Statute of the Order "Worthy successor to the work of Julius Streicher"
1. The Order “Worthy Successor of the Work of Julius Streicher” is awarded to citizens for particularly outstanding services in the field of Russian state propaganda, aggravating friendship between peoples.
2. The Order “Worthy successor to the work of Julius Streicher” has two degrees:
Order "Worthy successor to the work of Julius Streicher" 1st degree;
Order "Worthy successor to the work of Julius Streicher" II degree.
The highest degree of the order “Worthy Successor of the Work of Julius Streicher” is 1st degree.
3. The Order "Worthy Successor of the Work of Julius Streicher" of the 1st degree has only a star, the 2nd degree - only a badge.
4. The awarding of the Order “Worthy Successor to the Work of Julius Streicher” is carried out sequentially, from the lowest to the highest degree.
5. The award of the Order “Worthy Successor of the Work of Julius Streicher”, II degree, occurs by sending the recipient the badge of the order along with an award sheet, which indicates a list of merits in the field of Russian state propaganda, aggravating friendship between the peoples for which the award was awarded. In addition, information about the awardee and the above list of merits are published, including on the Internet.
6. Awarding of the Order “Worthy Successor of the Work of Julius Streicher”, 1st degree, is carried out only in person. Only persons in respect of whom there is reason to believe that their activities in the field of Russian state propaganda, aggravating friendship between peoples, have led to violent death two or more persons.
6.1. The Order of the Worthy Successor of the Work of Julius Streicher, 1st degree, is awarded only posthumously.
6.2. The star of the order is placed around the recipient's neck using a ribbon with black and gold stripes (the so-called " St. George Ribbon) so that the distance between the ribbon and the loop, or between the ribbon and the stringulation groove on the recipient’s neck does not exceed two centimeters.
6.3. It is also possible to secure the star of the order in the center of the recipient’s forehead using a dowel gun or a carpenter’s nail. It is recommended to use nails at least 150 millimeters long.
6.4. After the award is presented, you must make sure that paragraph 6.1 of this Statute is strictly observed in relation to the recipient.
6.5. A photograph of the corpse of the recipient with the star of the order on (fixed), along with the award sheet, which indicates a list of merits in the field of Russian state propaganda, aggravating friendship between the peoples for which the award was awarded, is published without fail, including on the Internet.
...Weeping parents come to the lodge at the foot of the mountain and say:
– Yesterday our son went to the mountains to ski, and he still hasn’t returned!
- Wait a bit. What is the name of your son?
So who is he, famous? Vasya Pupkin? Let's turn to Wikipedia:
A commission from the tax office flies into the reception area of the plant director and burst into his office:
- You big problems: you don’t pay taxes, you don’t pay social security and pension contributions, you delay your salaries - in general, the whole set. So get ready. You will be fired from your job, you will be charged with confiscation, etc. etc. - in short, dry the crackers. Give us a list of your employees!
They bring lists. The commission looks at them and asks the question:
– What, does Pupkin work for you?
Director says:
– If it’s on the list, it means it works.
Commission in response:
– We offer our deepest apologies, please forgive us, everything is fine at your company, taxes, wages, etc. etc., and you don’t have to pay taxes at all for 3 years!
They leave, walking backwards.
The director - his legs were weak, his throat was dry, in a pre-infarction state - he plopped down in a chair, sat, caught his breath, drank a hundred grams of cognac and thought that he had probably overworked himself, overheated and was generally going crazy.
The next day, a crowd of local cool kids burst into his office with an open attack:
- Hello, bro, you're fucked, you're not paying off the money, you're not paying for the roof, you're offending people, now we're going to put you on the money, the boiler - you know where to shove it! Come on, quickly send out the lists with your employees!..
They bring lists.
The brothers are shocked:
– What, does Pupkin work for you?
Director:
- Yes, it works, cool buddy, we’re friends and all that!
