Languages ​​of North America. Indigenous peoples of South America

The first mention of the Spanish language dates back to the 2nd century BC and it appeared on the Iberian Peninsula and has now spread to several continents. It is spoken by more than 400 million people in different countries of the world. Such a phenomenon as Latin American Spanish appeared thanks to the arrival of the conquistadors in America. Then the conquered countries began to speak the language of the invaders, mixed with local dialects. This is the same Spanish language, it is not distinguished separately, but is called a dialect or “national variant of the language.”

About 300 million Spanish-speaking people live in 19 countries of Latin America, for half of them it is a second language, and there is also a local one. Among the population there are many Indians, there are Uruguayans, Guarani, their number ranges from 2% (in Argentina) to 95% in Paraguay. For them, Spanish has not become their native language; many do not even know it at all. In some countries, archaisms have been preserved - words, addresses and figures of speech that have not been used for a long time.

Today, in addition to Spain itself, Spanish is spoken in Mexico and the countries of Central America - Honduras, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Nicaragua. There are 3 countries in the Antilles with the predominant use of the language - Cuba, the Dominican Republic and Costa Rico. On the mainland of South America there are also countries that use Spanish as their main or second language - Colombia, Ecuador, Chile, Venezuela, Peru, Bolivia. The Rioplata region of the mainland is occupied by the states: Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay; a lot of Spanish-speaking people live on their territory (more than 90% of Argentines speak Spanish).


Reasons for differences in language in different Latin American countries

The territory of modern Peru was inhabited for a long time by colonizers, mainly of noble origin, so the Spanish language in this country is closest to the original one. At the same time, unskilled workers and peasants lived in Chile and Argentina, who spoke more without complex phrases and words, simply in a working manner. Therefore, the Spanish language in Chile, its Chilean version, is very different from the classical pure one.

In countries where mainly Guarani Indians lived, the original Spanish mixed heavily with the local language, borrowing from them the features of spoken language, pronunciation and vocabulary. This option is most evident in Paraguay. But on the territory of modern Argentina lived both Spanish colonialists and local residents, as well as immigrants, who made up up to 30% of the total population. So the pure language was diluted by the dialect of local residents and the peculiarities of the conversation of visitors, in particular Italians.

Lexical features

The vocabulary of the Spanish language has undergone changes since the beginning of its existence, borrowing words and meanings from different languages ​​and dialects. The conquest of the territory of modern Latin America was no exception. When the Spaniards came here, the bulk of the population were Indians and local tribes with their own linguistic characteristics. The colonizers, in turn, brought their families, black slaves, and their own speech patterns. Thus, all changes in vocabulary that occurred in Spanish in these countries can be divided into 2 main groups:

  • Local words that have entered the Spanish vocabulary, denoting some features of the life and life of the indigenous inhabitants of the mainland, as well as Anglo-Saxon, Italian or American concepts;
  • Spanish words that have undergone changes while living in Latin American countries.

A separate category of words – archaisms, or “Americanisms” – appeared due to the transition of some concepts into the vocabulary of local residents from the Spanish language. Their peculiarity lies in the fact that in Spain they have not been used for a long time or have been greatly modified, turning into a new word.

For example, the word “pollera”, used in Latin America, means “skirt”, but is not used at all in Spain. This also includes prieto (black color) and frazada (blanket), which in Spanish would sound like negro and manta, respectively.

Thanks to the Indians and other peoples living on the mainland, many words hitherto unknown to the Spaniards came into the Spanish language.

  • Scientists call them indichenisms.
  • For example, papa (potato), caucho (rubber), llama (llama), quina (hina) and tapir (tapir) were not known to the Spaniards at all before arriving in South America.

And from the territory of modern Mexico, from the language of the Aztecs, Nahuatl, came the concepts used by Mexicans today - cacahuete (groundnut), hule (rubber), petaea (snuffbox). Many words came from the need to denote objects and plants previously unknown to the Spaniards.

Phonetic differences between languages

In the pronunciation of some words and letters, you can also find differences between classic Spanish and its Latin American version. Their appearance is due to the same reasons as new concepts - some sounds simply did not exist in the language of the indigenous people, they did not hear them, and some were pronounced in their own way. In general, pronunciation in the American version is softer and more melodic, words are pronounced less sharply and more slowly.

Jorge Sánchez Mendez, a linguist and scientist, describes the general sound of the Spanish language in different countries of Latin America:

  • Catalan (classical) – sounds sharp and authoritative, the words are pronounced heavily, firmly;
    In the Antilles on the contrary, all sounds are pronounced softly, speech is fluid, flowing;
    Andalusian variant– brighter, sonorous and lively;
    In Mexico speak softly and slowly, speech is unhurried and careful;
    In Chile and Ecuador– melodious, melodic, sounds soft and calm;
    and here is the conversation on the territory Rio de la Plata seems slow, calm and unhurried.

The main differences in pronunciation are recorded by the Institutes of Language Studies, have their own names and are as follows:

  1. Same pronunciation of letters "r" and "l", if they are at the end of a syllable. This feature is typical for the population of the countries of Venezuela and Argentina, some regions of the state - Puerto Rico, Colombia, and on the shores of Ecuador. For example, calamares in transcription looks like this - soldado sounds like , and the word amor reads like .
  2. Phonetic phenomenon Yeismo– the sound of the letters ll in combination, like “y”, or like “zh” - in Argentina. For example, the word “calle” is translated as “street” and is pronounced in Spain, in Latin American countries and in Argentina. Found in Mexico, Colombia and Peru, Chile and western Ecuador, as well as on the Caribbean coast.
  3. Changing the pronunciation of the letter "s", if it is at the end of a syllable, this feature is called aspiration. As for example in the words: este (this) will sound like, mosca (fly) is pronounced. Sometimes the letter is simply lost and not pronounced - las botas (shoes) are made into .
  4. Seseo – phonetic featureь, found in almost all countries of Latin America and consists in pronouncing the letters “s” and “z”, and sometimes “s”, as [s]. For example, pobreza sounds like , zapato - , and entices would be pronounced like - .
  5. Shifting stress in some words to an adjacent vowel or another syllable: pais is read as in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries.

These are the most common differences; there are many more small ones that involve different pronunciations of the same word. Despite these differences, representatives of states in South America have no difficulty understanding the Spaniards and each other.

Word formation

Hispanics use suffixes in words more often than Spaniards, the main ones being –ico/ica and –ito/ita. For example, platita (money) comes from the word "plata", ranchito (ranch) from "rancho", ahorita (now) from "ahora", and prontito (soon) comes from "pronto". In addition, some nouns have a different gender than in classical Spanish. For example, the word actor in Spain is masculine and pronounced comediante, and in Latin America - comedianta is feminine, the call in Spain la lamada is feminine, in Latin American countries ell lamado is masculine.

The same applies to animals, for which the Catalan language uses one word and most often it is masculine. And in Latin America they also added feminine ones: tigre, male. – tigra, female (tiger), caiman, male – caimana, female (cayman), sapo, husband – sapa, female (toad).


Basically, new words are formed by taking a root of non-Spanish origin and adding suffixes and prefixes to it. The basis is taken on common American concepts, adapted to a specific situation and nationality. Word-forming particles or suffixes are added to them, which give them a completely different meaning: -ada, -ero, -ear, -menta.

