What is hazing in the army? Hazing and hazing

I didn’t write anywhere that this is the norm.

I would like to be wrong and be happy for Lithuania, but the situation is a little more complicated than it seems. Perhaps you've heard of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

Volunteers selected not from criminals, but randomly selected healthy socially adjusted adults were randomly divided into guards and prisoners. So a third of the guards showed sadistic tendencies. This is the result closed society(barracks position in the army) and imposed social role(subordinate soldiers and soldiers, one way or another appointed to control and restore order). Second, i.e. the appointment of "guards" is optional.

In any team (medium and large) there are people who take pleasure in showing aggression towards others. In any team there are people with weak will, for whom it is easier to endure than to enter into conflict.

I asked and talked with my fellow soldiers, so imagine, they also believe that there was no hazing. But this does not mean that it really did not exist.

There are two rules. What doesn't concern you, you don't notice. What may torment your conscience, but you cannot change, you do not notice. If people’s psyches did not have such a property, they would quickly burn out emotionally. This is what happens to those who are professionally obliged to notice. It is a medically documented fact, not in Russia alone, but everywhere, and initially studied in Britain and the USA, that doctors, teachers, and police officers suffer from burnout syndrome.

You don’t pay attention, but aggression, pressure on the weak, is everywhere. The fact that people don't notice this in schools, for example, which everyone goes through, is sad. When your neighbor teased the fat, weak-willed boy in your class, that was what would later become “hazing” in the army.

When the USSR began conscripting criminals into the army, this did not give birth to hazing, but made its forms criminal.

As long as it does not take criminal forms, we simply do not notice it and do not understand it. In our unit, for example, no one noticed anything special and no one thought that anyone was doing anything criminal. Well, yes, ordinary stupid jokes, ordinary stupid half-joking attacks, demands, the strong one will simply smile and send, and then answer Vitas’ question - “we had nothing, what are you talking about?” But we got a weak one, and everything was bad in his family, he couldn’t stand it and shot himself. It turned out that what was ordinary was criminal.

Regarding history, returning to criminals and the USSR, in general, violence is like everyday life They were born in the army before the Red Army itself. Open the encyclopedia of Russian life" Quiet Don" - how Grigory begins to serve in the army. I think there are plenty of other examples, this is the first thing that comes to mind.

Comments:

The phenomenon of hazing in the army is not considered uncommon, despite the fact that the state is doing everything possible to combat it. It is generally accepted that hazing arose absolutely groundlessly and instantly took on a total character. The state has not yet been able to fully cope with the phenomenon; now you can often find information in electronic and printed sources about the problems identified in military units hazing, that “grandfathers” beat up recruits.

It was hazing that became one of the main reasons in Russia that evasion from the army became widespread. Despite attempts by state and municipal media to hush up the facts of the death of recruits at the hands of “grandfathers,” information about the crimes is disseminated thanks to committees of soldiers’ mothers. Today government bodies They do their best to convince conscripts and their parents that there is no hazing, but the effect of this is exactly the opposite.

About the history of the issue

Individual cases of hazing exist and, it seems, will remain in the ranks of the Armed Forces for some time to come. long time. What should new recruits do? In such situations, professional lawyers recommend acting strictly within the law, which provides for criminal liability for hazing. Whether hazing is eradicated or not is also quite controversial issue. There are three points of view on the emergence of the unofficial institution and culture of “grandfathers” in the army, which claim that hazing is:

a natural phenomenon in modern society;
the results of mistakes and miscalculations of the leadership of the Armed Forces;
coincidence of circumstances.

But the versions of experts and sociologists do not make it any easier for the conscript. It is generally accepted that hazing appeared in the Red Army during the years of Khrushchev’s “thaw”. Initially, it was only the responsibility of the recruits to hard work, but then the “grandfathers” improved and outright bullying of the old-timers began over the new recruits.

The question of how to deal with such a phenomenon has social, psychological, economic, historical aspects. As long as military service is mandatory and the Russian Armed Forces do not switch to a contract basis, manifestations of hazing will remain. In Russia, it is positioned that the army is almost 100% contract, but every year tens of thousands of young people are drafted into it, presented by law with a fact: they must give military duty to the state.

