since underlining is used only to indicate members of a sentence; It is permissible to mark these elements of the sentence by writing the words “introductory” or “address” over them.

Description of the complicating members of the sentence

When a sentence is complicated by direct speech or an inserted sentence, they are considered and described as an independent sentence, since both direct speech and an inserted sentence have their own purpose of utterance and intonation, which may not coincide with the purpose of the utterance and the intonation of the sentence itself.

So, for example, the proposal He asked indignantly: “How long will you continue to dig?!” should be analyzed as follows: the sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complete, complicated by direct speech. Direct speech is an interrogative, exclamatory, two-part, extended, complete, uncomplicated sentence.

The participial phrase complicates the sentence only if it is isolated. At the same time, the description should indicate the complication not by a participial phrase, but by a separate definition; in brackets it is possible, but not necessarily, to indicate that it is expressed by a participial phrase.

The comparative phrase can be any member of the sentence - the predicate ( This park is like a forest), circumstance ( The rain was pouring down like buckets), addition ( Petya draws better than Anton), definition (He's almost the same as his brother). In this case, comparative turnover can be either separate or non-separated. Complication is caused only by a separate comparative phrase, and, as in the case of a participial phrase, it is necessary to indicate the complication with a separate circumstance, addition or definition.

Homogeneous members, introductory words and sentences, and addresses are also described as complicating the structure of a sentence.

Sentences with homogeneous predicates present some complexity. In school and pre-university practice, it is believed that a two-part sentence in which the subject is used with several predicates is a simple sentence complicated by homogeneous predicates. In a one-component sentence, there are as many parts as there are predicates in it, with the exception of cases when the structure of the predicate contains homogeneous parts.

For example: I was offended and did not want to answer him- a simple two-part sentence with homogeneous predicates.

I felt offended and didn’t want to answer him.- difficult sentence.

I felt sad and lonely- a simple one-part (impersonal) sentence with homogeneous parts of the predicate.

One-part sentences

When analyzing one-part sentences, students often make various mistakes.

The first type of errors is associated with the need to distinguish between one-part and two-part incomplete sentences.

As already mentioned, we diagnose a definite-personal sentence by the form of the main member: the predicate in it is expressed by a verb in the form of the 1st and 2nd person singular and plural indicative mood (in the present and future tense), and in the imperative mood; the producer of the action is defined and can be called personal pronouns of the 1st and 2nd persons me, you, we, you:

I walk and walk, but I can’t reach the forest.

The peculiarity of verb forms with the morphological feature of the 1st and 2nd person is that each of these forms can “serve” one single subject: a form ending in -у ( go-y) - pronoun I, form with ending -eat/-ish ( go-eat) - pronoun you, form with -em/-im ( let's go) - pronoun we, form with -ete/-ite ( let's go) - pronoun you. Forms 1 and 2 of the imperative mood also clearly indicate the person who is the producer of the action.

Since the morphological feature of a person is represented by a verb only in the indicated forms, sentences of a similar meaning with a predicate-verb in the form of the past tense of the indicative mood and the conditional mood are considered two-part incomplete, for example:

He walked and walked, but never reached the forest.

In this sentence, the form of the predicate does not indicate in any way the producer of the action.

Even if it is clear from the previous context that the producer of the action is the speaker(s) or the hearer(s), sentences or parts of a complex sentence without a subject with a predicate in the past tense or in the conditional mood should be characterized as two-part incomplete, since information about the producer of the action is extracted not from the sentence itself, but from the previous context, which, in fact, is an indicator of the incompleteness of the sentence or part of it; see, for example, the second part of a complex sentence:

I would help you if I knew how.

In indefinite-personal sentences, as already mentioned, the main member is expressed by a verb in the 3rd person plural form (present and future tense in the indicative mood and in the imperative mood), the plural form of the past tense of the indicative mood or a similar form of the conditional mood of the verb. The producer of the action in these sentences is unknown or unimportant:

They are calling you / they called / let them call / they would call you.

Such sentences without a subject with a predicate in the indicated forms, in which the producer of the action is known from the previous context, are not indefinitely personal; see for example the second sentence in the following context:

We left the forest and tried to get our bearings. Then we walked along the path to the right.

