The first landing on the moon of the USSR. Soviet lunar program

D. Kennedy proposal for a joint program to land on the Moon (as well as the launch of more advanced meteorological satellites), but, suspecting an attempt to find out the secrets of the Soviet rocket and space technology, he refused [ ] . To maintain the championship [ ] in space exploration, the Soviet government first gave Korolev’s design bureau (KB) permission and resources to continue modifying the Vostok and Voskhod type ships and only preliminary preparation lunar manned projects, including a flyby of the Moon assembled in orbit by the 7K-9K-11K complex early project Soyuz ship.

Only a few years later, with a great delay relative to the United States, on August 3, the government decree approved the lunar manned program of the USSR and real large-scale work began on two parallel manned programs: a flyby of the Moon (“Proton” - “Zond/L1)” by 1967 and landing on it (N-1-L3) by 1968 with the start of flight design tests in 1966.

The resolution contained a complete list of all participants in the development of systems for L1 and L3 and prescribed multilateral work in which, it seemed, “no one is forgotten and nothing is forgotten.” Nevertheless, questions about the detailed distribution of work - who issues requirements to whom and for which systems - were debated and the answers to them were signed with private decisions and protocols for another three years.

The design of the L1 and L3 spacecraft and the N-1 rocket units, as well as the development of schemes for expeditions to and to the Moon, began even before the adoption of the program - in 1963. In two next year working drawings of the N-1 rocket were released and the first preliminary designs of lunar spacecraft appeared.

Dozens of government officials needed to understand the production and technical scale of the entire lunar program, determine the full volume of capital construction and make preliminary calculations total necessary costs. The economy of those years did not allow particularly accurate calculations. Nevertheless, experienced Gosplan economists, with whom Korolev usually consulted, warned that the real figures for the necessary costs would not pass through the Ministry of Finance and Gosplan. Not to mention the costs of a nuclear missile shield, it was necessary to find funds for new proposals for heavy missiles from Chelomey and Yangel.

The calculations submitted to the Central Committee and the Council of Ministers were underestimated. Officials of the State Committee for Defense Equipment, the Council of Ministers and the State Planning Committee made it clear that the documents should not intimidate the Politburo with many billions. There should be no extra costs in the project estimate. Chelomey and Yangel began to prove that their projects were much cheaper. Pashkov, highly knowledgeable in Gosplan policies, advised:

Deploy production with at least four media per year, involve everyone who is needed in the work, but according to a single schedule. And then we will issue more than one resolution. It is unlikely that anyone would dare to close down a work of such magnitude. There will be success - there will be money! Involve as many businesses as possible without delay.

In order to understand the design contradictions between Korolev, Chelomey and Yangel, D. Ustinov instructed NII-88 to carry out an objective comparative assessment of the possibilities of lunar exploration using carrier variants N-1 (11A52), UR-500 (8K82) and R-56 (8K68). According to the calculations of Mozzhorin and his employees, in order to unconditionally ensure priority over the United States, it is necessary to assemble a 200-ton rocket system in orbit near the Earth with the help of three N-1s. To do this, you will need three N-1 missiles or twenty UR-500 missiles. In this case, a ship weighing 21 tons will land on the Moon and a ship weighing 5 tons will return to Earth. All economic calculations were in favor of N-1. Thus, N-1 became the main promising carrier for the implementation of the Soviet lunar program and, as it turned out later, the main reason for its failure.

  • E-1 - collision with the Moon. Four launches. 1 partial success (Luna-1).
  • E-1A - collision with the Moon (Luna-2).
  • E-2 - photographing the far side of the Moon. The launch was planned for October-November 1958. Canceled.
  • E-2A - photographing reverse side Moon using the Yenisei-2 photosystem. Completed (Luna-3).
  • E-2F - canceled due to problems with the Yenisei-3 photosystem. The launch was scheduled for April 1960.
  • E-3 - photographing the far side of the Moon. Launched in 1960.
  • E-4 - Atomic explosion on the surface of the Moon. Canceled.
  • E-5 - entry into lunar orbit. Was planned for 1960.
  • E-6 - soft landing on the Moon. Was planned for 1960.
  • E-7 - photographing the surface of the Moon from orbit. Was planned for 1960.

Implementation of the program

The program was implemented according to the same principles as in the United States. At first, attempts were made to reach the surface of the Moon using AMS.

With their help, it was planned to perform a number of important applied tasks:

  • understand better physical properties lunar surface;
  • study the radiation situation in near space;
  • develop technologies for creating delivery vehicles;
  • demonstrate a high level national science and technology.

However, unlike the Americans, some of the work, especially those related to the manned aspect of the program, was classified. Before this year, only a few Soviet sources (“Yearbook of TSB” and the encyclopedia “Cosmonautics”) casually mentioned that the “Zond” apparatus was an unmanned prototype of a ship for circling the Moon, and general and non-specific phrases about future landings of Soviet cosmonauts on the Moon were mentioned in official sources stopped appearing even earlier - after a year.

In addition, imperfect technology has necessitated redundancy. individual systems. Since a manned flight around the Moon and landing on its surface was a matter of prestige, it was necessary to take maximum measures to prevent casualties in case of emergency situations.

To study the lunar surface, as well as for detailed mapping of possible landing sites for Soviet lunar spacecraft, the Luna series of satellites (representing vehicles for various purposes) were created. Also, special versions of lunar rovers were designed to support landing expeditions.

Lunar Cosmonaut Squad

The lunar group of the Soviet detachment of civilian cosmonauts at the TsKBEM in the Cosmonaut Training Center was actually created in the year. At the same time, before the strictest secrecy was imposed on the Soviet lunar program, Tereshkova spoke to foreign journalists about this and the fact that Gagarin was initially the head of the group during a visit to Cuba. Since then, the group has been documented (as a department for training cosmonaut commanders and researchers for the lunar program), in May it was approved by the Military-Industrial Commission, and in February it was finally formed.

Manned flyby of the Moon (UR500K/Proton-L1/Zond complex)

In different design bureaus there were a number of projects to fly around the Moon, including several launches and assembly of a spacecraft in low-Earth orbit (before the advent of the Proton rocket) and direct flight around the Moon. For the implementation of the flight program, a project was selected and brought to the stage of the last unmanned development launches and flights from the newly created OKB-1 Korolev 7K-L1 spacecraft as part of the Soyuz family and the Chelomey OKB-52 Proton launch vehicle created somewhat earlier.