IN educational institutions there are also hazing relationships between students and older children transfer the experience to adult life and into the army. Continuity of traditions, even negative ones, is a powerful factor. A soldier who has endured the bullying of old-timers, having risen to the rank of “grandfather,” in most cases begins to mock the new recruits himself. Now the cult of hazing is maintained due to the fact that in the army it is customary to despise “informers.” If a soldier who cannot bear the bullying submits a report in an attempt to protect himself from hazing, this document is often “lost” within the unit, and the young man receives a large portion of bullying, including physical violence.

Hazing economic relations can still be found in the Armed Forces today. No one will be surprised by soldiers working in farmers' fields or guarding a private person's dacha. From time to time, the military prosecutor's office reveals such facts, the perpetrators are held accountable, and after a while the media reports about new offenses. It is impossible to say that the military prosecutor's office and committees of soldiers' mothers are inactive. The widespread legal education of conscripts also played an important role in reducing the level of hazing. But there is a problem of hazing. A long-standing decision by the authorities to attract prisoners from prisons made a significant contribution to its emergence. During the Great Patriotic War this was a necessary step, but the military personnel also brought with them the subculture of the zone, which acquired the features of hazing by the time of Khrushchev’s “thaw”, and during the years of perestroika and the collapse of the USSR reached its peak.

Return to contents

What happened before?

It is paradoxical that in pre-revolutionary Russia- until the reign of Alexander I - was the most brutal system punishment of soldiers, but there was no hazing, as well as fraternities, which are more often mistaken for one of the forms of hazing. Some regiments were recruited on the basis of nationality or religion, which did not allow discrimination to flourish, especially since the word “nation” did not exist for the tsarist military. The soldier took the oath in the presence of a priest, rabbi, or mullah on a book revered by his religion, and this officially ended all issues related to nationality.
Military service lasted 25 years in war conditions, which left its mark on the relations between soldiers. The unspoken title of “grandfather” was honorable, but “for doing injustice to recruits” there was at least execution, and at maximum hard labor. The first glimpses of hazing began to appear closer to the revolution - among officers. The title “grandfather” secretly gave older students at the institutions where cadets were trained to look after the younger ones, but the phenomenon quickly developed into bullying.

Return to contents

Either remain silent or defend yourself

The army is a traditionally closed community, and one of the reasons why there is hazing is the forced service. The reduction in the level of hazing was greatly influenced by the fact that today soldiers are provided cellular communication and at any time they can inform their relatives about the real situation. There is another strict pattern: the lower the level of social and living conditions in the unit, the higher the hazing. If military personnel are forced to perform chores that have nothing to do with the goals of their service, then these tasks, as a rule, are transferred to recruits.

Some military personnel strenuously explain that hazing and hazing are two different things. Commanders try to hide the facts of hazing, because their detection will bring them reduction or removal of military ranks and criminal liability. And as a result, new recruits are faced with the fact that, having received a transfer or money transfer from their relatives, they must take “greetings from home” to the old-timers, and they will take from it whatever they see fit.

Today I will tell you whether there is hazing in the army. Before answering this question, I will explain what is hazing in the army, and what is hazing.

Hazing in the army- this is the process of training by old-timers (military personnel more than early date conscription) or in other words, “grandfathers” of the young recruits. And hazing relationships in the army are relationships between soldiers who grossly violate the requirements of the regulations and are usually a violation of the law with all the ensuing consequences.

Hazing in the army today - myth or reality?

As you understand, hazing in the army and hazing in the army are completely different things. Hazing is when young recruits arrive, and “grandfathers” or so-called “demobilization”, servicemen of a more senior conscription begin to teach them, for example, how to walk correctly, talk correctly, address elders military rank etc. That is, there is a smooth formation of a military man and, strictly speaking, from this.

Hazing in the army and hazing in the army

Hazing in the army has nothing to do with what you can see, for example, on YouTube by entering it in the search films about hazing in the army. All you see there is hazing in the army.

When you join the army, you are, accordingly, a recruit. You meet half-year students - these are the same soldiers, but they have already served for six months, the so-called “elephants”. In the general understanding, hazing is when a so-called old-timer begins to humiliate him physically or mentally young soldier.

Useful information for conscripts:

How many days, hours, minutes are left until your demobilization?

But, fortunately, today this problem in the army has generally been eliminated. Therefore, if mothers or young people who are just about to join the army are reading me, remember: there is no hazing in the army!