Such sentences are also two-part incomplete.

Thus, when characterizing a sentence as a single-component definite-personal, it is necessary to remember the restrictions on the form of the predicate; when diagnosing a sentence as indefinite-personal, it is also necessary to take into account the meaning - an indication that the performer of the action is unknown.

Generalized personal one-part sentences include not all one-part sentences that report an action that can be attributed to everyone, but only those in which the predicate is expressed in the 2nd person singular form of the indicative and imperative moods or the 3rd person plural indicative form moods:

The forest is being cut down and the chips are flying.

However, in a generalized personal meaning, definitely personal sentences with the main member in the form of 1st person and impersonal sentences can be used: What we have, we don’t keep; when we lose it, we cry; If you're afraid of wolves, don't go into the forest. Nevertheless, such proposals are not usually characterized as generalized and personal.

The greatest difficulties are associated with parsing an impersonal sentence.

It is very difficult to determine the composition of the main members in sentences like We had a lot of fun going down this slide., i.e. in sentences containing a copula, a nominal part and an infinitive. There are two traditions in the analysis of such proposals.

There is an opinion that when characterizing such sentences as impersonal or two-part, it is not the sequence of components that is important (the infinitive at the beginning of the sentence or after the copula and the nominal part), but the meaning of the nominal part of the predicate.

So, if in the nominal part an adverb is used with the meaning of the state experienced by the performer of the action (fun, sad, hot, cold, etc.), then this is a one-part impersonal sentence:

It was fun going down this slide.
It was fun to ride down this slide.

If in the nominal part a word is used with the meaning of a positive or negative evaluation (good, bad, harmful, useful, etc.), then we have a two-part sentence with a subject, an expressed infinitive:

It was harmful for him to smoke.
Smoking was bad for him.

According to another linguistic tradition, the characteristics of a sentence of this type depend on the order of the words in it, and not on the meaning of the word in the nominal part. If the infinitive comes before the connective and the nominal part, then, given the relatively free order of words in the Russian language, it denotes the subject of the message and is the subject:

Smoking was bad for him.

If the infinitive follows the copula and the nominal part, then we have an impersonal sentence:

It was harmful for him to smoke.

With regard to impersonal sentences, it is also necessary to note the following: not impersonal, but two-part incomplete, it is customary to consider parts of a complex sentence in which the subject position is replaced by an explanatory clause or direct speech, for example:

You could hear the gate creaking a (compare: It was audible).

“I’m lost,” flashed through my head.(compare: It flashed through my head).

Such sentences without a subordinate part or direct speech lose all meaning and are not used, which is a criterion for the incompleteness of the sentence. Thus, the sentences *It was heard or *It flashed through my head cannot be understood and are not used.

Instructions

At the first stage, you need to parse the sentence into members and underline them: the subject - with one line, the predicate - with two, - with a wavy line, the complement - with a dotted line, and the adverbial - with alternating dashes and dots. Sometimes it is also necessary to indicate the connections between the members of the proposal and ask questions to each of them.

If the sentence is simple, indicate the type of predicate: simple (PGS), compound verb (CGS) or compound nominal (CIS). If there are several, indicate the type of each of them. If, however, number each of its parts and draw up a diagram of this sentence, indicating the means of communication (and allied words). In addition, indicate the types of clauses (definitive, explanatory or adverbial clauses: clauses of time, place, cause, effect, condition, purpose, concession, comparison, manner of action, measure and degree or connecting) and the types of relations between them (sequential, parallel or homogeneous ).

Next, describe the sentence, indicating its type by purpose of the statement (declarative, interrogative or motivating), by intonation (exclamatory or non-exclamatory) and by quantity (simple or complex: , complex, non-conjunctive). If the sentence is simple, continue the analysis, indicating the type by the number of main members (two-part or one-part: nominative, definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal or impersonal), by the presence of members (widespread or non-extended), by the presence of missing main members ( complete or ), and also indicate how it is complicated (homogeneous members, isolated members, introductory or plug-in constructions, or not complicated by anything). If the sentence is complex, continue the analysis according to the same scheme, but for each of its parts separately.