They all have their own history, “nationality” and meaning. For example, the suffix –menta is actively used in word formation in the Venezuelan dialect; it has a general meaning: papelamnta – a pile of papers, perramenta – a pack of dogs. The suffix –io has the same meaning for the countries of Uruguay and Argentina – tablerio – a pile of stones.

In the words picada (path), sahleada (saber strike), nicada (company of children), “-ada” has a collective meaning or defining belonging to something. More examples: gauchada (an act characteristic of a gaucho), ponchada (a volume of things that can fit on a poncho) and so on.

But the suffix –ear creates new verbs or American nouns: tanguear - dance the tango, jinitear - ride a horse and other examples. The Spanish language in South America is more mobile, lively and developing than its European counterpart. Here there is a constant replenishment of the vocabulary, the formation of new concepts and phrases, due to the movement of the population across the mainland and the arrival of immigrants.

Grammatical differences

The grammar features characteristic of Latin America have their own system and are the result of many years of language evolution. The Spanish have a concept of "grammatical gender" applied to inanimate objects.

In the Latin American version there are words with the same meaning, but of strictly opposite gender. In Spain - el color (color), el fin (end), la bombilla (light bulb), la vuelta (surrender), and in South American countries - la color, la fin el bombillo, el vuelto.

The plural endings are also systematically different in different countries: café (1 cafe) - cafes (several cafes), te (tea) - tes (several types of tea), pie (leg) - pies (legs), and in Latin America they will be be called: cafeses, teses, pieses, respectively.

  • Peculiarities.
  • Words that have only a plural form (scissors, trousers, pliers) in the South American version are also used in the singular: tijeraz - tiera (scissors), bombachas - bombacha (trousers) and tenazas - tenaza (pliers). If a noun ends with the letters –ey, then according to the rules of the Spanish language their plural is formed by adding the ending “-es”, while in Latin America the ending is simplified: buey (bull) - bueyes/bueys, or rey (king) - reyes /reys.

When addressing people, Spaniards use the pronoun “you” - vosotros; in Latin America they address strangers - ustedes. And the pronoun “you” sounds like “vos” in South America and like “tu” in Europe.

As a conclusion

The result of the comparison is the understanding that Spanish is a living and spoken language, therefore it develops, breathes and absorbs new words, concepts and phrases. It depends on the national, territorial, cultural characteristics of the people speaking it. All differences are the result of a natural process of evolution and in no way affect the understanding of the Spanish dialect by representatives of different countries.

If you decide to learn a language, then you do not necessarily need to know these features and memorize them in order to travel to any country in Latin America. The classic version of Spanish is enough, you will be able to communicate with the locals, and the presence of “own” words is characteristic of each language, Russian is no exception. In each region of our country, there are several dozen phrases and concepts used only within a small territory, but this does not at all prevent us from understanding each other, even living in different regions of the Russian Federation.



Languages ​​of Middle America

Indian languages ​​of Mesoamerica(Indian languages ​​of Middle America, Mesoamerican/Mesoamerican languages) - languages ​​of the indigenous population of Mesoamerica before the arrival of Europeans. Unlike most indigenous languages ​​of the Americas, many of the languages ​​of Mesoamerica have largely survived to the present day.

  1. Arawakan languages ​​(also common in South America)
  2. Quitlatec tongue (isolate) † (1)
  3. Mayan (Mayan) family (many)
  4. Mihe-soke (mihe-soke) family (many)
  5. Oto-manga family (many)
  6. Tarasco (purépecha) language (isolate) (1)
  7. Uave language (isolate) (1)
  8. Juto-Astec family (also distributed north of Mesoamerica)
  9. Unclassified languages ​​of Middle America: † Alagvilak, † Amotomanco, † Guasave, † Tolimeco, † Chumbia, etc.

Literature

  • American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. - New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. - ISBN 0-19-509427-1
  • Classical Quiche // Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 5: Linguistics / Norman A. McQuown (Volume ed.). - Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968. - pp. 249–268. - ISBN 0-292-73665-7
  • Inventory of Classificatory Materials // Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 5: Linguistics / Norman A. McQuown (Volume ed.). - Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968. - pp. 63–78. - ISBN 0-292-73665-7
  • Ethnologue: Languages ​​of the World, Fifteenth edition. - online version. - Dallas, TX: SIL International, 2005. - ISBN 1-55671-159-X
  • The Mesoamerican Indian Languages. - Cambridge University Press, 1983. - ISBN 0-521-22834-4
  • The Relationship Among the Mixed-Zoquean Languages ​​of Mexico. - Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1995. - ISBN 0-87480-487-6

Wikimedia Foundation.

2010.

    See what “Languages ​​of Middle America” are in other dictionaries:

    They are distinguished by their extraordinary genetic fragmentation, comparable only to the Papuan languages. According to the most authoritative classification by Kaufman (1994) and Campbell (1997), the following families, isolates and unclassified languages ​​are distinguished... ... Wikipedia

    Indian languages ​​of Mesoamerica (Indian languages ​​of Middle America, Mesoamerican/Mesoamerican languages) languages ​​of the indigenous population of Mesoamerica before the arrival of Europeans. Unlike most local languages ​​of the Americas, many ... ... Wikipedia

    Taxon: Family Status: Generally recognized Range: Middle America (southern Mexico) ... Wikipedia

    Mixe Soque languages ​​Taxon: Family Status: Generally recognized Area: Middle America (southern Mexico) Number of speakers: at least 350,000 people ... Wikipedia

    Languages ​​of the world- Languages ​​of the world are the languages ​​of the peoples inhabiting (and previously inhabiting) the globe. The total number is from 2500 to 5000 (the exact figure is impossible to establish, because the difference between different languages ​​and dialects of the same language is arbitrary). To the most common... ... Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary

    Languages ​​of the peoples inhabiting (and previously inhabiting) the globe. The total number of languages ​​is from 2500 to 5000 (the exact figure is impossible to establish due to the conventions of distinction between different languages ​​and dialects of the same language). To the most common Ya. m... Great Soviet Encyclopedia

    The official language of Belize is English, but only 4 percent of the population speaks English as their first language. Most Belizeans speak English very well. The literacy rate of the population is 70%. Contents 1... ...Wikipedia

    The languages ​​of South America are distinguished by their extraordinary genetic fragmentation, comparable only to the Papuan languages. According to the most authoritative classification by Kaufman (1994) and Campbell (1997), the following families, isolates and ... ... Wikipedia are distinguished

    - (Indian languages ​​of Middle America, Mesoamerican/Mesoamerican languages) languages ​​of the indigenous population of Mesoamerica before the arrival of Europeans. Unlike most local languages ​​of the Americas, many Mesoamerican languages ​​in ... ... Wikipedia

Lesson 6. Latin America. Practical work No. 1.

The purpose of the lesson:study the characteristics of the GGP and EGP, the population and economy of Latin America; characterize the population; show which industries determine Latin America’s place in international specialization; contribute to the development of international feelings, interest in learning about the lives of other peoples and countries; develop responsibility, organization, and independence.

Lesson type: combined.

Equipment: textbook, illustrations, atlas.

During the classes

I. Org moment.

Announcing the topic and objectives of the lesson

II. Updating knowledge.

This topic is the first in the section of lessons dedicated to Latin America. You will get to know the diverse and interesting countries of the region, which play a significant role in the modern world. The teacher will tell you in detail about the composition, borders, and uniqueness of the countries of Latin America. As additional material, the lesson covers three topics: “Island of Freedom”, “Junta”, “Capture of Grenada”. The lesson will help you develop knowledge about the population of the region and identify patterns in the formation of the population of Latin America. The teacher will tell you about the main characteristics of the region's population, giving examples of the largest nations, cities, and countries.