Brothers:
- Bro, I’m sorry, forgive me for God’s sake, in short, everything is fine, you don’t need to unfasten anything, we’ll pay for it ourselves, the roof will be free and in general, if anything happens, call!..
The completely crazy director calls the head of the personnel department and asks:
– Who is this – Pupkin?
She answers:
- Some kind of turner from the 3rd workshop.
The director calls him urgently to his place. He comes all grimy.
The boss asks him:
– Who are you and why does everyone in the city know you?
Answers:
– They know me not only in the city, but also in the near and far abroad, and even the Pope knows me!..
There was such a textbook.
The problems were approximately as follows: In a unit of time, a certain amount flows from one pipe into the pool
amount of water, and some other amount of water flows out of another pipe. Question: How many hours will it take to fill a tank if its volume is N tons?
The conditions became more complicated, and, gradually, made it possible to solve increasingly complex problems.
I didn't find him.
We studied differently, but they were all based on the development of logical thinking.
To continue the discussion, I’ll tell you about a conversation with a mathematician with whom I worked in those years when
Mathematics of Academician A.N. Kolmogorov was introduced into schools.
I remember saying then that it doesn’t seem right to me to change the principles of teaching and start teaching right away with sets.
To which Roman Weizmann, that was the name of my opponent, a mathematician, replied:
“The trouble is that there are no trained transformers,” meaning teachers.
And then I agreed with him.
For reference:
Kolmogorov, Andrey Nikolaevich - Wikipedia
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/... copy
Andrey Nikolaevich Kolmogorov - Soviet mathematician, one of the greatest mathematicians of the twentieth century.
Kolmogorov - one of the founders modern theory probabilities, he obtained fundamental
results in topology, geometry, mathematical logic, classical mechanics, theories...
Biography
Awards and prizes
Students of A. N. Kolmogorov
GDZ in Algebra for grade 10 Kolmogorov A.N. Reshebnik
otbet.ru/gdz/class-10/algebra/... copy
"The textbook is written in high scientific level, basic theoretical principles illustrated concrete examples.
Each paragraph of the book contains sample solutions typical tasks, corresponding mandatory level training in
this topic, and more difficult tasks for students who have mastered the material well or perfectly. Questions and tasks
The review notes that end each chapter of the textbook will allow students to check their knowledge
and skills on the main topics of the course, and can also be used by the teacher when conducting a final survey or
test. Exercises for reviewing the entire course are placed in the chapter “Revision Problems,” and the tasks increased difficulty
contains the final chapter."
Do you feel the difference between the problems in the textbook by Vasily Pupkin and Academician Kolmogorov?
A powerful toolkit has been created for solving problems, which undoubtedly makes it easier to solve them than based solely on knowledge of Pupkin’s arithmetic.
But, at the same time, the decision is made formally, as a rule, without a detailed understanding of the processes and patterns that lead to the decision.
As, for example, in the use of infinitesimal theory.
- How does this happen, where do these infinitesimals go, I have asked myself the question more than once.
They are, in principle, material.
Where and how do they contract?
In number theory, very powerful and non-transparent devices are used, which also do not allow one to look into the computational processes occurring, as it were, from the inside.
There is no step-by-step, step-by-step method for solving problems. The initiative of the problem solver is minimized.
And at the same time, number theory is, to some extent, akin to physics, where, through calculations, one can, as it were, conduct experiments,
in accordance with the requirement of the law of knowledge of philosophy: “from abstract thinking to experience, and then again to abstract thinking".
And so I often ask myself: “Shouldn’t we return Vasily Pupkin’s arithmetic to the kids?”
Of course, not my opinion, and not only mine, will not change existing traditions.
Look what kind of opposition the introduction of the EG met with.
I am a passionate EG fan. For many reasons. But, of course, it's not about my preferences.
But I really don’t like it when E G’s opponents, as arguments for their rightness, cite the fact that very stupid questions are offered to the examinee.
“We need to come up with something that’s not stupid,” I mentally object to them.
