Genuine periodic table with ether. But not everything is so simple and there are some things we don’t know

Alexey Zolotarev - Who falsified the “periodic table” and for what purpose?

Preface

Mendeleev had two fundamental scientific discoveries:

1 – Discovery of the Periodic Law in the substance of chemistry,

2 – Discovery of the relationship between the substance of chemistry and substance, namely: particles form molecules, nuclei, electrons, etc., but in chemical reactions do not participate.

The cell for Ether was located in the zero group with inert gases and in the zero row as the main system-forming factor for building the System of chemical elements.

After the death of Mendeleev, the table was distorted by removing and canceling the zero group, thereby hiding the fundamental discovery of conceptual significance.

Aether theory - forbidden physics

ISS No. 3 Interdisciplinary Conceptual Seminar

The water cycle in nature is a true lie

ISS No. 2 Interdisciplinary Conceptual Seminar

At the conclusion of his article, V. G. Rodionov writes:

“The world ether is the substance of EVERY chemical element and, therefore, EVERY substance; it is the Absolute true matter as the Universal element-forming Essence.

The world ether is the source and crown of the entire genuine Periodic Table, its beginning and end - the alpha and omega of Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev’s Periodic Table of Elements.”

Let's pay attention to the dates - in 1905, Einstein, who threw out the world description (and thereby ideologically concreted the Earth exclusively in the three-dimensional world), formulated private theory relativity, and a year later (in 1907) - the sudden death of Mendeleev and then, by special order, a hasty “cleansing” of his table from the cells of the elements of the “zero” etheric group.

What did you expect?.. That people wouldn’t get to the bottom of it?..

Well, for the record: I don’t presume to judge how reliable the following information is, but it is very interesting. Further on the link in the replicas is the Slavic semantics of linguistic elements genetic code G. S. Grinevich and the Periodic System of Linguistic Elements of the Genetic Code, combined with the Periodic System of Elements of D. I. Mendeleev. In accordance with this superposition, it turns out that H2 O is ice, and CO is soot. Our distant ancestors knew this table, so what happens...

IN early XIX centuries, the old word coal in Russian chemical literature was sometimes replaced by the word “ carbon"(Scherer, 1807; Severgin, 1815); Since 1824, Solovyov introduced the name "".

THE BASIS OF EVERYTHING is primary matter. PROVEN BY SCIENCE

The basis of the Universe is primary matter: Russian scientist Nikolai Levashov. He wrote fundamental works"Heterogeneous Universe", " Last call to humanity" and "Essence and Mind" where he explains in detail how planets, planetary systems, galaxies and universes are born from primary matter, or as scientists call it - Dark Matter.

If we continue to act within the existing theoretical laws physics, chemistry, biology, genetics, based on the analysis of only 10% of matter, this can lead to the complete destruction of the Earth's ecological system. But now there is a high-quality scientific theory which reflects 100% reality. This high-quality scientific theory is contained in the book “Heterogeneous Universe” by Nikolai Levashov, and every year the amount of experimental evidence confirming it is growing. If science follows this path, then our society will experience unprecedented prosperity in both science and culture!

* About Essence, Mind and much more... - official website amazing person, Russian scientist, healer, writer - academician Nikolai Levashov

The world ether is the substance of EVERY chemical element and, therefore, EVERY substance; it is the Absolute true matter as the Universal element-forming Essence.The world ether is the source and crown of the entire genuine Periodic Table, its beginning and end - the alpha and omega of the Periodic Table of Elements of Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev.

In ancient philosophy, ether (aithér-Greek), along with earth, water, air and fire, is one of the five elements of being (according to Aristotle) ​​- the fifth essence (quinta essentia - Latin), understood as the finest all-pervading matter. IN late XIX century, the hypothesis of a universal ether (ME) filling all of the world’s space became widely circulated in scientific circles. It was understood as a weightless and elastic liquid that permeates all bodies. They tried to explain many physical phenomena and properties by the existence of the ether.

Facts. Ether was in the original periodic table. The cell for Ether was located in the zero group with inert gases and in the zero row as the main system-forming factor for building the System of chemical elements. After Mendeleev's death, the table was distorted by removing Ether and eliminating the zero group, thereby hiding the fundamental discovery of conceptual significance.
In modern Ether tables: 1 - not visible, 2 - not guessable (due to the absence of a zero group).

Such purposeful forgery hinders the development of the progress of civilization.
Man-made disasters (eg Chernobyl and Fukushima) would have been avoided if adequate resources had been invested in a timely manner in the development of a genuine periodic table. Hiding conceptual knowledge goes to global level for the “lowering” of civilization.

Result. In schools and universities they teach a cropped periodic table.
Assessment of the situation. The periodic table without Ether is the same as humanity without children - you can live, but there will be no development and no future.
Resume. If the enemies of humanity hide knowledge, then our task is to reveal this knowledge.
Conclusion. The old periodic table has fewer elements and more foresight than the modern one.
Conclusion. New level is possible only when the information state of society changes.

Bottom line. Returning to the true periodic table is no longer a scientific question, but a political question.

What was the main political meaning Einstein's teaching? It was to cut off mankind’s access to inexhaustible resources by any means possible. natural sources energies that were discovered by the study of the properties of the world ether. If successful on this path, the global financial oligarchy would lose power in this world, especially in the light of the retrospective of those years: the Rockefellers made an unimaginable fortune, exceeding the budget of the United States, on oil speculation, and the loss of the role of oil that occupied " black gold"in this world - the role of the lifeblood of the global economy - did not inspire them.

This did not inspire other oligarchs - the coal and steel kings. So tycoon Morgan immediately stopped funding Nikola Tesla’s experiments when he came close to wireless energy transfer and extracting energy “out of nowhere” - from the world’s ether. After this, the owner huge amount put into practice technical solutions no one provided financial assistance - the solidarity of financial tycoons is like that of thieves in law and a phenomenal sense of where the danger comes from. That's why against humanity and a sabotage was carried out under the name “Special Theory of Relativity”.

One of the first blows fell on Dmitry Mendeleev’s table, in which ether was the first number; it was thoughts about ether that gave birth to Mendeleev’s brilliant insight - his periodic table of elements.

6. Argumentum ad rem

What is now presented in schools and universities under the title “Periodic Table of Chemical Elements D.I. Mendeleev,” is an outright falsity.

The last time the real Periodic Table was published in an undistorted form was in 1906 in St. Petersburg (textbook “Fundamentals of Chemistry”, VIII edition). And only after 96 years of oblivion, the original Periodic Table rises for the first time from the ashes thanks to the publication of a dissertation in the journal ZhRFM Russian Physical Society.

After the sudden death of D.I. Mendeleev and the departure of his faithful scientific colleagues in the Russian Physico-Chemical Society, for the first time raised his hand to Mendeleev’s immortal creation - the son of D.I. Mendeleev’s friend and colleague in the Society - Boris Nikolaevich Menshutkin. Of course, Menshutkin did not act alone - he only carried out the order. After all, the new paradigm of relativism required the abandonment of the idea of ​​the world ether; and therefore this requirement was elevated to the rank of dogma, and the work of D.I. Mendeleev was falsified.