III. Studying a new topic.

Latin America is the name given to the region of the Western Hemisphere located between the United States and Antarctica. Latin America is divided into several subregions. These are Middle America (Mexico, countries of Central America and the West Indies), Andean countries (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile), countries of the La Plata basin (Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina), Brazil. The name “Latin America” comes from the historical predominant influence of the language, culture and customs of the Romance (Latin) peoples of the Iberian Peninsula in this part of the world.

The region covers an area of ​​21 million square meters. km with a population of more than 570 million people.

The countries of Latin America vary in area: the largest country in the region is Brazil, the smallest are in the Caribbean.

The borders between countries pass mainly along rivers, ridges and other orographic features.

Economic and geographical position of Latin America:

1. Proximity to the USA.

2. Distance from other regions of the world.

3. Availability of the Panama Canal.

4. Almost all countries (except Bolivia and Paraguay) have access to the sea.

According to the form of government, all countries in the region are republics. Latin America includes more than 33 countries. Some countries are members of the Commonwealth (for example, Guyana, Dominica, Trinidad and Tobago). Guiana belongs to France. Cuba is a socialist state.

In terms of the form of administrative-territorial structure, unitary states predominate; the following countries have a federal structure: Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Venezuela, Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Stages of formation of the political map of Latin America:

1. Stage of pre-European colonization.

2. Colonial stage.

3. Post-colonial stage.

4. Stage after the Second World War.

The civilizations of the Mayans, Aztecs, and Incas were located in Latin America.

The territory of Latin America was developed mainly by Spain and Portugal.

Puerto Rico has a special status. Puerto Rico is a territory dependent on the United States and has the status of an “unincorporated organized territory,” which means that this territory is under the administration of the United States (and is not an integral part of it), and is limited in scope by the US Constitution; The supreme power belongs to the US Congress, but the territory has its own system of self-government.

Currently, many issues regarding borders and ownership of territories have not been resolved. A striking example is the disputed Falkland Islands (Malvinas) between Great Britain and Argentina.

. Cuba.

The official name is the Republic of Cuba, the unofficial name since 1959 is Liberty Island - an island state in the northern part of the Caribbean Sea. The capital is Havana. Cuba is the largest island state in the region, stretching for 1250 km. It is located at the junction of the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico, forming the “American Mediterranean”. The key depicted on the country's coat of arms is a symbol of the fact that the island, discovered by Columbus in 1492, was for centuries a kind of key to the New World. Cuba is a socialist state; for a long time it was an ally of the USSR.

Population of Latin America

The region's population exceeds 570 million people. The ethnic composition of Latin America is quite complex, which is caused by the peculiarities of the historical development of the region. The largest country in terms of population in the region is Brazil (almost 200 million people).

The main racial and ethnic groups of modern Latin America:

1. Emigrants from Europe

2. Indigenous people

3. Blacks

Indian tribes and nationalities inhabited the region before the arrival of Europeans. Among them were such creators of high agricultural civilizations as the Aztecs and Mayans in Mexico, and the Incas in the Central Andes. Today, the indigenous Indian population in the region is approximately 15%. Many place names in Latin America, as in North America, are of Indian origin. The arriving Europeans almost completely destroyed the culture and achievements of the Indians, in addition, the Indian population itself was exterminated.

The second group was formed by European settlers, primarily from Spain and Portugal, whose descendants are called Creoles. Until the beginning of the 19th century. European immigration was relatively small, but then it acquired a large scale.

The third group was formed by Africans, who, starting from the 16th century, were brought by colonialists to Brazil, the West Indies and some other countries to work on plantations. Three centuries of the slave trade have led to the fact that in Latin America today blacks make up 1/10 of all inhabitants. The distribution center of the slave trade was the island of Jamaica.

More than half of the region's population are descendants of mixed marriages:

1. Mestizos (descendants from marriages of Caucasians and Indians).

Mestizos are present in almost all countries of the Western Hemisphere, including making up the majority of the population of countries such as Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Paraguay, Chile, Panama.

2. Mulattoes (descendants from mixed marriages of representatives of the Caucasian and Negroid races).

Mulattoes make up a significant part of the population of Latin America and the Caribbean (Dominican Republic - 73%, Cuba - 51%, Brazil - 38%).

In some Latin American countries, other words are used to designate the descendants of Negro-Indian marriages: in Brazil “cafuzu”, in Mexico “lobo”, in Haiti “marabou”, in Honduras, Belize, Guatemala - “garifuna”.

Therefore, almost all Latin American nations have a complex ethnic background. In Mexico and the countries of Central America, mestizos predominate; in Haiti, Jamaica, and the Lesser Antilles, blacks predominate. In most Andean countries, Indians or mestizos predominate, in Argentina, Uruguay and Costa Rica - Spanish-speaking creoles, and in Brazil there are only slightly fewer mulattoes and blacks than whites. In general, Creoles (descendants of the Spaniards and Portuguese) predominate.

The most complex ethnic composition is typical for Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina.

Latin Americans – a generalized name for the Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking peoples inhabiting the territory of modern Latin America and also widely represented in the USA, Spain, Canada, etc.

The most common languages ​​in Latin America are:

1. Spanish (this language is spoken by most residents).

2. Portuguese (Brazil).

3. English (Jamaica, Barbados, Guyana, etc.).

4. French (Haiti, Guiana, etc.).

5. Dutch (Suriname, Antilles).

In Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, along with Spanish, Indian languages ​​(Quechua, Aztec, etc.) are considered official.

The vast majority of Latin Americans profess Catholicism, which was promoted as the only official religion; other religions were persecuted by the Inquisition.

Latin America is characterized by a kind of dualism of cultures. Here, especially among the Indians and mestizos, the original culture of the indigenous population, dating back to pre-Columbian times, is preserved. This includes mythological and historical epics, music and dance, such famous historical and architectural monuments as the pyramids and palaces of the Aztecs, Toltecs and Mayans in Mexico, the Incan fortress city of Machu Picchu in Peru, included in the World Heritage List. This is also a newer culture, oriented towards European values, which is also manifested in literature, art, music, theater, and architecture. In addition to religious holidays, various carnivals, bullfights, and rodeos became widespread. Football is very popular. The distribution of the population of Latin America is characterized by three main features. Firstly, this is one of the least populated regions of the world with an average density of only 28 people per 1 sq. km. The islands have a very high population density. Secondly, the unevenness of its distribution is more pronounced than in most other large regions. Thirdly, in no other region of the world has the population mastered vast plateaus to such an extent and does not rise so high into the mountains.

Latin America is characterized by a traditional type of population reproduction. And although the peak of the demographic explosion here was passed in the middle of the 20th century, in some countries of Central America and in the poorer countries of South America (Bolivia, Paraguay) population growth is still 2-2.5% per year. This affects not only the number, but also the age structure, increasing the “burden” of children on the working population.

The countries have high crime rates, stratified society, and many live below the poverty line.

In terms of urbanization indicators, Latin America is more reminiscent of economically developed than developing countries: its average level in the region is very high (80%), and the pace is now slow. At the same time, there is an increasing concentration of the population in large cities, the number of which has exceeded 300, and in millionaire cities (there are more than 40 of them). The region has developed a special Latin American type of city. Colonial cities were created according to a single plan that Spain and Portugal developed for their possessions. The core of the city was usually the central square, on which the town hall, cathedral, and administrative buildings were located. From this square the streets diverged at right angles, forming a clear “chessboard” grid. In recent decades, modern development has superimposed on it.