Now the difference between the grandfathers and the new addition is only six months. Hazing in the army appears because servicemen in the army live in a male group and, of course, they may have disagreements. These disagreements arise absolutely various reasons, even for household purposes. So don’t think that the entire army is built on the fact that grandfathers show their superiority over young soldiers.

Many people think that this is what hazing looks like in the army. But that's not true!

In the general understanding, hazing is when an old soldier beats a young soldier (the so-called “spirit”). Of course, a lot depends on the people, and in every military collective there are such “rotten” soldiers who begin to tell what kind of “grandfather” he is and how long he served.

But in fact, given his current service life, what kind of “grandfather” can he be? He served 4-5 months more than the young soldier. But still, mostly more or less adequate young people serve in the army, for whom honor and decency are not empty words, and, accordingly, they do not behave like that.

Young people, now I am turning to you, remember, no matter what the situation, always keep your head cool. Don’t let your emotions get the better of you, because this momentary weakness of yours (the desire to hit someone) can lead to irreversible consequences.

Keep in mind that military people, in particular conscripts, and all their actions are multiplied by three. If in civilian life you hit someone in the face, and even if he writes a statement against you to the police, then you will receive a maximum administrative punishment.

In the army, this is all multiplied by three, if you hit a soldier and he wrote a report on you, then you will 100% be put in the so-called “diesel” - a disciplinary battalion (disbat), where you can serve a year, a year and a half, or a maximum of two years. And this momentary weakness can lead to such disastrous consequences.

Therefore, it is better to send such an opponent to three Russian letters than to bite your elbows later. To summarize, I would like to say once again: there is no hazing as such. There are conflicts on household level and not entirely adequate soldiers from the senior conscription who think that they are mega cool soldiers.

Also, what I wanted to say in this article: in the army there is hazing and hazing. Only hazing is good concept, the process of training young recruits, hazing in the army - this is any situation that violates military regulations or laws and can lead to bad consequences.

The activities of the Russian Armed Forces are subject to the laws of the State. Federal laws, Statutes, regulations and directives cannot contradict the Constitution of the country. Citizens are obliged to defend their Motherland, and the State, in turn, guarantees every person his rights and freedoms, including the protection of honor and dignity. The army is a heterogeneous group, whose members differ in nationality and religion. Different level education and upbringing leads to inevitable conflicts of interest. Differences military collective from civilians is that after working hours, civilians go home, and military personnel can spend time together intended for relaxation.

Pay attention! Relations within the military collective depend on strict adherence to the Charter, which regulates the rules of behavior and communication between equal and unequal people by rank and positions.

Hazing relationships between military personnel lead to team disunity and a decrease in the effectiveness of unit interaction.

The concept of hazing

A team is a complex organism that develops according to its own laws. Cohesive groups of people perform assigned tasks with the greatest efficiency, while internal disunity leads to sabotage of orders, interferes with the passage of signals along the vertical of power, and makes feedback difficult.

The situation in army collectives is complicated by the presence of a strict hierarchy, not only the one defined by the Charter, but also an informal one, where the leader becomes a person endowed with physical strength, subjugated more weak people. Any relationship that runs counter to the requirements of the Charter can be called non-statutory. The most striking manifestation of a violation of the statutory rules of relations in the army is:

Hazing - discrimination is manifested on the basis of length of service.
Fellowship - implies the creation of groupings within the team based on the territorial basis of residence of employees before their conscription.

The group unites around an informal leader, and the followers understand on a subconscious level that failure to recognize the power of the leader will put them at a lower level and lead to pressure from the majority.

Forms of manifestation

Hazing relationships in the army are varied; their object is the life and health of military personnel, human dignity, property rights and violation of the rest regime.

The most common forms of manifestation of hazing:

beating;
bullying and mockery;
ridiculing features of appearance and physique;
discrimination on religious and national grounds;
blackmail and extortion;
creating unbearable conditions of service without the use of direct violence, but with threats of it;
physical and psychological pressure;
involvement in work not related to the performance of official duties;
coercion to refuse food;
unlawful seizure of funds and other material assets.

The reasons for illegal acts are the impunity of senior soldiers, the inability of young men who came from their families to join the army to stand up for themselves, indifference and the hushing up of incidents by a neutral part of the team.