The main distortion of the Table is the transfer of the “zero group” of the Table to its end, to the right, and the introduction of the so-called. "periods". We emphasize that such (only at first glance, harmless) manipulation is logically explainable only as a conscious elimination of the main methodological link in Mendeleev’s discovery: the periodic system of elements at its beginning, source, i.e. in the upper left corner of the Table, must have a zero group and a zero row, where the element “X” is located (according to Mendeleev - “Newtonium”), - i.e. world broadcast.
Moreover, being the only system-forming element of the entire Table of Derived Elements, this element “X” is the argument of the entire Periodic Table. Transferring the zero group of the Table to its end destroys the very idea of ​​this fundamental principle of the entire system of elements according to Mendeleev.

To confirm the above, we will give the floor to D.I. Mendeleev himself.

“... If analogues of argon do not give compounds at all, then it is obvious that it is impossible to include any of the groups of previously known elements, and for them it should be opened special group zero... This position of argon analogues in the zero group is a strictly logical consequence of the understanding of the periodic law, and therefore (the placement in group VIII is clearly incorrect) was accepted not only by me, but also by Braizner, Piccini and others... Now, when it has become not subject to the slightest Without the doubt that before the first group, in which hydrogen must be placed, there exists a zero group, the representatives of which have atomic weights less than those of the elements of group I, it seems to me impossible to deny the existence of elements lighter than hydrogen.

This element “y”, however, is necessary in order to mentally get close to that most important, and therefore most rapidly moving element “x”, which, in my understanding, can be considered ether. I would like to tentatively call it “Newtonium” - in honor of the immortal Newton... The problem of gravitation and the problem of all energy (!!! - V. Rodionov) cannot be imagined to be really solved without a real understanding of the ether as a world medium that transmits energy over distances. A real understanding of the ether cannot be achieved by ignoring its chemistry and not considering it an elementary substance; elementary substances are now unthinkable without their subordination to periodic law” (“An Attempt at a Chemical Understanding of the World Ether.” 1905, p. 27).

This is exactly what it turned out to be. And if so, then this circumstance, on the one hand, serves as confirmation of the correctness of the periodic principles, and on the other hand, clearly shows the relationship of argon analogues to other previously known elements. As a result, it is possible to apply the analyzed principles even more widely than before, and expect elements of the zero series with atomic weights much lower than those of hydrogen.

Thus, it can be shown that in the first row, first before hydrogen, there is an element of the zero group with an atomic weight of 0.4 (perhaps this is Yong’s coronium), and in the zero row, in the zero group, there is a limiting element with an negligibly small atomic weight, not capable of chemical interactions and, as a result, possessing extremely fast partial (gas) movement of its own.

These properties, perhaps, should be attributed to the atoms of the all-pervading (!!! - V. Rodionov) world ether. I indicated this idea in the preface to this publication and in a Russian journal article of 1902...” (“Fundamentals of Chemistry.” VIII ed., 1906, p. 613 et seq.)

Ether in the periodic table

The periodic table of chemical elements officially taught in schools and universities is a falsification. Mendeleev himself, in his work entitled “An Attempt at a Chemical Understanding of the World Ether,” gave a slightly different table (Polytechnic Museum, Moscow):

The last time the real Periodic Table was published in an undistorted form was in 1906 in St. Petersburg (textbook “Fundamentals of Chemistry”, VIII edition). The differences are visible: the zero group has been moved to the 8th, and the element lighter than hydrogen, with which the table should begin and which is conventionally called Newtonium (ether), is completely excluded.

The same table was immortalized by the “bloody tyrant” Comrade. Stalin in St. Petersburg, Moskovsky Avenue. 19. VNIIM im. D. I. Mendeleeva (All-Russian Research Institute of Metrology)

Monument-table Periodic table of chemical elements D.I. Mendeleev made mosaics under the guidance of Professor of the Academy of Arts V.A. Frolov (architectural design by Krichevsky). The monument is based on a table from the last lifetime 8th edition (1906) of Fundamentals of Chemistry by D.I. Mendeleev. Elements discovered during the life of D.I. Mendeleev are indicated in red. Elements discovered from 1907 to 1934 , indicated in blue. The height of the monument-table is 9 m. The total area is 69 sq. m. m

Why and how did it happen that they lie to us so openly?

The place and role of the world ether in the true table of D.I. Mendeleev

1. Suprema lex – salus populi

Many have heard about Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev and about the “Periodic Law of Changes in the Properties of Chemical Elements in Groups and Series” that he discovered in the 19th century (1869) (the author’s name for the table is “Periodic System of Elements in Groups and Series”).

Many have also heard that D.I. Mendeleev was the organizer and permanent leader (1869-1905) of the Russian public scientific association called “Russian Chemical Society” (since 1872 - “Russian Physico-Chemical Society”), which throughout its existence published the world-famous journal ZhRFKhO, until until the liquidation of both the Society and its journal by the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1930.

But few people know that D.I. Mendeleev was one of the last world-famous Russian scientists of the late 19th century who defended the idea of ​​ether as a universal substantial entity in world science, who gave it fundamental scientific and applied value in revealing the secrets of Genesis and to improve the economic life of people.

There are even fewer who know that after the sudden (!!?) death of D.I. Mendeleev (01/27/1907), then recognized as an outstanding scientist by all scientific communities around the world except for the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences, his main discovery - the “Periodic Law” - was deliberately and widely falsified by world academic science.

And there are very few who know that all of the above is connected together by the thread of sacrificial service of the best representatives and bearers of the immortal Russian Physical Thought for the good of the people, the public benefit, despite the growing wave of irresponsibility in the highest strata of society of that time.

In essence, comprehensive development This dissertation is devoted to the last thesis, because in true science any neglect of essential factors always leads to false results. So, the question is: why do scientists lie?

2. Psy-faktor: ni foi, ni loi

It is only now, since the end of the 20th century, that society is beginning to understand (and even then timidly) the practical examples that an outstanding and highly qualified, but irresponsible, cynical, immoral scientist with a “world name” is no less dangerous for people than an outstanding, but immoral politician, military man, lawyer or best case scenario- an “outstanding” highway bandit.

Society was instilled with the idea that the world's academic scientific community is a caste of celestial beings, monks, holy fathers who care day and night about the welfare of peoples. And mere mortals must simply look their benefactors in the mouth, meekly financing and implementing all their “scientific” projects, forecasts and instructions for reorganizing their public and private lives.

In fact, the criminal element in the world scientific community is no less than among the same politicians. In addition, criminal, anti-social acts of politicians are most often visible immediately, but the criminal and harmful, but “scientifically based” activities of “prominent” and “authoritative” scientists are not recognized by society immediately, but after years, or even decades , in his own “public skin”.

Let us continue our study of this extremely interesting (and secret!) psychophysiological factor scientific activity(let’s call it the psi factor), which results in an unexpected (?!) negative result a posteriori: “we wanted what was best for people, but it turned out as always, i.e. to the detriment." Indeed, in science, a negative result is also a result that certainly requires comprehensive scientific understanding.