  • submit a schedule for the production and testing of the UR-500 missile within a week;
  • together with the heads of OKB-1 and OKB-52, S. P. Korolev and V. M. Chelomey, within two weeks, consider and resolve issues about the possibility of unifying the manned spacecraft being developed for flying around the moon and landing an expedition on its surface;
  • within a month, submit the LCI program for the UR-500 rocket and manned spacecraft.

Nevertheless, both the military-industrial complex and the Ministry of General Machinery found it expedient to continue work based on the use of the Soyuz complex (7K, 9K, 11K) as another option for solving the problems of orbiting the Moon, and also instructed OKB-1 and OKB-52 to work out all the issues use of the UR-500K launch vehicle in the Soyuz complex program.

To fulfill the assignment of the Ministry and the issued instructions, during September-October, a comprehensive assessment of the state of work in OKB-52 and OKB-1 was carried out to implement the tasks of flying around the Moon with the involvement of employees of NII-88 (now TsNIIMASH), the Scientific and Technical Council of the Ministry, the heads of the Ministry, representatives of the government and the Central Committee of the CPSU. During the review, it became clear that OKB-52 is not able to resolve in a timely manner all issues related to the creation and testing of the UR-500 rocket, the rocket upper stage and the LK-1 lunar orbital vehicle. In OKB-1, on the contrary, the state of development of a manned spacecraft of type 7K and upper stage D for the N1-L3 complex was more favorable. This created the basis for the reorientation from OKB-52 to OKB-1 of work on the spacecraft and upper stage D for the flyby of the Moon, including solving a number of problems related to the implementation of the lunar expedition program carried out by the N1-L3 complex.

Flight schedule of 7K-L1 spacecraft (from the beginning of 1967):

Flight Task Date
2P February - March 1967
3P unmanned flight in highly elliptical orbit March 1967
4L unmanned lunar flyby May 1967
5L unmanned lunar flyby June 1967
6L world's first manned flyby of the Moon June-July 1967
7L August 1967
8L unmanned or manned flyby of the Moon August 1967
9L unmanned or manned flyby of the Moon September 1967
10L unmanned or manned flyby of the Moon September 1967
11L unmanned or manned flyby of the Moon October 1967
12L manned lunar flyby October 1967
13L reserve

There were turtles on the Zond-5 ship. They became the first living beings in history to return to Earth after flying around the Moon - three months before the Apollo 8 flight.

IN nervous conditions“lunar race”, due to the USSR conducting two unmanned flights around the Moon and concealing failures in the L1 program, the United States made a risky rearrangement in its lunar program and made a flyby flight before the previously planned complete testing of the entire Apollo complex in low-Earth orbit. The Apollo 8 lunar flyby was carried out without a lunar module (which was not yet ready) following the only near-Earth manned flight of an orbiter. This was the first manned launch for the Saturn 5 super-heavy launch vehicle.

In the USSR, to ensure priority for the world's first manned flight, the launch of the Zond-7 manned spacecraft as part of the L1 program was planned for December 8, 1968. Due to the fact that previous unmanned flights of the L1 spacecraft were completely or partially unsuccessful due to the lack of development of the ship and the carrier, such a risky flight was canceled - despite the fact that the crews wrote a statement to the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee asking for permission to fly to the Moon immediately to get ahead of the United States . Even if permission had been received, the USSR would not have won the flyby stage of the “lunar race” - on January 20, 1969, when trying to launch the Zond-7 spacecraft in unmanned mode, the Proton launch vehicle exploded (the descent module was saved by the emergency rescue system) .

The last unmanned flight of the Soyuz-7K-L1 spacecraft, called Zond-8, was made in October, after which the L1 program was finally closed, since the non-stop flight Soviet cosmonauts The moon, after the Americans landed on it twice, lost its meaning.

Moon landing (complex N1-L3)

The leadership of the USSR set the task of ensuring priority also for the world's first landing on the Moon. This was provided for by the first decree of the year in general, and by decree from the beginning of the year the first expedition was prescribed for the third quarter of the year. The Soviet lunar landing program N1-L3 (parallel to the lunar flyby), which actually began in 1966, lagged far behind the American one, mainly due to problems with the carrier. The first two of the year (before the first American expedition), as well as the two subsequent ones, test launches of the new super-heavy launch vehicle N-1 ended in failure. The lunar orbital ship-module 7K-LOK of the L3 complex made one, and the lunar-landing ship-module T2K-LK made three test near-Earth unmanned launches after the first US landing. According to the N1-L3 program, which continued for some time even after the triumph of the United States, the first Soviet expedition could take place only in the year , followed by one to five subsequent ones.

A number of different lunar landing projects were considered: several launches and assembly of a lunar ship from compartments in low-Earth orbit, direct flight to the Moon (without undocking for about lunar orbit) etc. For a “direct” flight, OKB-52 Chelomeya proposed to develop its own ship LK-700 based on its carrier UR-700. This project was rejected as more technically complex and longer to implement. Due to greater developments and less technical risk, the Korolev Design Bureau N1-L3 project with a single-launch launch from the Earth and the division of ship-modules near the Moon into two - remaining on the lunar one - was selected and brought to the stage of unmanned test launches and flights. orbit and landing followed by takeoff and docking. During the development of this project, the “replanting” option with the launch of the entire L3 complex with one launch of the N-1 rocket, but without the cosmonauts, who were to be delivered on board the L3 by a separate launch of the Soyuz spacecraft, was considered as an option, but was ultimately rejected.

The main parts of the rocket and space system for landing on the Moon according to the N-1-L3 project were the Soyuz-7K-LOK lunar orbital ship, the LK lunar landing ship and the N1 super-heavy launch vehicle.

The lunar orbital vehicle was very similar and significantly unified with the near-Earth orbital vehicle Soyuz-7K-LOK and also consisted of a descent module, a living compartment, on which a special compartment was located with orientation and mooring engines and a docking system unit, instrumentation and energy compartments, which housed the “I” rocket unit and units of the oxygen-hydrogen power supply system fuel cells. The household compartment also served as an airlock during the astronaut’s transition to the lunar spacecraft through open space(after putting on the Krechet lunar suit).

The crew of the Soyuz-7K-LOK spacecraft consisted of two people. One of them had to go through outer space to the lunar ship and land on the Moon, and the second had to wait for the return of his comrade in lunar orbit.

The Soyuz-7K-LOK spacecraft was installed for unmanned flight tests on the N-1 carrier during its fourth (and last) launch in November, but due to a carrier accident it was never launched into space.