Largest cities in Latin America:

1. Mexico City.

2. Buenos Aires.

3. Sao Paulo.

4. Rio de Janeiro.

In Latin America, one feature is particularly pronounced, which is also characteristic of other regions of the developing world and is usually called “false urbanization.” “False urbanization” is a type of urbanization in which the share of the urban population far exceeds the share of the economically active urban population employed in production and non-production sectors. The main reason for “false urbanization” is the constant influx of poor rural population into the cities, which the authorities are unable to provide with housing and work.

The city is the capital of Mexico. Mexico City was founded in 1325 by the Aztec Indians. The founders of the city - the ancient Aztecs - initially led a nomadic lifestyle and were engaged in hunting and fishing. Their tribes appeared in the vicinity of modern Mexico City around 1200. Nowadays, Mexico City is one of the largest cities in the world, and the population of the agglomeration exceeds 21 million people. Mexico City accounts for almost 25% of the country's total GDP and is the main economic, political, and cultural center.

The city is located in the southeast of Brazil, it is the capital of the state of the same name. The largest city in the Southern Hemisphere. Located in the valley of the Tiete River, 70 km from the Atlantic coast.

Favelas are slums in Brazilian cities, often located on mountain slopes. Favelas lack developed infrastructure and have high crime rates. Many modern favelas emerged in the 1970s as a result of accelerated urbanization in Brazil.

Latin America is provided with almost all known types of mineral raw materials, and in many of them it stands out among other regions of the world. Here you can find the most unusual combinations of minerals in relatively small areas.

Latin America has large reserves of niobium, lithium, beryllium, molybdenum, copper, sulfur, antimony, silver, bauxite, oil, etc.

The richness and diversity of Latin America's mineral resources is explained by the peculiarities of the geological and tectonic structure of its vast territory. Associated with the crystalline basement of the South American platform and the folded belt of the Cordillera and Andes are basins and deposits of ores of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, especially iron ore, lithium, molybdenum, copper, nickel, tin, as well as gold and silver, which primarily attracted the Spanish conquistadors . And large deposits of oil and natural gas formed in the marginal and intermountain troughs of this belt.

The largest oil and gas basins in the region are located in Venezuela and Mexico, as well as in Ecuador and Colombia. In Venezuela, this is the Maracaibo basin, located in an intermountain depression overlooking the Caribbean Sea. Oil here lies both on land and within the waters of Lake Maracaibo. According to some reports, Venezuela ranks 2nd in the world in terms of oil reserves, second only to Saudi Arabia. In Mexico, it also occurs both on land and on the shelf of the Gulf of Mexico.

Latin America is also rich in bauxite, the formation of which is associated with lateritic weathering crust, as well as many non-metallic minerals, especially saltpeter and sulfur. The largest reserves of bauxite are found in Brazil, Jamaica, Suriname, and Venezuela.

The Andes are especially rich in ore minerals. A unique tin belt stretches across the Andes of Bolivia, Peru and surrounding areas of Brazil. Tin deposits are adjacent to antimony deposits (Bolivia). The largest resources of lead-zinc ores are located in Peru and Mexico. In these so-called mesothermal depths, mainly copper and base metal ores were deposited. These deposits are characterized by very rich ore accumulations. A striking example of this type is the famous Serre de Pasco deposit in Peru. In addition, the Andes have large reserves of silver, copper and other metals.

Ore minerals of the Andes:

1. Copper.

2. Tin.

3. Iron.

4. Lead-zinc.

5. Tungsten.

6. Antimony.

7. Molybdenum.

8. Noble metals.

The copper belt stretches across Latin America (Peru, Chile, Ecuador, Colombia). 2/3 of all copper reserves are in Chile. In this country, copper export is one of the main sources of income.

Large reserves of saltpeter are found in the Atacama Desert.

Precious stones are mined in Colombia (emeralds), Peru, and Brazil.

Large coal deposits are located in Brazil and Colombia.

Latin America is very rich in high quality iron ores. The most important deposits are confined to metamorphosed rocks of the Precambrian continental shield of South America. In non-competitive first place is Brazil. One of the world's largest iron ore deposits - 18 billion tons - is Carajas in the state of Pará, which, according to preliminary estimates, is twice the entire ore potential of the state of Minas Gerais, where almost all other exploited deposits are currently located. In addition, Bolivia and Mexico have large reserves of iron ore.

The wealth and diversity of the region's renewable natural resources is primarily due to its location primarily in the equatorial, tropical and subtropical climatic zones.

Agroclimatic resources are favorable, but in some years the penetration of cold air masses from the south has a detrimental effect on agriculture. In addition, the annual distribution of precipitation adds its own important adjustments to this picture, and along with zones of excess moisture (Amazonia), there are areas in Mexico, Chile, and Argentina where artificial irrigation is necessary. In addition, it is Latin America that is characterized by the periodic repetition of such a natural disaster as the El Niño phenomenon, which is associated with anomalous warming of the usually rather cool coastal surface waters of the Pacific Ocean.

In terms of water resources, Latin America ranks first among large regions of the world, and in terms of economic hydropower potential it is second only to Asia.

The enormous wealth of Latin America is its forests, which occupy more than 1/2 of the entire territory of the region. It is no coincidence that Latin America from space appears to be a green continent. In terms of forest resources per capita, Latin America ranks first in the world. The largest forest resources are found in Brazil (second only to Russia), Venezuela, and Colombia. The fauna of the region is also very rich and diverse.

IV. Practical work

Identify the characteristics of the population and economy of Latin American countries using the example of leading countries belonging to different regions.

1 option: Compile an economic and geographical profile of Brazil.

Option 2: Compile an economic and geographical profile of Chile.

Option 3: Compile an economic and geographical profile of Cuba.

Option 4: Compile an economic and geographical profile of Argentina.

CHARACTERISTICS PLAN.

1.Territory, borders, position, political system.

2. Natural resources and conditions: richness and diversity.

3. Population: size, reproduction, ethnic composition, location, features of urbanization.

4. Economy: leading industries, contradictions in development.

5. Foreign economic relations.

V. Consolidation of the studied material.

    What regions (subregions) are distinguished in Latin America?

    What are the features of the EGP of Latin America?

    Name the largest ethnic groups in Latin America.

    Give examples of the largest cities in Latin America.

    What are the features of the distribution of mineral resources in Latin America?

    Give examples of Latin American countries and their characteristic resources.

VI. Homework.

the general name for the languages ​​of the Indians of the indigenous peoples of North and South America who lived on these continents before and after the arrival of European colonialists. The Indians usually do not include one of the groups of indigenous inhabitants of America - the Eskimo-Aleut peoples, who live not only in America, but also in Chukotka and the Commander Islands (Russian Federation). Eskimos are very different from their neighbors- Indians physical appearance. However, the racial diversity of the Indians of North and South America is also extremely large, so the non-inclusion of Eskimos and Aleuts among the Indians is motivated mainly by tradition.

The diversity of Indian languages ​​is so great that it is comparable to the diversity of human languages ​​in general, so the term “Indian languages” is very arbitrary. American linguist J. Greenberg, who came up with the so-called “Amerindian” hypothesis, proposed uniting all Indian languages, except for the languages ​​of the Na-Dene family, into a single macrofamily - Amerindian. However, most specialists in Indian languages ​​were skeptical about this hypothesis and the “mass comparison of languages” methodology behind it.