Prevention of relations not according to the regulations in the RF Armed Forces

Responsibility for the state of the moral climate of the staff of a military unit is assigned to its commander and military leaders at all levels. Identification of hazing relationships consists of:

monitoring personnel;
conducting individual conversations with the risk group, explaining to military personnel their rights and the consequences of hazing;
conducting anonymous surveys;
implementation psychological testing team;
timely response of management to reports of violations of the Charter.

To prevent crime, the unit command must take measures aimed at improving relationships in the team, namely:

constantly monitor the moral and psychological situation in the unit;
have the skills to obtain reliable information about relationships between subordinates and the structure of subgroups;
have sufficient authority to influence the team as a whole and its individual groups, be able to counteract negative sentiments;
identify informal leaders, turn their organizational skills and others personal qualities for the benefit of the team;
maintain contact with relatives of subordinates;
distribute the load among all members of the unit, stop cases of shirking duties and shifting them to other military personnel;
not to allow the predominance of persons of the same nationality or religion in the unit, distributing them evenly among different departments;
identify individuals with obvious criminal tendencies.

All these measures, combined with regular participation in team sports games and other collective activities aimed at strengthening team spirit will lead to a decrease in the number of complaints about hazing in the ranks of the Armed Forces.

Legal liability

Responsibility for violation of the Charter in the unit entrusted to him falls on the immediate superior. For each case of hazing that resulted in harm to a serviceman, an investigation is carried out. The investigation not only identifies the person responsible for the violation legal rights military, but also determines the degree of responsibility of each leader.

contact the medical unit to record the beatings; each case of injury is subject to investigation;
file a complaint with your immediate commander;
file a complaint with relatives or human rights organizations;
notify about illegal actions colleagues, in writing;
call on hotline prosecutor's office, its telephone number must be indicated on the stands of the military unit;
request a transfer to another department.

Every precedent of an appeal by military personnel is checked. If facts of hazing are established, the perpetrators are subject to disciplinary action. If there are signs of a crime, the verification material is sent according to jurisdiction. Every person, regardless of his official position, has the right to defend his life and dignity by any legal means.
Share information about the moral climate in the unit. Are there cases of hazing, are they brought to the attention of the command. What methods does the unit’s leadership use to suppress violations? Ask questions in the comments block.

We all know how difficult it is in the Russian army because of the hazing that exists there. Some were simply beaten half to death, and some were even driven to suicide. Grandfathers mock recruits and the saddest thing is that all this happens with the permission of the officers. Also, the situation with hazing is getting worse from year to year due to national hatred within the army. Read more creepy stories soldiers who were victims of hazing. Not for the faint of heart.

Anton Porechkin. Athlete, national team member Trans-Baikal Territory in weightlifting. He served on Iturup Island (Kuril Islands), military unit 71436. On October 30, 2012, during the 4th month of service, he was beaten to death by drunken grandfathers. 8 blows with a mining shovel, little was left of the head.

Ruslan Aiderkhanov. From Tatarstan. Drafted into the army in 2011, he served in military unit 55062 in the Sverdlovsk region. Three months later he was returned to his parents like this:

Traces of beatings, a knocked out eye, broken limbs. According to the military, Ruslan caused all this to himself when he tried to hang himself on a tree not far from the unit.

Dmitry Bochkarev. From Saratov. On August 13, 2012, he died in the army after days of sadistic abuse by his colleague Ali Rasulov. The latter beat him, forced him to sit for a long time on half-bent legs with his arms extended forward, striking him if his position changed. Also, by the way, Sergeant Sivyakov mocked private Andrei Sychev in Chelyabinsk in 2006. Sychev then had both legs and genitals amputated, but he remained alive. But Dmitry was brought home in a coffin.

Before the army, Ali Rasulov studied at a medical school, so he decided to practice on Dmitry as a doctor: he cut him with nail scissors cartilage tissue from the nose, damaged during the beatings, he sewed up tears in the left ear with a household needle and thread. “I don’t know what came over me. I can say that Dmitry irritated me because he did not want to obey me,” Rasulov said at the trial.

Dmitry irritated him because he did not want to obey...

Taking into account the fact that Rasulov carried out sadistic experiments on the victim for 1.5 months and tortured her to death, the verdict Russian court a sadist should consider it ridiculous: 10 years in prison and 150 thousand rubles to the parents of the murdered person. Compensation type.