Considering the correlation between the psi factor and the main objective function (GOF) of the government funding body, we come to an interesting conclusion: the so-called net, big science past centuries has by now degenerated into a caste of untouchables, i.e. into a closed box of court healers who have brilliantly mastered the science of deception, brilliantly mastered the science of persecuting dissidents and the science of subservience to their powerful financiers.

It is necessary to keep in mind that, firstly, in all so-called “civilized countries” their so-called. “national academies of sciences” formally have the status government organizations with the rights of the leading scientific expert body of the relevant government. Secondly, all these national academies of sciences are united among themselves into a single rigid hierarchical structure(the real name of which the world does not know), developing a unified strategy for behavior in the world for all national academies of sciences and a unified so-called. a scientific paradigm, the core of which is not the disclosure of the laws of existence, but the psi factor: by carrying out the so-called “scientific” cover (for the sake of credibility) of all the unseemly acts of those in power in the eyes of society, as “court healers”, to gain the glory of priests and prophets, influencing, like a demiurge, the very course of human history.

Everything stated above in this section, including the term “psi factor” that we introduced, was predicted with great accuracy and justification by D.I. Mendeleev more than 100 years ago (see, for example, his analytical article of 1882 “What kind of Academy is needed in Russia?”, in which Dmitry Ivanovich actually gives a detailed description of the psi factor and in which they proposed a program for the radical reorganization of the closed scientific corporation of members of the Russian Academy Sciences who viewed the Academy solely as a feeding trough to satisfy their selfish interests.

In one of his letters 100 years ago to Kyiv University professor P.P. Alekseev D.I. Mendeleev openly admitted that he was “ready to incense himself to smoke the devil out, in other words, to transform the foundations of the academy into something new, Russian, his own, suitable for everyone in general and, in particular, for the scientific movement in Russia.”

As we see, a truly great scientist, citizen and patriot of his homeland is capable of even the most complex long-term scientific forecasts. Let's now consider historical aspect changes in this psi factor, discovered by D.I. Mendeleev at the end of the 19th century.

3. Fin de siècle

Since the second half of the 19th century in Europe, on the wave of “liberalism,” there has been a rapid numerical growth of the intelligentsia, scientific and technical personnel and a quantitative increase in the theories, ideas and scientific and technical projects offered by these personnel to society.

By the end of the 19th century, competition for “a place in the sun” sharply intensified among them, i.e. for titles, honors and awards, and as a consequence of this competition, the polarization of scientific personnel according to moral criteria has increased. This contributed to the explosive activation of the psi factor.

The revolutionary fervor of young, ambitious and unprincipled scientists and intellectuals, intoxicated by their quick learning and impatient desire to become famous at any cost in scientific world, paralyzed not only representatives of a more responsible and more honest circle of scientists, but also the entire scientific community as a whole, with its infrastructure and established traditions that previously counteracted the unbridled growth of the psi factor.

Revolutionary intellectuals of the 19th century, overthrowers of thrones and government systems in European countries, spread the bandit methods of their ideological and political struggle with the “old order” with the help of bombs, revolvers, poisons and conspiracies) also in the field of scientific and technical activities. In student classrooms, laboratories and on scientific symposiums they ridiculed supposedly outdated sanity, supposedly outdated concepts formal logic- consistency of judgments, their validity. Thus, at the beginning of the 20th century, instead of the method of persuasion, the method of total suppression of one’s opponents, through mental, physical and moral violence above them. At the same time, naturally, the value of the psi factor reached an extremely high level, experiencing its extreme in the 30s.

As a result, at the beginning of the 20th century, the “enlightened” intelligentsia, in fact, violently, i.e. revolutionary, in a way that replaced the truly scientific paradigm of humanism, enlightenment and social benefit in natural science with its own paradigm of permanent relativism, giving it the pseudoscientific form of the theory of general relativity (cynicism!).

The first paradigm relied on experience and its comprehensive assessment for the search for truth, the search for and understanding of the objective laws of nature. The second paradigm emphasized hypocrisy and unscrupulousness; and not for the search for objective laws of nature, but for the sake of their egoistic group interests to the detriment of society. The first paradigm worked for the public benefit, while the second did not imply this.

From the 1930s to the present, the psi factor has stabilized, remaining an order of magnitude higher than its value in the early and mid-19th century.

For a more objective and clear assessment of the real, and not mythical, contribution of the activities of the world scientific community (represented by all national academies of sciences) to the public and private lives of people, we introduce the concept of a normalized psi factor.

The normalized value of the psi factor equal to one corresponds to a 100% probability of obtaining such a negative result (i.e. such social harm) from implementation scientific developments who declared a priori a positive result (i.e. a certain social benefit) for a single historical period of time (change of one generation of people, about 25 years), in which all of humanity completely dies or degenerates in no more than 25 years from the moment of the introduction of a certain block of scientific programs.

4. Kill with kindness

The cruel and dirty victory of relativism and militant atheism in the mentality of the global scientific community at the beginning of the 20th century - main reason of all human troubles in this “atomic”, “cosmic” age of the so-called “ scientific and technological progress" Let's look back - what more evidence do we need today to understand the obvious: in the 20th century there was not a single socially beneficial act of the worldwide brotherhood of scientists in the field of natural and social sciences that would strengthen the population of Homo sapiens, phylogenetically and morally. But there is just the opposite: merciless mutilation, destruction and destruction of the psycho-somatic nature of man, healthy image his life and his habitat under various plausible pretexts.

At the very beginning of the 20th century, all key academic positions in managing the progress of research, topics, financing of scientific and technical activities, etc. were occupied by a “brotherhood of like-minded people” professing a dual religion of cynicism and selfishness. This is the drama of our time.

It was militant atheism and cynical relativism, through the efforts of its adherents, that entangled the consciousness of all, without exception, the highest statesmen on our Planet. It was this two-headed fetish of anthropocentrism that gave birth to and introduced into the consciousness of millions the so-called scientific concept of the “universal principle of degradation of matter-energy,” i.e. the universal disintegration of previously emerged - no one knows how - objects in nature. In place of the absolute fundamental essence (the universal substantial environment), a pseudoscientific chimera of the universal principle of energy degradation, with its mythical attribute - “entropy”, was put.

5. Littera contra littere

According to the ideas of such luminaries of the past as Leibniz, Newton, Torricelli, Lavoisier, Lomonosov, Ostrogradsky, Faraday, Maxwell, Mendeleev, Umov, J. Thomson, Kelvin, G. Hertz, Pirogov, Timiryazev, Pavlov, Bekhterev and many, many others - World environment is an absolute fundamental essence (= substance of the world = world ether = all matter of the Universe = “quintessence” of Aristotle), which fills isotropically and without remainder the entire infinite world space and is the Source and Carrier of all types of energy in nature - indestructible “forces of motion” , "forces of action".