It is quite difficult to indicate the exact number of Indian languages ​​and make an exhaustive list of them. This is due to a number of circumstances. First, it is necessary to distinguish between modern and pre-colonization language pictures. It is believed that before colonization in North America (north of the Aztec empire, located in central Mexico) there were up to four hundred languages, and now there are just over 200 of them left in this territory. Moreover, many languages ​​disappeared before they were recorded in any way . On the other hand, languages ​​such as Quechua in South America have expanded the territorial and ethnic base of their distribution many times over the past centuries.

The second obstacle to calculating Indian languages ​​is related to the problem of distinguishing between language and dialect. Many languages ​​exist in several regional varieties called dialects. Often the question of whether two similar forms of speech should be considered different languages ​​or dialects of the same language is very difficult to resolve. When solving the language/dialect dilemma, several heterogeneous criteria are taken into account.

1) Mutual intelligibility: is mutual understanding possible between speakers of two idioms without prior training? If yes, then these are dialects of the same language; if not, then these are different languages.

2) Ethnic identity: very similar (or even identical) idioms may be used by groups that perceive themselves as different ethnic groups; such idioms can be considered different languages.

3) Social attributes: An idiom that is very close to a certain language may have certain social attributes (for example, statehood), which makes it considered a special language.

4) Tradition: similar situations can be viewed differently simply due to tradition.

From a physical-geographical point of view, America is usually divided into North and South. From political to North (including Canada, USA and Mexico), Central and South. From an anthropological and linguistic point of view, America is traditionally divided into three parts: North America, Mesoamerica and South America. The northern and southern borders of Mesoamerica are understood differently, sometimes in terms of modern political divisions (then, for example, the northern border of Mesoamerica is the border of Mexico and the United States), and sometimes in terms of pre-colonial cultures (then Mesoamerica is the sphere of influence of the Aztec and Mayan civilizations ).

Classifications of Indian languages. The history of the classification of North American languages ​​goes back more than one and a half centuries. The forerunner of the genetic classification of North American languages ​​was P. Duponceau, who drew attention to the typological similarity of many of these languages ​​(1838), namely their polysyntheticism. The authors of the first actual genetic classifications were A. Gallatin (1848) and J. Trumbull (1876). But it was the classification named after John Wesley Powell that was truly comprehensive and very influential. Major Powell (1834-1902) was an explorer and naturalist who worked for the Bureau of American Ethnology. In the classification prepared by Powell and his associates, 58 language families of North America were identified (1891). Many of the families he identified have retained their status in the modern classification. In the same 1891, another important classification of American languages ​​appeared, belonging to Daniel Brinton (1891), who introduced a number of important terms (for example, “Uto-Aztecan family”). In addition, Brinton's classification included the languages ​​of not only North but also South America. Later classifications of North American languages ​​were based on Powell's classification, and those of South American languages ​​were based on Brinton's classification.

Soon after the publication of Powell's classification, attempts were made to reduce the number of North American language families. Californian anthropologists A. Kroeber and R. Dixon radically reduced the number of language families in California, in particular they postulated the associations of “Hoca” and “Penuti”. Reductionist trend of the early 20th century. found its culmination in the widely known classification of E. Sapir (1921, 1929). This classification included only six macrofamilies (stocks) of North American languages: Eskimo-Aleut, Algonquian-Wakashan, Na-Dene, Penutian, Hokan-Siouan and Aztec-Tanoan. Sapir considered this classification as a preliminary hypothesis, but later it was reproduced without the necessary reservations. As a result, the impression was formed that the Algonquin-Wakash or Hokan-Siwan associations were the same recognized associations of the New World as, say, the Indo-European or Uralic languages ​​in Eurasia. The reality of the Eskimo-Aleut family was later confirmed, and the remaining five Sapirian macrofamilies were revised or rejected by most specialists.

The contrast between linguists prone to lumping and splitting remains in American studies to this day. Beginning in the 1960s, the second of these trends began to gain strength; its manifesto was the book

Native languages ​​of the Americas (eds. L. Campbell and M. Mithun, 1979). This book takes the most conservative approach possible, listing 62 language families (including some Mesoamerican families) that have no identifiable relationship. More than half of these families represent genetically isolated single languages. This concept is based on a qualitatively new level of knowledge about most North American languages ​​compared to Sapir's time: during the 1960-1970s, detailed comparative historical work was carried out on all nuclear families of North America. This work has continued actively over the past two decades. "Consensus Classification" was published in Volume 17 (Languages ) fundamentalHandbook of North American Indians (ed. A. Goddard, 1996). This classification, with minor modifications, repeats the 1979 classification, also representing 62 genetic families.

The first detailed classification of South American languages ​​was proposed in 1935 by the Czech linguist C. Loukotka. This classification includes 113 language families. Subsequently, much work on the classification of Amazonian languages ​​was carried out by the Brazilian linguist A. Rodriguez. One of the most modern and conservative classifications belongs to T. Kaufman (1990).