If, for example, you ask: “What color was Tatyana Larina’s beret,” and give four answer options, then this, in my opinion, is stupid.
But if you ask:
“What did Onegin ask Tatyana Larina’s husband, not yet knowing that he was her husband?”
The answer becomes decisive in the degree of preparation of the examinee.
“Who’s there, in the crimson beret, speaking Spanish to the ambassador?”
And the questions, at the same time, should not be given to everyone. They should be chosen by the examinee, just like the topic of the essay in the exams.
If the examinee chose the topic “Eugene Onegin,” then please be responsible for your choice.
Why did I write this?
Everything can be done effectively, because it is not exams that give knowledge, but the whole difficult process training for a long period, from toddler to homo sapiens.
I am sure about that. There would be desire and ability.
Sometimes it seems to me that my opponents’ misunderstanding of the work is explained precisely by the fact that we studied from different arithmetic textbooks.
It seems to me that when solving problems in number theory, for which there is a powerful apparatus based on calculations and comparisons, many problems can be solved based on the study of existing calculation patterns that can only be understood..
No matter how many methods were used to prove the BTF. But these powerful devices do not provide an assessment of the patterns that become obvious when using methods based on the arithmetic of Vasily Pupkin.
How can you distinguish a factor
arising in
\(\large F_(b_x^n)\ =(b_x^n-1)/(2n)\),
or as an indication of the possibility of obtaining an exact degree through
\(\large F_(b_x^n)*(2n)+1 \),
or as a value due to the fact that the difference
\(\large (F_c-F_a) \)
contains such a factor.
As a result, the value \(\large F_(b_x^n) \) lacks the factor \(\large n \). For Case 2 of BTF due to the appearance of an additional factor \(\large n\) in the difference of degrees,
compared to their number in the difference (s-a), and for Case 1 of the BTF even without this pattern.
compared to their number in the difference \(\large (c-a)\), and for Case 1 of the BTF even without this pattern.
It turns out that so far no apparatus other than the computing apparatus can do this.
The existing pattern, in my firm conviction, is an indisputable fact confirming the validity of the evidence.
In my opinion and Felix Schmiedel, member dxdy forum, is also prone to this.
But he did not express any specific recognition.
His position remained unclear to me.
True, according to this pattern, no objections appeared.
The objections raised, in my opinion, do not stand up to criticism at all.
But moderator Lia closed the topic.
I really don’t know who he is and how deep he is in the topic, but a fact is a fact.FbnxA
I understand that winning supporters is not a quick process, but hope remains.
And if it is not in vain, then, to a large extent, thanks to the arithmetic of Vasily Pupkin.
I remember I was never good at fractions. I couldn’t understand how it was possible to divide 2/3 of an apple and 3/5 of another apple equally among four brats.
My father was very annoyed by my lack of understanding.
He forgave me a D in dictation and a C in history, but he could not forgive me a D in arithmetic.
He told me: “It cannot be that my son does not understand arithmetic.”
It got to the point of screaming and standing in the corner.
And this continued, as I remember, for quite a long time.
And suddenly, I realized how you can divide all these parts of apples, first into 4 parts, and then between the apples.
How wonderful the arithmetic lessons became, and even more so the tests, when I was the first to run out of the class in the middle of the lesson and ran home to report my success to my mother.
And throughout school years, I no longer had any difficulties in understanding algebra, geometry, chemistry, or physics. Maybe because I simply learned to simplify the problem, or rather to make two, three or more simple ones out of it, the solution to which I either already knew, or they were no longer unsolvable.
My father, my head teacher, provided me with studying the exact sciences at school not only ease of knowledge, but also pleasure. And this love for exact sciences remained with me throughout my life.
And being engaged in life in not at all exact sciences, I was often distracted from the routine monotony, immersed in solving or comprehending something new and unknown to me.
And even the swearing of the authorities, when I worked at a coal mine as a mining foreman, where there was no way without it, it seemed to move away, almost beyond the horizon, when I, pretending to listen to the swearing, continued to try to understand how one can determine whether it is being divided or not. number A, divisor C.