In contrast to this, according to the currently dominant view in world science, absolute fundamental essence the mathematical fiction “entropy” was proclaimed, and even some “information”, which the world’s academic luminaries in all seriousness recently proclaimed so-called. “Universal fundamental essence”, without bothering to give this new term a detailed definition.

According to the scientific paradigm of the former, harmony and order of the eternal life of the Universe reigns in the world, through constant local updates (a series of deaths and births) of individual material formations of different scales.

According to the pseudoscientific paradigm of the latter, the world, once created in an incomprehensible way, is moving into the abyss of general degradation, equalization of temperatures towards general, universal death under the vigilant control of a certain World supercomputer, which owns and disposes of some “information”.

Some see around them the triumph of eternal life, while others see around them decay and death, controlled by a certain World Information Bank.

The struggle of these two diametrically opposed worldview concepts for dominance in the minds of millions of people is the central point of the biography of humanity. And the stakes in this struggle are of the highest degree.

And it is absolutely no coincidence that the entire 20th century the world scientific establishment is busy introducing (supposedly as the only possible and promising) fuel energy theory explosives, synthetic poisons and drugs, toxic substances, genetic engineering with the cloning of biorobots, with the degeneration of the human race to the level of primitive oligophrenics, downs and psychopaths. And these programs and plans are now not even hidden from the public.

The truth of life is this: the most prosperous and powerful spheres on a global scale human activity created in the 20th century according to the latest scientific thought, were: porn, drug, pharmaceutical business, arms trade, including global information and psychotronic technologies. Their share in the global volume of all financial flows significantly exceeds 50%.

Next. Having disfigured nature on Earth for 1.5 centuries, the world academic fraternity is now in a hurry to “colonize” and “conquer” the near-Earth space, with the intention of scientific projects turning this space into a garbage dump for their “high” technologies. These gentlemen academicians are literally bursting with the coveted satanic idea of ​​managing the circumsolar space, and not just on Earth.

Thus, the foundation of the paradigm of the world academic brotherhood of free masons is laid on the stone of extremely subjective idealism (anthropocentrism), and the very building of their so-called scientific paradigm rests on permanent and cynical relativism and militant atheism.

But the pace of true progress is inexorable. And, just as all life on Earth reaches out to the Sun, so the minds of a certain part of modern scientists and natural scientists, not burdened by the clan interests of the universal brotherhood, reach out to the sun. eternal Life, eternal movement in the Universe, through knowledge of the fundamental truths of Existence and the search for the basic objective function existence and evolution of the species xomo sapiens. Now, having considered the nature of the psi factor, let’s take a look at the Table of Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev.

6. Argumentum ad rem

What is now presented in schools and universities under the title “Periodic Table of Chemical Elements D.I. Mendeleev” is an outright fake.

The last time the real Periodic Table was published in an undistorted form was in 1906 in St. Petersburg (textbook “Fundamentals of Chemistry”, VIII edition).

And only after 96 years of oblivion, the original Periodic Table rises for the first time from the ashes thanks to the publication of this dissertation in the journal ZhRFM of the Russian Physical Society. Genuine, unfalsified Table D.I. Mendeleev “Periodic table of elements by groups and series” (D. I. Mendeleev. Fundamentals of Chemistry. VIII edition, St. Petersburg, 1906)

After the sudden death of D.I. Mendeleev and the passing of his faithful scientific colleagues in the Russian Physico-Chemical Society, for the first time he raised his hand to Mendeleev’s immortal creation - the son of his friend and colleague D.I. Mendeleev's Society - Boris Nikolaevich Menshutkin. Of course, that Boris Nikolaevich also did not act alone - he only carried out the order. After all, the new paradigm of relativism required the abandonment of the idea of ​​a world ether; and therefore this requirement was elevated to the rank of dogma, and the work of D.I. Mendeleev was falsified.

The main distortion of the Table is the transfer of the “zero group”. The tables are at the end, to the right, and the introduction of the so-called. "periods". We emphasize that such (only at first glance, harmless) manipulation is logically explainable only as a conscious elimination of the main methodological link in Mendeleev’s discovery: the periodic system of elements at its beginning, source, i.e. in the upper left corner of the Table, must have a zero group and a zero row, where the element “X” is located (according to Mendeleev - “Newtonium”), i.e. world broadcast.

Moreover, being the only system-forming element of the entire Table of Derived Elements, this element “X” is the argument of the entire Periodic Table. Transferring the zero group of the Table to its end destroys the very idea of ​​this fundamental principle of the entire system of elements according to Mendeleev.

To confirm the above, we will give the floor to D.I. Mendeleev himself.

“...If argon analogues do not give compounds at all, then it is obvious that it is impossible to include any of the groups of previously known elements, and for them a special group zero should be opened... This position of argon analogues in the zero group is a strictly logical consequence of the understanding periodic law, and therefore (the placement in group VIII is clearly incorrect) was accepted not only by me, but also by Braizner, Piccini and others...

Now, when it has become beyond the slightest doubt that before that first group, in which hydrogen must be placed, there exists a zero group, the representatives of which have atomic weights less than those of the elements of group I, it seems to me impossible to deny the existence of elements lighter than hydrogen.

Of these, let us first pay attention to the element of the first row of the 1st group. We denote it by “y”. It will obviously have the fundamental properties of argon gases... “Coronium”, with a density of about 0.2 relative to hydrogen; and it cannot in any way be the world ether. This element “y”, however, is necessary in order to mentally get close to that most important, and therefore most rapidly moving element “x”, which, in my understanding, can be considered ether. I would like to tentatively call it “Newtonium” - in honor of the immortal Newton... The problem of gravitation and the problem of all energy (!!!) cannot be imagined to be really solved without a real understanding of the ether as a world medium that transmits energy over distances. A real understanding of the ether cannot be achieved by ignoring its chemistry and not considering it an elementary substance” (“An Attempt at a Chemical Understanding of the World Ether.” 1905, p. 27).

“These elements, according to the magnitude of their atomic weights, took a precise place between the halides and the alkali metals, as Ramsay showed in 1900. From these elements it is necessary to form a special zero group, which was first recognized by Errere in Belgium in 1900. I consider it useful to add here that, directly judging by the inability to combine elements of group zero, analogues of argon should be placed earlier (!!!) than elements of group 1 and, in the spirit of the periodic system, expect a lower atomic weight for them than for alkali metals.

This is exactly what it turned out to be. And if so, then this circumstance, on the one hand, serves as confirmation of the correctness of the periodic principles, and on the other hand, clearly shows the relationship of argon analogues to other previously known elements. As a result, it is possible to apply the analyzed principles even more widely than before, and expect elements of the zero series with atomic weights much lower than those of hydrogen.

Thus, it can be shown that in the first row, first before hydrogen, there is an element of the zero group with an atomic weight of 0.4 (perhaps this is Yong’s coronium), and in the zero row, in the zero group, there is a limiting element with an negligibly small atomic weight, not capable of chemical interactions and, as a result, possessing extremely fast partial (gas) movement of its own.