Linguistic diversity and linguistic-geographical features of America. American linguist R. Austerlitz formulated an extremely important observation: America is characterized by a much higher genetic density than Eurasia. The genetic density of a particular territory is the number of genetic associations represented in this territory, divided by the area of ​​this territory. The area of ​​North America is several times smaller than the area of ​​Eurasia, and the number of language families in America, on the contrary, is much greater. This idea was developed in more detail by J. Nichols (1990, 1992); According to her data, the genetic density of Eurasia is about 1.3, while in North America it is 6.6, in Mesoamerica it is 28.0, and in South America it is 13.6. Moreover, there are areas in America with particularly high genetic density. These are, in particular, California and the northwestern coast of the United States. This area is an example of a "closed linguistic zone" with high linguistic diversity. Confined zones usually occur under specific geographic conditions; factors contributing to their occurrence are the ocean coasts, mountains, other insurmountable obstacles, as well as favorable climatic conditions. California and the northwest coast, sandwiched between the mountains and the ocean, fit these criteria perfectly; It is not surprising that genetic density here reaches record levels (in California 34.1). On the contrary, the center of North America (the Great Plains area) is an “extended zone”, only a few families are common there, occupying a fairly large area, the genetic density is 2.5.The Settlement of America and the Prehistory of Indian Languages. The settlement of America occurred through Beringia, the zone of the modern Bering Strait. However, the question of the time of settlement remains debatable. One point of view, based on archaeological evidence and dominant for a long time, is that the main prehistoric population migrated to America 12-20 thousand years ago. Recently, more and more evidence has been accumulating about a completely different scenario. Among this evidence there is also linguistic evidence. Thus, J. Nichols believes that the extreme linguistic diversity of America can be explained in two ways. If we adhere to the hypothesis of one wave of migration, then at least 50 thousand years must have passed since this wave to achieve the current level of genetic diversity. If we insist on a later start of migration, then the existing diversity can only be explained by a series of migrations; in the latter case, we have to assume that genetic diversity was transferred from the Old World to the New. It is most likely that both are true, i.e. that the settlement of America began very early and occurred in waves. In addition, archaeological, genetic and linguistic evidence suggests that the bulk of the proto-American population migrated not from the depths of Eurasia, but from the Pacific region.Major families of Indian languages. The largest language families in America are listed below. We will consider them, gradually moving from north to south. In this case, we will not make a distinction between living and dead languages.Family on the Dene (Na-Dene) includes the Tlingit and Eyak-Athabascan languages. The latter are divided into the Eyak language and the rather compact Athabaskan (Athabaskan ~ Athapaskan) family, which includes about 30 languages. Athabascan languages ​​are spoken in three areas. Firstly, they occupy one massif of inland Alaska and almost the entire western part of Canada. The ancestral homeland of the Athabaskans is located in this area. The second Athabascan range is Pacific: these are several enclaves in the states of Washington, Oregon and northern California. Third Area languages ​​are common in the southwestern United States. The South Athabascan languages, otherwise called Apache, are closely related. These include the largest North American language in terms of number of speakers, Navajo.(cm. NAVAJO).Sapir attributed the Haida language to Na-Dene, but after repeated testing this hypothesis was rejected by most experts, and today Haida is considered an isolate.Salish (Salishan) family is distributed compactly in southwestern Canada and northwestern USA. This family contains about 23 languages ​​and is divided into five continental groups and four coastal groups: Central Salish, Tsamos, Bella Coola and Tillamook. There are no proven external connections of the Salish family to date.. Vakash family (Wakashan) is common on the coast of British Columbia and on Vancouver Island. It includes two branches: northern (Kwakiutl) and southern (Nutkan). Each branch includes three languages.Algskaya (Algic) family consists of three branches. One of them is the traditionally distinguished Algonquian family, distributed in the center and east of the continent. The other two branches are the Wiyot and Yurok languages, located in a completely different area in northern California. The relationship of the Wiyot and Yurok languages ​​(sometimes called Ritwan) with the Algonquian languages ​​has long been questioned, but is now recognized by many experts. The question of the ancestral home of the Alg family in the west, in the center or in the east of the continent remains open. The Algonquian family includes about 30 languages ​​and occupies almost all of eastern and central Canada, as well as the entire region around the Great Lakes (except Iroquoian territory,see below ) and the northern part of the Atlantic coast of the United States (as far as North Carolina in the south). Among the Algonquian languages, a compact group of closely related Eastern Algonquian languages ​​stands out. Other languages ​​hardly form groups within the Algonquian family, but come directly from the common Algonquian “root”. Some Algonquian languages ​​- Blackfoot, Cheyenne, Arapaho - spread particularly far west into the prairie region.Siouan (Siouan) family includes about two dozen languages ​​and occupies a compact spot of the main part of the prairie range, as well as several enclaves on the Atlantic coast and in the southeastern United States. The Catawba and Wahkon languages ​​(southeastern United States) are now considered to be a distant group of the Siouan family. The remaining Siouan languages ​​are divided into four groups: the southeastern, Mississippi Valley, upper Missouri, and Mandan groups. The largest group is the Mississippi group, which in turn is divided into four subgroups: Dhegiha, Chiwere, Winnebago and Dakota(cm. DAKOTA).The Siouan languages ​​are probably related to the Iroquoian and Caddoan languages. Other previously proposed Siouan family affiliations are considered unproven or erroneous; The Yuchi language is considered an isolate.Iroquois (Iroquoian) family has about 12 languages. The Iroquoian family has a binary structure: the southern group consists of one Cherokee language, all other languages ​​are included in the northern group. Northern languages ​​are common in the area of ​​Lakes Erie, Huron and Ontario and along the St. Lawrence River, as well as further south on the Atlantic coast of the United States. Cherokee is even further to the southwest.Caddoan (Caddoan) family includes five languages ​​that occupy a chain of north-south enclaves in the prairie area. The Caddo language is farther apart from the other Caddoan languages ​​than they are from each other. The kinship of the Caddoan and Iroquois families is now considered practically proven.Muskogean (Muskogean) family includes about 7 languages ​​and occupies a compact region in the extreme southeastern United States east of the lower Mississippi, including Florida. The hypothesis about the unification of the Muskogean languages ​​with four other languages ​​of the same area under the name of the Gulf macrofamily, proposed by M. Haas, has now been rejected; these four languages ​​(Natchez, Atakapa, Chitimasha, and Tunica) are considered isolates.Kiowa-Tanoan (Kiowa-Tanoan) family includes the Kiowa language of the southern prairie region and three languages ​​of the Southwestern United States representing the Pueblo culture (along with Keres languages, a Uto-Aztecan Hopi language, and a Zuni isolate).

The so-called “Penutian” macrofamily, proposed at the beginning of the 20th century. Kroeber and Dixon, is extremely problematic and as a whole is not recognized by specialists. Within the “Penutian” association, the most encouraging connections are between the Klamath language, the Molala language (both in Oregon) and the Sahaptin languages ​​(Oregon, Washington); this association is called the “Penutian languages ​​of the Plateau” (4 languages). Another relationship that is considered as a reliable genetic connection within the framework of the “Penutian” association is the unity of the Miwok family (7 languages) and the Costanoan family (8 languages); This association is called the “Utian” family and is located in northern California. In total, the hypothetical “Penutian” association, in addition to the two already named, includes 9 more families: Tsimshian family (2 languages), Shinuk family (3 languages), Alsey family (2 languages), Siuslau language, Kus family (2 languages), Takelma -Kalapuyan family (3 languages), Vintuan family (2 languages), Maiduan family (3 languages) and Yokuts family (at least 6 languages). Sapir also attributed the Cayuse language (Oregon) and the “Mexican Penutian” family Mihe-Soke and the Huave language to the Penutian macrofamily.

Kochimi-Yumanskaya (Cochim-Yuman) family is common in the border region between the United States and Mexico. The Cochimi languages ​​are found in central Baja California, and the Yuman family of ten languages ​​is found in western Arizona, southern California, and northern Baja California. The Yuman family was classified as a “Hokan” macrofamily. Now the Kochimi-Yuman family is considered as the core of this hypothetical association. The most likely genetic connections between the Cochimi-Yuman languages ​​and the Pomoan languages ​​spoken in northern California (the Pomoan family includes seven languages). According to modern ideas, the “Khokan” association is as unreliable as the Penutian one; in addition to those already mentioned, it includes 8 independent families: the Seri language, the Washo language, the Salin family (2 languages), the Yana languages, the Palainihan family (2 languages), the Shastani family (4 languages), the Chimariko language and the Karok language. Sapir also included Yakhik Esselen and the now extinct Chumash family, which included several languages, among the Khokan languages.Uto-Aztecan (Uto-Aztecan) family largest in the western United States and Mexico. There are about 22 Uto-Aztecan languages ​​in the United States. These languages ​​fall into five main groups: Nama, Tak, Tubatulabal, Hopi and Tepiman. A number of other groups are represented in Mexico, including the Aztec languages(cm . AZTEC LANGUAGES).Uto-Aztecan languages ​​occupy the entire Great Basin of the United States and large areas of northwestern and central Mexico. The Comanche language is common in the southern prairie region. Numerous external connections of the Uto-Aztecan languages ​​proposed in the literature are unreliable.

The last two families considered are partly located in Mexico. Next we come to families that are represented exclusively in Mesoamerica.