Lunar ship The LC consisted of a sealed cosmonaut cabin, a compartment with attitude control engines with a passive docking unit, an instrument compartment, a lunar landing unit (LAU) and rocket block E. The LC was powered by chemical batteries installed externally on the LPA frame and in the instrument compartment. The control system was built on the basis of an on-board digital computer and had a manual control system that allowed the astronaut to independently select the landing site visually through a special window. The lunar landing module had four legs - supports with honeycomb absorbers of excessive vertical landing speed.

The lunar spacecraft LK T2K was successfully tested three times in low-Earth orbit in unmanned mode under the names “Cosmos-379”, “Cosmos-398” and “Cosmos-434”, respectively, in November and February and August.

Flight schedule of L3 ships (from the beginning of the year):

Mission Target Date
3L mock-ups for testing N1 September
4L reserve
5L unmanned LOC and LC December
6L unmanned LOC and LC February
7L April 1968
8L manned LOK and unmanned LC with landing on the Moon as a backup LC-R June 1968
9L manned LOC and unmanned LOC August 1968
10L manned LOK and LC with the world's first astronaut landing on the Moon September 1968
11L manned LOK and unmanned LC with landing on the Moon as a backup LC-R
12L manned LOK and LC with landing of an astronaut on the Moon
13L reserve

In the USA, when developing powerful carriers of the Saturn series, very large volume ground testing of their individual components and assemblies. This allowed the Americans to carry out all test and manned launches of the Saturn 5 rocket without any accidents. The N-1 rocket was developed in the same way as previous less powerful launch vehicles: by eliminating the causes of malfunctions identified during test launches. However, for a structure of this size and complexity, this path turned out to be too long and expensive. A total of four launches of the N-1 rocket were made. All of them ended in accidents even before the end of the first stage. The real disaster was the second launch of the N-1: immediately after taking off from the ground, the rocket caught fire and fell on the launch complex, almost completely destroying it.

The last launch of the N-1 rocket took place on November 23, less than a month before the last flight to the Moon under the Apollo program. After which it was decided that the prospect of visiting the Moon was much later than that How the Americans completed their lunar program does not justify the effort and money spent on it. In May further work with the N-1 carrier - and with them the entire N-1-L3 program - were finally closed.

These photographic materials are some of the remaining evidence today that the USSR also tried to land a man on the Moon - obviously, after they could not do this, or, more precisely, did not have time to do it, the program was forgotten.

However, fortunately, few things disappear irrevocably and without a trace. The photographs that we can see show one of the laboratories of the Moscow Aviation Institute, as well as aerospace equipment, including spacecraft and landing lunar module.

The “Moon Race” is well known to many contemporaries: before American President John Kennedy initiated the launch of the Apollo program, Soviet Union noticeably ahead of the United States in matters of lunar exploration. In particular, in 1959 an automatic interplanetary station Luna 2, and in 1966 a Soviet satellite entered its orbit.

Like the Americans, Soviet scientists developed a multi-step approach to accomplishing the task. They also had two separate modules for orbit and landing.

While the Apollo 11 crew included three members, the entire burden of the Soviet lunar program had to rest on the shoulders of one cosmonaut - thus, the weight of the equipment was significantly reduced. In addition, there were other differences that made the Soviet apparatus lighter. First of all, these include the comparative simplicity of the design, the use of the same engine for landing and takeoff, as well as the lack of a direct connection between the orbital and lunar module. This meant that the astronaut would need to do a spacewalk to transfer to the lander before landing and, later, to climb back into the orbital module after returning from the Moon. After this, the lunar module was disconnected, and the spacecraft was sent to Earth without it.

The main reason that prevented Soviet side to land a man on the Moon, there were failures with launch vehicles. Although the first two test launches were successful, the rocket crashed during the third. In the fourth test, conducted in 1971, the test spacecraft returned to Earth on the wrong trajectory, ending up in Australian airspace, which could have caused an international scandal: Soviet diplomats allegedly had to convince the Australians that the object falling on them was the Cosmos-434 test space module, and not a nuclear warhead.

After several failures, the program became too expensive, and after the Americans presented the world with documentary evidence of the success of the Apollo 11 mission, it made no sense at all. As a result, space equipment has become something of a museum piece.

The Moon was destined to become the celestial body with which perhaps the most effective and impressive successes of humanity outside the Earth are associated. Direct Study natural satellite our planet began with the start of the Soviet lunar program. January 2, 1959 automatic station Luna 1 made its first flight to the Moon in history.

The first launch of a satellite to the Moon (Luna 1) was a huge breakthrough in space exploration, but main goal, flight from one celestial body to another was never achieved. The launch of Luna-1 provided a lot of scientific and practical information in the field space flights to others celestial bodies. During the flight of Luna-1, the second escape velocity was achieved for the first time and information was obtained about radiation belt Earth and outer space. In the world press, the Luna-1 spacecraft was called “Dream”.

All this was taken into account when launching the next satellite, Luna-2. In principle, Luna-2 almost completely repeated its predecessor Luna-1; the same scientific instruments and equipment made it possible to fill in data on interplanetary space and correct the data obtained by Luna-1. For the launch, the 8K72 Luna launch vehicle with the “E” block was also used. On September 12, 1959, at 6:39 a.m., the Luna-2 spacecraft was launched from the Baikonur RN Luna cosmodrome. And already on September 14 at 00 hours 02 minutes 24 seconds Moscow time, Luna-2 reached the surface of the Moon, making the first flight in history from the Earth to the Moon.

The automatic interplanetary probe reached the surface of the Moon east of the “Sea of ​​Clarity”, near the craters Aristil, Archimedes and Autolycus (selenographic latitude +30°, longitude 0°). As data processing based on orbital parameters shows, the last stage of the rocket also reached the lunar surface. Three symbolic pennants were placed on board Luna 2: two in the automatic interplanetary vehicle and one in the last stage of the rocket with the inscription “USSR September 1959”. Inside Luna-2 there was a metal ball consisting of pentagonal pennants, and upon impact lunar surface the ball scattered into dozens of pennants.

Dimensions: Total length was 5.2 meters. The diameter of the satellite itself is 2.4 meters.

RN: Luna (modification R-7)

Weight: 390.2 kg.

Objectives: Reaching the surface of the Moon (completed). Achieving the second escape velocity (completed). Overcome the gravity of planet Earth (completed). Delivery of "USSR" pennants to the surface of the Moon (completed).

JOURNEY INTO SPACE

"Moon" - name Soviet program exploration of the Moon and a series of spacecraft launched in the USSR to the Moon since 1959.