At the institute I no longer enjoyed exact sciences.
That's right, through my own fault.
Gabay, a teacher from God, read mathematics to us.
He also taught practical lessons for us. One day he called me, but I was not ready.
Maybe that’s why he gave me C grades for both the first semester and the second.
There was no more mathematics, and I was unable to rehabilitate myself.
Almost everything from the exact sciences was taught in a dry, formalized, uninteresting way. There was no sense of meaning, significance, or usefulness.
Maybe because there was no teacher next to me who, like my father, would have been able to reveal to me the way of understanding arithmetic. Higher mathematics did not captivate me, just like Kolmogorov’s mathematics - it’s true that the best time for understanding passed, new things became more and more difficult to learn. But, sometimes, it seems to me that it would not be bad if I, in the right age, would have been trained in Kolmogorov's mathematics.
It seems to me that parallel study of arithmetic would be useful for me.
And perhaps even now, caring dads, it is not useless to try to solve problems from Vasily Pupkin’s arithmetic with their little ones.
After all, it is known that knowledge of two languages increases the inclination and, not least important, the ability to write.
How many doctors have become writers, and what kind of ones!
The serious study of Latin is, it is true, not useless for the effect noticed.
Who knows, maybe parallel study of arithmetic will also not be useless for someone, and perhaps it will provide not only pleasure, but also success.
I think it's worth a try.
Observant parents cannot help but notice whether or not the little one enjoys the activities.
And, if it appears, then I assure you that it may be useful in the future.
This simpleton is more popular on the Internet than many politicians and show business stars. Who is Vasya Pupkin and why does everyone know him?
Internet meme
It's a paradox, but in reality it doesn't exist. He is an Internet meme (a media object created by mass communication).
For such purposes, even a new scientific word was identified - exemplification. IN in this context it is which is used to refer to an unknown person. For example, the Ivanovs, Petrovs, and Sidorovs often appear in jokes.
From school, we are more familiar with the concept (for example, traitors are called Judas, and production leaders are called Stakhanovites), but this is not the same thing as an exemplar. If in the first case there is usually some real personality or artistic character gave a name to a generalized image, then in the second the name and surname were specially invented to designate an already existing social phenomenon.
Vasily Pupkin - a real phenomenon. Although he actually does not exist, like Mickey Mouse and Santa Claus, the Internet media space wants to convince us otherwise.
It’s surprising, but the number of Vasya Pupkin’s home pages is simply off the charts. There are more than 38 thousand profiles of the same name, and this is only on the Internet.
Who does the notorious character represent?
Often our compatriots like to remember the name of Alexander Sergeevich in vain. Eg:
- Who will clean up?
- Pushkin! (used to mean “no one”).
But Vasily Pupkin is “someone, but not me.”
Currently, this character is a reflection of the mass Russian Internet user. The fact is that The World Wide Web has penetrated into every cell of the post-Soviet space, the number of network users is growing every year, and this people are quite motley and multifaceted.
And among them there are some simpletons who consider themselves beaten experts in some areas and love to rant about it. They were dubbed Vasily Pupkins.
What is he like?
In fact, netizens created Vasya Pupkin in their own image and likeness. Therefore, it is constantly evolving, just like its creators: its values change, its thinking transforms, it acquires new qualities.
Vasily Pupkin is active. He loves to get smart on all sorts of forums, and never misses the opportunity to insert his two cents into any discus. Although in fact he is a little stupid, but absolutely harmless. He lives by the laws of network culture and supports average values.
Sometimes Vasily Pupkin means an arrogant writer, critic or political scientist, one hundred percent confident that he is right. Although even the very combination of first and last name reeks of through-and-through provincialism. What can I say if naive dupes who are easily used for their own benefit are popularly called Vasya. They often play the same role in jokes.