Otomangean (Otomanguean) family has many dozens of languages ​​and is spoken primarily in central Mexico. The seven groups within the Otomanguean family are Amusgo, Chiapanec-Mangue, Chinanteco, Mixteco, Otomi-Pame, Popolocan and Zapotec.Totonac (Totonacan) family is distributed in east-central Mexico and includes two branches: Totonac and Tepehua. The Totonac family includes about a dozen languages.Mihye-soke family (Mixe-Zoque) is widespread in southern Mexico and includes about two dozen languages. The two main branches of this family are the Mihe and the Soke.Mayan family (Mayan) The largest family of the south of Mexico, Guatemala and Belize. There are currently between 50 and 80 Mayan languages.Cm . MAYAN LANGUAGES.Misumalpan (Misumalpan) family includes four languages, located in El Salvador, Nicaragua and Honduras. Perhaps this family is genetically related to the Chibchan (see below ). Chibchanskaya (Chibchan) language family is transitional between the languages ​​of Mesoamerica and South America. Related languages ​​are spoken in Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela and Colombia. The Chibchan family includes 24 languages.

The further families under consideration are strictly South American, although some of them have peripheral representatives in Central America.

Arawakan (Arawakan), or Maipurean, family is distributed throughout almost all of South America, a number of Central American countries down to Guatemala, and all the islands of the Caribbean, including Cuba. The center of gravity of this family, however, is in the western Amazon. The Arawak family consists of five main branches: central, eastern, northern (including the Caribbean, Interior and Wapishana groups), southern (including the Bolivia-Paran, Campa and Purus groups) and western.Caribbean(Ká riban) the main family of northern South America. (We emphasize that the Caribbean group mentioned in the previous paragraph does not refer to this family, but to the Arawakan. This homonymy arose due to the fact thatá Ribi peoples from the mainland conquered the Arawak peoples of the islands and in some cases transferred their self-name to them. TOá The Ribi family includes 43 languages.

In western Amazonia (roughly the same place as the Arawak family) the languages ​​are found

Tucanoan (Tuká noan) family. This family includes 14 languages.

The Andean region contains languages

Quechuan(Quechuan) and Aymaran (Aymaran) families. The great languages ​​of South America, Quechua and Aymara, belong to these families. The Quechuan family includes several Quechua languages, which in other terminology are called dialects(cm. QUECHUA).Aymaran family, or Khaki (Jaquí ), consists of two languages, one of which is Aymaraá (cm. AIMAR Á).Many experts suggest that these two families are related and form the Kechumara macrofamily; other linguists explain the similarities by borrowings.

Located in the southern foothills of the Andes

Panoan (Panoan) family. It is divided into eight branches, named according to geography (eastern, north-central, etc.), and includes 28 languages.

There is a family in eastern Brazil

same (Je), which includes 13 languages. There is a hypothesis that languagessame together with another 12 small families (from 1 to 4 languages ​​​​each) form a macrofamilymacro. TO macro include, in particular, the Chiquitano language, the Bororoan family, the Mashakali family, the Caraj languagesá and etc.

Along the periphery of the macro-area, i.e. actually distributed throughout Brazil and surrounding areas

Tupian(Tup ian ) macrofamily. It includes about 37 languages. The Tupian macrofamily includes the core Tupi-Guarani family, which consists of eight branches: Guaranian, Guarayu, Tupian proper, Tapirape, Cayabi, Parintintin, Camayura and Tukunyape. The Guarani branch includes, in particular, one of the great South American languages ​​- the Paraguayan Guarani language(cm. GUARANI).In addition to the Tupi-Guarani languages, the Tupi union includes eight more separate languages ​​(their genetic status has not been definitively established).Sociolinguistic information. American Indian languages ​​are extremely diverse in their sociolinguistic characteristics. The current state of Indian languages ​​developed under the conditions of European colonization and subsequent existence as languages ​​of ethnic minorities. Nevertheless, in the current state, reflexes of the social and demographic situation that took place in the pre-colonial period are clearly visible. There are many individual differences in the modern sociolinguistic status of Indian languages, but there are features common to entire areas. In this sense, it is convenient to consider North America, Mesoamerica and South America each separately.

Despite the high linguistic genetic density of North America, population density during the pre-contact period was low. Most estimates of the Indian population before colonization are in the region of 1 million. Indian tribes, as a rule, did not number more than a few thousand people. This situation continues today: Indians represent very small minorities in the United States and Canada. However, there are several tribes whose numbers number in the tens of thousands: Navajo, Dakota, Cree, Ojibwa, Cherokee. Many other tribes within 18

– 20th centuries disappeared completely (as a result of genocide, epidemics, assimilation) or survived as ethnic groups, but lost their language. According to the data of A. Goddard (based, in turn, on information from M. Krauss, B. Grimes, and others), 46 Indian and Eskimo-Aleut languages ​​have been preserved in North America, which continue to be acquired by a fairly large number of children as native languages. In addition, there are 91 languages ​​that are spoken by a fairly large number of adults, and 72 languages ​​that only a few older people speak. Another 120 or so languages ​​that were somehow recorded have disappeared. Almost all North American Indians speak English (or French or Spanish). In the last one or two decades, vigorous efforts have been made by Indians and linguists in a number of places in the United States and Canada to revive indigenous languages.

The populous Mayan and Aztec empires were destroyed by the conquistadors, but the descendants of these empires number in the hundreds of thousands. These are the Masahua languages ​​(250-400 thousand, Oto-Manguean family, Mexico), Eastern Huastec Nahuatl (more than 400 thousand, Uto-Aztecan family, Mexico), Mayan Qeqchi languages ​​(280 thousand, Guatemala), West-central Quiche ( more than 350 thousand, Guatemala), Yucatecan (500 thousand, Mexico). The average number of Mesoamerican speakers is an order of magnitude higher than in North America.

In South America, the linguistic situation is extremely polarized. On the one hand, the vast majority of languages ​​have a very small number of speakers - several thousand, hundreds or even tens of people. Many languages ​​have disappeared, and this process is not slowing down. Thus, in most of the largest language families, from a quarter to half of the languages ​​have already become extinct. However, the population speaking indigenous languages ​​is estimated at between 11 and 15 million people. This is due to the fact that several South American languages ​​became interethnic for entire groups of Indian tribes, and subsequently a means of self-identification for Indians (regardless of their specific ethnic origin) or even entire countries. As a result, Indian languages ​​acquired official status in a number of states.

(cm. QUECHUA; AYMARA; GUARANI).Typological features. For all the genetic diversity of the languages ​​of the Americas, it is clear that very few generalizations can be made about the structural features of these languages. Most often, as a constitutive feature of the “American” language type,polysynthetism , i.e. a large number of morphemes per word on average (compared to the interlingual “standard”). Polysynthetism is a characteristic not of any words, but only of verbs. The essence of this grammatical phenomenon is that many meanings, often expressed in the languages ​​of the world as part of names and functional parts of speech, are expressed in polysynthetic languages ​​as part of a verb. The result is long verb forms containing many morphemes, and other parts of the sentence are not as obligatory as in European-style languages ​​(Boas spoke of the “word-sentence” in North American languages). Sapir gave the following example of a verbal form from the Californian Yana language (Sapir 1929/Sapir 1993: 414): yabanaumawildjigummaha"nigi "let us, each [of us], really move west across the stream." The structure of this form is: ya-(some .people.move); banauma- (all); dji- (to.west); nigi (we). In the Iroquois Mohawk language, the word ionsahahnekúntsienhte means “he scooped up water again” (an example from the work of M. Mitun). The morphemic analysis of this word is as follows: i- (through); ons- (again); a- (past); ha- (masculine unit agent); hnek- (liquid);ó ntsien- (get.water); ht- (causative); e" (precision).