These properties, perhaps, should be attributed to the atoms of the all-pervading (!!!) world ether. I indicated this idea in the preface to this publication and in a Russian journal article of 1902...” (“Fundamentals of Chemistry.” VIII ed., 1906, p. 613 et seq.).

7. Punctum soliens

The following clearly follows from these quotes.

1. Elements of the zero group begin each row of other elements, located on the left side of the Table, “... which is a strictly logical consequence of understanding the periodic law” - Mendeleev.
2. A particularly important and even exclusive place in the sense of the periodic law belongs to the element “x” - “Newtonium” - the world ether. And this special element should be located at the very beginning of the entire Table, in the so-called “zero group of the zero row”. Moreover, being a system-forming element (more precisely, a system-forming essence) of all elements of the Periodic Table, the world ether is a substantial argument for the entire diversity of elements of the Periodic Table. The Table itself, in this regard, acts as a closed functional of this very argument.

Now let's turn to the works of the first falsifiers of the Periodic Table.

8. Corpus delicti

In order to erase from the consciousness of all subsequent generations of scientists the idea of ​​​​the exclusive role of the world ether (and this was precisely what the new paradigm of relativism required), the elements of the zero group were specially transferred from the left side of the Periodic Table to the right side, shifting the corresponding elements a row lower and combining the zero group with the so-called "eighth". Of course, there was no place left for either element “y” or element “x” in the falsified table.

But even this was not enough for the relativist brotherhood. Exactly the opposite, the fundamental thought of D.I. is distorted. Mendeleev about the particularly important role of the world ether. In particular, in the preface to the first falsified version of the Periodic Law by D.I. Mendeleev, not at all embarrassed, B.M. Menshutkin states that Mendeleev allegedly always opposed the special role of the world ether in natural processes. Here is an excerpt from an article by B.N., unparalleled in its cynicism. Menshutkina:

“Thus (?!) we return again to that view, against which (?!) always (?!!!) D. I. Mendeleev opposed, which from the most ancient times existed among philosophers who considered all visible and known substances and bodies composed of the same primary substance of the Greek philosophers (“proteule” of the Greek philosophers, prima materia of the Romans). This hypothesis has always found adherents due to its simplicity and in the teachings of philosophers it was called the hypothesis of the unity of matter or the hypothesis of unitary matter" (B.N. Menshutkin. “D.I. Mendeleev. Periodic Law.” Edited and with an article on the current situation of the periodic law by B.N. Menshutkin. State Publishing House, M-L., 1926).

9. In rerum nature

Assessing the views of D.I. Mendeleev and his unscrupulous opponents, it is necessary to note the following.

Most likely, Mendeleev unwittingly made a mistake in the fact that the “world ether” is an “elementary substance” (i.e., a “chemical element” - in the modern sense of the term). Most likely, the “world ether” is a true substance; and as such, in the strict sense, is not a “substance”; and it does not possess “elementary chemistry” i.e. does not have “extremely low atomic weight” with “extremely fast intrinsic partial motion.”

Let D.I. Mendeleev was mistaken about the “materiality” and “chemistry” of the ether. In the end, this is a terminological miscalculation of a great scientist; and in his time this is excusable, because then these terms were still quite blurred, just entering scientific circulation. But something else is absolutely clear: Dmitry Ivanovich was absolutely right that the “world ether” is an all-forming essence - the quintessence, the substance from which the entire world of things (the material world) consists and in which all material formations reside. Dmitry Ivanovich is also right that this substance transmits energy over distances and does not have any chemical activity. The latter circumstance only confirms our idea that D.I. Mendeleev deliberately singled out the element “x” as an exceptional entity.

So, “world ether”, i.e. the substance of the Universe is isotropic, has no partial structure, but is the absolute (i.e., the ultimate, fundamental, fundamental universal) essence of the Universe, the Universe. And precisely because, as D.I. correctly noted. Mendeleev, - the world ether is “not capable of chemical interactions”, and therefore is not a “chemical element”, i.e. “elementary substance” - in the modern sense of these terms.

Dmitry Ivanovich was also right that the world ether is a carrier of energy over distances. Let's say more: the world ether, as the substance of the World, is not only a carrier, but also a “guardian” and “carrier” of all types of energy (“forces of action”) in nature.

From time immemorial D.I. Mendeleev is echoed by another outstanding scientist, Torricelli (1608 - 1647): “Energy is the quintessence of such a subtle nature that it cannot be contained in any other vessel except in the innermost substance of material things.”

So, according to Mendeleev and Torricelli world broadcast is the innermost substance of material things. That is why Mendeleev’s “Newtonium” is not just in the zero row of the zero group of his periodic system, but this is a kind of “crown” of his entire table of chemical elements. The crown, which forms all the chemical elements in the world, i.e. all matter. This Crown (“Mother”, “Matter-substance” of any substance) is the Natural environment, set in motion and encouraged to change - according to our calculations - by another (second) absolute essence, which we called the “Substantial flow of primary fundamental information about forms and ways of movement of Matter in the Universe." More details about this can be found in the journal “Russian Thought”, 1-8, 1997, pp. 28-31.

We chose “O”, zero, as the mathematical symbol of the world ether, and “womb” as the semantic symbol. In turn mathematical symbol We chose “1”, one, for the substantial flow, and “one” for the semantic flow. Thus, based on the above symbolism, it becomes possible to succinctly express in one mathematical expression the totality of all possible forms and methods of movement of matter in nature:

This expression mathematically defines the so-called. an open interval of intersection of two sets - set “O” and set “1”, while the semantic definition of this expression is “one in the bosom” or otherwise: The substantial flow of primary fundamental information about the forms and methods of movement of Matter-substance completely permeates this Matter-substance, i.e. world broadcast.

In religious doctrines, this “open interval” is clothed in the figurative form of the Universal act of God’s creation of all matter in the World from Matter-Substance, with Which He continuously remains in a state of fruitful copulation.

The author of this article is aware that this mathematical construction was once inspired by him, again, strange as it may seem, by the ideas of the unforgettable D.I. Mendeleev, expressed by him in his works (see, for example, the article “An attempt at a chemical understanding of the world ether”). Now it is time to summarize our research outlined in this dissertation.

10. Errata: ferro et igni

The categorical and cynical disregard by world science of the place and role of the world ether in natural processes (and in the Periodic Table!) has precisely given rise to the whole gamut of problems for humanity in our technocratic age.

The main one of these problems is fuel and energy.

It is precisely ignoring the role of the world ether that allows scientists to make a false (and at the same time crafty) conclusion that a person can only produce useful energy for his daily needs by burning, i.e. irreversibly destroying the substance (fuel). Hence the false thesis that the current fuel energy industry has no real alternative. And if so, then, supposedly, there is only one thing left: to produce nuclear (ecologically the dirtiest!) energy and gas-oil-coal production, littering and poisoning immeasurably our own habitat.