Also, this virtual character is sometimes used to personify his “not-self”, rewarding him negative qualities and primitive thinking, which disgusts those who oppose themselves and Vasya Pupkin. For example, you can often hear the following dialogues in everyday life: “I won’t take this. Let Vasya Pupkin buy this.” This is the name given to the collective class of those individuals who are considered inferior or inferior to themselves, their loved ones.
The origin of the folklore character Vasya Pupkin is ambiguous. Some associate his last name with the word “navel,” that is, this man convinced himself that he was the navel of the earth. The second even attribute to her historical roots: they say, there was such a failed rhyme-maker Vasily Pushkin, a relative of Alexander Sergeevich, but in terms of versification he was not suitable to hold a candle to him. That’s why they twisted his last name as a joke to emphasize the absurdity of his claims to a pedestal in the field high poetry. Still others are sure that by his appearance this hero is connected with the author of a textbook on the arithmetic of the times Tsarist Russia, but more about that later. In addition, Vasisualiy Pupkin (aka Vasya Pupkin) is sometimes awarded the patronymic Alibabaevich (from the film "Gentlemen of Fortune").
Why did it take root?
It is interesting that, unlike other common nouns, it is written not with a lower case, but with capital letter, creating the illusion of the real existence of such a person, and not just a collective image.
Russians are a nation that loves to laugh at itself. Vasily Pupkin is the product of such self-irony. Even the combination of a rustic name and a stately surname creates a comic effect.
Among other things, it is convenient. His first and last name help to succinctly express an entire concept, characterize someone, or simply replace the usual username.
It is estimated that almost every second network user calls himself Vasya Pupkin when he registers on a website. This is a kind of anonymous self-name.
Off the Web
This product folklore expanded its habitat and stepped beyond the boundaries of Internet pages. Politicians often mention him in their speeches, meaning whole class commoners, a conventional image of a bearer of public opinion.
This reflects the condescending attitude of the superior intelligentsia towards the people, and specifically towards the Russian people. It would be hard to call a Dagestani or an Ossetian Vasya Pupkin.
In the army you can hear: “Sergeant Vasya Pupkin is ready for combat service!” and the like. That is, these first and last names have long been used as an example of representation.
Vasily Pupkin "Arithmetic"
If you believe in the existence of an arithmetic teacher who published a textbook for parochial schools with the notorious problems about the capacity of swimming pools, then it becomes clear where his modern namesake “grows his legs.” Although the connection between them is difficult to establish. True, for some reason there is no such textbook anywhere in libraries, there are no records in the archives about its existence, it is known only from the stories of old people who went to parochial schools. Therefore, we can assume that this book - a textbook by Vasily Pupkin - is just a replicated myth and nothing more.
Analogues in other languages
Such exemplifications are not a phenomenon of purely Russian folklore. For example, in English vocabulary there is a certain John Doe. Initially, this was the name given to the male plaintiff in trial, if the real name is unknown or anonymous. The defendant was named Richard Rowe. John Doe is now an alias for the unidentified body of a man in judicial practice. If we were talking about the same corpse of a woman, then she is given a name. The child is called Baby Doe. Also, patients in hospitals who are unable to name their own are registered under such fictitious names. real name due to coma or amnesia.
Mr. Smith plays a similar role. True, his first and last name are used in the broader sense of “anonymous” or “typical Englishman”.
America has its own folklore character - Joe-Six-Pack (Joe Six-Cans). This is a representative of the working profession, not particularly burdened with intelligence, who tends to drink exactly that amount of beer after work.
Real Vasya Pupkin
But how many namesakes of this virtual hero live in real world? At first glance it seems that there should be at least a couple of dozen. Research was even conducted on this matter, and it turned out that such a surname is very rare for Russian society. Only about fifty representatives of the Pupkins were discovered, and among them there was only one Vasily, living in Saratov region. How his name deserved such popularity, he does not know.
Although this image is fictitious, it lives a little in each of us. So, who is Vasya Pupkin? He is truly a hero of our time. It’s sad, but, at times, these are the heroes.