The first generation spacecraft (“Luna-1” - “Luna-3”) flew from the Earth to the Moon without first launching an artificial Earth satellite into orbit, making corrections on the Earth-Moon trajectory and braking near the Moon. The devices flew over the Moon (“Luna-1”), reached the Moon (“Luna-2”), flew around it and photographed it (“Luna-3”).

Second-generation spacecraft (“Luna-4” - “Luna-14”) were launched using more advanced methods: preliminary insertion into orbit of an artificial Earth satellite, then launch to the Moon, trajectory correction and braking in cislunar space. During the launches, they practiced flying to the Moon and landing on its surface (“Luna-4” - “Luna-8”), soft landing (“Luna-9” and “Luna-13”) and transferring into orbit an artificial lunar satellite (“Luna -10", "Luna-11", "Luna-12", "Luna-14").

More advanced and heavier third-generation spacecraft (“Luna-15” - “Luna-24”) flew to the Moon according to the scheme used by second-generation satellites; Moreover, to increase the accuracy of landing on the Moon, it is possible to make several corrections on the flight path from the Earth to the Moon and in the orbit of an artificial satellite of the Moon. The Luna devices provided the first scientific data on the Moon, the development of a soft landing on the Moon, the creation of artificial lunar satellites, the taking and delivery of soil samples to Earth, and the transportation of lunar self-propelled vehicles to the surface of the Moon. Creation and launch of various automatic lunar probes is a feature of the Soviet lunar exploration program.

MOON RACE

The USSR started the “game” by launching the first artificial satellite. The United States immediately became involved. In 1958, the Americans hastily developed and launched their satellite, and at the same time formed “for the benefit of all” - this is the motto of the organization - NASA. But by that time, the Soviets had overtaken their rivals even further - they sent the dog Laika into space, which, although it did not return, proved with its own heroic example the possibility of survival in orbit.

It took almost two years to develop a lander capable of delivering a living organism back to Earth. It was necessary to modify the structures so that they could withstand two “travels through the atmosphere”, to create a high-quality sealed and resistant high temperatures sheathing And most importantly, it was necessary to calculate the trajectory and design engines that would protect the astronaut from overloads.

When all this was done, Belka and Strelka got the opportunity to show their heroic canine nature. They completed their task - they returned alive. Less than a year later, Gagarin flew in their footsteps - and also returned alive. Americans in that 1961 airless space only Ham the chimpanzee was sent. True, on May 5 of the same year, Alan Shepard made a suborbital flight, but this achievement of space flight was not recognized by the international community. The first “real” American astronaut, John Glenn, ended up in space only in February 1962.

It would seem that the United States is hopelessly behind the “boys from the neighboring continent.” The triumphs of the USSR followed one after another: the first group flight, the first man in outer space, the first woman in space... And even the Soviet “Moons” reached the natural satellite of the Earth first, laying the foundations for the technique of gravitational maneuvers so important for current research programs and photographing the far side night luminary.

But it was possible to win such a game only by destroying the opposing team, physically or mentally. The Americans were not going to be destroyed. On the contrary, back in 1961, immediately after Yuri Gagarin’s flight, NASA, with the blessing of the newly elected Kennedy, set a course for the Moon.

The decision was risky - the USSR achieved its goal step by step, systematically and consistently, and still it did not do without failures. A space agency The US has decided to take a step, if not a whole flight of stairs. But America compensated for its, in a certain sense, arrogance by carefully working out the lunar program. The Apollos were tested on Earth and in orbit, while the USSR launch vehicles and lunar modules were “tested in combat” - and did not withstand the tests. As a result, the US tactics turned out to be more effective.

But the key factor that weakened the Union in the lunar race was the split within the “team from the Soviet court.” Korolev, on whose will and enthusiasm the astronautics rested, first, after his victory over the skeptics, lost his monopoly on decision-making. Design bureaus grew like mushrooms after rain on black soil unspoiled by agricultural cultivation. The distribution of tasks began, and each leader, whether scientific or party, considered himself the most competent. At first, the very approval of the lunar program was late - politicians, distracted by Titov, Leonov and Tereshkova, took up it only in 1964, when the Americans had already been thinking about their Apollo for three years. And then the attitude towards flights to the Moon turned out to be not serious enough - they did not have the same military prospects as the launches of Earth satellites and orbital stations, and they required much more funding.

Problems with money, as is usually the case, “finished off” grandiose lunar projects. From the very start of the program, Korolev was advised to underestimate the numbers before the word “rubles”, because no one would approve of the real amounts. If developments were as successful as previous ones, this approach would be justified. The party leadership still knew how to count and would not close a promising business in which too much has already been invested. But combined with a confused division of labor, the lack of funds led to catastrophic delays in schedule and savings in testing.

Perhaps the situation could be rectified later. The astronauts were burning with enthusiasm, even asking to be sent to the Moon on ships that did not survive the test flights. Design bureaus, with the exception of OKB-1, which was under the leadership of Korolev, demonstrated the inconsistency of their projects and quietly left the scene. The stable economy of the USSR in the 70s made it possible to highlight additional funds to refine the missiles, especially if the military got involved. However, in 1968, an American crew flew around the moon, and in 1969, Neil Armstrong took his small victorious step in the space race. The Soviet lunar program has lost its meaning for politicians.

Why didn't we end up on the moon? Most often you can hear about the imperfection of the technological base of Soviet industry, which was unable to create a rocket and spacecraft for the lunar project. It was reported that the Soviet Union was doomed to lose to the United States in the lunar race. But this is not entirely true. The main reason for the failure of the most expensive space project (4 billion rubles in 1974 prices) was the inconsistency of the actions of various departments and the ambitions of a number of leaders of that period.

Why did we need the Moon?

In reality, the Soviet lunar program was a symmetrical response to the American lunar program. The leaders of OKB-1 were absolutely not interested in the moon. Korolev and the N-1 rocket project were a modernized version of an earlier royal project. Intended for the delivery of a hydrogen super-bomb and for the launch of large-sized orbital complexes, the dimensions of which were supposed to be several times larger than the Soyuz and Mir that appeared later. It was completely unfeasible to implement the lunar program.