Video on the topic

The proposal scheme is not just a faculty whim. It allows you to better understand the structure of a sentence, determine its specifics, and finally parse it faster. Any diagram is, first of all, visual; You will agree that when you are dealing, for example, with Lev Nikolaevich, clarity is very necessary for understanding the proposal.

Instructions

You need to start by determining which parts of the sentence are words. First, determine the subject and predicate - the grammatical basis. This way you will already have a well-defined “stove” from which you can “dance”. Then we distribute the remaining words among the members of the sentence, taking into account the fact that they are all divided into a subject and a predicate group. In the first group, in the second - addition and circumstance. Please also take into account that some words are not members of the sentence (for example, conjunctions, interjections, introductory and inserted constructions), and that several words together make up one member of the sentence (adverbial and participial phrases).

Make a diagram offers, explain the placement of punctuation marks.

Video on the topic

Morphemic parsing words - parsing by composition, definition and selection of significant derivational parts of a word. Morphemic parsing precedes word formation - determining how the word appeared.

Instructions

With syntactic parsing e of a simple sentence is highlighted (subject and predicate). Then the type of sentence is determined by the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative or incentive), its emotional coloring (exclamation or ). After this, it is necessary to establish the type of sentence by its grammatical basis (one-part or two-part), by members (common or non-common), by the presence or absence of any member (complete or incomplete). Also, a simple can be complicated (homogeneous or isolated members are present) or uncomplicated.

With syntactic parsing For a complex sentence, in addition to determining the grammatical basis and type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement, it is necessary to prove that it is complex and establish the type of connection between simple sentences (conjunctive or non-conjunctive). If the connection is conjunction, then the type of sentence is determined by the nature of the conjunction: compound. If the sentence is complex, then it is necessary to find out what kind of coordinating conjunction the parts of the sentence are connected with: connective, disjunctive or adversative. In a complex sentence, the main and subordinate clauses, the means of connecting the subordinate clause with the main clause, the question answered by the subordinate clause, the type are determined. If a complex sentence is non-union, then the semantic relationships between simple sentences are determined and the punctuation mark is explained. It is also necessary to draw an outline of the proposal.

Video on the topic

Tip 6: How to Define an Indefinite-Personal Sentence

A sentence expresses a message, a motive, or a question. Two-part sentences have a grammatical basis consisting of a subject and a predicate. The grammatical basis of a one-part sentence is represented by either a subject or a predicate.

Instructions

All verbal one-part sentences have a predicate, but no subject. Moreover, in a definite-personal sentence, the form of the verb and the meaning of the message suggest that the action relates to a specific person: “I love books,” “Find the right solution,” “Take care of honor from a young age.”

The verb can be in the first or second person singular form or in the indicative or imperative mood. The first person means that the verbal question is asked from the pronouns “I”, “we”; second person – from the pronouns “you”, “you”. The imperative mood encourages action, the indicative simply conveys information.

In an indefinite-personal sentence, the action is performed by indefinite or unidentified persons. This action is important in itself. The verb is in the third person form of the present or past tense. Examples: “The news is shown on TV,” “The tragedy was reported on Friday,” “The poster was removed from the door.” To get a verb in the third person plural form, ask a question to the pronoun “they”.

Do not confuse one-part sentences with incomplete two-part ones. The missing main member of a two-part incomplete sentence is easily restored based on the context and speech situation. For example, if the person performing the action is named in the previous sentences.

In our language, thoughts can be conveyed using different sentence structures. Conjunctive and non-conjunctive complex sentences are capable of replacing each other in speech: when the structure changes, the semantic content remains the same. Omit the conjunction and you have a non-union sentence. Do not distort the meaning and use punctuation marks correctly!

Complex sentences with subordinate clauses of cause, explanatory, condition, time and consequence can also be changed to non-conjunctive ones. Often the type of subordinate clause helps to determine conjunctions that clearly indicate the semantic relationships expressed in the sentence. Observe the examples: “The passengers were in a hurry because (causality) there were five minutes left before the train departed” - “The passengers were in a hurry: there were five minutes left before the train departure”; “I (addition) cannot make it to the ship in time” - “I understand: it is impossible to make it to the ship in time”; “If (condition) you say a word, they will add ten” - “If you say a word, they will add ten”; When (time) the finches came to life, the forest came to life” - “The finches arrived - the forest came to life”; “The firewood is out, so (the consequence) there is nothing to burn with

Sources:

Russian language. 9th grade. Textbook for educational institutions
Means of expressing syntactic relationships between parts of a complex sentence in 2019

Sentence parsing is a detailed analysis of a sentence, divided into several components. Thanks to this method, students will test their knowledge of the syntax of the Russian language. In educational institutions, parsing is the last chapter in the syntax section, since it provides an opportunity to comprehensively use previously acquired knowledge.