It is precisely ignoring the role of the world ether that pushes all modern nuclear scientists to a crafty search for “salvation” in the splitting of atoms and elementary particles on special expensive synchrotron accelerators. In the course of these monstrous and extremely dangerous experiments, they want to discover and subsequently use the so-called “for the good”. “quark-gluon plasma”, according to their false ideas - as if “pre-matter” (the term of the nuclear scientists themselves), according to their false ideas cosmological theory so-called " big bang Universe."

It is worthy of note, according to our calculations, that if this so-called. “the most secret dream of all modern nuclear physicists” is inadvertently achieved, then it will most likely be a man-made end of all life on earth and the end of planet earth itself - truly a “Big Bang” on a global scale, but not just for fun, but for real.

Therefore, it is necessary to stop as quickly as possible this crazy experimentation of world academic science, which is struck from head to toe by the poison of the psi factor and which, it seems, does not even imagine the possible catastrophic consequences of these crazy parascientific undertakings.

D.I. Mendeleev turned out to be right: “The problem of gravity and the problems of all energy cannot be imagined to be really solved without a real understanding of the ether as a world medium that transmits energy over distances.”

D.I. Mendeleev was also right in that “someday they will realize that entrusting the affairs of a given industry to the people who live in it does not lead to the best results, although it is useful to listen to such persons.”

“The main meaning of what has been said is that general, eternal and lasting interests often do not coincide with personal and temporary ones, they even often contradict one another, and, in my opinion, one should prefer - if it is no longer possible to reconcile - the first rather than the second. This is the drama of our time.” D. I. Mendeleev. “Thoughts for the knowledge of Russia.” 1906

So, the world ether is the substance of every chemical element and, therefore, of every substance, it is the Absolute true matter as the Universal element-forming Essence.

The world ether is the source and crown of the entire genuine Periodic Table, its beginning and end - alpha and omega of the Periodic Table of Elements of Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev.

World broadcast and Dmitry Mendeleev

Published: 02/04/2014

... The more I had to think about the nature of chemical elements, the more I deviated from both classical concept about primary matter, and from the hope of achieving the desired comprehension of the nature of the elements by studying electrical and light phenomena, and each time more urgently and clearly realized that earlier or first we must obtain a more real idea of ​​“mass” and “ether” than now. .

D. I. Mendeleev.

Portrait of D. I. Mendeleev by I. N. Kramskoy. 1878 The idea of ​​a “chemical” ether, which, according to D.I. Mendeleev, is closely related to the periodic system of elements, has been nurtured by the scientist since the 1870s .

In January 1904, Petersburg Leaflet No. 5, on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev, published an interview with him. When asked what scientific research he is currently engaged in, the scientist replied: “They are aimed exclusively at confirming the theory, or rather attempt, of a chemical understanding of the world ether that I put forward last year.”

What is this theory that we know so little about?

Article “An attempt at a chemical understanding of the world ether” D.I. Mendeleev graduated in October 1902, and published in January 1903 in No. 1-4 of the “Bulletin and Library of Self-Education”. In May 1904, in a letter to the famous astronomer Simon Newcombe, he said that he was going to write an article in the near future “concerning modern ideas about the complexity of chemical elements and about electrons...”

The complexity of chemical elements and electrons is clear to the modern reader, but the world ether? Now even schoolchildren know that this idea has been rejected by science. Therefore, probably, one of Mendeleev’s last works is very rarely commented on, is practically not mentioned anywhere, and is generally difficult to find. In many scientific and educational libraries in the multi-volume “Works” of D. I. Mendeleev, volume 2, where the chapter is located, is missing "An attempt at a chemical understanding of the world ether." Sometimes you even get the impression that they are somehow bashfully trying to erase this “curious” work from the scientist’s heritage. Many people seem to condescendingly think that the great Mendeleev, in his old age, may have exceeded his level of competence.

But let's not rush to conclusions. D.I. Mendeleev nurtured this “embarrassing” theory for almost his entire creative life. Two years after the discovery of the periodic system (Mendeleev was not yet 40 years old), on a print from the “Fundamentals of Chemistry” his hand made an inscription near the hydrogen symbol, which can be deciphered as follows: “Ether is the lightest of all, millions of times.” Apparently, “ether” seemed to Mendeleev as the lightest chemical element.

“Already since the 70s, the question has been persistently stuck in my mind: what is ether in the chemical sense? It is closely connected with the periodic system of elements, and it aroused me in me, but only now do I dare to talk about it.”

Cover of the book “An Attempt at a Chemical Understanding of the World Ether.” 1905

So, the chemical element of the ether is the element of the ether - the atomicity of the ether - the discreteness of the ether. This is not the ether that modern physics has discarded as an unnecessary crutch. Let's open the dictionary:

"Ether (Greek) Aither- hypothetical material environment filling space)... In classical physics by ether was meant homogeneous, mechanical, elastic medium, filling absolute Newtonian space" (Philosophical Dictionary / Ed. M. M. Rosenthal. - M., 1975).

The classic definition of ether is the emphasis on homogeneity or continuity. The ether that Mendeleev speaks about consists of elements, it is atomic, it is inhomogeneous, it is discontinuous and discrete. It has structure.

Dmitry Ivanovich's interest in the problem of ether in the 1870s was closely related to the periodic table (“that’s what got me excited”) and subsequent work on gas research. " At first, I believed that the ether is the sum of the rarest gases in a limiting state. I conducted experiments at low pressures to obtain hints of the answer.”

But these works did not satisfy him: “... the idea of ​​the world ether as an extreme rarefaction of vapors and gases does not withstand even the first bouts of thoughtfulness - due to the fact that the ether cannot be imagined except as a substance that penetrates everything and everywhere; this is not characteristic of vapors and gases.”

The detailed development of the “chemical concept of the world ether” began with the discovery of inert gases. D.I. Mendeleev predicted many new elements, but here inert gases were unexpected even for him. He did not immediately accept this discovery, not without an internal struggle, and disagreed with most chemists regarding the location of inert gases in the periodic table. Where should they be located? Modern chemists, without hesitation, will say: of course, in VIII group. And Mendeleev categorically insisted on the existence of a zero group. Inert gases are so different from other elements that their place was somewhere on the side of the system. It seemed that it made no difference whether they were on the right (Group VIII) or left (Group Zero) edge. This seems completely unprincipled to us, especially for that time when they did not know electronic structure atoms, although even now we are only deluding ourselves that we know.

At the suggestion of William Ramsay, Mendeleev included group zero in the periodic table, leaving room for elements lighter than hydrogen.

Mendeleev thought differently. Putting the inert gases on the right means getting a whole series of voids between hydrogen and helium. It was a challenge to search for new elements between hydrogen and helium! Maybe there is a halogen lighter than fluorine (Mendeleev allowed the possibility of the existence of such a halogen, if we assume that helium is actually in group VIII) or other light elements between hydrogen and helium? There are none, so the place of inert gases is on the left, in the zero group! Moreover, their valency is more likely zero than VIII. And the quantitative ratio of atomic weights clearly indicates the position of the inert gases on the left, at the beginning of each row.

“This position of the argon analogues in the zero group constitutes a strictly logical consequence of the understanding of the periodic law,” - stated D.I. Mendeleev.