But the CPSU Central Committee decided to accept the challenge of the Americans. In 1960, a decree was issued by the Government Decree of June 23, 1960 “On the creation of powerful launch vehicles, satellites, spacecraft and space exploration in 1960-1967.” was planned to take place in the 1960s. design development and the necessary amount of research in order to create a new spacecraft in the coming years missile system with a launch mass of 1000-2000 tons, ensuring the launch of heavy interplanetary spacecraft into orbit around the Earth

ship weighing 60-80 tons, powerful liquid rocket engines with high performance, liquid hydrogen rocket engines, nuclear and electric propulsion engines, high-precision autonomous and radio control systems, space radio communication systems, etc. But already in 1964, the CPSU Central Committee put the new goal is to carry out a manned expedition to the Moon before the United States delivers an astronaut to the Moon.

Blows of fate

The first difficult test for the project was the personal conflict between Korolev and Glushko and the latter’s refusal to develop engines for the lunar rocket. An urgent decision was made to entrust the development of engines to the design bureau under the leadership of Kuznetsov.

According to Glushko, the creation of an engine of the required size using oxygen could be delayed, encountering problems with pulsating combustion and protecting the chamber walls and nozzle from overheating. In turn, the use of long-lasting components that provide stable combustion in the liquid-propellant rocket engine chamber with a temperature of 280 - 580 degrees. C lower than oxygen fuel will speed up engine burnout. In addition, the liquid rocket engine turned out to be structurally simpler.

Assessing Glushko’s arguments, Korolev wrote the following in a memo addressed to the head of the expert commission: “The entire argument about the difficulties of testing an oxygen engine is based on the experience of the V. Glushko Design Bureau in working with an open circuit rocket engine. It should be especially emphasized that these difficulties have nothing to do with the engines of the closed circuit adopted for the N-1 rocket, in which the oxidizer enters the combustion chamber in a hot and gaseous state, and not in cold and liquid, as with the usual, open circuit. Indeed, when starting closed circuit engines, thermal ignition of the components in the combustion chamber occurs due to the heat of the hot gaseous oxidizer - oxygen or AT. This method of starting a closed-circuit oxygen-kerosene engine was experimentally tested in OKB-1 engines and adopted for the last stage of the Molniya launch vehicle, as well as in the N. Kuznetsov OKB during the development of oxygen-kerosene engines NK-9V and NK-15V for the N- rocket 1". The expert commission sided with Korolev. Glushko did not forgive the Queen for this. He supports general designer Chelomey, in his project of the giant UR-700 rocket, an alternative to the N-1 using engines of his own design. But the scientific commission led by Academician Keldysh gave preference to the N-1 OKB-1 project, since design work by that time, N-1 was almost completed.

In the Resolution of August 3, 1964, it was first determined that the most important task in the exploration of outer space using the N1 launch vehicle is the exploration of the Moon with the landing of expeditions on its surface and their subsequent return to Earth.

Main developers lunar system L3 were:

— OKB-1 is the lead organization for the system as a whole, the development of rocket blocks G and D, engines for block D and the development of lunar (LK) and lunar orbital (LOK) ships;

— OKB-276 (N.D. Kuznetsov) — for the development of the G block engine;

- OKB-586 (M.K. Yangel) - for the development of the rocket block E of the lunar ship and the engine of this block;

— OKB-2 (A.M. Isaev) — for the development of the propulsion system (tanks, PG systems and engine) of block I of the lunar orbital ship;

— NII-944 (V.I. Kuznetsov) — on the development of a control system for the L3 system;

- NII-885 (M.S. Ryazansky) - on the radio measuring complex;

— GSKB Spetsmash (V.P. Barmin) — for the complex of ground equipment of the L3 system.

The dates for the start of the LCT were also determined - 1966 and the implementation of the expedition in 1967-1968.

At this point, an important adjustment is made to the development of the rocket. In order to ensure the delivery of an astronaut in one launch, Korolev adapts the N-1 to new conditions almost “from the knees.” Project L3 takes on the form that does not change until the lunar program is closed. From the previous scheme (with direct landing without separation into orbital and landing modules) new option stood out for its weight. Now one launch of the N 1 was enough, although for this it was necessary to increase its carrying capacity by 25 tons. The 91.5-ton L3 complex would be launched into an intermediate near-Earth orbit with an altitude of 220 km and an inclination of 51.8°. The device could remain here for up to 1 day, during which final preparations were made. Gradually an understanding of the complexity of the task at hand came.

The next blow is funding restrictions. Korolev was unable to obtain funding for a number of important elements project, one of which was a ground stand for testing the first stage engine block - the country's leadership considered this unnecessary, while in the Apollo project this stand was present. The head of the testing department of the Saturn 5 - Apollo project, K. Muller, was able to prove that to successfully solve the problem there is only one way: complete ground testing of the entire system in all possible normal and emergency situations. He gave his all to ensure that 2/3 of the funds allocated for the project were invested in the creation of test benches and achieved positive result: virtually all Saturn 5 launches were successful. The engines of the first stage of the N-1 (and there were 30 of them!) were tested separately and never in a single block on a test bench. Testing the engines “live” would certainly delay the implementation of the project.

Engine adjustments are being made immediately to reduce problems during test flights. Was developed automatic system engine thrust correction, which made it possible, if one or more of the engines fail, to transfer the load in a balanced manner to the others. Subsequently, lattice aerodynamic rudders were also used (this technology found application 10 years later in missiles for interceptor fighters). Distinctive feature N-1 was unique for our launch vehicles of that time in terms of mass payload payload. The supporting structure worked for this (the tanks and the frame did not form a single whole), the relatively low density of the arrangement due to the huge spherical tanks led to a decrease in the payload. On the other hand, extremely small specific gravity tanks, extremely high engine performance and constructive solutions allowed to increase it.

In 1966, Korolev dies on the operating table - OKB-1 is headed by his permanent deputy, Mishin. It is already clear to everyone that in 1968 it will not be possible to get to the moon and, apparently, in 1969 too. Calculations were made already for 1970.

The first stage had 30 engines installed along two concentric circles. Although the engine proved to be quite reliable in bench tests, most of the problems were caused by vibrations and other unaccounted-for effects associated with the simultaneous operation of so many engines (this was due to the lack of a comprehensive test bench, for which no money was given).

Academician Vasily Mishin (part of the interview):

– Vasily Pavlovich, they say that at one time Korolev promised: “In the year of the fiftieth anniversary Soviet power soviet man will be on the moon! Do you remember under what circumstances this happened?