Most of the largest language families in North America have a pronounced tendency towards polysyntheticism: Na-Dene, Algonquian, Iroquoian, Siouan, Caddoan, Mayan. Some other families, especially in the western and southern parts of the continent, are closer to the typological average and are characterized by moderate synthetism. Polysynthesis is also characteristic of many languages ​​of South America.

One of the main aspects of polysynthetism is the presence of indicators of arguments in the verb; such are the morpheme -nigi "we" in Yana and ha- "he" in Mohawk. These indicators encode not only the internal features of the arguments themselves (person, number, gender), but also their role in predication (agent, patient, etc.). Thus, role meanings, which in languages ​​like Russian are expressed by cases as part of names, are expressed in polysynthetic languages ​​as part of the verb. J. Nichols formulated an important typological opposition between vertex/dependent marking: if in a language like Russian, role relationships are marked on dependent elements (names), then in a language like Mohawk on the vertex element (verb). Indicators of arguments in a verb are traditionally interpreted in American studies as pronouns incorporated into the verb. To describe this phenomenon, Jelinek proposed the concept of “pronominal arguments”: in languages ​​of this type, the true arguments of the verb are not independent nominal word forms, but associated pronominal morphemes as part of the verb. Nominal word forms in this case are considered as “adjuncts” to pronominal arguments. Many Indian languages ​​are characterized by the incorporation into the verb of not only pronominal morphemes, but also nominal roots, especially corresponding to the semantic roles of patient and place.

Using the material of Indian languages, an active sentence construction was discovered for the first time. Activity a phenomenon alternative to ergativity and accusativity

(cm . LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY).In an active construction, both agent and patient are encoded regardless of the transitivity of the verb. The active model is characteristic, in particular, of such language families as Pomoan, Siouan, Caddoan, Iroquois, Muskogean, Keres, etc. in North America, and for the Tupian languages ​​in South America. The concept of active languages, which belongs to G.A. Klimov, is largely based on these Indian languages.

Indian languages ​​significantly influenced the development of word order typology. Studies of basic word order routinely cite data from South American languages ​​to illustrate rare orders. Yes, in

á in the Ribi language of Khishkaryana, according to the description of D. Derbyshire, the basic order is “object predicate subject” (very rare in the languages ​​of the world). The material of Indian languages ​​also played a big role in the development of the typology of pragmatic word order. For example, R. Tomlin and R. Rhodes found that in Ojibwa Algonquian the most neutral order is the opposite of that common in European languages: thematic information comes after non-thematic information. M. Mitun, relying on the material of polysynthetic languages ​​with pronominal arguments, proposed not to consider the basic order as a universally applicable characteristic; indeed, if noun phrases are merely appendices to pronominal arguments, then their order should hardly be considered an important characteristic of the language.

Another feature of a number of Indian languages ​​is the opposition between the proximal (near) and obviative (distant) third person. The most famous system of this type is found in the Algonquian languages. Noun phrases are explicitly marked as referring to a proximate or obviative person; this choice is made on discursive grounds; a person known or close to the speaker is usually chosen as proximate. Further, on the basis of the difference between two third persons in a number of Indian languages, the grammatical category of inverse is built. Thus, in Algonquian languages ​​there is a personal hierarchy: 1st, 2nd person > 3rd proximate person > 3rd obviative person. In transitive predications, the agent may be higher than the patient in this hierarchy, and then the verb is marked as a direct form, and if the agent is lower than the patient, then the verb is marked as inverse.

Andrey Kibrik LITERATURE Berezkin Yu.E., Borodatova A.A., Istomin A.A., Kibrik A.A.Indian languages . In the book: American ethnology. Study guide (in print)
Klimov G.A. Typology of active languages . M., 1977

There are about 7,469 languages ​​in the world as of 2015. But which one is the most common among them? According to the well-known Ethnologue directory, which is developed and published in printed and electronic form by the international non-profit organization SIL International, the list of the most common languages ​​in the world (by number of speakers) is as follows.

Malay

Malay (including Indonesian) is a language that includes several related languages ​​spoken on the island of Sumatra, the Malay Peninsula, the coastal regions of Borneo, Indonesia and Thailand. Speaks it 210 million Human. It is the official language of Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia and one of the four official languages ​​of Singapore, as well as the working language of the Philippines and East Timor.


Bengali is in ninth place in the ranking of the most widely spoken languages ​​in the world. It is the official language of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and the Indian states of West Bengal, Assam and Tripura. It is spoken in parts of the Indian states of Jharkhand, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh, as well as the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. It is the second most spoken language in India. Total number of speakers in the world - 210 million Human.


French is the official language of France and 28 other countries (Belgium, Burundi, Guinea, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Republic of the Congo, Vanuatu, Senegal, etc.), spoken by about 220 million Human. It is the official and administrative language of many communities and international organizations, such as the European Union (one of the six official languages), the International Olympic Committee, the United Nations and others.


Portuguese is a language spoken by more than 250 million people living in Portugal and former Portuguese colonies: Brazil, Mozambique, Angola, Cape Verde, Guinea-Bissau, Sao Tome, Principe, East Timor and Macau. In all these countries it is the official language. Also common in the United States of America, France, South Africa, Bermuda, the Netherlands, Barbados and Ireland. It is one of the official languages ​​of the European Union and other international organizations.


Russian is the official language of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Widely distributed in Ukraine, Latvia and Estonia. To a lesser extent in countries that were part of the Soviet Union. It is one of the six official languages ​​of the United Nations and the most widely spoken language in Europe. All people in the world speak Russian 290 million Human.


Hindi is the official language of India and Fiji, spoken 380 million people, predominantly in the central and northern regions of India. In the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan and the capital Delhi, Hindi is the official language of government and the main language of instruction in schools. It is also common in Nepal, Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Suriname, the Republic of Mauritius and the Caribbean islands.


The fourth place in the ranking of the most popular languages ​​in the world is Arabic. It is the official language of all Arab countries, as well as Israel, Chad, Eritrea, Djibouti, Somalia, Comoros and the unrecognized state of Somaliland. It is spoken all over the world 490 million Human. Classical Arabic (the language of the Quran) is the liturgical language of 1.6 billion Muslims and one of the official languages ​​of the United Nations.


Spanish or Castilian is a language that originated in the medieval kingdom of Castile in what is now Spain and spread during the Age of Discovery primarily to North and South America, as well as parts of Africa and Asia. It is the official language of Spain and 20 other countries (Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Chile, Cuba, Panama, Peru, etc.). Total Spanish spoken in the world 517 million people. It is also used as an official and working language by many international organizations, including the European Union, the United Nations, the Union of South American Nations, etc.


English is the official language of Great Britain, the USA, Ireland, Canada, Malta, Australia, New Zealand, as well as some Asian countries. It is widespread in parts of the Caribbean, Africa and South Asia. In total, English is the official language of almost 60 sovereign states and many global and regional international organizations. The total number of speakers in the world is 840 million Human.


The most widely spoken language in the world is Mandarin, known as Putonghua or Mandarin, a group of Chinese dialects spoken in the north and southwest of China. It is the official language of the People's Republic of China, Taiwan and Singapore. In addition, it is common in places where the Chinese diaspora lives: Malaysia, Mozambique, Mongolia, the Asian part of Russia, Singapore, the USA, Taiwan and Thailand. According to the Ethnologue reference book, this language is spoken 1.030 million people.

Share on social media networks



Did you like the article? Share with your friends!