Alexander Cherepanov. From the village of Vaskino, Tuzhinsky district, Kirov region. Served in military unit 86277 in Mari El. In 2011, he was brutally beaten for refusing to deposit 1000 rubles. to the phone of one of the grandfathers. After which he hanged himself in the back room (according to another version, he was hanged dead in order to imitate suicide). In 2013, in this case he would have been sentenced to 7 years ml. Sergeant Peter Zavyalov. But not for murder, but under the articles “Extortion” and “Excess of Official Power”.

Nikolai Cherepanov, father of a soldier: “We sent this son to the army, but this is the kind of son he was returned to us...”
Nina Konovalova, grandmother: “I began to put a cross on him, I saw that he was covered in wounds, bruises, bruises, and his head was all broken...” Ali Rasulov, cutting out cartilage from Dima Bochkarev’s nose, did not know “what came over me.” And what happened to Peter Zavyalov, who for 1000 rubles. killed another Russian guy in the army - Sasha Cherepanov?

Roman Kazakov. From Kaluga region. In 2009 recruit of the 138th motorized rifle brigade (Leningrad region) Roma Kazakov was brutally beaten by contract soldiers. But apparently they overdid it. The beaten man lost consciousness. Then they decided to stage an accident. The soldier, they say, was asked to repair the car, but he died in the garage from exhaust fumes. They put Roman in the car, locked him in the garage, turned on the ignition, covered the car with an awning to guarantee... It turned out to be a gas van.

But Roman did not die. He was poisoned, fell into a coma, but survived. And after some time he spoke. The mother did not leave her son, who became disabled, for 7 months...

Larisa Kazakova, mother of a soldier: “At the prosecutor’s office I met with Sergei Ryabov (this is one of the contract soldiers - author’s note), and he said that they forced me to beat recruits. Battalion commander Bronnikov beat off my hands with a ruler, I have a criminal record, the conviction was not expunged until 2011, I could not act differently, and had to follow the battalion commander's order".

The case was closed, information about hematomas disappeared from the soldier’s medical documents, and the car (evidence) unexpectedly burned down a month later. The contract soldiers were fired, the battalion commander remained to serve further.

Roman Suslov. From Omsk. Drafted into the army on May 19, 2010. The photo below was taken at the station before boarding the train. He had a one and a half year old son. To the place of duty (Bikin, Khabarovsk region) didn't arrive. On May 20, he informed his family via SMS about abuse on the train by an officer and a warrant officer who accompanied the conscripts. On the morning of May 21 (the second day in the army) he sent an SMS: “They will kill me or leave me disabled.” May 22 - hanged himself (according to the military). There were signs of beatings on the body. Relatives demanded a re-examination of the causes of death. The military prosecutor's office refused.

Vladimir Slobodyannikov. From Magnitogorsk. Called up in 2012. Served in military unit 28331 in Verkhnyaya Pyshma (also in the Urals). At the very beginning of his service, he stood up for another young soldier who was being bullied. This caused the fierce hatred of grandfathers and officers. On July 18, 2012, after 2 months in the army, I called my sister and said: “Valya, I can’t do it anymore. They will kill me at night. That’s what the captain said.” That same evening he hanged himself in the barracks.

Pechenga, Murmansk region. 2013

200th motorized rifle brigade. Two Caucasians mock a Russian guy.

Unlike Caucasians, Russians, as always, are atomized. We are not in solidarity. They would rather mock the younger conscripts themselves than help someone during the lawlessness of national minorities. The officers also behave as they once did in tsarist army. “Dogs and lower ranks are not allowed to enter” there were signs in the parks of Kronstadt and St. Petersburg, i.e. the officers did not seem to consider themselves and the lower classes to be one nation. Then, of course, the sailors, without regret, drowned their nobles in the Gulf of Finland and cut them into pieces in 1917, but what changed?

Vyacheslav Sapozhnikov. From Novosibirsk. In January 2013, he jumped out of a 5th floor window, unable to withstand the bullying from the community of Tuvans in military unit 21005 (Kemerovo region). Tuvinians are a small people Mongoloid race in the south of Siberia. The current Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation S.K. Shoigu - also Tuvan.