- Yes, Korolev never said anything like that about the Moon. We would never have been able to land there before the Americans. Our guts were thin and we had no money. We were only able to launch vehicles into orbit. And a flight to the Moon is an order of magnitude more expensive! Yes, we were the first in orbit by accident. This is all propaganda... The fact is that America is a rich country, the Americans could have surpassed us a long time ago. But they needed to regain their lost prestige - after the first Sputniks and Gagarin. And Kennedy spoke to Congress in 1961 and asked for 40 billion dollars for this event in order to land Americans on the Moon and return them to Earth before the year 70. The United States at that time could go to such huge expenses, but our country, exhausted after the war, could not allocate such funds in such a time frame. That's all.

– So they specifically chose the goal and timing so that they would definitely get ahead of us?

– Well, yes... And moreover, it was the Saturn 5-Apollo program that pushed us. Before that, we were working on the N-1 rocket for completely different purposes, not for the Moon. They planned to launch heavy orbital station for 75 tons. And then, when the American single-launch scheme (the Saturn 5-Apollo project) became known, the leadership of our country instructed the three leading design bureaus, headed by Korolev, Yangel and Chelomey, to develop a project for such an expedition to the Moon with a return to Earth. As a result of consideration of these projects, the N 1-LZ project, developed by OKB-1 under the leadership of Sergei Pavlovich Korolev, was chosen. In particular, and because the N-1 rocket had already been developed and put into production, it only had to be “increased” a little - the launch mass was increased from 2200 tons to 3000 and 30 engines were installed instead of 24 on the first stage.

In parallel, work was carried out to fine-tune spaceship. The most developed project was the Korolev Design Bureau L1, according to which a number of unmanned test flights were carried out. This ship was similar to the Soyuz-7K-OK (orbital ship) designed for flights in near-Earth orbit, known to the general public simply as Soyuz. The main differences between the Soyuz-7K-L1 spacecraft and the Soyuz-7K-OK spacecraft are the absence of an orbital compartment and enhanced thermal protection of the descent vehicle for entering the atmosphere at the second escape velocity. The Proton launch vehicle was used to launch the spacecraft.

The plan was to enter the atmosphere above southern hemisphere Earth, and due to aerodynamic forces, the descent vehicle rose again into space, and its speed decreased from the second cosmic speed to suborbital. The re-entry into the atmosphere took place over the territory of the Soviet Union. The Soyuz-7K-L1 spacecraft made five unmanned test flights under the names Zond-4 – 8. At the same time, the Zond-5 – 8 spacecraft flew around the Moon. Another four ships could not be launched into space due to accidents of the Proton launch vehicle during the launch phase. (Prototypes of the Soyuz-7K-L1 spacecraft were also launched, as well as several of its research modifications not related to the manned lunar flyby program.) In three of the five Zond flights, accidents occurred that would have led to the death of crew members or injury. they would be injured if these flights were manned. There were turtles on the Zond-5 ship. They became the first living beings in history to return to Earth after flying around the Moon - three months before the Apollo 8 flight.

In the USSR, there were a number of different projects for landing on the Moon: several launches and assembly of a lunar ship in low-Earth orbit, direct flight to the Moon, etc., but only the Korolev Design Bureau N1-L3 project was brought to the stage of test launches. The N1-L3 project was basically the same as the American Apollo project. Even the layout of the system at the launch stage was similar to the American one: the lunar ship was located in an adapter below the main ship, just like the Apollo lunar module.

The main parts of the rocket and space system for landing on the Moon according to the N1-L3 project were the Soyuz-7K-LOK lunar orbital ship, the LK lunar spacecraft and the powerful N1 launch vehicle.

The crew of the Soyuz-7K-LOK spacecraft consisted of two people. One of them had to go through outer space to the lunar ship and land on the Moon, and the second had to wait for the return of his comrade in lunar orbit.

The Soyuz-7K-LOK spacecraft was installed for flight testing on the N1 launch vehicle in its fourth (and last) launch, but due to the launch vehicle accident it was never launched into space.

Lunar ship "LK": 1 - lunar landing unit, 2 — missile block “E”, 3 — cosmonaut cabin, 4 — blocks of the vital activity system, 5 - observation device during landing, 6 - attitude control engine block, 7 — radiator of the thermal control system, 8 - docking point, 9 — aiming sensor, 10 - adjustment sensors, 11 — instrument compartment, 12 - television camera, 13 - omnidirectional antennas, 14 - power supplies, 15 - support stand with shock absorber, 16 - strut with shock absorber, 17 - landing radar, 18 — hinged instrument compartment, 19 - weakly directional antennas, 20 — antennas of the rendezvous system, 21 - television antennas, 22 - pressing motor, 23 - main engine, 24 - reflector, 25 - backup engine.

The control system was built on the basis of an on-board computer and had a manual control system that allowed the astronaut to independently select the landing site visually through a special window. The lunar landing device was a four-legged original design with honeycomb residual vertical landing speed absorbers.

The lunar spacecraft was successfully tested three times in low-Earth orbit in unmanned mode under the names “Cosmos-379”, “Cosmos-398” and “Cosmos-434”.

Unfortunately, for many reasons, the testing dates were constantly shifted “to the right”, and the time for the implementation of the lunar program was constantly shifted “to the left”. This, naturally, affected the work, which in the last quarter of the 1960s took on a completely abnormal pace. However, it was assumed that by launching a rocket every three to four months, we would complete flight tests and move on to planned operation of the complex in 1972 - 1973.

The first launch of the N1-L3 rocket and space complex occurred on February 21, 1969. As a result of a fire in the tail compartment and a malfunction of the engine control system, which at 68.7 seconds issued a false command to turn off the engines, the rocket died. The second launch of the N1-L3 complex was carried out four months later and also ended abnormally due to the abnormal operation of engine No. 8 of block A. As a result of the explosion, the launch complex was almost completely destroyed. And although voices were again heard in favor of the unreliability of Kuznetsov’s engines and the rocket design itself, the cause of the disasters was the haste to prepare flight tests.

The commission found out the following: even during bench testing, the susceptibility of NK-15 to the ingress of large (tens of mm) metal objects into the oxidizer pump was registered, which led to damage to the impeller, fire and explosion of the pump; small metal objects (shavings, sawdust, etc.) burning in the gas generator led to the destruction of the turbine blades. Non-metallic objects (rubber, rags, etc.) that got into the TNA input did not cause the engine to stop. This reliability result was not achieved even much later! Instance 5L belonged to the first batch of flight products, which did not provide for the installation of filters at the inlet to the pumps. They were supposed to be installed on the engines of all rockets, starting with the 8L carrier, which was supposed to be used during the fifth launch.