It becomes clear why Dmitry Ivanovich insisted on the existence of a zero group; his references to a hypothetical halogen lighter than fluorine are understandable; This even makes sense of his search for an element lighter than hydrogen, the existence of which he had long thought about: “It never occurred to me that the series of elements should begin with hydrogen.” “Deprive hydrogen of the original position it has long occupied, and force it to wait for elements with an even lower atomic weight than hydrogen, which is what I have always believed in.”- these are the scientist’s innermost thoughts, which he hid until periodic law will not be fully established. “I had thoughts that elements with an atomic weight less than 1 could be expected before hydrogen, but I did not dare to speak out in this sense due to the conjectural nature of the assumption and especially because then I was careful not to spoil the impression of the proposed new system, if its appearance is accompanied by such assumptions as about elements lighter than hydrogen.”

Just in the zero-group system he defended, which was first proposed by the Belgian scientist Leo Herrera in 1900 at a meeting of the Royal Belgian Academy of Sciences (Academie royale de Belgique), hydrogen seems to be not the first at all, since it inevitably appears before free space for an ultra-light element - maybe this is the “ether element”?

“Now, when it has become beyond the slightest doubt that before group I, in which hydrogen must be placed, there exists a zero group, the representatives of which have atomic weights less than those of the elements of group I, it seems to me impossible to deny the existence of elements lighter than hydrogen", - wrote Dmitry Ivanovich.

In the law he discovered, Mendeleev tries to understand from the physical side the nature of mass as the main characteristic of matter. Finding out physical basis gravity (we also know little about how much time and effort he devoted to this problem), closely related to the concept of the world ether as a “transmitting” medium, he is looking for the lightest element. However, the results of experiments in the 1870s, which boiled down to proving that “Ether is the sum of the most rarefied gases” did not satisfy Mendeleev. For some time he stopped research in this direction, did not write anywhere, but, apparently, never forgot about them.

At the end of his life, in search of an answer to questions concerning the deep properties of matter, he again turns to the “world ether”, with the help of which he tries to penetrate into the nature of the basic concept of natural science of the 19th century (and of the 20th and even 21st centuries) - mass, as well as provide explanations for new discoveries and, above all, radioactivity. Mendeleev's main idea is as follows: “A real understanding of the ether cannot be achieved by ignoring its chemistry and not considering it an elementary substance; elementary substances are now unthinkable without their subordination to periodic law.” Characterizing the world ether, Mendeleev considers it “firstly, the lightest of all elements both in density and atomic weight, secondly, the fastest moving gas, thirdly, the least capable of forming certain strong compounds with any other atoms or particles and , fourthly, an element that is widespread and pervasive everywhere.”

The weight of an atom of this hypothetical element X, according to Mendeleev's calculations, can range from 5.3 × 10" to 9.6 × 10" 7 (if the atomic weight of H is 1). To estimate the mass of a hypothetical element, he draws on knowledge from the fields of mechanics and astronomy. Element X received its place in the periodic table in the zero period of the zero group, as the lightest analogue of inert gases. (Mendeleev calls this element “newtonium.”) In addition, Dmitry Ivanovich admitted the existence of another element lighter than hydrogen - element Y, coronium (presumably the coronium lines were recorded in the spectrum of the solar corona during a solar eclipse in 1869; the discovery of helium on Earth provided the basis consider the existence of this element to be real). At the same time, Mendeleev more than once emphasized the hypothetical nature of elements X and Y and did not include them in the tables of elements of the 7th and 8th editions of “Fundamentals of Chemistry”.

The scientific exactingness and responsibility in Mendeleev’s works do not require comment. But, as we see, if the logic of the search required it, he boldly put forward the most unusual hypotheses. All the predictions he made based on the periodic law (the existence of 12 elements unknown at that time, as well as corrections atomic masses elements) were brilliantly confirmed.

“When I applied the periodic law to the analogues of boron, aluminum and silicon, I was 33 years younger, I had complete confidence that sooner or later what was foreseen must certainly come true, because everything there was clearly visible to me. The vindication came sooner than I could have hoped. I didn’t take risks then, but now I do. This requires determination. She came when I saw radioactive phenomena... and when I realized that it was no longer possible for me to put it off and that, perhaps, my imperfect thoughts would lead someone on a path more correct than the one possible, which seems to my weakening vision.”

So, is this the first major mistake, maybe even a deep delusion of the great scientist, as many now believe, or just a regrettable misunderstanding of the genius by his incapable students?

At the beginning of the 20th century, not only Mendeleev, but also many physicists and chemists believed in the existence of “ether”. However, after Albert Einstein created the special and general theories of relativity, this belief began to fade. It is generally accepted that by the 1930s the “ether” problem no longer existed, and the question of elements lighter than hydrogen disappeared by itself. But, again, the problem of the classical ether, the homogeneous ether, has disappeared, but the structural ether (Mendeleev’s ether) is quite alive, only it is now called structural vacuum or physical vacuum Dirac. So the question is only in terminology.

An entry made by the hand of D.I. Mendeleev on a page with the periodic system of 1871 in his textbook “Fundamentals of Chemistry” of 1871, stored in the scientist’s archive: “Ether is the lightest of all, millions of times.” Illustration from the book by R. B. Dobrotin and others “Chronicle of the life and work of D. I. Mendeleev.”

Let's return to elements lighter than hydrogen. Any chemist knows homological series and how their first members, especially the first, behave. The first one is always special. He always stands out from the crowd general series. Hydrogen is placed in both groups I and VII (it is somewhat similar to both alkali metals and halogens at the same time). So, hydrogen is not like the first... In our search for real zero-period elements, we find ourselves in a completely different world, and it seems that this is the world of elementary particles.

The understanding of chemistry as the science of qualitative changes, according to many researchers, is manifested most clearly in the periodic table, and at the very beginning of the system it is simply dazzlingly bright. “The most common simple bodies in nature have low atomic weight, and all elements with low atomic weight are characterized by sharp properties. They are therefore typical elements." and as we approach " zero point“There should be simply fantastically “sharp” qualitative leaps, which follows from its singular nature, since “...here is not only the edge of the system, but also typical elements, and therefore one can expect originality and features.”

We often talk about the fundamental nature of the periodic law, but it seems that we still don’t really understand this. Let's repeat Mendeleev: “The essence of the concepts that give rise to the periodic law lies in the general physico-chemical principle of correspondence, transformability and equivalence of the forces of nature.”

In conclusion, I would like to quote the words of Dmitry Ivanovich:

“I look at my attempt, which is far from complete, to understand the nature of the world ether from the real chemical side as nothing more than an expression of the sum of my accumulated impressions, which come out solely for the reason that I do not want the thoughts inspired by reality to disappear. It is likely that similar thoughts have occurred to many, but until they are expressed, they easily and often disappear and do not develop, do not entail a gradual accumulation of the reliable, which alone is preserved. If they contain at least a part of the natural truth that we are all looking for, my attempt is not in vain, it will be developed, supplemented and corrected, and if my thought is incorrect in its foundations, its presentation, after one or another type of refutation, will prevent others from repeating it. I don’t know any other way for a slow but steady movement forward.”