How to parse a proposal

Syntactic analysis is a logical and step-by-step process. They use it at school two types of parsing: oral and written. Their difference lies in the fact that in written language the parts of speech are marked schematically, while in oral language they are spoken out.

Step by step analysis:

Determine what purpose carries a proposal. If the author is trying to tell something - narrative, ask - interrogative, induce to some action - incentive.
Emotional color in writing is expressed by the presence of an exclamation mark. If you see an exclamation mark at the end, then the sentence is exclamatory. If it is not there, it is non-exclamatory.
Count the number grammatical basics. One grammatical basis is simple, several are complex.
Describe The connection between the parts of the sentence is union or non-union.
Determine how the parts communicate with each other: conjunctions (subordinating or coordinating) or intonation (punctuation marks).
Depending on the alliances describe the type: compound, complex or non-union.
Analyze each part for the following parameters: the presence of main and minor members, the search for complicating factors (homogeneous members, introductory constructions, interjections, appeals).
Make a diagram sentences, graphically highlighting the components.

Note! Syntactic analysis of a complex sentence differs from a simple one only in the number of grammatical bases. Because of this, some steps (step 7) are repeated.

The best services for online analysis

Lexis Res

The Lexis Res website is one of the best services for member-based parsing in English. Main advantage– a detailed description of all the meanings of a single word, which will help users learning English.

The interface consists of two buttons. Team " Analyze" starts the process. The results are available at the bottom of the page. Function " Random sentences» will allow you to get acquainted with the work of the site using the example of a random offer.

pros:

Detailed parsing.
No annoying advertising.
Wide functionality of the service.
Minimalist interface.
Extensive base of words.

Minuses:

The resource is adapted for English expressions only.
Lack of graphic symbols.
Without proper knowledge of a foreign language, it will be difficult to read detailed explanations.

Delph-in

The Delph-in service is another English-language resource dedicated to parsing. Uniqueness is that it uses the Linguistic Knowledge Builder programming language, which is used in foreign universities.

Using the Linguistic Knowledge Builder Method provides benefits in terms of detail and its components. The English Resource Grammar technology, which is also used in foreign education, is responsible for visualization.

Advantages:

Great for exploring highly focused offerings.
A huge number of tools for parsing parts of speech.
There is no limit on the number of characters.

Flaws:

People with a good command of English will be able to fully work with the service.
A cumbersome interface that will take time to master.

MorphologyOnline

The MorphologyOnline website is a Russian-language resource dedicated to syntax. The site interface fits into one button. From user required enter the required word, and the program will analyze it.

For the convenience of users, the service provides step-by-step verification. In most cases, the verification process is carried out in three stages: identification of the part of speech, morphological features and probable syntactic role.

pros:

Detailed analysis.
Operational operation of the site.
No advertising.

Minuses:

Parsing is carried out within one word.
The main emphasis of the resource is on morphology.
Narrow specialization.

Gramota.ru

Gramota.ru is a Russian-language site that parses the requested word. Submitted by the service is carried out checks the selected word not only according to syntactic and morphological characteristics, but runs the selected word through all popular dictionaries, including a dictionary of specialized terms.

Advantages:

Detailed analysis of a word, including searching for meaning in dictionaries.
Nice user interface.
Possibility to choose criteria.

Flaws:

The program parses one word at a time.
The site is more focused on morphological analysis.

Goldlit

Goldlit website is one of the best parsing portals. Key Advantage Russian-speaking competitors have the opportunity to analyze entire proposals.

The algorithm of actions is extremely simple: the user enters a phrase or word. The portal processes the information and parses each word separately. Near every member the initial forms of the word, the part of speech to which it belongs, are written, and then grammatical analysis and declension by case are performed.