The reliability of the rocket engine seemed insufficient to Kuznetsov himself. Since July 1970, the OKB began to create qualitatively new engines, virtually reusable and with a significantly increased service life. However, they were ready only by the end of 1972, and flight tests were supposed to continue until that time on rockets with old liquid-propellant engines, the control over which had been increased.

Due to damage to the launch complex and a slowdown in the pace of work, preparations for the third flight test were delayed for two years. Only on Sunday, June 27, 1971, the 6L rocket launched at 2:15:70 Moscow time from the second, recently built, launch facility of site 110 of the Baikonur Cosmodrome. All engines worked stably. From the moment of liftoff, telemetry recorded abnormal operation of the roll control system.

Starting from the 39th second, the control system was unable to stabilize the carrier along its axes. At the 48th second, due to reaching supercritical angles of attack, the destruction of the launch vehicle began in the area of ​​​​the junction of block “B” and the nose fairing. The head unit separated from the rocket and, collapsing, fell not far from the launch. The “decapitated” carrier continued its uncontrolled flight. At the 51st second, when the roll angle reached 200 degrees, on command from the end contacts of the gyroplatform, all engines of block “A” were turned off. Continuing to disintegrate in the air, the rocket flew for some time and fell 20 km from the launch, leaving a crater on the ground with a diameter of 30 m and a depth of 15 m.

On November 23, 1972, 17 months after the unsuccessful third attempt, the fourth took place. Instance 7L started from position No. 2 at 9:11:52 Moscow time. For outside observers, up until the 107th second, the flight was successful. The engines operated stably, all rocket parameters were within normal limits. But some cause for concern emerged at the 104th second. They didn’t even have time to attach any significance: 3 seconds later, in the tail section of block “A,” a strong explosion scattered the entire peripheral propulsion system and destroyed the lower part of the spherical oxidizer tank. The rocket exploded and fell into pieces in the air. But the program performers themselves did not lose heart. They understood: everything is natural, the rocket is learning to fly, accidents are inevitable. In the 8L carrier, the developers tried to take into account all the previously obtained flight test results. The rocket became significantly heavier, but its creators had no doubt that there would be no more explosions or fires in block “A” and that the fifth attempt would solve the problem of flying the L-3 unmanned expedition using a simplified scheme without landing on the lunar surface.

By the beginning of 1974, the 8L rocket was assembled. The installation of new, reusable liquid propellant engines has begun at all its stages. Thus, the NK-33 engine of block “A” was a modernized version of the NK-15 with significantly increased reliability and performance. Trouble-free ground testing of all liquid-propellant rocket engines gave confidence in the successful fifth launch of the rocket, scheduled for the fourth quarter of 1974. A working version of the lunar spacecraft with all the necessary automation was installed on the rocket. It was planned to fly around the moon and it was possible to send an expedition on the next flight.

Sad end

The removal of Academician V. Mishin from the post of head of OKB-1 and the appointment of V. Glushko in his place in May 1974 was unexpected for the entire team. Work on N-1 in the newly formed NPO Energia in the shortest possible time completely abandoned, the official reason for the closure of the project was “the lack of heavy payloads corresponding to the carrying capacity of the carrier.” The production capacity of the rocket units, almost all the equipment of the technical, launch and measuring complexes was destroyed. At the same time, costs in the amount of 6 billion rubles were written off. (in prices of the 70s) spent on the topic.

Glushko himself proposed at that time an alternative project “Energy” using new, not yet created engines. Therefore, he was afraid of the successful launch of the N-1 rocket with a lunar ship on board - this could ruin all the plans of his team. Later, it took another 13 years to create a rocket of similar power and 14.5 billion rubles were spent.

The Energia complex was created much later - in 1987 and launched after the death of the chief designer. By that time, the rocket turned out to be unnecessary and expensive due to the collapse of the USSR, and by technical solution The Energia-Buran combination is outdated, because the Americans launched a similar complex 8 years earlier. There were no longer any tasks for its use. The cost and implementation time of the project significantly exceeded those compared to Korolev’s “lunar” project. “Energia”, after several launches, two of which were partially successful, ceased to exist.

LV "Energia" at the launch

Kuznetsov did not accept his removal from work on liquid propellant engines and continued bench testing of his engines. Ground tests were carried out in 1974-1976 until January 1977 new program, requiring confirmation of the operability of each rocket engine within 600 s. However, usually fire tests of single engines at the OKB lasted 1200 s. Forty liquid-propellant rocket engines operated from 7,000 to 14,000 seconds, and one NK-33 operated for 20,360 seconds. Until 1995, 94 engines of blocks “A”, “B”, “C” and “D” of the N-1 rocket were stored in the warehouses of NPP Trud until 1995. It turned out to be surprising that Kuznetsov’s engines for the N-1 rocket still exist and are still ready to operate as they were in that distant time.

Acceleration block“D”, developed by the Korolev Design Bureau for the N-1 rocket, is still used when launching vehicles using the Proton rocket.

Subsequently, Glushko also proposed a project for an expedition to the Moon, including the creation of a long-term habitable base, but the time for ambitious dreams had already passed. Complete absence The economic effect of the program affected the opinion of the country's leadership - no one was going to fly to the Moon in the Soviet Union. Although it could have been in July 1974.

July 3, 1969, Baikonur Cosmodrome. In the foreground is the Soviet lunar rocket N-1 (product No. 5L). In the background is a try-on rocket for testing ground launch systems (note that the try-on rocket does not have an escape system).

The closure of the Soviet manned lunar flight program occurred in June 1974, at which time the entire cosmonaut corps was disbanded. The following month, the rockets ready for launch were cut into pieces. The destruction of the technological backlog led to a 15-year lag in the development of astronautics. What is to blame? Why did attempts to get to the moon stop?


It is often said that the industry of the USSR could not create a spacecraft to fly to the Moon, that there was no appropriate technological base. They also say that it was simply impossible to compete with the USA. But the main reason for the failure of the project, which cost 4 billion at 1974 prices. rub., was the inability of various departments to agree among themselves and the personal aspirations of some leaders.

The US began its lunar program with sole purpose: surpass the USSR after the Russians launched the world's first satellite, took pictures of the far side of the Moon and were the first to launch a man into space. Landing man on the moon was the last chance. To achieve this goal, the best representatives of science were gathered, orders were given to the most suitable corporations in the absence of competition. The USSR usually followed this path.