Georgy RYAZANTSEV, researcher at Moscow State University. M. V. Lomonosov.

Based on materials from publications of the journal “Science and Life”

1. Discovery of the quanton and quarkon as the zero element

On January 10, 1996, I discovered a four-dimensional space-time quantum (quanton) in the form of an electromagnetic quadrupole, which includes four entire weightless quarks: two electric (+1e and –1e) and two magnetic (+1g and –1g), where ±e and ±g are elementary integer electric (e) and magnetic (g) charges. The discovery of the quanton served as the basis for the creation of the theory of elastic quantized medium (QM), revealing the discrete quantized structure of the cosmic vacuum. Your name quanton derived from the term denoting quantum space-time. Quanton characterizes the presence of electromagnetic symmetry of quantized space-time. The quanton is the most stable particle in nature, the decay of which into individual quarks is impossible.

However, to describe the entire variety of material matter that is located inside quantized space-time, the properties of the quanton are not enough, and the presence of one more particle is required - quarkona, which includes two entire weightless electric quarks (+1e and –1e). Your name quarkon received from the term quark. An excess of electric quarks (+1e and –1e) bound into quarcons, and not included in the quantons, determines the presence of electrical asymmetry of space. A quarkon is an unstable particle and is capable of decaying into individual electric whole quarks (+1e and –1 e).

The discovery of the quanton and quarkon served as the basis for the creation of the fundamental theory of Superunification, which explains the mechanism of formation of material matter, combining gravity, electromagnetism, nuclear and electroweak forces from a unified position.

Only four whole quarks were needed in the Superunification theory to describe the structure and phenomenon of the birth of weighty main elementary particles: electron, positron, proton and neutron, and weightless ones: electron neutrino and photon, inside weightless quantized space-time. It is shown that the mass of particles appears as a result of spherical deformation of quantized space-time, representing a kind of clot of electromagnetic energy.

Nature is structured very rationally and basically consists of only four whole quarks in the composition of a quanton and a quarkon. When a quarkon decays into two electric quarks, a pair of particles is born inside quantized space-time: an electron and a positron. When quarcons are folded into an alternating shell like the C 60 fullerene, a neutron is born. The presence of an unbalanced electric quark of positive polarity in the alternating shell determines the structure of the proton.

As you know, atomic nuclei are made up of protons and neutrons, called nucleons. The Superunification Theory Reveals the Nature of nuclear forces, as short-range electric forces between quarks of alternating shells of nucleons, regardless of the presence (for a proton) or absence (for a neutron) of excess electric charge. The number of protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus determines the electrical charge of the atom and its mass, forming Mendeleev's periodic system of chemical elements.

Thus, I have shown thesis (read the theory of Superunification in more detail) that the basis of the periodic system of elements by nature is two particles (quanton and quarkon) representing in a pair the zero element (Table 1) of the primordial matter from which the entire diversity of living and inanimate nature consists of the Universe and the Universe itself.

Table 1.

The zero row of the table (row 0) and the zero group (group 0) are divided into two subgroups (01 and 02). Subgroup 01 includes quanton (Qn). Subgroup 02 includes quarkon (Qr). The mass of the zero element is zero 0.000 (there is no gravity there yet). The quark composition is given for Q n (±e and ±g) and Q r (±e). Particle energy calculations are given in Superunification theory.

2. United zero element - quarkonium

The zero element presented in Table 1 in the form of a double particle quanton-quarkon reflects the physical essence of primordial matter, but from the point of view of chemical elements a certain formalization is required when the dualism of quanton and quarkon must be presented in the form of a single entity with a name, for example, "quarkonium" with symbolic designation:

That is, quarkonium is a symbolic element consisting only of whole quarks (±2 e and ±g ) as part of quanton and quarkon. In quarkonium notation index nrefers to the quanton, and the indexr- to the quarkon.

Table 2 contains the zero symbolic element quarkonium, consisting of whole quarks as part of a quanton and a quarkon. In Fig. 1 represents the structure of the zero element symbolically Quarkonia, consisting of a quanton and a quarkon. Quarkonium has no mass, like the quarks that make up it. In Fig. 1 shown graphic image a quanton in the form of an electromagnetic quadrupole, and a quarkon in the form of an electric dipole. In general, quarkonium has a design reminiscent of an energy cross, which encodes the physical essence of primordial matter (four-dimensional discrete quantized space-time), which is based on whole quarks.

2. From the history of the zero element

Element zero was first introduced by Mendeleev, the author of the periodic table of chemical elements (Table 3). He also introduced a zero group and a zero row into the table of elements. Opened the table with the zero element "newtonium"- a kind of “atom” of ether. By introducing newtonium, Mendeleev believed that in nature there is some kind of primordial matter from which all other chemical elements of the periodic system are built. At that time, the world ether was considered such primordial matter.

In the Superunification theory, there is no ether - there is weightless quantized space-time, consisting of entire electric and magnetic quarks as part of quantons and quarcons. Quanton and quarkon represent the zero symbolic element quarkonium, included in the table of elements to replace the term Newtonium, which did not take root.

Table 3.

How did it historically happen and for what reason did the zero element Newtonium, the zero series and the zero group, were thrown out of the table of elements, contrary to the idea of ​​the author himself? The whole point is in the incorrect interpretation of the properties of the world ether at the beginning of the 20th century, which was considered as a kind of gas-like weighty medium in the form of very rarefied material matter. It was believed that the Earth flies through a mechanical gas-like ether, without dragging it along with it. At the same time, the properties of a luminiferous medium were wrongfully attributed to the gas-like ether.

Thus, two gross fundamental mistakes were immediately made regarding the hypothesis of a gas-like ether and its luminiferous properties. Based on these errors, an interference method was proposed for measuring the speed of light in the direction of movement and across the movement of the Earth relative to the stationary ether. However, in the experiments of Michelson and Morley, and subsequent experiments, no change in the speed of light was detected. The global gas-like ether did not exist as a medium filling the entire world space.

The problem was solved in the Superunification theory, which considers the cosmic vacuum as a four-dimensional quantized space-time, subject to the principle of spherical invariance. In accordance with this principle, the gravitational field during the movement of a particle (body) retains its configuration regardless of the speed of movement, up to the speed of light.

Moreover, every significant object in the Universe obeys Einstein’s principle of relativity, when each body represents a certain physical center in a local region of space and the change in the speed of light in directions in this local region does not depend on the speed of the object. This was proven experimentally in the experiments of Michelson and Morley. In general, depending on the magnitude of the deformation (gravitational curvature according to Einstein) of the quantized space-time, the speed of light is a variable value and depends on the magnitude of the disturbing gravitational potential. For a moving object, gravitational potential is a function of speed.

4. V.S. Leonov. Quantum Energetics: Theory of Superunification. Viva Books, India, 2011, 732 pages.

6. D. I. Mendeleev. Basics of chemistry. VIII edition, St. Petersburg, 1906.