The Soviet lunar program was just a response to the United States. The Moon itself was not of interest to the leaders of OKB-1 Korolev. But the USA issued a challenge and the USSR accepted it. The N-1 missile project was a continuation of the existing project, which was developed as a delivery vehicle hydrogen bomb and launching large-sized complexes into orbit, many times larger than the later Soyuz, Salyut and Mir.

The implementation of the lunar program was not economically feasible. But the CPSU Central Committee did not abandon it. According to the Government Decree, issued in 1960, it was planned to create a new rocket system for launching a heavy spacecraft weighing up to 60-80 tons into orbit, creating new rocket engines, control systems and space radio communications. In 1964, a new goal was set - a manned flight to the Moon and landing on its surface before the Americans.

The L-1 lunar project became the cause of a fierce struggle between the design bureaus of Korolev and Chelomey. The existing Proton launch vehicle could theoretically make a manned flight around the Moon, but the recollections of participants in the events indicate that Korolev refused to put cosmonauts on a poisonous rocket. The fact is that the fuel for the Proton was heptyl, the oxidizing agent was nitric acid. In Kazakhstan, many poisonings were recorded among local residents who used the first stages of Protons in their households. Official information stated that the use of Proton was abandoned due to too high overloads that the astronauts could not withstand.

A difficult test for the project was the conflict between Korolev and Glushko, as a result of which the latter abandoned the development of an engine for the rocket. The work was transferred to the Kuznetsov design bureau.

It was planned that two astronauts would participate in the lunar project, and only one would descend to the surface of the Moon, while the second was supposed to remain in orbit. The first person to walk on the moon was supposed to be A.A. Leonov, Yu.A. was supposed to act as an understudy. Gagarin. The N-1 launch vehicle was designed to deliver the Soyuz spacecraft with a manned lunar module into lunar orbit.

So why didn't it happen? One of the reasons was austerity. Four N-1 launches were unsuccessful due to the first stage, for which a test stand was not built. Since all first stage engines were tested separately, it was impossible to determine the cause of stage failure.

When it became known that the Americans were about to go to the Moon, Leonov was eager to fly, but he was not allowed in, which saved his life. N-1 launched on February 21, 1969 without a crew, six months before the launch of Apollo 11. The rocket exploded shortly after the flight began. The second attempt was carried out on July 3, 1969. The rocket exploded right on the launch pad, almost completely destroying the launch complex. Even then it became clear that we would not be the first to get to the Moon.

Korolev and Gagarin pass away. These two deaths were tantamount to the death of the Russian cosmonautics. And the point is not that there were no other talented designers and trained cosmonauts. Korolev and Gagarin were members of the Kremlin and their opinions were listened to. Korolev not only argued with anyone, regardless of rank, he knew how to present his project in such a way that the military advocated the need for its implementation. The first satellite was a beacon for ballistic missiles. He convinced the military that building a base on the Moon would allow them to keep the whole world under attack. He kept silent about the almost unaffordable cost of the project for the country. The military jumped at the idea. In addition, the N-1 rocket could launch into orbit stations weighing over 100 tons, such as the Zvezda station, which was conceived for military purposes.

Korolev knew how to use the needs and desires of the military in own purposes, knocking out funds for the implementation of their projects. For Korolev himself, the flight to the Moon was only the first step towards a flight to Mars.

The change of management in the design bureau did not bring anything good. Funding decreased significantly, the test stand was not built. The launch complex was restored, but subsequent attempts to launch the rocket were not successful due to the same reason for the failure of the first stage. And the Americans were already accepting congratulations on the successful landing on the Moon. The Soviet lunar program was curtailed, and Mars was also forgotten.

However, another attempt was made. The hopes of the Russian cosmonautics were pinned on the Energia rocket. The tests were successful. But the rocket was buried under the collapsed roof of the assembly and testing building at Baikonur. This put an end to Russia's plans. The United States has become a leader in space exploration. There is no point in trying to compete with them, spending hundreds of billions on flights.

Russia's leadership in space is a thing of the past due to the winding down of the lunar program and a change in leadership in astronautics. Today's undisputed leader is the United States. But if the country’s leadership had not forgotten Tsiolkovsky’s words that the one who conquered space would rule the world, the situation could have turned out differently.

Who can become the leader of tomorrow? Most likely China. His space program quite fantastic, the moon landing project should be completed with the construction of a lunar base by 2021. Many do not believe in the feasibility of this project, but China has already proven that it is capable of very unexpected actions, as evidenced by the ultra-fast growth of its economy.

Photo of the secret lunar program of the USSR

These photographic materials are some of the remaining evidence today that the USSR also tried to land a man on the Moon - obviously, after they failed to do this, or, more precisely, did not have time to do it, the program was forgotten.

However, fortunately, few things disappear irrevocably and without a trace. The images we can see show one of the laboratories of the Moscow Aviation Institute, as well as aerospace equipment, including a spacecraft and a lunar landing module.

The history of the “Moon Race” is well known to many contemporaries: before American President John Kennedy initiated the launch of the Apollo program, the Soviet Union was noticeably ahead of the United States in matters of lunar exploration. In particular, in 1959 the automatic interplanetary station “Luna-2” was delivered to the surface of the Moon, and in 1966 a Soviet satellite entered its orbit.

Like the Americans, Soviet scientists developed a multi-step approach to accomplishing the task. They also had two separate modules for orbit and landing.

While the Apollo 11 crew included three members, the entire burden of the Soviet lunar program had to rest on the shoulders of one cosmonaut - thus, the weight of the equipment was significantly reduced. In addition, there were other differences that made the Soviet apparatus lighter. First of all, these include the comparative simplicity of the design, the use of the same engine for landing and takeoff, as well as the lack of a direct connection between the orbital and lunar module. This meant that the astronaut would need to do a spacewalk to transfer to the lander before landing and, later, to climb back into the orbital module after returning from the Moon. After this, the lunar module was disconnected, and the spacecraft was sent to Earth without it.

The main reason that prevented the Soviet side from landing a man on the Moon was failures with launch vehicles. Although the first two test launches were successful, the rocket crashed during the third. In the fourth test, carried out in 1971, the test spacecraft returned to Earth along the wrong trajectory, ending up in Australian airspace, as a result of which an international scandal could have arisen: Soviet diplomats allegedly had to convince the Australians that the object falling on them was a test spacecraft. the Kosmos-434 module, not a nuclear warhead.

After several failures, the program became too expensive, and after the Americans presented the world with documentary evidence of the success of the Apollo 11 mission, it made no sense at all. As a result, space equipment has become something of a museum piece.



Did you like the article? Share with your friends!